[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthew Zimmerman) writes:
Larry has been consistently using
OxAB op 0xBB
in his messages to represent a (French quote) hyperop,
(corresponding to the Unicode characters 0x00AB and 0x00BB)
More and more conversations like this, (and how many have we seen here
already?)
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Damian Conway wrote:
Larry mused:
Of course, Real Mathematicians will want [1..10) and (1..10] instead.
Forgive me but is this syntax really necessary.
Does it buy us enough over +1 and -1?
And for what it's worth, Real Mathematicians do not use open intervals for
On 2 Nov 2002 at 0:06, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthew Zimmerman) writes:
Larry has been consistently using
OxAB op 0xBB
in his messages to represent a (French quote) hyperop,
(corresponding to the Unicode characters 0x00AB and 0x00BB)
More and more conversations
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 01:15:05 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SMTPD: qpsmtpd/0.12, http://develooper.com/code/qpsmtpd/
Michael Lazzaro writes:
magical whitespace modifier:
_ - When used at the
From: Markus Laire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 14:44:39 +0200
On 2 Nov 2002 at 0:06, Simon Cozens wrote:
More and more conversations like this, (and how many have we seen here
already?) about characters sets, encodings, mail quoting issues, in
fact, anything other than Perl,
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 06:07:34AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
I do most of my work over an ssh connection to my favorite server,
through gnome-terminal. gnome-terminal does not support unicode, so
this whole thread has been filled with ?'s and \251's. I can't see a
thing...
gnome-terminal
Luke Palmer writes:
What _are_ you talking about. IIRC, there were never any plans for
such a placeholder. There were the placeholder _variables_, $^x et
al., but the underscore was never used for such a thing. That could
be why I've been so confused by some of your examples.
i
On Friday, November 1, 2002, at 04:06 PM, Simon Cozens wrote:
More and more conversations like this, (and how many have we seen here
already?) about characters sets, encodings, mail quoting issues, in
fact, anything other than Perl, will be rife on every Perl-related
mailing list if we persist
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Ed Peschko wrote:
I'm probably opening up a whole new can of worms here, but if we said
that the following were both vector operators:
^ == intersection operator
v == union operator
then these could have potentially useful meanings on their *own* as set
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 12:06:07AM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
More and more conversations like this, (and how many have we seen here
already?) about characters sets, encodings, mail quoting issues, in
fact, anything other than Perl, will be rife on every Perl-related
mailing list if we persist
On 2002.11.01 19:06 Simon Cozens wrote:
More and more conversations like this, (and how many have we seen here
already?) about characters sets, encodings, mail quoting issues, in
fact, anything other than Perl, will be rife on every Perl-related
mailing list if we persist with this idiotic
11 matches
Mail list logo