[perl6/specs] 73ff49: META doesn't need an entire glossary to itself

2016-01-18 Thread GitHub
n 2016) Changed paths: M S22-package-format.pod Log Message: --- META doesn't need an entire glossary to itself There's a document-level one right above it. Merged the two.

[perl6/specs] 990d52: Add "XS" to glossary

2015-11-05 Thread GitHub
v 2015) Changed paths: M S99-glossary.pod Log Message: --- Add "XS" to glossary

[perl6/specs] a71e37: Add "list to remember" to glossary

2015-09-04 Thread GitHub
paths: M S99-glossary.pod Log Message: --- Add "list to remember" to glossary

[perl6/specs] 5b5a93: Define CURLI in glossary

2015-08-19 Thread GitHub
paths: M S99-glossary.pod Log Message: --- Define CURLI in glossary

[perl6/specs] 64b47f: pouring into the glossary Danaides barrel

2015-04-21 Thread GitHub
) Changed paths: M S99-glossary.pod Log Message: --- pouring into the glossary Danaides barrel

[perl6/specs] 9708f2: Correcting misplaced section links in glossary

2015-01-25 Thread GitHub
paths: M S99-glossary.pod Log Message: --- Correcting misplaced section links in glossary Commit: 3de429d4c8b2c7ef3606f3b6c492787daf9059c6 https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/3de429d4c8b2c7ef3606f3b6c492787daf9059c6 Author: Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de Date: 2015

[perl6/specs] 662083: Resolving unresolved internal links in glossary

2015-01-25 Thread GitHub
paths: M S99-glossary.pod Log Message: --- Resolving unresolved internal links in glossary Commit: 44a21c0439101276cd9e43ac6eb2d4af6562da97 https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/44a21c0439101276cd9e43ac6eb2d4af6562da97 Author: Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de Date: 2015

[perl6/specs] 39517a: glossary: Add an example for an infix

2015-01-25 Thread GitHub
paths: M S99-glossary.pod Log Message: --- glossary: Add an example for an infix

[perl6/specs] 2f45ae: More glossary updates (Synopsis, TMTOWTDI)

2014-06-14 Thread GitHub
paths: M S99-glossary.pod Log Message: --- More glossary updates (Synopsis, TMTOWTDI)

[perl6/specs] f70506: [glossary] explain thunk

2014-04-11 Thread GitHub
paths: M S99-glossary.pod Log Message: --- [glossary] explain thunk

[perl6/specs] 749198: Add some more glossary terms

2014-04-11 Thread GitHub
paths: M S99-glossary.pod Log Message: --- Add some more glossary terms

[perl6/specs] f0f664: more glossary entries

2013-07-02 Thread GitHub
paths: M S99-glossary.pod Log Message: --- more glossary entries

[perl6/specs] fce8a2: Framework for a Perl 6 glossary

2013-06-28 Thread GitHub
) Changed paths: A S99-glossary.pod Log Message: --- Framework for a Perl 6 glossary

[perl #60658] Broken links to Glossary and Patch Bug Report Submission Information

2008-11-19 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Matt Kraai # Please include the string: [perl #60658] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60658 Howdy, On the Developer Resources page at http://www.parrot.org/dev, the Glossary

[perl #49902] [PATCH][perl6] small glossary clarification

2008-01-17 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Zev Benjamin # Please include the string: [perl #49902] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49902 May as well mention what Rakudo is in the glossary entry. Zev Index: languages

[perl #49902] [PATCH][perl6] small glossary clarification

2008-01-17 Thread Jerry Gay via RT
applied with minor modifications as r24966. ~jerry

Glossary is missing from parrotcode.org

2007-03-09 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
hi, on http://www.parrotcode.org/resources.html there's a link named glossary. clicking on that link results in an empty page. The glossary is in docs/glossary.pod It should be put it in the website repository too. regards, kjs

[perl #41768] Fwd: Glossary is missing from parrotcode.org

2007-03-09 Thread via RT
, 2007 6:34:06 AM EST To: Perl 6 Internals perl6-internals@perl.org Subject: Glossary is missing from parrotcode.org hi, on http://www.parrotcode.org/resources.html there's a link named glossary. clicking on that link results in an empty page. The glossary is in docs/glossary.pod

Re: [yapc] DOC: glossary

2006-07-03 Thread Jose Castro
On Jul 2, 2006, at 11:23 PM, Uri Guttman wrote: hi to all docathon hackers (and others too), one idea we came up with during the docathon is that perl6 needs a glossary. would the terms autobox or mixin make any sense to a newcomer who didn't know any OO theory? so this is a proposal

RE: [yapc] DOC: glossary

2006-07-03 Thread York, Joel
] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uri Guttman Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 5:24 PM To: perl6-language@perl.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [yapc] DOC: glossary hi to all docathon hackers (and others too), one idea we came up with during

DOC: glossary

2006-07-02 Thread Uri Guttman
hi to all docathon hackers (and others too), one idea we came up with during the docathon is that perl6 needs a glossary. would the terms autobox or mixin make any sense to a newcomer who didn't know any OO theory? so this is a proposal to start a glossary as a new S\d+ or other document. here

Re: DOC: glossary

2006-07-02 Thread Juerd
I haven't actually read your message, just the Subject, because I was just going to bed. Be sure to check out http://pugs.kwiki.org/?Perl6Nomenclature Juerd -- http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html

[PATCH] Remove glossary from todo.html

2004-08-16 Thread William Coleda
Parrotcode's TODO list http://www.parrotcode.org/todo.html Has a reference to the glossary.pod. I presume this was supposed to be reference to the TODO file in the source, which, pending another patch, is now empty. This patch removes the ref to the TODO file instead of updating it. (I saw a

New glossary entries

2003-11-02 Thread Gregor N. Purdy
I just committed a few new glossary entries for folks reading the summaries: IMC, IMCC, Packfile, PBC, PIR. -- Gregor Purdy[EMAIL PROTECTED] Focus Research, Inc. http://www.focusresearch.com/

Re: Glossary?

2002-11-26 Thread James Mastros
On 11/17/2002 1:11 AM, Dave Storrs wrote: Arrays know how to manage their own size; they will grow and shrink as needed when you add or remove elements. You never need to worry about whether an array has enough space to hold the number of elements you are about to insert. Reference to

RE: Glossary? [x-adr]

2002-11-26 Thread Garrett Goebel
James Mastros wrote: On 11/17/2002 1:11 AM, Dave Storrs wrote: Arrays know how to manage their own size; they will grow and shrink as needed when you add or remove elements. You never need to worry about whether an array has enough space to hold the number of elements you are about to

Re: Glossary? [x-adr]

2002-11-26 Thread Larry Wall
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:38:55AM -0600, Garrett Goebel wrote: : James Mastros wrote: : On 11/17/2002 1:11 AM, Dave Storrs wrote: : Arrays know how to manage their own size; they will grow : and shrink as needed when you add or remove elements. You : never need to worry about whether an

RE: Glossary?

2002-11-18 Thread Garrett Goebel
From: Dave Storrs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:29:38PM -0600, Garrett Goebel wrote: It is interesting that no one has yet taken the time to start defining the terms we're using. Good point. I volunteered to be keeper of the glossary a while ago, but I never

Re: Glossary?

2002-11-17 Thread fearcadi
Dave Storrs writes: Good point. I volunteered to be keeper of the glossary a while ago, but I never actively started creating one. That said, let's make this the first entry. Comments and constructive criticisms welcomed from all comers. I tryed to cut in stone ( but this is very

Re: Glossary? ( Some additions/changes )

2002-11-17 Thread fearcadi
=- =section assignment vs binding =- * A = B ; assign means : evaluate the *value* on the right hand side and *distribute* it ( value ) among the containers ( which if

Re: Glossary?

2002-11-17 Thread fearcadi
terminology clearing : =back =over glossary =item * variable - a variable-name associated with ( referencing ) container. =item * variable-name - an entry in the symbol-table that contains a name - string beginning with *sigil* . otherwize

Re: Glossary?

2002-11-16 Thread Dave Storrs
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:29:38PM -0600, Garrett Goebel wrote: It is interesting that no one has yet taken the time to start defining the terms we're using. Good point. I volunteered to be keeper of the glossary a while ago, but I never actively started creating one. That said, let's make

list == literal array? (was: Glossary?)

2002-11-15 Thread Garrett Goebel
Stéphane Payrard wrote: On (14/11/02 16:21), Garrett Goebel wrote: Stéphane Payrard wrote: But when we say literal array, do we talk about the representation or the value? The representation of a fixed value. If a literal is the representation of a constant value, then a

Glossary?

2002-11-14 Thread Garrett Goebel
It is interesting that no one has yet taken the time to start defining the terms we're using. For instance what is a literal? Would everyone agree with the following definition? A literal is the represention of a constant value. It is important not to confuse the representation with the value.

Re: Glossary?

2002-11-14 Thread Stéphane Payrard
On (14/11/02 14:29), Garrett Goebel wrote: From: Garrett Goebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Glossary? Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:29:38 -0600 It is interesting that no one has yet taken the time to start defining the terms we're using. For instance what is a literal

RE: Glossary?

2002-11-14 Thread Garrett Goebel
Stéphane Payrard wrote: On (14/11/02 14:29), Garrett Goebel wrote: It is interesting that no one has yet taken the time to start defining the terms we're using. For instance what is a literal? Would everyone agree with the following definition? A literal is the represention

Re: Glossary?

2002-11-14 Thread Stéphane Payrard
On (14/11/02 16:21), Garrett Goebel wrote: From: Garrett Goebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Stéphane Payrard' [EMAIL PROTECTED], Garrett Goebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Glossary? Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:21:23 -0600 Stéphane Payrard wrote: On (14/11/02 14

[perl #16962] [PATCH] add ICU to the glossary

2002-09-03 Thread via RT
it in the glossary, so here is an explanation and a link. -kevin diff -u -p -r1.6 glossary.pod --- glossary.pod26 Aug 2002 03:02:26 - 1.6 +++ glossary.pod3 Sep 2002 13:30:04 - -152,7 +152,18 objects faster than memory) See also: LDOD +=head2 ICU

Glossary Requests

2002-07-12 Thread Mike Litherland
Hi all, I've been lurking for a bit until I'm up to speed enough to help out. I'm glad to see a glossary is forming of some of the terms newbies need, but there are some things I think are missing. First is that COW was discussed a few days (weeks?) ago, but doesn't appear to have made

Re: Glossary Requests

2002-07-12 Thread Melvin Smith
At 11:13 AM 7/12/2002 -0400, Mike Litherland wrote: I've been lurking for a bit until I'm up to speed enough to help out. I'm glad to see a glossary is forming of some of the terms newbies need, but there are some things I think are missing. First is that COW was discussed a few days (weeks

Re: Glossary Requests

2002-07-12 Thread Dan Sugalski
? There may already be something there. The glossary is probably a good idea anyway. It's not in there. Looks from the website source that the glossary page is build from docs/glossary.pod. I'll update it now with COW, GC, DOD, and PMC. PS Other website updates: Aren't we on version 0.0.6 now

Glossary changes

2002-07-12 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:01 PM -0400 7/12/02, Melvin Smith wrote: Did you check docs/ and docs/pdds first? There may already be something there. The glossary is probably a good idea anyway. I added some definitions to glossary. I think the changes'll be picked up on parrotcode.org around 4PM EST

Re: Glossary changes

2002-07-12 Thread Robert Spier
Dan Sugalski writes: At 12:01 PM -0400 7/12/02, Melvin Smith wrote: Did you check docs/ and docs/pdds first? There may already be something there. The glossary is probably a good idea anyway. I added some definitions to glossary. I think the changes'll be picked up on parrotcode.org around 4PM

Re: Glossary changes

2002-07-12 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:27 AM -0700 7/12/02, Robert Spier wrote: Dan Sugalski writes: At 12:01 PM -0400 7/12/02, Melvin Smith wrote: Did you check docs/ and docs/pdds first? There may already be something there. The glossary is probably a good idea anyway. I added some definitions to glossary. I think

Re: Glossary Requests

2002-07-12 Thread Robert Spier
I've heard reports of rsync not working. I don't use it, so I dunno there. If someone's got the proper incantation, or follows the directions and it doesn't work (when you're *sure* you know what you're doing) I'll update it appropriately. Yes, this seems broken at the moment. I've opened a

Re: Glossary Requests

2002-07-12 Thread Robert Spier
Correct, I don't maintain the site, but I believe Robert has said he would accept patches. Yes, if people send me updates/diff/new content's, or just replace this paragraph with this, I'll do the merges. -R

Re: Glossary Requests

2002-07-12 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Spier) writes: I've heard reports of rsync not working. I don't use it, so I dunno there. If someone's got the proper incantation, or follows the directions and it doesn't work (when you're *sure* you know what you're doing) I'll update it appropriately. Yes,

Re: Parrot Glossary - COW

2002-07-08 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
FYI; the Guile schemers have had several discussions that may be of interest to the Parrot personnel regarding copy on write strings and shared substrings. Perhaps they thought of something you have not? I imagine they must have a list archive you can find. -- As any limb well and duly

Re: Parrot Glossary - COW

2002-07-05 Thread Aldo Calpini
Markus Laire wrote: I've been following this list for a month, but havn't yet learned what COW really means. It's used so often that perhaps it should be added to Parrot Glossary. I'll give my try, but I'm no expert at all. feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. COW stands for Copy On Write

Re: Parrot Glossary - COW

2002-07-05 Thread Larry Wall
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Nicholas Clark wrote: : On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 02:54:18PM +0200, Aldo Calpini wrote: : this approach saves memory, because you can create as many copies of a : string as you want, without allocating it many times. unless you modify : them, at least. it's also usually a

glossary

2002-06-20 Thread Robert Spier
The glossary in cvs docs/glossary.pod is now available on the web: http://www.parrotcode.org/glossary

Parrot Glossary

2002-06-11 Thread Robert Spier
There's enough words and definitions going by that not everyone understands that it's time for us to have a glossary. I'm willing to do the administrative work of maintaining it, if others send me entries. So... if there are words you think should be in the parrot glossary (the recent