[Apologies if you receive this twice, but my messages from work
haven't been going through, so I'm resending everything now that I
have my home net connection back.]
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 12:19:35PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Steve Fink wrote:
>
> > bsr $I0
> >
> >It will complain that
On Feb-18, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> =head1 Stack calling conventions
>
> Arguments are Bd in reverse order onto the user stack:
>
>.arg y # save args in reversed order
>.arg x
>call _foo #(r, s) = _foo(x,y)
>.local int r
>.local int s
>.result s # restore results in
Here's a silly little tool that I've used for a long time to help
debug various programs. I just added perl support to it, so I thought
I'd announce it in case anyone got some use out of it.
To use it, save it into your $PATH somewhere. Then, instead of running
"./someapplication args...", run "de
First -- wow, thanks! I tried out the stabs stuff for the JIT
yesterday, and it's really helpful to be able to step through PASM
code from within emacs's gud mode.
I had one problem, though -- whenever stepping over a keyed op (eg
"set I0, P0[3]"), gdb fails to recognize that it reaches any more
l
The invoke op is bothering me -- namely, it disturbs me that it
implicitly operates on P0. I know that P0 is the correct register to
use according to pdd03, but I dislike having it be implicit. The user
is required to set the rest of the pdd03 conventions up manually, so I
don't see any need for in
Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> At 12:06 AM -0500 2/21/03, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
> >Andy Wardley wrote:
> >>
> >> Dan Sugalski wrote much sense, including these gems:
> >[snip]
> >> > Code must be able to fetch a handle on a particular method for
> >> > later calling
> >>
> >> By this I presume you
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 12:09 PM +0100 2/20/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Starting from the unbearable fact, that optimized compiled C is still
faster then parrot -j (in primes.pasm), I did this experiment:
- do register allocation for JIT in imcc
- use the first N registers as MAPped processor regi
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 08:34:05AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> >If I
> >
> >perl Configure.pl --cgoto=0 && make all test
> >
> >then the build fails with:
>
> We need to sort out different cases:
> 1) $cc doesn't have computed goto
> 2) user doesn't want to build cor
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:45:49PM -0500, Simon Glover wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Simon Glover wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >
> > > If I
> > >
> > > perl Configure.pl --cgoto=0 && make all test
> > >
> > > then the build fails with:
> > The problem is that an
At 12:09 PM +0100 2/20/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Starting from the unbearable fact, that optimized compiled C is
still faster then parrot -j (in primes.pasm), I did this experiment:
- do register allocation for JIT in imcc
- use the first N registers as MAPped processor registers
This sounds pret
At 12:06 AM -0500 2/21/03, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
Andy Wardley wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote much sense, including these gems:
[snip]
> Code must be able to fetch a handle on a particular method for later
> calling
By this I presume you mean that the handle would be frozen to the
method as it wa
At 6:24 PM -0500 2/20/03, Mark Jason Dominus wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 2:06 PM + 2/19/03, Peter Haworth wrote:
>On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:56:25 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> I got clarification. The sequence is:
>>
>> 1) Search for method of the matching name in inheritanc
At 2:07 PM -0800 2/17/03, Tupshin Harper wrote:
I've been a parrot lurker for quite some time, and I've recently
wanted to start participating in some way. One idea that came to
mind was to port a language I wrote a while back which is an
XML->relational converter. Call it XTOR(XML to Relational
Cal Henderson (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Cal Henderson
# Please include the string: [perl #21276]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21276 >
hi,
this patch fixes some formatting issues that cause d
Leon Brocard (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Leon Brocard
# Please include the string: [perl #21301]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21301 >
This little patch changes the life.pasm in examples/assembl
Andy Wardley wrote:
>
> Dan Sugalski wrote much sense, including these gems:
[snip]
> > Code must be able to fetch a handle on a particular method for later
> > calling
>
> By this I presume you mean that the handle would be frozen to the
> method as it was when then handle was fetched? If you l
Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> At 2:06 PM + 2/19/03, Peter Haworth wrote:
> >On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:56:25 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >> I got clarification. The sequence is:
> >>
> >> 1) Search for method of the matching name in inheritance tree
> >> 2) if #1 fails, search for an AUTOLOAD
> >>
Nicholas Clark wrote:
If I
perl Configure.pl --cgoto=0 && make all test
then the build fails with:
We need to sort out different cases:
1) $cc doesn't have computed goto
2) user doesn't want to build core_ops_cg.c
Case 1) shouldn't matter, as the CGP core is only called from JIT/i386/gnucc
Case
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
- do register allocation for JIT in imcc
- use the first N registers as MAPped processor registers
The "[RFC] imcc calling conventions" didn't get any response. Should I
take this fact as an implict "yep, fine"?
Here is again the relevant part, which has implications on
19 matches
Mail list logo
