Jerry,
CSP did use divisions into three, so trichotomies do belong to his
philosophy. Only in his latest phase he devoted himself to developing
triadicity as his key concept in his theory of the Categories.
So, trichotomies of signs, such as icon, index, symbol etc. are OK. But
only for the
Ben, List:
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 4:23 PM, Benjamin Udell wrote:
>
> It contains (in terms of the three-trichotomy system, and borrowing the
> italicized terms from Liszka):
> 1. the second division from the _presentative_ trichotomy (sign's relation to
> itself),
> 2. the second division fro
Gary, Kirsti, list,
You wrote, "I've been a little "out of it" post surgery, but did someone
earlier quote that passage? In any event, I can't find it in this thread."
I was referring to a post by Orliaguet from many years ago, but nobody
else quoted it in the thread. I tried a few years ago
List, Kirsti, Ben:
I am a bit puzzled by these responses, which appear strange to my way of
thinking.
By the standards of some, I am not a “Peircer”.
My aim is bio-medical reserch on specific quantitative issues; the writings of
CSP are studied in order to contribute to my understanding of t
Ben, list
Ben, you wrote: ".[Orliaguet ]. . .. quoted a passage by Peirce that
required understanding the term "triad" to refer to the three correlates in
triadic action with one another — sign-object-interpretant — and not to any
other trichotomy (three-way division); otherwise the passage by Pe
Kirsti, Jerry, list,
Kirsti is generally correct. I remember years ago at peirce-l when
Orliaguet made the same point (with superfluous sarcasm) to Kirsti. He
quoted a passage by Peirce that required understanding the term "triad"
to refer to the three correlates in triadic action with one ano
Hi,
I feel a need to point out that "sinsign, index and dicisign" presents a
trichotomy of signs. Not a triad, but a tree-part division, a
classification, if you wish.
All triads and triadicity involve mediation. Triadicity also involves
meaning, not just signs.
Kirsti
Jerry LR Chandler
List, Franklin, Frederik:
The OUP book,
The Structure of Objects
by Kathrin Koslicki (2008)
addresses some of the philosophy that appears to be difficult to understand.
More particularly, it illuminates the triad, sinsign, index and dicisign in
relation to parts of the whole, the illation b
Jerry, list,
Jerry, you wrote:
The terms "coupling" and "grammar" are used in the senses of CSP. Coupling
> referring to CSP's paper on the logic of Copula. Grammar in the typical
> sense that that one may find in the classical text by Otto Jesperson, *The
> Philosophy of Grammar *or in CSP's w
(This post was found in my email "Draft Box”. This response was drafted on Dec.
13 th, 2015.
Franklin, Matt, List:
Some short responses to your concerns and further questions are raised.
On Dec 12, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Franklin Ransom wrote:
> Jerry, list,
>
> Well, I'm glad that someone agrees w
10 matches
Mail list logo
