a Taborsky; Benjamin Udell;
*Subject:* Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive
Logic
Ozzie, Stephen, Stephen, List,
I agree. And I think, that idealists are in fact realists, because:
Liberty, equality, fraternity and justice are not only ideals, but
also human instincts,
can’t be fully specified.
Messengers not blamed in my understanding.
John
From: Stephen C. Rose [mailto:stever...@gmail.com]
Sent: July 14, 2015 7:37 PM
To: John Collier
Cc: Peirce List
Subject: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
I was merely being a messenger
ily explained.
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> *From:* Stephen C. Rose [mailto:stever...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* July 14, 2015 7:14 PM
> *To:* John Collier; Peirce List
> *Subject:* Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive
> Logic
>
>
>
> Here
to me to be too robust to
be so easily explained.
John
From: Stephen C. Rose [mailto:stever...@gmail.com]
Sent: July 14, 2015 7:14 PM
To: John Collier; Peirce List
Subject: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Here is a squib:
118. In the first place all that
*Sent:* July 12, 2015 8:04 PM
> *To:* ozzie...@gmail.com
> *Cc:* Stephen Jarosek; Edwina Taborsky; Benjamin Udell; <
> peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
> *Subject:* Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive
> Logic
>
>
>
> Ozzie, Stephen, Stephen, List,
>
&g
; Benjamin Udell;
Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Ozzie, Stephen, Stephen, List,
I agree. And I think, that idealists are in fact realists, because: Liberty,
equality, fraternity and justice are not only ideals, but also human instincts,
inherited structure of
Thank you, Ben, for your detailed explanation. I understand it completely. From time to time I had the instinctive urge to contradict one or the other theory that had appeared in the thread. Now, about "Instincts", there is a discussion in Biosemiotics List (Ozzie, are you a member of Biosemioti
Helmut, I suggested back on July 12, 2015, that the thread be brought
back to explicit relations to Peirce - I did see that the thread had
earlier been explicitly or at least clearly related to Peirce. You made
the same kind of point very well on July 2 2015, saying "It is
Peirce-related only i
Helmut -
You asked "What kind of signs are instincts, inherited representamens and
immediate objects?"
I'll venture a perspective: In problem-solving (or creative activity), curious
instinct is the force behind abduction, representamens summarize inductive
insights about objects, and objects co
Ben Novaks Book is Peirce-related, because it is about abduction, and how abduction was misused by Hitler. Edwina had mentioned many other historical, economical, and other causes for this ideology. This was Peirce related because it was about the fixation of belief. Instincts for exam
Ben Novaks Book is Peirce-related, because it is about abduction, and how abduction was misused by Hitler. Edwina had mentioned many other historical, economical, and other causes for this ideology. This was Peirce related because it was about the fixation of belief. Instincts for example are re
I thought I raised a valid point but I think it turned out to be a red
flag. Sorry.
Books http://buff.ly/15GfdqU Art: http://buff.ly/1wXAxbl
Gifts: http://buff.ly/1wXADj3
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Benjamin Udell wrote:
> Stephen, please don't join in the insultingly trivializing games t
Stephen, please don't join in the insultingly trivializing games that
others have played with the meaning of "Peirce-related", and please
don't convert it to a question of what is Peirce is relevant or related
to. PEIRCE-L has the audience that it has because of the promise of
Peirce-related di
Peirce is relevant to the issues we are discussing, particularly to the
relationship between semiosis then and now, to the growing iteration and
acceptance of triadic rather than binary thinking, and to the huge sea
change which Helmut just noted. There is a text probably prominent on
Arisbe that l
Folks, I'm not the moderator (that's Gary Richmond), just the
co-manager, but it seems like this thread has gotten away from
explicitly Peirce-related matters. Is it possible to bring it back to
Peirce matters?
Best, Ben
On 7/12/2015 6:24 PM, Thomas wrote:
Helmet ~
Local "culture" is like a
Helmet ~
Local "culture" is like a species or a language or a market area: largely
defined by limits on transportation.
Since culture travels on the internet (literature, movies, news, fashion,
music) much faster than people can travel/migrate/mix by conventional means,
certain shared values a
that takes on a life of its own.
sj
From: Edwina Taborsky [mailto:tabor...@primus.ca]
Sent: Saturday, 11 July 2015 2:54 PM
To: Thomas
Cc: Benjamin Udell; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Yes, very nice outline, Thomas, of the
ion is neither liberal nor
> conservative]. sj
>
>
>
> *From:* Ozzie [mailto:ozzie...@gmail.com ]
> *Sent:* Sunday, 12 July 2015 7:26 PM
> *To:* Stephen Jarosek
> *Cc:* Edwina Taborsky; Benjamin Udell;
> *Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
; serious about maintaining true democratic principles. [and for what it’s
> worth, my position is neither liberal nor conservative]. sj
>
> From: Ozzie [mailto:ozzie...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, 12 July 2015 7:26 PM
> To: Stephen Jarosek
> Cc: Edwina Taborsky; Benjamin U
what it’s worth, my position is neither
liberal nor conservative]. sj
From: Ozzie [mailto:ozzie...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, 12 July 2015 7:26 PM
To: Stephen Jarosek
Cc: Edwina Taborsky; Benjamin Udell;
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Stephen ~
I
ar by multiculturalism/identity politics can be even more racist, bigoted and irrational than any majority...is naive in the extreme.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Thomas
To: Edwina Taborsky
Cc: Benjamin Udell ;
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 1
hat the
> well-intentioned idealist becomes naught but a useful idiot... useful as a
> public face of the bureaucratic machine that takes on a life of its own.
> sj
>
> From: Edwina Taborsky [mailto:tabor...@primus.ca]
> Sent: Saturday, 11 July 2015 2:54 PM
> To: Thomas
> C
ists, and there is no solution to this conflict of interest. It is at
> this juncture that the well-intentioned idealist becomes naught but a
> useful idiot... useful as a public face of the bureaucratic machine that
> takes on a life of its own.
>
> sj
>
>
>
> *From:* Edw
ay, 11 July 2015 2:54 PM
To: Thomas
Cc: Benjamin Udell; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Yes, very nice outline, Thomas, of the strength of the 'melting pot' tactic,
which I support. And that's why I'm against t
; *From:* Edwina Taborsky [mailto:tabor...@primus.ca ]
> *Sent:* Saturday, 11 July 2015 2:54 PM
> *To:* Thomas
> *Cc:* Benjamin Udell; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
>
>
>
> Yes, very nice outline, Thomas,
gt;
Cc: Benjamin Udell <mailto:bud...@nyc.rr.com> ;
<mailto:peirce-l@list.iupui.edu%3e>
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Edwina ~
Germans and the other groups you listed have all assimilated into Amer
Tom, it sounds like you have javascript disabled. - Best, Ben
On 7/11/2015 6:52 PM, Ozzie wrote:,
Ben N ~
I tried several times to download your dissertation, but the website
was unresponsive. So I gave up.
Regards,
Tom Wyrick
-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "R
sky wrote:
>>
>> No, Helmut, I don't think that the German people 'had more barbaric
>> instincts than other people'. We are all similar in our capacity for
>> emotional irrationality and violence. When a societal system of law and
>> order breaks down
empirical and logical
validation. Furthermore, if fascism became dominant in Nazi Germany, then, why
did it also become dominant in Italy? Was Mussolini also 'a mystery'?
Edwina
----- Original Message -
From: Ben Novak
Cc: Benjamin Udell ; PEIRCE-L
Sent: Saturday, July
> 'Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority shares in it'.
> Democracy, to be just, requires a constitution and the rule of law, set up
> as created by men, and capable of change by men, but applicable to all.
>
> Edwina
>
> - Original Message -
>
bigoted and irrational than any majority...is naive in the extreme.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Thomas
To: Edwina Taborsky
Cc: Benjamin Udell ;
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Edwin
x27;. Democracy, to be just, requires a constitution and the rule of law, set up as created by men, and capable of change by men, but applicable to all.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Helmut Raulien
To: Ozzie
Cc: Edwina Taborsky ; ; Peirce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:51 PM
Subje
rise was a mysterious event. I remain focused on the economic,
political and societal infrastructure - which can decimate a culture's deep
beliefs in a decade. We have our own examples.
Edwina
- Original Message -----
From: Benjamin Udell
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Sent: Friday, July 10
decimate a culture's deep
beliefs in a decade. We have our own examples.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Udell
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Having grown up
aborsky ; ; Peirce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:51 PM
Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive
Logic
I agree, that his "abduction-type message is" only "a big part of
that success". Tenacity, authority and apriori also are. I wrote,
that
till quite something to see when
> you cross the border between the two.
>
> Edwina
> ----- Original Message -
> From: Ozzie
> To: Edwina Taborsky
> Cc: Helmut Raulien ; ; Peirce List
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published
hen
> you cross the border between the two.
>
> Edwina
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Ozzie
> *To:* Edwina Taborsky
> *Cc:* Helmut Raulien ;
> ; Peirce List
> *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2015 2:26 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published:
- Original Message -
From: Helmut Raulien
To: Ozzie
Cc: Edwina Taborsky ; ; Peirce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:51 PM
Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
I agree, that his "abduction-type message is" only "a big
or Hitler's political tactics.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Helmut Raulien
To: stever...@gmail.com
Cc: Edwina Taborsky ; Peirce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 12:50 PM
Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive L
ascism or Hitler's political tactics.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Helmut Raulien
To: stever...@gmail.com
Cc: Edwina Taborsky ; Peirce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 12:50 PM
Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Now I am wonderin
dwina
> - Original Message -
> From: Helmut Raulien
> To: stever...@gmail.com
> Cc: Edwina Taborsky ; Peirce List
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 12:50 PM
> Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
>
> Now I am wondering, which of the
er's political tactics.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Helmut Raulien
To: stever...@gmail.com
Cc: Edwina Taborsky ; Peirce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 12:50 PM
Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Now I am wondering, which of
Helmut Raulien
> *To:* stever...@gmail.com
> *Cc:* Edwina Taborsky ; Peirce List
>
> *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2015 12:50 PM
> *Subject:* Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive
> Logic
>
> Now I am wondering, which of the four methods of fixating belief
irce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 12:50 PM
Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Now I am wondering, which of the four methods of fixating belief did Hitler
use? According to Ben Novak it is like this, I think: He was tenacious, but
that is no
- Original Message -
From: Stephen C. Rose
To: Edwina Taborsky
Cc: Peirce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
And scientific method's hold on the present is more secure than in the past and there
rselves. There is only one scientific method, but there are
>> three methods of irrational belief in Peirce's work.
>>
>> Edwina
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> *From:* Stephen C. Rose
>> *To:* Edwina Taborsky ; Peirce List
&
To: Edwina Taborsky ; Peirce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
All Edwina says is fine. My only caveat is that the tendency of what she
calls utopianism (that assumption needs some proving
na
Ed
- Original Message -----
From: Ben Novak
To: Benjamin Udell
Cc: PEIRCE-L
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Dear Ben U:
Thank you for your many compliments to the readability of the dissertation
gt; or mystical element.
>>>
>>> For example, you claim that when his party took power, German politics
>>> consisted of 28 parties - why was Hitler's dominant? In Canada, at the
>>> federal level, there are 26 political parties - and there is nothing
>>
e three methods of
irrational belief in Peirce's work.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Stephen C. Rose
To: Edwina Taborsky ; Peirce List
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
All Edwina says is fine.
is not rooted in
>> pragmatic reality but in a notion of utopian purity of the past, such that
>> 'if only we returned to that pure mode', then, all would be well. It is now
>> rampant in the Al Qaeda (from the 19th c!) and ISIS of the MENA. There are,
>> I maintain
ler.
>
> And then, we must acknowledge that fascism is not unique to one era and
> one man, but, we are all susceptible to a 'Fixation of Belief' by
> irrational means.
>
> Edwina
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Ben Novak
> *To:* Edwina Tabor
?
What is abductive about Hitler's 'reasoning'?
Again, my view - and I say it is my view - is that the onus for
explanation of a topic is not to have readers buy your book or
read it online, but for you to explain key points to us - and
then, explain why you align i
arious cult figures, of wealthy preachers, of
due to their being logical? Or for some other reason(s)?
What is abductive about Hitler's 'reasoning'?
Again, my view - and I say it is my view - is that the onus for
explanation of a topic is not to have readers buy your
some examples would be
> helpful. His behaviour around Stalingrad was hardly logical.
>
> Is the popularity of various cult figures, of wealthy preachers, of due
> to their being logical? Or for some other reason(s)?
>
> What is abductive about Hitler's 'reasoning&#x
I still think, is useful on
a list.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Ozzie
To: Benjamin Udell
Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Ben ~
Thanks for your helpful sum
ut for you to explain key points to us - and then,
explain why you align it with Peircean theory.
Edwina
- Original Message -
*From:* Ben Novak <mailto:trevriz...@gmail.com>
*To:* Stephen Jarosek <mailto:sjaro...@iinet.net.au>
*Cc:* Stephen C. Rose <mailto:stever...@gma
be
>> helpful. His behaviour around Stalingrad was hardly logical.
>>
>> Is the popularity of various cult figures, of wealthy preachers, of due to
>> their being logical? Or for some other reason(s)?
>>
>> What is abductive about Hitler's 'reasonin
this path; social media are
filled with examples of speculation gone wild.
Edwina
- Original Message -
*From:* Benjamin Udell <mailto:bud...@nyc.rr.com>
*To:* peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
*Sent:* Thursday, July 09, 2015 9:37 PM
*Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently publishe
blems are due to others, not their own fiscal
policies. Think of mobs, which all follow this path; social media are
filled with examples of speculation gone wild.
Edwina
- Original Message -
*From:* Benjamin Udell <mailto:bud...@nyc.rr.com>
*To:* peirce-l@list.iupui.e
nced that their problems are due to others, not their own
fiscal policies. Think of mobs, which all follow this path; social media are
filled with examples of speculation gone wild.
Edwina
- Original Message -----
From: Benjamin Udell
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Sent: Thursday,
n Novak <mailto:trevriz...@gmail.com>
*To:* Stephen Jarosek <mailto:sjaro...@iinet.net.au>
*Cc:* Stephen C. Rose <mailto:stever...@gmail.com> ; Peirce List
<mailto:Peirce-L@list.iupui.edu>
*Sent:* Thursday, July 09, 2015 5:12 PM
*Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitle
to explain key points to us - and then, explain why you
> align it with Peircean theory.
>
> Edwina
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Ben Novak
> *To:* Stephen Jarosek
> *Cc:* Stephen C. Rose ; Peirce List
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 09, 2015 5:
but for you to
explain key points to us - and then, explain why you align it with Peircean
theory.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Ben Novak
To: Stephen Jarosek
Cc: Stephen C. Rose ; Peirce List
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently publ
Ben:
I remain a bit puzzled by the nature of the work. Perhaps because of the fuzzy
nature of CSP's abduction from an abstract point of view.
This area of analysis is remote from my interests, but I would note that I
travelled in East Germany in 1971 and lectured (in German) on my scientific
cessible to their message **will have gone." *Oswald Spengler
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Stephen Jarosek
wrote:
> Stephen, you make my point impeccably. ‘nuff said ;)
>
>
>
> *From:* Stephen C. Rose [mailto:stever...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 9 July 2015 5:
. But the bottom line is that no, evil is not some other place or some other time. It is here and it is now. Welcome to the zombie apocalypse.
sj
From: Stephen C. Rose [mailto:stever...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 7 July 2015 5:30 PM
To: Edwina Taborsky; Peirce List
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Rec
Stephen, you make my point impeccably. ‘nuff said ;)
From: Stephen C. Rose [mailto:stever...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 9 July 2015 5:27 PM
To: Stephen Jarosek; Peirce List
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Again this topic is too huge and important to
Stephen, you make my point impeccably. ‘nuff said ;)
From: Stephen C. Rose [mailto:stever...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 9 July 2015 5:27 PM
To: Stephen Jarosek; Peirce List
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Again this topic is too huge and important to
> other place or some other time. It is here and it is now. Welcome to the
> zombie apocalypse.
>
> sj
>
>
>
> *From:* Stephen C. Rose [mailto:stever...@gmail.com ]
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 7 July 2015 5:30 PM
> *To:* Edwina Taborsky; Peirce List
> *Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L]
revriz...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Ben:
Fascinating topic... will attempt to download thesis.
from the post by Stephen Jarosek:
“Unlike the other forms of logic, abduction is base
Ben N., all,
Let's re-start the thread from this fresh copy and hope that the glitch
doesn't recur. Further below I paste Ben Novak's initial post. Here I'll
add his info on the URL for the PDF of his book:
http://access.cjh.org/home.php?type=extid&term=1055795#1
...and click all the "
Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Helmut Raulien wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 07. Juli 2015 um 23:05 Uhr
>> *Von:* "Helmut Raulien"
>> *An:* stever...@gmail.com
>> *Cc:* "Edwina Taborsky" , "Peirce List" <
>> Peirce-L@li
* stever...@gmail.com
> *Cc:* "Edwina Taborsky" , "Peirce List" <
> Peirce-L@list.iupui.edu>
> *Betreff:* Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive
> Logic
>
> I think, abduction in itself is not a bad thing: It is the "brainstorm"
>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 07. Juli 2015 um 23:05 Uhr
Von: "Helmut Raulien"
An: stever...@gmail.com
Cc: "Edwina Taborsky" , "Peirce List"
Betreff: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
I think, abduction in itself is not a bad thin
7;s false methods far more often than they are held by the non-tribal method of science.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Jerry LR Chandler
To: PEIRCE-L
Cc: Ben Novak
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductiv
ore often than they are held by the non-tribal method of
> science.
>
> Edwina
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Jerry LR Chandler
> *To:* PEIRCE-L
> *Cc:* Ben Novak
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:20 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently publi
od of science.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Jerry LR Chandler
To: PEIRCE-L
Cc: Ben Novak
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Ben:
Fascinating topic... will attempt to download thesis.
Ben:
Fascinating topic... will attempt to download thesis.
from the post by Stephen Jarosek:
“Unlike the other forms of logic, abduction is based on instinct and has a
power over emotions.”
Is this your statement?
Is this your belief?
In your view, what are the linguistic / rhetorical const
. Genocentrism is itself derived from abductive reasoning.
sj
From: Ben Novak [mailto:trevriz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 6 July 2015 4:36 AM
To: Stephen C. Rose
Cc: PEIRCE-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic
Dear Stephen:
I agree that the price is
Dear Stephen:
I agree that the price is outrageously high. Unfortunately, the publisher
sets the price, and I have no control over that. It is my hope that soon
the price may come down.but, again, I cannot fathom the logic of the
publisher.
In the meantime, the book is available either in y
A less expensive edition might encourage more to buy it. Especially if they
have no budget for such purchases. I am sure such a discussion would be of
interest.
Books http://buff.ly/15GfdqU Art: http://buff.ly/1wXAxbl
Gifts: http://buff.ly/1wXADj3
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Ben Novak wrote:
Dear Peirce-L members:
Please allow me to join Tom Wyrick in accepting the invitation to introduce
ourselves.
I am rejoining this List for the third time. I first joined in
approximately 1999 when I discovered Charles Sanders Peirce as I was
writing my Ph.D. dissertation. Peirce's theory of abduc
83 matches
Mail list logo
