On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 03:56:04PM +0200, Yuval Kogman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I've started prelimenary work on Test::Harness::Daemon, which is
supposed to let you make various clients to testing. Some will
report, others will schedule, some will do both.
Unless it's a sub-part of
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:49:31AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Yes. I'll presume that the first Perl6 compiler will just emit closures
for each block.
Ah, I hope not. I *really* hope not. (Paying attention Patrick? :)
That'd be rather slower than necessary in most cases.
Yup, I'm paying
On Tue 14 Dec 2004 15:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dominic Mitchell) wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 12:21:50PM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 14 Dec 2004, at 11:26, Clayton, Nik wrote:
To be honest, I don't care if someone's house style is for TAB to
indent
2, 4, or 8 characters; how much
hm, works fine for others. maybe the weird port i'm using for that web
server isn't agreeing with your firewall.
-jeff
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Michael Walter wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:07:43 -0500 (EST), Jeff Horwitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it useful? not really. does it help you
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:07:43 -0500 (EST), Jeff Horwitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it useful? not really. does it help you waste 5 minutes of your day?
certainly. :)
Waiting for the request to time out indeed wasted some idle time :-)
wink-ingly yours,
Michael
On Tue 14 Dec 2004 18:21, Ricardo SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* H.Merijn Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-12-14T11:28:19]
About spaces, another thing springs to mind, for which I would gladly kill
the
responsible people to allow it (I bet M$ was the first to push it): Spaces
in
Here's all I have to say about tabs.
I expect the source to look the same no matter whose editor, pager, printer
or utility I run it through. Literal tabs violate this. The end.
Here's what I have to say about clever bracing/spacing styles.
Your bracing/spacing style should not be a
Hi all,
I'm trying to compile Parrot on Win XP (with MS Visual C++ authoring edition
installed) and - after cvs update, nmake realclean, perl Configure.pl -
nmake works for a while and stops with:
...
astlexer.c
ast\astlexer.c(1433) : fatal error C1083: Include-Datei kann nicht geöffnet
On Tue 14 Dec 2004 21:49, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's all I have to say about tabs.
I expect the source to look the same no matter whose editor, pager, printer
or utility I run it through. Literal tabs violate this. The end.
Here's what I have to say about clever
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 11:10:51PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
If programmers outside your project look at it and go Huh? you've just
lost yourself a potential patch as they recoil.
Don't think so. spaces and bracing is hard to do it so bad as to other people
unable to be able to read it.
You may be interested in what I found on my journey to 100% coverage
with D::C http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=378586
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So even when you approach 100% there's still bugs to be found with
simple coverage analysis.
I think this is the most valuable part of the exercise -
Below is a rather straightforward patch, but as it represents an
interface change (albeit a fully backwards compatible one), I thought I
would post it for discussion.
Background on the proposed change: there apparently are two sets of
runops functions, I'd characterize Parrot_runops_fromc as a
On 12/14/2004 6:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So even when you approach 100% there's still bugs to be found with simple
coverage analysis.
I think this is the most valuable part of the exercise - the bugs you find
when you think 'its got 98% coverage, there
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently parrot sets the current object for a method call *after*
calliing invoke on the invokable thing. This is a bit problematic,
since the invokable thing likely needs to have the object in place to
invoke right.
Fixed.
leo
Will Coleda via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Loading platform and local hint files. Bad command or
Rerunning
perl Configure.pl --verbose=2
should reveal the failing program.
leo
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 8:07 AM +0100 12/10/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
* What is the intended usage of the action handler?
* Specifically is this also ment for lazy DOD runs?
* How is the relationship to the Cpop_pad opcode?
The one thing that I figure *will* be done is that
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 7:45 AM +0100 12/11/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Thinking more about that it seems that we don't have much chance to keep
the current scheme that the destination is passed in.
I fully expected this to be an issue. Perl 5 and perl 6 are going to
have
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
subclass - To create a subclass of a class object
Is existing and used.
add_parent - To add a parent to the class this is invoked on
become_parent - Called on the class passed as a parameter to add_parent
What is the latter used for?
Will Coleda via RT wrote:
Sam's latest patch seems to have resolved this issue - dynclasses now build,
and:
perl t/harness t/dynclass/py*
skips 1 test, passes everything else.
What test is skipped?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/parrot/dynclasses$ make test
cd .. ; perl -Ilib t/harness t/dynclass/*.t
At 8:48 AM -0500 12/14/04, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 9:08 AM + 12/14/04, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMCC's doing odd things when moving PMCs into the appropriate spot
when calling into functions with a large number of parameters. Here's
a snip from a
On Tue 14 Dec 2004 17:10, Adam Turoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:14:32 +0100, H.Merijn Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue 14 Dec 2004 16:04, Clayton, Nik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've normally got enough going on in my head when writing code,
worrying about the
Ah yep, that surely is the reason. Too bad, have to wait until I get home ;-)
- Michael
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:25:32 -0500 (EST), Jeff Horwitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hm, works fine for others. maybe the weird port i'm using for that web
server isn't agreeing with your firewall.
-jeff
At 11:13 AM +0100 12/14/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
subclass - To create a subclass of a class object
Is existing and used.
Right. I was listing the things we need in the protocol. Some of them
we've got, some we don't, and some of the stuff we have we
* H.Merijn Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-12-14T11:28:19]
About spaces, another thing springs to mind, for which I would gladly kill the
responsible people to allow it (I bet M$ was the first to push it): Spaces in
database table and field names. DON'T! NEVER! Once you start it, you will
never
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 09:32:51PM -0600, Michael Carman wrote:
I think this is the most valuable part of the exercise - the bugs you find
when you think 'its got 98% coverage, there cant possibly be any bugs
left...oh, look'
With a little luck, that's when it finally sinks that coverage
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 11:15:13AM +, Ben Evans wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 05:35:53AM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Tripped across this on WardsWiki just now. #5 is my favorite as its often
forgotten in the noise.
Oh, the noise! Oh, the noise! Noise! Noise! Noise!
That's one
26 matches
Mail list logo
