Gil has "one minor comment" on what I said about the Okishio theorem
vs. Marx: >>Marx phrased his argument under the assumption that the
rate of surplus value is held constant, but I don't read him positing
this as the economically relevant condition--rather it's a
simplifying assumption stipu
On Thu, 15 Jun 1995, Pamela Sue Fendt wrote:
> The jazz fascists of today thump the virtues of the once shunned bebop and
> jazz has probably had its most regressive 15 years in all its history
> (that is, if you allow the word "jazz" to stand in your way). There are
> innovations along free ja
I have been a member of the CWA (Communications Workers of America) for
roughly 17 years, and sadly, our very own Morton Bahr is one of the only
major union leaders supporting Lane Kirkland. Since I know Bahr personally,
it ain't any big surprise.
While, like many union types who ha
The Bureau of Justice Statistics puts out an annual called
"Correctional Populations in the United States. I don't have a recent
one handy, but it has tables on prisons -- State and Federal -- and
jails, plus those on probation.
A glance at a back issue suggests that women are aroun
Marsh Feldman writes
> (3) Because the homeowner has some equity to lose, the
> Bank is more willing to believe a homeowner will eventually
> catch up in payments.
I see your point. Maybe a renter can get away without paying rent
for 2 months while a homeowner might get by not making
mortgage
"Quihubo Videos" currently has 4 independently produced videos available for
English speaking audiences and is working on subtitling and narrating others
for distribution in the US and Europe.
Videos currently available:
EL EFECTO TEQUILA (The Tequila Effect): Produced by COPAL, this video r
On Thu, 15 Jun 1995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One could imagine, then, undertaking an essentially mathematical
> argument in which none of the words have been replaced by symbols.
> . . .
> would become a living nightmare. To put it the other way around, you
> could think of mathematical sy
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 1995 08:51:20 -0500
> From: Paul Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: AFL-CIO Upheaval Heralds Renewal
>
> long, I confess, but suitable, I hope, for circulation. Please feel fr
Gil,
Other than as an exercise in gaining clarification concerning Marx's
terminology and thus in extending his efforts, how is the Okishio Theorem
relevant or "useful." Note that for Okishio not only is the real wage
constant but all prices used in determining whether or not the rate of
pro
Addendum to my earlier post on this topic, a thought experiment.
1) Think of a non-definitional and radically critical claim about
capitalism you believe to be necessarily true.
2) How would you establish this claim *is* in fact a necessary
consequence of capitalism, rather than (say), an acc
> EL SALVADOR *** URGENT ACTION *** EL SALVADOR *** URGENT
> June 14, 1995
>MAQUILADORAS WORKERS UNDER ATTACK IN EL SALVADOR
>
> Dear Friends,
>
> The National Labor Committee in New York reports that women maquiladora
> workers are under attack in El Sa
Jim writes:
> In the midst of his very interesting and useful thoughts on math,
> Gil writes that "even if one doesn't agree with the premises of
> Okishio's theorem, who would have known that Marx's claim was
> inconsistent with those premises before Okishio's proof?"
>
> I think this exampl
On Thu, 15 Jun 1995, Doug Henwood wrote:
> The Sourcebook is huge, fascinating, and free.
Not too much longer, I'll bet.
> To get your copy, call
> 1-800-732-3277.
I suppose 'furriners' like Canadians are shit out of luck, eh?
In the midst of his very interesting and useful thoughts on math,
Gil writes that "even if one doesn't agree with the premises of
Okishio's theorem, who would have known that Marx's claim was
inconsistent with those premises before Okishio's proof?"
I think this example shows up some of the li
G. Skillman's little 'article' on mathematics in economics was
about the clearest bit of writing I've seen here, or in the Marxism List
yet (being a newcomer could have something to so with that). That others
could be so focused...
I especially enjoyed the example of Jazz used t
ONE addition to Doug's restatement of Penny's comment:
>
> By the way, as Penny Ciancanelli put it, rather nicely I think, the Third
> World got a Fisher-style deflation, while the First World gets Minsky
> management.
>
> Doug
And, the first world also gets a Steindl/Baran/Sweezy stagnation t
Doug writes:
> I'm still
> wondering, though - what is gained by Stiglitz's use of mathematical
> reasoning. Does it express something that can't be expressed in words? Does
> it deepen the mystery surrounding the priesthood? Does it aim to persuade
> an audience that would find mere word non-rig
At 10:25 AM 6/15/95, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>can anyone send me a reference for the percentage of prisoners which are
>female in the 20th century? I would prefer something for Massachusetts or
>Boston, but US wide or any north eastern city will do. I am finding that
>circa 1830-40, the prison
can anyone send me a reference for the percentage of prisoners which are
female in the 20th century? I would prefer something for Massachusetts or
Boston, but US wide or any north eastern city will do. I am finding that
circa 1830-40, the prison population in Boston was 37-45% female in any give
Eric Nilsson writes:
>Marsh Feldman writes that the increase in homeownership in
>the US might permit workers to weather unemployment better
>then before.
>
>This is because even if workers are unable to make mortgage
>payments they typically have many months before the bank
>moves to take their
> Please distribute freely:
> 3rd Conference on Occupational Stress and Health: Announcement, Part A.
>
>
> WORK, STRESS, AND HEALTH '95:
>
> CREATING HEALTHIER WORKPLACES.
>
>
>The Third Interdisciplinary Conference on
>
> ___
> LaborNet Program Coordinator \ Voice: 415/442-0220 x128
> Institute for Global Communications \ Fax: 415/546-1794
> LaborNet*EcoNet*PeaceNet*\ E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> WomensNet*ConflictNet*
> From: Carl Cuneo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Cuba Embargo
> X-To: Forum on Labor in the Global Economy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-cc: Multiple recipients of list LABOR-L
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Multiple recipients of list LABOR-L <[EMAIL PRO
OOPS, I sent the following only to the Rayp, though I think it's
probably of more general interest.
Glenn Rayp of the University of Antwerp writes:
>>... a good reason for reducing the US federal budget deficit
would be the balance of payments deficit ... This is
comprehensible though. As t
Of course both the scarcity and surplus approach appear. The surplus
approach doesn't make any sense in the absence of scarcity. If there was
no scarcity who would give a damn about surplus.
-- Rod
On Wed, 14 Jun 1995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Devine writes:
>
> Both the surplu
At 3:17 PM 6/14/95, James Devine wrote:
>Is it correct to date the transition to banker power the fall of
>the Bretton Woods fixed-exchange rate system? I would guess that
>the rise of the US budget deficit (which also gives the central
>banks and money-lenders more power) was a later intensifica
Bill, you are completely right. The rusty cold warriors in the Pentagon
have been lobbying hard for loopholes in any test ban treaty
negotiated to exclude "low-yield" tests which are difficult to verify and
laboratory testing with computer simulations. Even as the
Comprehensive Test Ban Trea
About 30 years ago as today, financial power was much more concentrated in
the few dominant financial institutions than in the top corporations,
especially taking interlocking directorates into account. I've been amazed
at the relative fall of US banks in international financial circles since
The problem with federal budget policy in the U.S. is that the policy
has very little to do with the economics of government budgets.
A simple example illustrates this: In the Carter years federal
deficits were a hot political topic. We needed to reduce "the deficit"
(laughably small by today
DOLE SAID:
> 1) "Politics of class war" As in, Clinton's intention to avoid
> [further] tax cuts for the rich to go with tax cuts for the middle
> class promotes the politics of class warfare, which we
> statespersonlike Republicans wish to avoid...
>
GIL TRANSLATED:
> Translation: yeah, w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> As an aside on Mike's post, I'd like to comment on two code phrases
> in Bob Dole's "Republican response" to Clinton's proposal. They're
> interesting because one hears them a lot from right-wingers these
> days, and in taken in tandem they contradict each other i
With friends like this who needs enemies.
i read this evening in the OZ press that the US has adopted a
low key response to the french bastards plan to resume nuclear
weapons testing in the South Pacific. the writer thought that
the US might join france in watering down the as-it stands now
comp
From raypg Thu Jun 15 09:35:03 1995
Return-Path:
Received: by suntew.ua.ac.be (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
id AA08382; Thu, 15 Jun 1995 09:35:03 +
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: *Cinetic Mail Manager V2.1
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 1995 09:48:25 wdt
From: raypg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (glenn rayp)
co
Gil says:
As an aside on Mike's post, I'd like to comment on two code phrases
in Bob Dole's "Republican response" to Clinton's proposal. They're
interesting because one hears them a lot from right-wingers these
days, and in taken in tandem they contradict each other in substance.
1) "Politic
34 matches
Mail list logo
