Re: [HACKERS] Pg7.1beta3: connect failed: The DB System is starting up.

2001-01-12 Thread Vadim Mikheev
With Apache Mod Perl, Apache::DBI, stress test with apache bench (ab -n 10 -c 4) in apache error_log i've got: [Pg7.1beta3 with standard conf files.] And how many simult connections you did? .. [Fri Jan 12 07:48:58 2001] [error] DBI-connect(dbname=mydb) failed: The Data

[HACKERS] AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX

2001-01-12 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
How about having some #if BROKEN_TIMEZONE_DATABASE code which uses both mktime() and localtime() to derive the correct time zone? That is, call mktime to get a time_t, then call localtime() to get the time zone info, but only on platforms which do not get a complete result from just

Re: [HACKERS] Pg7.1beta3: connect failed: The DB System is starting up.

2001-01-12 Thread Valter Mazzola
From: "Vadim Mikheev" To: "Valter Mazzola" , Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pg7.1beta3: connect failed: The DB System is starting up. Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:36:55 -0800 With Apache Mod Perl, Apache::DBI, stress test with apache bench (ab -n 10 -c 4) in apache error_log i've got:

RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

2001-01-12 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Mikheev, Vadim wrote: Um, you do realize that a contrib module that gets used as part of the regress tests may as well be mainstream? At least in terms of the portability requirements it will have to meet? I'm unhappy again. Bad enough we accepted a new feature

AW: [HACKERS] CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization)

2001-01-12 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
A disk-block CRC would detect partially written blocks (ie, power drops after disk has written M of the N sectors in a block). The disk's own checks will NOT consider this condition a failure. But physical log recovery will rewrite every page that was changed after last checkpoint, thus

RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

2001-01-12 Thread Oleg Bartunov
OK. We found an old implementation of R-Tre using GiST (Pg95) and we'll try to implement regression test using R-Tree it's anyway will be a good test. Regards, Oleg On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Oleg Bartunov wrote: On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Mikheev, Vadim wrote: Um, you do

[HACKERS] pgaccess: russian fonts SQL window???

2001-01-12 Thread Anatoly K. Lasareff
Two questions about pgaccess. I use tkl/Tk 8.2, Postgresql 7.1, FreeBSD 4.0 . 1. I cannot view russian text in russian when I use pgaccess. I set all the fonts in 'Preferences' to -cronyx-helvetica-*-*-*-*-17-*-*-*-*-*-koi8-* , but don't see russian letters in 'tables' and others windows. The

Re: [HACKERS] Suggested fix for pg_dump

2001-01-12 Thread Philip Warner
At 13:29 7/01/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Essentially, worst case scenario, we are going from 'broken-broken' ... No, I don't think so. The current pg_dump code is only broken if you've renamed a column involved in a foreign-key dependency (if I

Re: [HACKERS] Pg7.1beta3: connect failed: The DB System is startingup.

2001-01-12 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Vadim Mikheev wrote: With Apache Mod Perl, Apache::DBI, stress test with apache bench (ab -n 10 -c 4) in apache error_log i've got: [Pg7.1beta3 with standard conf files.] And how many simult connections you did? .. [Fri Jan 12 07:48:58 2001]

Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

2001-01-12 Thread Hannu Krosing
Tom Lane wrote: Um, you do realize that a contrib module that gets used as part of the regress tests may as well be mainstream? At least in terms of the portability requirements it will have to meet? _If_ we want to have a tested GiST (and not the "probably works but really has some nasty

Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

2001-01-12 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Hannu Krosing wrote: Oleg Bartunov wrote: OK. We found an old implementation of R-Tre using GiST (Pg95) and we'll try to implement regression test using R-Tree it's anyway will be a good test. How is it different than using RD-tree for tests ? No difference at

Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX

2001-01-12 Thread Thomas Lockhart
Here is the program. The call to localtime(t_ago) is redundant and hence the adjustment of t_ago can be skipped. It is in this program as a sanity check. As it stands, this program assumes that the input and resulting date are in the usual UNIX range of [1901, 2038]. I presume that there

Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What's wrong with warning message if GiST test not passed ? You're being *way* too optimistic. An output discrepancy in a test of GIST we could live with. But think about other scenarios: 1. GIST test coredumps on some platforms. This corrupts other

[HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

2001-01-12 Thread Thomas Lockhart
IMHO, giving out real test results, even negative, instead of leaving things untested would be a honest thing to do. afaict there are several concerns or decisions, and we've made a few already: Re: gist.c patches... 1) Oleg and Hannu are committed to testing the repaired GiST as soon as it

Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

2001-01-12 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Oleg Bartunov wrote: On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Hannu Krosing wrote: Oleg Bartunov wrote: OK. We found an old implementation of R-Tre using GiST (Pg95) and we'll try to implement regression test using R-Tree it's anyway will be a good test. How is it different

Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! )

2001-01-12 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote: Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What's wrong with warning message if GiST test not passed ? You're being *way* too optimistic. An output discrepancy in a test of GIST we could live with. But think about other scenarios: 1. GIST test

Re: [HACKERS] Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN.

2001-01-12 Thread Lamar Owen
Bruce Momjian wrote: I announced this on Announce/General a few hours ago. I wanted to mention that all general PostgreSQL news goes to those two lists, on the assumption that all people are subscribed to either of those two lists. I don't post to hackers by default because I don't want

Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
Pete Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thinking about that a bit more, I think that tm_isdst should not be written into. IIRC, setting isdst to -1 was necessary to get the right behavior across DST boundaries on more-mainstream systems. I do not think it's acceptable to do worse on systems

AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX

2001-01-12 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Pete Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thinking about that a bit more, I think that tm_isdst should not be written into. IIRC, setting isdst to -1 was necessary to get the right behavior across DST boundaries on more-mainstream systems. I do not think it's acceptable to do worse on

Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
Zeugswetter Andreas SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, the annoyance is, that localtime works for dates before 1970 but mktime doesn't. Best would probably be to assume no DST before 1970 on AIX and IRIX. That seems like a reasonable answer to me, especially since we have other platforms that

AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX

2001-01-12 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Yes, the annoyance is, that localtime works for dates before 1970 but mktime doesn't. Best would probably be to assume no DST before 1970 on AIX and IRIX. That seems like a reasonable answer to me, especially since we have other platforms that behave that way. How can we do this ---

RPMs (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?)

2001-01-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Lamar Owen writes: Does the python build stuff use DESTDIR these days? It does not. You'd have to delve into the internals of the Python-provided makefiles. I might just have to do that, but if you want to look then let me know because this should get fixed. The perl stuff needs some other

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ...

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree that the complete changelog is probably too long, I'm just against the per-version segmenting. Changelogs are usually used (well, by me) to get an overview when and how segments of code were worked on. The primary key here is not what

Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

2001-01-12 Thread Thomas Lockhart
An optional test is like no test at all. No one runs optional tests. If the test is supposed to work then it should be mainstream. If the test might not work then you better go back and figure out what you're testing. If the test might not *compile* (which is probably the more severe

Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

2001-01-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
At this point my vote is to leave the GIST test in contrib for 7.1. Anyone who actually cares about GIST (to be blunt: all three of you) can run it as a separate step. I don't want it in the standard regress tests until 7.2, when we will have a reasonable amount of time to test and debug

Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! )

2001-01-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Agreed ... now let's move onto more important things, cause we've spent much too long on this as it is ... Namely, should we bundle up a beta4 this weeekend, so that the GiST changes are in place for further testing, or hold off for ... ? I would hold off. GIST people can download the

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?

2001-01-12 Thread bpalmer
Speaking of which.. rpm -ivh ftp://ftp.postgresql/pub/whatever/postgresql-\*.rpm Is there a clearing house for packages? I have made some for OpenBSD (www.crimelabs.net/postgresql.shtml), but I wouldn't even know where to get the rpm or deb files. Should there be a folder on the ftp server

Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! )

2001-01-12 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote: The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Namely, should we bundle up a beta4 this weeekend, so that the GiST changes are in place for further testing, or hold off for ... ? First I'd like to finish a couple of open items I have, like fixing the

[HACKERS] Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases

2001-01-12 Thread Frank Joerdens
First I tried to dump out a database like: frank@limedes:~ pg_dump mpi dump.mpi getTables(): relation 'institute': 6 Triggers were expected, but got 0 The database mpi does contain a table 'institute' and a few foreign key constraints. Then I tried to dump another database, as in:

Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX

2001-01-12 Thread Pete Forman
Tom Lane writes: Pete Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thinking about that a bit more, I think that tm_isdst should not be written into. IIRC, setting isdst to -1 was necessary to get the right behavior across DST boundaries on more-mainstream systems. I do not think it's

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?

2001-01-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
bpalmer writes: Is there a clearing house for packages? I have made some for OpenBSD (www.crimelabs.net/postgresql.shtml), but I wouldn't even know where to get the rpm or deb files. Should there be a folder on the ftp server for packages for the betas? The RPMs are on the FTP server.

Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
Pete Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is fairly arbitrary what the answer to this question is: if six months is subtracted from a to give b, should a.local.hour = b.local.hour or should a.utc.hour = b.utc.hour? If you want the former then set tm_isdst = -1 before calling mktime. It's not

[HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?

2001-01-12 Thread Thomas Lockhart
Is there a clearing house for packages? I have made some for OpenBSD (www.crimelabs.net/postgresql.shtml), but I wouldn't even know where to get the rpm or deb files. Should there be a folder on the ftp server for packages for the betas? The RPMs are on the FTP server. In general I

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?

2001-01-12 Thread Oliver Elphick
bpalmer wrote: Is there a clearing house for packages? I have made some for OpenBSD (www.crimelabs.net/postgresql.shtml), but I wouldn't even know where to get the rpm or deb files. Should there be a folder on the ftp server for packages for the betas? Typically, deb files are

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?

2001-01-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
bpalmer writes: This traffic does not seem necessary for the list, but here are my thoughts. I think it is. I don't begin to disagree with this for a second. I know that there are a lot of RPM users out there that would like the RPM. I'm aware that there would be a lesser demand for

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases

2001-01-12 Thread Frank Joerdens
Frank Joerdens wrote: [ . . . ] Restarting the server didn't make a difference. I upgraded to beta3 just now and the problem persists. I didn't do an initdb obviously cuz I cannot save the data via pg_dump. Beta3 will read beta2 data OK (I guess this means that an initdb is not required when

RE: [HACKERS] Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases

2001-01-12 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
[ . . . ] Restarting the server didn't make a difference. I upgraded to beta3 just now and the problem persists. I didn't do an initdb obviously cuz I cannot save the data via pg_dump. Beta3 will read beta2 data OK (I guess this means that an initdb is not required when going from

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
Frank Joerdens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Then I had a look via psql at intranet and it turns out that it shows up as the database mpi mangled into the database intranet, contentwise; i.e. it doesn't only show the tables that are in intranet but also those that belong to mpi? I think you've

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
Frank Joerdens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are questions related to 7.1 beta versions best directed to hackers or to general? hackers is the proper place for discussing any unreleased version, I'd say. Or you can file a bug report on pgsql-bugs, if that seems more appropriate.

RE: [HACKERS] Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases

2001-01-12 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
You should probably write off your databases as toast ... update to beta3 and do an initdb. Sorry about that ... And try to reproduce bug. Sorry. Vadim

Re: [HACKERS] Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN.

2001-01-12 Thread Nathan Myers
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 10:00:40AM -0600, Keith G. Murphy wrote: And here I was thinking it was post''-gre-see'-quel I pronounce it "postgres". (I suspect that everybody else does too, whenever possible.) In English there's no problem with the spelling differing from the pronunciation.

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases

2001-01-12 Thread Frank Joerdens
"Mikheev, Vadim" wrote: [ . . . ] Restarting the server didn't make a difference. I upgraded to beta3 just now and the problem persists. I didn't do an initdb obviously cuz I cannot save the data via pg_dump. Beta3 will read beta2 data OK (I guess this means that an initdb is

RE: [HACKERS] Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases

2001-01-12 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
ERROR: Cannot insert a duplicate key into unique index pg_class_oid_index -- start log -- Which makes me pause . . . are OIDs unique per database or per PostgreSQL installation? I think per database. Therefore

Re: [HACKERS] Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN.

2001-01-12 Thread Lamar Owen
Bruce Momjian wrote: Lamar Owen wrote: Now that I look through my inbox, I don't see the post anywhere. Hmmm Not in trash either, which I didn't empty yesterday. That is strange. I saw it on those lists. I've been seeing some odd e-mail propagation lately. I want to say I

Re: [HACKERS] Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN.

2001-01-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: Lamar Owen wrote: Now that I look through my inbox, I don't see the post anywhere. Hmmm Not in trash either, which I didn't empty yesterday. That is strange. I saw it on those lists. I've been seeing some odd e-mail propagation lately. I want to

Re: RPMs (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?)

2001-01-12 Thread Lamar Owen
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Lamar Owen writes: Does the python build stuff use DESTDIR these days? It does not. You'd have to delve into the internals of the Python-provided makefiles. I might just have to do that, but if you want to look then let me know because this should get fixed.

RE: [HACKERS] Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases

2001-01-12 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
Evil it was. The haste with which beta3 appeared should've tipped you off that beta2 was badly broken :-(. What's puzzling us, though, is that this bug was in the WAL code from day one, and no one noticed it Just for accuracy - this bug is not related to WAL anyhow. This bug was in new file

RE: [HACKERS] CRCs

2001-01-12 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
But physical log recovery will rewrite every page that was changed after last checkpoint, thus this is not an issue anymore. No. That assumes that when the drive _says_ the block is written, it is really on the disk. That is not true for IDE drives. It is true for SCSI drives only

Re: [HACKERS] CRCs

2001-01-12 Thread Nathan Myers
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 01:07:56PM -0800, Mikheev, Vadim wrote: But physical log recovery will rewrite every page that was changed after last checkpoint, thus this is not an issue anymore. No. That assumes that when the drive _says_ the block is written, it is really on the disk.

Re: [HACKERS] CVS updates on committers list...

2001-01-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Well there is cvs2cl and there is a utility I use: pgsql/src/tools/pgcvslog Has anyone ever thought of asking the FreeBSD folks for their CVS COmmit message generator? They generate ONE message with more info in it for multi-directory commits than we do with ours.

RE: [HACKERS] CVS updates on committers list...

2001-01-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
I'm referring to the actual commit messages. It would be in the CVS server config -Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 4:03 PM To: Larry Rosenman Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers List Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS updates on

RE: [HACKERS] SIGTERM - elog(FATAL) - proc_exit() is probably a bad idea

2001-01-12 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
I think we'd be lots better off to abandon the notion that we can exit directly from the SIGTERM interrupt handler, and instead treat SIGTERM the same way we treat QueryCancel: set a flag that is inspected at specific places where we know we are in a good state. Comments? This will be

Re: [HACKERS] CVS updates on committers list...

2001-01-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] I'm referring to the actual commit messages. It would be in the CVS server config Oh, yes, I understand now. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 +

RE: [HACKERS] CRCs

2001-01-12 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
You know - this is *core* assumption. If drive lies about this then *nothing* will help you. Do you remember core rule of WAL? "Changes must be logged *before* changed data pages written". If this rule will be broken then data files will be inconsistent after crash recovery and you will

Re: [HACKERS] CVS updates on committers list...

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
"Larry Rosenman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm referring to the actual commit messages. It *would* be awfully nice if the pgsql-committers traffic were one message per commit, instead of one per directory touched per commit. This has been suggested before, but nothing got done ...

Re: [HACKERS] CRCs

2001-01-12 Thread Nathan Myers
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:16:07PM -0800, Mikheev, Vadim wrote: You know - this is *core* assumption. If drive lies about this then *nothing* will help you. Do you remember core rule of WAL? "Changes must be logged *before* changed data pages written". If this rule will be broken then

Re: [HACKERS] CVS updates on committers list...

2001-01-12 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "Larry Rosenman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm referring to the actual commit messages. It *would* be awfully nice if the pgsql-committers traffic were one message per commit, instead of one per directory touched per commit. This has been suggested

Re: [HACKERS] CRCs

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) writes: "Changes must be logged *before* changed data pages written". If this rule will be broken then data files will be inconsistent after crash recovery and you will not notice this, w/wo CRC in data blocks. You can include the data blocks' CRCs in the

RE: [HACKERS] CRCs

2001-01-12 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
It wouldn't help you recover, but you would be able to report that you cannot recover. How? The scenario Vadim is pointing out is where the disk drive writes a changed data block in advance of the WAL log entry describing the change. Then power drops and the WAL entry never gets made.

Re: [HACKERS] CRCs

2001-01-12 Thread Nathan Myers
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 06:06:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) writes: "Changes must be logged *before* changed data pages written". If this rule will be broken then data files will be inconsistent after crash recovery and you will not notice this, w/wo CRC in

RE: [HACKERS] SIGTERM - elog(FATAL) - proc_exit() is probably a bad idea

2001-01-12 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
-Original Message- From: Mikheev, Vadim I think we'd be lots better off to abandon the notion that we can exit directly from the SIGTERM interrupt handler, and instead treat SIGTERM the same way we treat QueryCancel: set a flag that is inspected at specific places where we

Re: [HACKERS] SIGTERM - elog(FATAL) - proc_exit() is probably a bad idea

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
I think we'd be lots better off to abandon the notion that we can exit directly from the SIGTERM interrupt handler, and instead treat SIGTERM the same way we treat QueryCancel: set a flag that is inspected at specific places where we know we are in a good state. Comments? This will be

Re: [HACKERS] SIGTERM - elog(FATAL) - proc_exit() is probably a bad idea

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
"Hiroshi Inoue" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hmm, CancelQuery isn't so urgent an operation currently. For example, VACUUM checks QueryCancel flag only once per table. Right, we'll need to check in more places. See my just-posted proposal. Checking at any spinlock grab should ensure that we

[HACKERS] Re: still no log

2001-01-12 Thread Martin A. Marques
El Mi 10 Ene 2001 20:55, Alfonso Peniche escribi: Existe un archivo llamado postmaster.init en el directorio de postgres, en ese directorio le especificas si quieres que use o no los logs. Ya revisaste ese archivo? No existe tal archivo, pero ya lo sulocione. Gracias de todas formas. ;-) --

Re: [HACKERS] CVS updates on committers list...

2001-01-12 Thread The Hermit Hacker
I keep meaning to work with Alfred on this ... just keeps getting backburnered :( Let me take a look at her this weekend ... On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Larry Rosenman wrote: Has anyone ever thought of asking the FreeBSD folks for their CVS COmmit message generator? They generate ONE message

Re: [HACKERS] CRCs

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
"Mikheev, Vadim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If log record was not really flushed on disk in 3. but on-disk image of index block was updated in 4. and system crashed after this then after restart recovery you'll have unlawful index tuple pointing to where? Who knows! No guarantee that

Re: [HACKERS] CRCs

2001-01-12 Thread Nathan Myers
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:10:36PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Nathan Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010112 15:49] wrote: Obviously it's better to configure the disk so that it doesn't lie about what's been written. I thought WAL+fsync wasn't supposed to allow this to happen? It's an OS

Re: [HACKERS] CVS updates on committers list...

2001-01-12 Thread The Hermit Hacker
Done ... just tried adding white space to three files, in three directories, and it seems to go through as one commit ... let's see what happens next time Tom makes a big change :) On 12 Jan 2001, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "Larry Rosenman" [EMAIL

RE: [HACKERS] CRCs

2001-01-12 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
If log record was not really flushed on disk in 3. but on-disk image of index block was updated in 4. and system crashed after this then after restart recovery you'll have unlawful index tuple pointing to where? Who knows! No guarantee that corresponding heap tuple was flushed on

Re: [HACKERS] CRCs

2001-01-12 Thread Daniele Orlandi
Nathan Myers wrote: It wouldn't help you recover, but you would be able to report that you cannot recover. While this could help decting hardware problems, you still won't be able to detect some (many) memory errors because the CRC will be calculated on the already corrupted data. Of course

Re: [HACKERS] CVS updates on committers list...

2001-01-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
The Hermit Hacker writes: Done ... just tried adding white space to three files, in three directories, and it seems to go through as one commit ... let's see what happens next time Tom makes a big change :) When Peter makes a small change, this happens:

Re: [HACKERS] CVS updates on committers list...

2001-01-12 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Hermit Hacker writes: Done ... just tried adding white space to three files, in three directories, and it seems to go through as one commit ... let's see what happens next time Tom makes a big change :) When Peter makes a small change,

Re: [HACKERS] CVS updates on committers list...

2001-01-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Ian Lance Taylor writes: /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/CVSROOT/log_accum: not found Odd that it would work once. Is log_accum listed in the CVSROOT/checkoutlist file? commit_prep Won't be able to do mail logging. log_accum Won't be able to do mail logging. What files are in

Re: RPMs (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?)

2001-01-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Lamar Owen writes: It's pretty dramatic to get the 'You don't have permissions to install' message from the perl 'make install' when I am performing the build (and the make install) as root. Particularly when 7.0's perl 'make install' worked semi-properly. I say semi-properly because the

Re: [HACKERS] CVS updates on committers list...

2001-01-12 Thread The Hermit Hacker
okay, got all of this fixed up ... I missed the 'checkoutlist' file, and the mail program was pointing at the wrong place :( testing now ... On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Ian Lance Taylor writes: /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/CVSROOT/log_accum: not found Odd that it

Re: [HACKERS] CVS updates on committers list...

2001-01-12 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ian Lance Taylor writes: /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/CVSROOT/log_accum: not found Odd that it would work once. Is log_accum listed in the CVSROOT/checkoutlist file? commit_prep Won't be able to do mail logging. log_accum

Re: [HACKERS] CRCs

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
AFAICS, disk-block CRCs do not guard against mishaps involving intended writes. They will help guard against data corruption that might creep in due to outside factors, however. Right. Given that we seem to have agreed on that, I withdraw my complaint about disk-block-CRC not being in

Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess: russian fonts SQL window???

2001-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anatoly K. Lasareff) writes: Two questions about pgaccess. I use tkl/Tk 8.2, Postgresql 7.1, FreeBSD 4.0 . 1. I cannot view russian text in russian when I use pgaccess. I set all the fonts in 'Preferences' to -cronyx-helvetica-*-*-*-*-17-*-*-*-*-*-koi8-* , but don't see