RE: [PHP-DEV] cvs: php4 /main output.c

> Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > How about you read Zeev's excellent explanation of this issue in > > Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021003111648.05550388@localhost>? > > Zeev may forgot some or misunderstood my patches. > I have to take a look at SAPI code. IIRC it has been > changed a little to w

[PHP-DEV] RE: #19637 [Opn->Bgs]: .php file truncated

> (Do we have HOWTO for getting backtrace from Windows?) No we don't because its quite complex although we could make it easier. If we were to build PHP with symbols enabled and perhaps also provide .pdg and .dbg files (we would have to make sure we always build in c:\php4 or some such) then we

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] include statement in php.ini file

In general I agree with this proposal but I have some concerns, as I am not familiar with the ini code these may be unfounded, introducing it may well 1) Introduce Security Concerns depending on the time the ini file is loaded (IF I have safe_mode = on then you include an ini file with safe_mod

RE: [PHP-DEV] W32api functions

>At 06:16 PM 4/3/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>And w32api is in PECL CVS btw. > >What exactly does this mean, considering it's also in php4/ext/w32api? My thoughts exactly.. James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] W32api functions

Yes and yes... At 01:24 AM 4/3/2002, Ilia A. wrote: >Hello, > >Are the W32api functions in the CVS will make it into the upcoming 4.2 >release and if so will they be a part of the standard binaries distributed >for windows? Ive just rewritten these but havnt put them into CVS yet.. it uses OO a

Re: [PHP-DEV] TML++

> On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 06:16, Joey Smith wrote: > > On Saturday, Jan. 26th, at 11:36am MST my son, Joseph Clark Smith, > > Jr. was born. He is 19.5" in length and 7 lbs. 5 oz. > > > > More pictures later, but here's on to start with: > > http://www.joeysmith.com/~joey/jj.jpg > > Congratulations

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

> Jim Winstead wrote: > > no objections, but one thing that should be considered is what > > happens to the documentation for these extensions when they are no > > longer a part of the core distribution. > > QA too. > > "I suppose removing some of these less frequently used extensions will > a

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: CVS Account Request: bradmssw

> > I have written an extension to php for the MCVE engine. It can be > > loaded as a module or compiled into the code base, and would like to > > have it distributed with PHP. I would need commit access in order to > > maintain the module. The product, MCVE is a credit card processing > > en

Re: Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] Re: Shootout

> need for storage). absolutely *no* reasonable programmer will ever use > PHP to calculate prime numbers or fractals (maybe with mathematical > extensions, but not with raw PHP code). Hey I have a little PHP-GTK app that does simple fractals... whats wrong with that??? :P - James -- PHP De

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apology

> > I don't think you should be apologizing. Nobdoy should. > > Anyways, I'm now really going 'away' for a while too and > not stir this soup anymore. I hope that some people here > stop and think a bit what is wrong here as it's quite > obvious that something definately needs to be changed. > And

Re: [PHP-DEV] [NEW EXTENSTION]: templates

> On Wed, 05 Dec 2001, Björn Schotte wrote: > > It should be self-evident that most things are "IMHO". > > So I don't see the reason why you're trying to make a > > problem out of that. > > One thing I try to avoid is making assumptions, because most of the > world's problems come from that. As

Re: Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] [NEW EXTENSTION]: templates

> On Wed, 05 Dec 2001, Björn Schotte wrote: > > I suggest ext/template being extemely important. > > Sorry, but I am completely against it. +1, the only exception I might make would be Smarty as it is well designed and a lot of people use it but I dont think even smarty has a place in the PHP Dis

Re: [PHP-DEV] php-patches@lists.php.net?

> On Tue, 04 Dec 2001, Thies C. Arntzen wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:04:29PM +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > > > How about to have *new* list for sending patch for PHP? > > > PostgreSQL has list for that. It seems the list is working great > > > for them. > > > > php-dev is perfect fo

Re: [PHP-DEV] first bug report for 4.1.0 (was [PHP-DEV] Bug #14329:Mail() does not work)

> > Just imagine having to explain the confusion with the 4.1.0 release to > > everyone... oh my ;) > > The real 4.1.0 release will have zend version number 1.1.0a (while the > old, bogus one has 1.1.0 as Zend version number). Woth putting a note about this on the bug pages and php.net when we

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

How about in future to avoid this happening when we roll the release tag as 4.1.0 or whatever call the tar.gz file php-4.1.0pre1.tar.gz then it becomes slightly more obvious its not 4.1.0 also all we then have to do is rename php-4.1.0pre1 to php-4.1.0.tar.gz to do the release no need to reroll wh

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0RC4

> since news about 4.1.0 leaked out to the php-general list, wouldn't it > make sense to call this one 4.1.1? (or 4.1.0pl1? :) > Why?? Yes 4.1.0 was leaked on php-general and php-homepage.de but both were replied to making it very clear 4.1.0 hasnt been released yet. calling 4.1.0pl1 or 4.1.1

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

> > Did you check the 4.1.0 Zeev packaged? It was supposed to be backed out. I > don't have time to check now. Still present in this package. Similar script as brian: F:\PHP-41~1.0\RELEAS~2>php -q test.php hi Fatal error: Cannot redeclare test() in F:\PHP-41~1.0\RELEAS~2\include.php on line 10

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch: Nested comments

> But in C, you can #if 0 whole blocks out regardless. I'm in favour of a > change like this (if not this specific one) in 4.2. if(0) { } - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

[PHP-DEV] Re: PHPDoc Future

> James Moore wrote: > > > > > Q: What about DocBook? > > > A: I don't have the neccessary knowledge for this, but I know some guys > > > that actually have it. Means, I've send some pizza's and beer crates to > > > send to the

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHPDoc Development Status

> Q: What about DocBook? > A: I don't have the neccessary knowledge for this, but I know some guys > that actually have it. Means, I've send some pizza's and beer crates to > send to them and make them feel guilty to help us ;). Help is very much > appreciated. What needs doing on this front?? -

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch: Nested comments

> Although my vote doesn't count much here :-) I'm for it... > > ... but it would be a problem for 4.x I guess because this > horribly breaks BC when/if there's a new 4.x release and > people start using it. > > But it would be nice to have it in ZE2. > > my 2c - Markus

Re: [PHP-DEV] Server-Wide Persistent objects in PHP?

> Yea, that's the problem. In my application, just loading the class files > on each page adds quite a bit of overhead. (1000's of lines of code). Only load what you need then :) Or rewrite in C. > I've taken a look through the PHP/Zend source and it looks to me like it > would be possible to c

Re: [PHP-DEV] Out of date modules etc

> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:32:49 -0000, James Moore wrote: > > >CCVS has now been dropped by redhat (it will be replaced by MCVE), > >the module doesnt really seem to be supported either. With sablotron > >going the same way (for different reasons though) perhaps we should

[PHP-DEV] Out of date modules etc

CCVS has now been dropped by redhat (it will be replaced by MCVE), the module doesnt really seem to be supported either. With sablotron going the same way (for different reasons though) perhaps we should create a unsupported or and old directory in the pear c extension repository for these m

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: File Uploads in the PHP 4.2.0

- Original Message - From: "Zak Greant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "PHP Quality Assurance Team Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "PHP Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 9:23 AM Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: File Uploa

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0 Final RC QA Status

I just reuploaded another copy try now. - James - Original Message - From: "Alain Samoun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "James Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Zak Greant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0 Final RC QA Status

- Original Message - From: "Alain Samoun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Zak Greant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jani Taskinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andy Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0 Final RC QA Status

> If it's any use to you, I bought a licence for Wise Install Builder solely > for the purpose of building the PHP windows installation stuff. I chose the > Wise software because it seemed significantly more capable than the > InstallShield stuff. Anyway, since it was bought for the job, I'd be mo

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0 Final RC QA Status

> > I'm all for testing windows builds, especially if anyone wants to chuck > the Sablatron extension my way as well. > > Karl ext/sablatron is no longer existant, you need to port to ext/xslt instead. (Perhaps we should write a wrapper libaray to help people who are using ext/sablatron for now

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0 Final RC QA Status

> On November 21, 2001 06:55 am, Jani Taskinen wrote: > > I think we should be testing the pre-compiled binaries which will > > later on become the release for win32 platforms. As we have seen many > > times before, there have been build-problems in the release which > > were not caught by tests.

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0 Final RC QA Status

Win32 Builds, Apache, IIS, CGI work, Apache2 doesnt but works in latest CVS (segfaults on requests but thats a minor fix.) All modules Ive built and tested work (that is the major ones). - James - Original Message - From: "Zak Greant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.1.0 Final RC

> At 10:23 20.11.2001 +0000, James Moore wrote: > > > James Moore wrote: > > > > It wont load for me.. might but my build or something else.. has anyone > > > > had it working on win32 yet?? > > > > > > AFAICS, there is no (working) works

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.1.0 Final RC

> James Moore wrote: > > It wont load for me.. might but my build or something else.. has anyone > > had it working on win32 yet?? > > AFAICS, there is no (working) workspace in the PHP_4_0_7 branch to > build the sapi/Apache2Filter for Win32. I can build it (I j

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.1.0 Final RC

> Can you please build the sapi for Apache2? > thanks > -Jobarr It wont load for me.. might but my build or something else.. has anyone had it working on win32 yet?? - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comman

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.1.0 Final RC

Win32 build with several sapis (apache, isapi and ts) and extensions all build in debug mode available from: http://phpuk.org/~james/php-4.1.0RC3-win32.zip - James > > > www.php.net/~zeev/php-4.1.0RC3.tar.gz > > Lets get this bitch out the window :) Release on thurs if nothing else big > comes u

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.1.0 Final RC

> www.php.net/~zeev/php-4.1.0RC3.tar.gz Lets get this bitch out the window :) Release on thurs if nothing else big comes up? - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contac

Re: [PHP-DEV] set_time_limit() bug - pending for PHP 4.1.0

could this be similar to the engine=on/engine=off thing that we had quite a while ago?? Or is it due to global rather than local settings being overridden in set_time_limit? - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c

Re: [PHP-DEV] The opposite of ===

!== - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PHP-DEV] md5sum() patch

shouldnt it be file_md5 if we are sticking with out namespace convention. - James - Original Message - From: "Chris Newbill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PHP DEV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 5:57 AM Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] md5sum() patch > Nahh I think md5_file() isn'

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 4.1.0RC2 - can we roll?

- Original Message - From: "Alan Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:31 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 4.1.0RC2 - can we roll? > This may sound a bit self interested, but the curl extension has a > serious (well to me :) bug that p

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.1.0

> > But should it return: > > > > $str = array( > > string => "James" > > string => "Zeev" > > string => "" > > string => "Andrei" > > ) > Enduser point of view ;). IMO Should return en empty string (it is an empty string) or NULL,

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.1.0

> I suggest an RC2 (today?) and a release by the end of the week, or Monday > at the latest. > James - how sure are you that the fix you submitted is good and that we > won't find out afterwards that the bogus behavior was actually the right > thing to do? :) Well I know the old behaviour was wr

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.1.0

> The one symptom Rasmus pointed out (which was quite specific for > mbstring-xlation+zlib-compression) was MFH'd, so I think there are no big > showstoppers left. > Ive a fix for strtok's behaviour in HEAD but not in 4_0_7 should I merge it?? (See news for details of the fix). - James -- PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.1.0

> On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, James Moore wrote: > > Putting out a release we arnt happy with is worse than not putting a release > > out at all. > > Just wondering what in the current branch people aren't happy with. Its too old, things are being merged in still which could w

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.1.0

> > i haven't really changed my mind - but i want a fast > decision. as there isn't any clear consens here i think we > should release 4.1 as-it-is-with-the-last-showstoppers-fixed > and go from there. we should also learn from this and assign > a RM for the next release! i me

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Proposal for release process (Was: Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.1.0)

> >We have a bit of a dilemma here. As you all know, the 4.0.7 branch, on > >which 4.1.0 is currently scheduled to be based on, has branched away a few > >months ago. Some people have expressed concern that releasing 4.1.0 based > >on that branch is not a good idea, because there have been so

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP Module in source dist?

> If you can humor me for the moment and make the assumption that it would > be something the PHP developer group thinks is a valuable addition, is it > mostly a matter of the developers on this list deciding it should be > added? Or is there a more formal process? Should I be addressing email > d

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #13846 Updated: Patch: Use [ ] as shortcut forarray()

> Still readable without problems to me ;) The syntax is ugly -10 from me :) - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Security e-mail address

we were going to set up [EMAIL PROTECTED] at one point with a closed list of recieptients.. mainly core devs and a few QA People who can check out if it is a security problem or not. Dont think this ever happen. Perhaps it would be an idea though - James - Original Message - From: "Rasmu

[PHP-DEV] Fw: results of semi-automatic source code audit

Anyone feel the need to reply to this?? - James - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:59 PM Subject: results of semi-automatic source code audit > /* > * results of semi-automatic source code audit of a > * majority

Re: [PHP-DEV] Feature?

> I want to pass value to only one or more but not to all params. Also this will make the code clearer I think. > Comments are welcome! This is somthing that has been discussed as a probable feature in PHP 5 but for now you could pass an assoc. array to get round the problem. - James -- PHP D

Re: [PHP-DEV] karma request - phpweb

> Hi! I request karma for module phpweb. Am working with jmcastagnetto on > user notes where Voting and "User Moderation" will be implemented. And > will most likely find other things to do, albeit nothing major (yet?). Colin has already done this with the PHP-GTK Manual. - James -- PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] RISC OS port

> There's only a handful of small patches to various files, and a new SAPI > module. Should I post the changes to this list, mail them to someone, or > apply for a CVS account? I don't envisage too many more changes, but > there might be the odd thing now and again if other peoples changes > caus

Re: [PHP-DEV] Email Processors Wanted!!!

> Hi guys, > > This list seems to get a fair amount of spam. Any chance of blocking posts > from non-subscribers. Sure, it would upset the one-time posters, but > surely its not too hard for them to subscribe and unsubscribe. > > > Gavin This isnt an option, please see the archives for previous

Re: [PHP-DEV] Documenting Zend (was: zend_parse_parameters)

> Kinda like the FSF assignment. This is so that we can publish these docs > in books free of charge, without having to run after everybody who > contributed. Don't worry, we don't get a nickel out of it. I dunno what its under now but the Open Documentation License is nice as then main contri

Re: [PHP-DEV] Documenting Zend (was: zend_parse_parameters)

> > > > Perhaps the php-doc guys can set up the basics (I don't have > > time to become a doc guru) so that we at least have somewhere > > to put it, and that might encourage people to write some docs. > > Also, whenever a new API comes along (like zend_parse_parameters) > > it could be put in the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Woah

Just to add my few £0.02 to this discussion :) _() just doesnt make sense to anyone who hasnt used gettext() which tbh is probably the vast majority of the comunity, I have seen _ in the function lists and Zend and Harmuts site and just thought it was a querk somewhere.. _() to me looks like some

Re: [PHP-DEV] microtime and gettimeofday

> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:48:52AM +0200, Alexander Jäger wrote : > > i wanted to do a waiting function and read on php.net, that usleep does not > > work under windows. so i did my own function and got problems with microtime > > and gettimeofday > > does anybody has expiriences that these does

Re: [PHP-DEV] python dictionary-like % (percent) substitution in php (was: Good idea in % (percent) substitutions in string)

- Original Message - From: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "---" <@zend.com> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:51 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] python dictionary-like % (percent) substitution in php (was: Good idea in % (percent) substitutions in string) > I t

Re: [PHP-DEV] bogus bugs...

> If I find bugs that are open, but are fixed, or bogus or whatever, should I > report them somewhere? Yep.. send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], he will be pleased to recieve them :) - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For add

Re: [PHP-DEV] GLIBC maintainer about Stallman

> Whoa, an interesting read. Does this mean you wont be pushing for PHP to be LGPL'd then?? - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail

Re: [PHP-DEV] Setting up RFC

> The work on Zend Engine 2 has now started, _without_ a proper definition of > it. IMHO, that's not the ideal situation, since this could lead to strange > inconsequences, because the precise behaviour is decided during > implementation. Umm what about the white paper that was prepaired before

Re: [PHP-DEV] Setting up RFC

> On the other hand, the latter one could be named 'RFC process', since it > hasn't yet been defined what the heck it is precisely... RFC.. Request For Comments, its as simple as that someone posts a document outlining what they want changed/want to do, calls it an RFC and is litterally making a

Re: [PHP-DEV] Setting up RFC

> > Ive written one or two before, mainly for the release process (I think its > > in CVS under README.realease_process or somthing like that). Id suggest > > people just get on and write them and post them to php-dev where people > > generally read them and make comments. I dont see what there is

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP in a Hyper-secure environment

anychance of writing your complex functions in C? then you can do exectly what you want. - James - Original Message - From: "Howie Oakes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP in a Hyper-secure env

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6

Works perfect for me with IIS5/win2k but becareful of which extensions you use, a lot of extensions are STILL not threadsafe. - James > -Original Message- > From: Phil Driscoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 June 2001 11:02 > To: Liz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subjec

RE: [PHP-DEV] Internal Working -- performance question

> a) Is there a faster way to send data between 2 processes, > that will work with PHP, and is supported by Windows and *nix. How about abstacting it, under Linux use shared mem (should be fastest) if its avalible, other wise use sockets then If that's not avalible use database/file version. -

RE: [PHP-DEV] Command line option for shell scripting [ And some interactive mode issues]

Something along this line which I wanted to do was to turn the time out off for interactive mode as at the moment it times out after 30secs, anyone got any objections if I make that change?? - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [PHP-DEV] extension depending on extension?

> Alright, so what I'm doing is wrapping two libraries from the > Jabber Project (http://www.jabber.org). The first is an > xmlnodes wrapper, similar to DOM but more internalized as > well as some other helper functions, the second is jabber > specific functionality. Here is where it gets t

RE: [PHP-DEV] Need Help!!

> Yes. There is nothing specific in there about compiling the > code under windows. Brian Oh I must be dreaming then when I looked at http://www.php.net/manual/en/install-windows.php#install.windows.build.. Supprising what you imagine isnt it?? :) - James -- PHP Development Mailing List

RE: [PHP-DEV] Need Help!!

> I want to try to fix the character truncation problem when > using an mssql database, but I can't seem to figure out how > to compile PHP under VC 6. I have searched all over the site > for some insight into what to do, but I am still having > problems creating/finding TSRM.mak. Any and a

RE: [PHP-DEV] Bug #7387 Updated: weird problems with unquoted array subscripts

> > ID: 7387 > Updated by: jeroen > Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Status: Assigned > Bug Type: Documentation problem > Operating system: > PHP Version: 4 (any) > Assigned To: jeroen > Comments: Jeroen, Generally when a bug is assigned to someone and you want to work on it then its polite t

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0.6 branch, bug #4630

> David, > > Can you please grab the latest CVS and check if it fixes your > problems. If > it does I think it can be merged into 4.0.6. David, Generally wed be appreciative if someone with AIX would think about joining the PHP QA Team to ensure future versions of PHP also run on the platfor

RE: [PHP-DEV] disktotalspace()

> > >> How do you feel about renaming the existing diskfreespace() > > >> function to disk_free_space() (with an alias for backwards > > >> compatibility)? > > > > > > A warm fuzzy feeling :) Seriously though, it's been discussed in > > > great length, and at least from what I understood, going

RE: [PHP-DEV] disktotalspace()

> > Well, there is no "CVS standard", but rather a standard in the > CODING_GUIDELINES file. However, in this case, I think you can > disregard that, since the function is so similiar (in nature) to the > diskfreespace() function that disktotalspace() makes the most sense, > instead of disk_tota

RE: [PHP-DEV] disktotalspace()

> > Before you add it can you name it properly (To the CVS standard). > > I don't follow you. How is it named improperly, and what is the > CVS standard? http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/php4/CODING_STANDARDS?rev=1.6&content-type=te xt/vnd.viewcvs-markup Derick suggested: diskspace_free and di

RE: [PHP-DEV] disktotalspace()

Before you add it can you name it properly (To the CVS standard). cheers, - James > -Original Message- > From: Jon Parise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 15 May 2001 05:01 > To: Sterling Hughes > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] disktotalspace() > > > On Mon, May 14,

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

> > the readme shold be nuked as it's pretty out of date. > > info's not covered by install.txt should be moved there, IMO. > > One thing I noted when setting my windows stuff up was that there > were various > details in different places, makes it a little more confusing. A > simple HTML > file

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Linux on S/390

Zak, I suggest that one of the QA Team Members signs up for an account, preferably someone who has a decent amount of experiance of debugging on Linux we could then use the system to verify bugs/run RC tests on the server. Any of the QA Team Members/Developers willing to be responsible for this?

[PHP-DEV] RE: NEWS line

Documentation structure from phpdoc. (James Moore) > > -Andrei > * It said 'Winmodem' on the box, but I still feel like I lost. * -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P

RE: [PHP-DEV] Zend API changes

> > > You're not wrong; It's been done and published > > > (http://www.zend.com/apidoc/), and is the base for additional work > > > that I invited people to improve on. > > > >Hey, are the sources for this manual available somewhere? CVS maybe? > > Yep, sure thing; cvs.zend.com, co ZendAPI; R

RE: [PHP-DEV] Zend API changes

> * James Moore wrote: > > And the point of this other than trying to start a flame war was Bjorn? > > I'm not starting a flame war. I just didnt understand what your comments possibly had to do with the Zend API docs. AFIAK they arnt QPL'd (and if they are it doesnt re

RE: [PHP-DEV] Zend API changes

> > There's a good starting point already, people are more than welcome to > > extend it. > > I don't understand why people should work in their spare-time > on a tool which is published under the Zend Licence (which is > similar to QPL). As we know of QPL, all developer's seem to > be equal, b

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Release process

> > > What's the status of the show stoppers list James put up? We > > > should fix as > > > many bugs as we can (at least those which are planned to be fixed > > > in 4.0.6) > > > before branching, to avoid having to synchronize two branches for > > > every bug > > > fix. > > > >Ill go through t

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Release process

> What's the status of the show stoppers list James put up? We > should fix as > many bugs as we can (at least those which are planned to be fixed > in 4.0.6) > before branching, to avoid having to synchronize two branches for > every bug > fix. Ill go through tonight and update list and post t

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6

> >I would be very against this.. to me it seems silly, the current QA Team > >will have to spend 90% of their time running through the (maybe > hundreds) of > >reports rather than testing. It makes more sense to me to try and attract > >more people who know what they are doing to the QA Team rat

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6

http://www.php.net/install its all there under the windows section.. why dont people read the manual?? - James > -Original Message- > From: Eduardo Dominguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 02 May 2001 18:22 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6 > > > >

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6

> Seriously though, win32 is particular hard to do automated testing. > Maybe we could use cygwin for running the test-suite under win32 and at > least be able to use standard *nix tools? It already does run under windows. - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubs

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6

> >Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > I think it's enough to announce it on the PHP mailing list > with a short > > > explanation of what RC means. We don't want the whole world > to download > > the RC. > > > >i would like to spread the news as far as possible > > Let's take it one step at a time. We sho

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6

> At 04:22 PM 5/2/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote: > >I don't see any unusual peak now; We have tons of bug reports all the > >time. IMHO our problem is no longer lack of QA, but lack of developer > >resources to fix bugs. > >I truly think that making RCs effective releases gains nothing. If >

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] COM is screwed up

there are no com tests but I did play with it for Liz with RC3 or 4 for a while and it worked then. (I bet its that god damn COM diff that phanto made I thought he said he had tested it.. I havnt had time to yet but will build and test tonight. - James > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL

RE: [PHP-DEV] Bug #10567: Your PHP 4.05 Zip file is missing 88 bytes!

This seems definiatly to be the case.. (I would build one but on a 56k its going to take a few hours before its upthere) - James > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30 April 2001 23:18 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] Bug #10567:

[PHP-DEV] ODBC Build

Can you please look at the patch in bug http://www.php.net/bugs.php?id=10563 and commit it if its needed/comment on the bug. thanks - James -- James Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.perl.com/search/index.php - we must be doing somthing right -- PHP Development Mailing List <h

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6

> Guys, > > I think that despite the release of 4.0.5 tomorrow we are pretty close to > having an RC1 for 4.0.6. Lots of things have been fixed/added since 4.0.5 > (check the NEWS file). > Can we make a list of things which still need to make it into > 4.0.6 before > we branch? > > Andi K I have

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Crypt salts not random.. (fwd)

> > > In order to avoid this you actually have to call it at completely > > different > > > times, something you can't really guarantee. We should > probably not use > > > the timestamp as the seed (at least not alone), but also take > the pid into > > > account. > > > > > > Zeev > > > > > >

RE: [PHP-DEV] STOP PRODUCTION

K the fix seems to have worked for me too I cant reproduce this any more. - James > -Original Message- > From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 29 April 2001 08:35 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] STOP PRODUCTION > > > Please try the latest Zend CVS. > Also

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Assigned PHP 4 bugs reminder

Can we get it to stop listing bogus reports too. THat will drop the size by a large amount. - James > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Jani Taskinen > Sent: 29 April 2001 08:48 > To: Andrei Zmievski > Cc: Derick Rethans; [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still segments

than just having ini_error being called.. - James > -Original Message- > From: Sean R. Bright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 28 April 2001 19:04 > To: 'James Moore'; 'Liz' > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Up

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still segments

? - James > -Original Message- > From: James Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 28 April 2001 18:46 > To: Liz > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still > segments > > > the php.exe gives an error parsing th

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still segments

the php.exe gives an error parsing the newest browscap.ini file Ill look into that. - James > -Original Message- > From: Liz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 28 April 2001 18:30 > To: Bug Database > Subject: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still segments > > > Yeah, I no

  1   2   >