[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

t know if I would like to see it in production enviroment yet but under Win 2k IIS5 it seems Good. Under NT 4 AFAIK it is terrible for some unknown reasons. If we can get the few win issues sorted then I think maybe then it will be up to product standards under win2k and IIS 5. (I can never seem

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP script source revealed on windows

released in a few hours then more information on this will be made avalible and will be posted in the appropriate places. James -- James Moore PHP Quality Assurance Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: question about this patch release (fwd)

Jani, What is the exact setup of the machines? Do you know or can you find this out. Apache Version, httpd.conf A sample vhost would be good so I can see how the include paths are set. And any other relevant information we can get off them to make it easier to reproduce. Especially any details of

RE: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline

ich could contradict or at least not be compatible with each other, I can see no mention of the jurisdiction that these issues should be resolved in.. James -- James Moore PHP Quality Assurance Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe,

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net\version4\downloads directory gone! How to build on win32 without?

Its in CVS now isnt it. http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/php4/bindlib_w32/ also number.c is now included in PHP. James -- James Moore PHP Quality Assurance Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

RE: [PHP-DEV] ooops, i thought it new one but:

her an upgrade is necessary. James -- James Moore PHP Quality Assurance Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: moshe doron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 27 January 2001 19:30 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] ooops, i thought it new one but: >

RE: [PHP-DEV] ooops, i thought it new one but:

erability without knowing your > > servers setup. It is possible, but personally I wouldn't worry too much > > about it although you should urge your ISP to upgrade to 4.0.4pl1. > > > > Andi > > > > At 08:07 PM 1/27/2001 +, James Moore wrote: > > &

RE: [Fwd: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9094: Microseconds seem to be untrue values]

Ill have to eat my words and find what else could be causeing the problems :) James -- James Moore PHP Quality Assaurance Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /win32 time.c

works now. Ill look and see if theres a way to make it as accurate as the *nix version. James > -Original Message- > From: James Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 February 2001 15:53 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /win32 time

RE: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request

Im intrigued though.. what does inki want to do with a CVS account?? I think inki is a secret MSFT operative sent to introduce bugs into PHP as its kicking ASP's arse :) James > This is certainly one for the archives ;-) > > -Sterling > > > > Full name: Ingmar Heinrich > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Dear Friends & Future Millionaire:

> Top priority for me is that common list operations must not > require manual attention. There were more than 16,000 > different senders on our lists so far. And only a small > fraction of those addresses are subscribed. Do you really > want to approve all those sender add

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #2328 Updated: I would like animated gif support within php.

whats wrong with gd? Although current version doesnt support it there are lots of patched versions avalible. James > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 February 2001 18:46 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #2328 Updat

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #2483 Updated: set_file_buffer return value

cant === sort this one out in php4 James > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 February 2001 18:49 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #2483 Updated: set_file_buffer return > value > > > ID: 2483 > Updated by: jimw > R

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4032 Updated: Major security issue PHP+Apache

Liz, Was this issue fixed and does it still occur? Can you still reproduce it? Thanks James -- James Moore PHP QA Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Liz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 11 February 2001 02:08 > To: Bug Database > Subject: [PHP-DEV

[PHP-DEV] FW: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/midgard .cvsignore ChangeLog INSTALL Makefile.in access.c article.c attachment.c calendar.c config.m4 element.c event.c eventmember.c file.c fudge genentry.pl group.c ho

Thought this should really be brought up on Dev list rather than CVS list but personally I dont think that midgard has a place in the main distributions CVS.. maybe im wrong but if we begin to put all full applications in CVS just because they are useful we are going to bloat. Whats the difference

RE: [PHP-DEV] Midgard (Was: cvs: php4 /ext/midgard .cvsignore...)

> > At 22:11 12/2/2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > >The idea here is that Midgard has a large installed base of > users, all of > > >whom have to run a modified version of PHP. The extension, > albeit rather > > >large at this point, is supposed to provide the basic > functionality in the > > >st

RE: [PHP-DEV] Midgard (Was: cvs: php4 /ext/midgard .cvsignore...)

> > > With the PHP4 version of Midgard, patching is no longer a necessity. > > > It's an ordinary extension like the others. > > > > Perhaps it would be an idea to move it out of the main PHP CVS > (into another > > cvs module) for now and put links on php.net, personally I > would really like > >

RE: [PHP-DEV] Time for 4.0.5?

> Hum, having just contributed to said download size... we've done our > best to > minimize the KLOC, removing some cruft and moving a couple of functions > into > a (separate) library, but we'd be down to stripping comments to go > further... > the only other thing I could suggest is using bzip2

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Problem with strings on Win32

> ** > string(6) "" > > . So, the variable's type and size are set correctly, but not its value. > > I'm using yesterday's CVS on Windows 2000 Professional. Sascha already > checked this on his machine(s) and could NOT reproduce this. Sorry to ask this but your not being stupid and lo

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-PEAR] PEAR issue #2 (pear-dev) vote

(X) pear-users and pear-dev James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9267 Updated: vars are set to "" instead of NULL

> 1) not mysql, mssql > > 2. it means that the mssql_result call failed for some reason, because > false was returned, not an empty string. > > still, the bug should be closed ;-) *Cough* I should really get some glasses ;) *cough* James -- PHP Development Mailing List

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

> RFC: what should their names be in 4.0.5? > > ( ) stay with ctype_alpha() ... > ( ) switch to ctype_isalpha() ... > ( ) switch to ctype_isalpha() ... and have ctype_alpha() aliases > (X) switch to ctype_is_alpha() ... > ( ) switch to ctype_is_alpha() ... and have [Undocumentated] ctyp

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming

> -Original Message- > From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 26 February 2001 09:52 > To: Hartmut Holzgraefe > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming > > > HH>> RFC: what should their names be in 4.0.5?

RE: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request

> Full name: Steph Fox > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ID: sfox > Purpose: Working on php-gtk manual Can someone please add steph and give her karama for php-gtk/docs as shes been helping with parts of the manual (mainly correcting my terrible english.. ;0) Cheers, James -- James

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.5RC1 packaged

You can grab win32 binaries from ftp://ftp.phpuk.org/php_binaries/ James > -Original Message- > From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 13 March 2001 19:52 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-QA] 4.0.5RC1 packaged > > > http://www.php.net/distr

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.5 RC2 Win32 Binaries?

> Any chance in getting the Win32 4.0.5 RC2 binaries built? The > 4.0.5 RC1 binaries did not include crypt() support, so I could > not fully test them on our test server. Ill pop a build up later although I dont know if I can get crypt support in there.. Ill try James -- PHP Development Mail

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #10000: corrupt http_post_vars when using session_start

> Subject: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #1: corrupt http_post_vars when using Whoo 10k bugs.. Hmm is that somthing to be proud of or not?? ;) James -- James Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For a

[PHP-DEV] fastcgi

.5RC4\sapi\fastcgi\fastcgi.c(409) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before ',' D:\php-4.0.5RC4\sapi\fastcgi\fastcgi.c(409) : error C2059: syntax error : ')' Error executing cl.exe. Is this just me being totally stupid and not defining somthing I should or is th

[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0.5 Release & Midgard Problems

ooner too. If nobody objects to this strongly I propose we do this in 24-48 hours and then release 4.0.5 which has been dragging on for a while now. James -- James Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] PHP Web Scripting: http://www.php.net/ PHP QA Team: http://qa.php.net/ PHP-GTK: http://gtk.php.net/ VL-SRM: h

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0.5 Release & Midgard Problems

> Um... > > If I'm not mistaken, the midgaurd extension itself, only provides > functionality to the "midguard" application? Ie, end-users of midguard > will not use the functions and classes exported by the extension, only > midguard will use that functionality? > > If so, I'm not too sure i

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0.5 Release & Midgard Problems

ibuting the latest version of PHP compiled or as source code with midguard so people can go one place and download midguard or midguard can be placed in PEAR but midgard is too bigger project to have in PHP cvs for the two systems release cycles to coordinate well so both are stable at the sam

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.0.5 Release Candidate testing

> > 1. The function array_flip($array) puts one extra zero byte at > the end of > > each element in the return array thus making the result non binary safe. > > I've just fixed it in CVS. How critical is this? does it need to also be in 4.0.5 (sorry Zeev ;)) James -- PHP Development Mailing L

[PHP-DEV] mail.c

I was just reading through mail.c and this stuck out to me as seeming a little strange.. can anyone explain it?? (lines 43-46) #ifdef COMPILE_DL_STANDARD ZEND_GET_MODULE(odbc) #endif Why is it odbc? is this a careless ctrl-c ctrl-v someone has done or should it actually be this? cheers, James

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.0.5 Release Candidate testing

> Zeev's output buffering fix hasn't been committed yet; it's a one-line > change, and it makes the transparent output compression stuff work. MFH it then and we can get 4.0.5 out the door ;) James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re[2]: [PHP-QA] RC6 available!

Sounds like your debugger was built against a different version of PHP (4.0.5RC1 or 4.0.4pl1, kill the loading of the debugger from your php.ini to test and it should not give the error. The zend people will provide a new debugger build against php 4.0.5 when its released im sure. - James > Com

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP-4.0.5-RC6

> test.php >echo $test; > ?> > > http://host/test.php?test=1;2;3 This happens for me too with 4.0.5RC6 and yesterdays CVS. Is this the expected behaviour? shouldnt the ; be %3B (at which point you get the expected output.. I dont think that this is a bug. -James -- PHP Developm

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] PHP-4.0.5-RC6

> Anyone have an idea why this happens? > > Andi Shouldnt the ; be urlencoded (%3B works fine)?? James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP-4.0.5-RC6

> > Yes, that's true. I did ask (couple of times) before > > I committed that patch. And yes, now both & and ; are > > considered as arg separators. > > > > And I'd like to think that it's a feature than bug. ;) > > That would be true, if PHP would be some kind of reference > implementati

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP-4.0.5-RC6

> James, > > You have to be aware that now PHP has such a big user base we need to be > very careful in the changes we make especially when we can be pretty > certain that it might burn quite a lot of people. We can break > compatibility more easily when we have a major release (as from PHP 3 to

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: ; arg seperator

> I disagree, we explicitly document that the arg_separator defaults to & > and that this is the character that separates url arguments. This follows > the original CGI specification. The fact that this is no longer the > accepted standard for this doesn't mean we can just up and change it in a

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: ; arg seperator

Just to reply to myself we are fairly broken here according to rfc 2396 but if you guys think thats acceptable until 4.1 (whenever that might be) then thats fine.. Relavant part of RFC: 2.2. Reserved Characters Many URI include components consisting of or delimited by, certain special cha

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: ; arg seperator

> Same here. I know there's a few things like this out there...I am going > to bed now. If no one else has done it before I wake, I'll start doing > some digging. > > On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote the following to Joey > Smith, PHP...: > > > At 03:18 PM 4/3/2001 -0600, Joey Smith wrot

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] --with-pear[=DIR] patch

> > 4. The CGI version of PHP is always built and installed. > > I think this should be optional. Perhaps optionally disabled.. --without-cgi? James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/sockets sockets.c

> > Everyone, > > Can I merge this into the current RC? This should not cause > any problems. What are we doing with the current release right now? who is having problems and which problems are outstanding?? We have two possible MFH's that people want to do which shouldnt really be included at

[PHP-DEV] RE: changes

> > What are we doing with the current release right now? > > who is having problems and which problems are outstanding?? > > a single compiler warning issue - in ext/standard/exec.h there must be a > declaration of php_Exec: > > int php_Exec(int type, char *cmd, pval *array, pval *return_value);

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.5 modules

> Hi! > > Is there some policy about the inclusion of newly added modules to RC's? > I'ld like to see the dbx module in the 4.0.5 release... > > Cheerio, Marc. I dont think any new code should be added to the Release branch now, although this is a contentious issue but I think its a bit late in

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / TODO-4.1.txt

> Stig Bakken wrote: > > Log: > > here's a preliminary list of stuff for 4.1 > > Is there any timeframe for when PHP 4.1.0 will be released? > > PS: When will PHP 4.0.5 be released? :) Well im not happy with the current state of some bugs in HTTP_AUTH section and waiting for a reply from

RE: [PHP-DEV] Bug #8722 Updated: non blocking sockets reading doesn't work on WIN32

> > ID: 8722 > > Updated by: jmoore > > Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Old-Status: Open > > Status: Assigned > > Bug Type: Sockets related > > PHP Version: 4.0.4pl1 > > Assigned To: jmoore > > Comments: > > > Ill test the patch and commit if it works well. It looks right to me. > > james, thi

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.5, GD 2.0 and the zend.com weekly summary

irm/deny this? > > I'm not bothered either way, but I would like to correct the info > on the weekly summary if it is not going to appear in 4.0.5. > > --Wez. Its not in the branch and thus wont be in the release. - James -- James Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.perl.c

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-WIN] xml with php

> Any guidance would be greatly appreciated, Please dont cross post like this these questions should be sent to php-general. I just got three copies of this in my mailbox which isnt really necessary now is it? - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mai

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.5: Merge Request

> The QA process as it is IS a joke. Without the support from the developers > there aren't any possible ways that it can ever succeed. > It isn't the QA people who fix bugs. They just test and report to > developers > who should FIX those bugs. Some core developers seem to have forget this.. I c

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.5: Merge Request

you should subscribe to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list where discussion about a new bug system is occuring. - James > -Original Message- > From: Stephen van Egmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25 April 2001 17:56 > To: Andi Gutmans > Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf; Zeev Suraski; Jani Taskinen; [EM

[PHP-DEV] RE: 4.0.5: Merge Request

Its doesnt at all :) We are using it as a temporary codename until we can think of a better one. - James > -Original Message- > From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25 April 2001 18:42 > To: James Moore > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still segments

the php.exe gives an error parsing the newest browscap.ini file Ill look into that. - James > -Original Message- > From: Liz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 28 April 2001 18:30 > To: Bug Database > Subject: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still segments > > > Yeah, I no

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still segments

? - James > -Original Message- > From: James Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 28 April 2001 18:46 > To: Liz > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still > segments > > > the php.exe gives an error parsing th

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still segments

than just having ini_error being called.. - James > -Original Message- > From: Sean R. Bright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 28 April 2001 19:04 > To: 'James Moore'; 'Liz' > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Up

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Assigned PHP 4 bugs reminder

Can we get it to stop listing bogus reports too. THat will drop the size by a large amount. - James > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Jani Taskinen > Sent: 29 April 2001 08:48 > To: Andrei Zmievski > Cc: Derick Rethans; [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [PHP-DEV] STOP PRODUCTION

K the fix seems to have worked for me too I cant reproduce this any more. - James > -Original Message- > From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 29 April 2001 08:35 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] STOP PRODUCTION > > > Please try the latest Zend CVS. > Also

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Crypt salts not random.. (fwd)

> > > In order to avoid this you actually have to call it at completely > > different > > > times, something you can't really guarantee. We should > probably not use > > > the timestamp as the seed (at least not alone), but also take > the pid into > > > account. > > > > > > Zeev > > > > > >

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6

> Guys, > > I think that despite the release of 4.0.5 tomorrow we are pretty close to > having an RC1 for 4.0.6. Lots of things have been fixed/added since 4.0.5 > (check the NEWS file). > Can we make a list of things which still need to make it into > 4.0.6 before > we branch? > > Andi K I have

[PHP-DEV] ODBC Build

Can you please look at the patch in bug http://www.php.net/bugs.php?id=10563 and commit it if its needed/comment on the bug. thanks - James -- James Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.perl.com/search/index.php - we must be doing somthing right -- PHP Development Mailing List <h

RE: [PHP-DEV] Bug #10567: Your PHP 4.05 Zip file is missing 88 bytes!

This seems definiatly to be the case.. (I would build one but on a 56k its going to take a few hours before its upthere) - James > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30 April 2001 23:18 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] Bug #10567:

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] COM is screwed up

there are no com tests but I did play with it for Liz with RC3 or 4 for a while and it worked then. (I bet its that god damn COM diff that phanto made I thought he said he had tested it.. I havnt had time to yet but will build and test tonight. - James > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6

> At 04:22 PM 5/2/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote: > >I don't see any unusual peak now; We have tons of bug reports all the > >time. IMHO our problem is no longer lack of QA, but lack of developer > >resources to fix bugs. > >I truly think that making RCs effective releases gains nothing. If >

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6

> >Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > I think it's enough to announce it on the PHP mailing list > with a short > > > explanation of what RC means. We don't want the whole world > to download > > the RC. > > > >i would like to spread the news as far as possible > > Let's take it one step at a time. We sho

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6

> Seriously though, win32 is particular hard to do automated testing. > Maybe we could use cygwin for running the test-suite under win32 and at > least be able to use standard *nix tools? It already does run under windows. - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubs

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6

http://www.php.net/install its all there under the windows section.. why dont people read the manual?? - James > -Original Message- > From: Eduardo Dominguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 02 May 2001 18:22 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6 > > > >

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6

> >I would be very against this.. to me it seems silly, the current QA Team > >will have to spend 90% of their time running through the (maybe > hundreds) of > >reports rather than testing. It makes more sense to me to try and attract > >more people who know what they are doing to the QA Team rat

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Release process

> What's the status of the show stoppers list James put up? We > should fix as > many bugs as we can (at least those which are planned to be fixed > in 4.0.6) > before branching, to avoid having to synchronize two branches for > every bug > fix. Ill go through tonight and update list and post t

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Release process

> > > What's the status of the show stoppers list James put up? We > > > should fix as > > > many bugs as we can (at least those which are planned to be fixed > > > in 4.0.6) > > > before branching, to avoid having to synchronize two branches for > > > every bug > > > fix. > > > >Ill go through t

RE: [PHP-DEV] Zend API changes

> > There's a good starting point already, people are more than welcome to > > extend it. > > I don't understand why people should work in their spare-time > on a tool which is published under the Zend Licence (which is > similar to QPL). As we know of QPL, all developer's seem to > be equal, b

RE: [PHP-DEV] Zend API changes

> * James Moore wrote: > > And the point of this other than trying to start a flame war was Bjorn? > > I'm not starting a flame war. I just didnt understand what your comments possibly had to do with the Zend API docs. AFIAK they arnt QPL'd (and if they are it doesnt re

RE: [PHP-DEV] Zend API changes

> > > You're not wrong; It's been done and published > > > (http://www.zend.com/apidoc/), and is the base for additional work > > > that I invited people to improve on. > > > >Hey, are the sources for this manual available somewhere? CVS maybe? > > Yep, sure thing; cvs.zend.com, co ZendAPI; R

[PHP-DEV] RE: NEWS line

Documentation structure from phpdoc. (James Moore) > > -Andrei > * It said 'Winmodem' on the box, but I still feel like I lost. * -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Linux on S/390

Zak, I suggest that one of the QA Team Members signs up for an account, preferably someone who has a decent amount of experiance of debugging on Linux we could then use the system to verify bugs/run RC tests on the server. Any of the QA Team Members/Developers willing to be responsible for this?

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

> > the readme shold be nuked as it's pretty out of date. > > info's not covered by install.txt should be moved there, IMO. > > One thing I noted when setting my windows stuff up was that there > were various > details in different places, makes it a little more confusing. A > simple HTML > file

RE: [PHP-DEV] disktotalspace()

Before you add it can you name it properly (To the CVS standard). cheers, - James > -Original Message- > From: Jon Parise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 15 May 2001 05:01 > To: Sterling Hughes > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] disktotalspace() > > > On Mon, May 14,

RE: [PHP-DEV] disktotalspace()

> > Before you add it can you name it properly (To the CVS standard). > > I don't follow you. How is it named improperly, and what is the > CVS standard? http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/php4/CODING_STANDARDS?rev=1.6&content-type=te xt/vnd.viewcvs-markup Derick suggested: diskspace_free and di

RE: [PHP-DEV] disktotalspace()

> > Well, there is no "CVS standard", but rather a standard in the > CODING_GUIDELINES file. However, in this case, I think you can > disregard that, since the function is so similiar (in nature) to the > diskfreespace() function that disktotalspace() makes the most sense, > instead of disk_tota

RE: [PHP-DEV] disktotalspace()

> > >> How do you feel about renaming the existing diskfreespace() > > >> function to disk_free_space() (with an alias for backwards > > >> compatibility)? > > > > > > A warm fuzzy feeling :) Seriously though, it's been discussed in > > > great length, and at least from what I understood, going

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0.6 branch, bug #4630

> David, > > Can you please grab the latest CVS and check if it fixes your > problems. If > it does I think it can be merged into 4.0.6. David, Generally wed be appreciative if someone with AIX would think about joining the PHP QA Team to ensure future versions of PHP also run on the platfor

RE: [PHP-DEV] Bug #7387 Updated: weird problems with unquoted array subscripts

> > ID: 7387 > Updated by: jeroen > Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Status: Assigned > Bug Type: Documentation problem > Operating system: > PHP Version: 4 (any) > Assigned To: jeroen > Comments: Jeroen, Generally when a bug is assigned to someone and you want to work on it then its polite t

RE: [PHP-DEV] Need Help!!

> I want to try to fix the character truncation problem when > using an mssql database, but I can't seem to figure out how > to compile PHP under VC 6. I have searched all over the site > for some insight into what to do, but I am still having > problems creating/finding TSRM.mak. Any and a

RE: [PHP-DEV] Need Help!!

> Yes. There is nothing specific in there about compiling the > code under windows. Brian Oh I must be dreaming then when I looked at http://www.php.net/manual/en/install-windows.php#install.windows.build.. Supprising what you imagine isnt it?? :) - James -- PHP Development Mailing List

RE: [PHP-DEV] extension depending on extension?

> Alright, so what I'm doing is wrapping two libraries from the > Jabber Project (http://www.jabber.org). The first is an > xmlnodes wrapper, similar to DOM but more internalized as > well as some other helper functions, the second is jabber > specific functionality. Here is where it gets t

RE: [PHP-DEV] Command line option for shell scripting [ And some interactive mode issues]

Something along this line which I wanted to do was to turn the time out off for interactive mode as at the moment it times out after 30secs, anyone got any objections if I make that change?? - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [PHP-DEV] Internal Working -- performance question

> a) Is there a faster way to send data between 2 processes, > that will work with PHP, and is supported by Windows and *nix. How about abstacting it, under Linux use shared mem (should be fastest) if its avalible, other wise use sockets then If that's not avalible use database/file version. -

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6

Works perfect for me with IIS5/win2k but becareful of which extensions you use, a lot of extensions are STILL not threadsafe. - James > -Original Message- > From: Phil Driscoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 June 2001 11:02 > To: Liz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subjec

Re: [PHP-DEV] md5sum() patch

shouldnt it be file_md5 if we are sticking with out namespace convention. - James - Original Message - From: "Chris Newbill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PHP DEV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 5:57 AM Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] md5sum() patch > Nahh I think md5_file() isn'

Re: [PHP-DEV] The opposite of ===

!== - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PHP-DEV] set_time_limit() bug - pending for PHP 4.1.0

could this be similar to the engine=on/engine=off thing that we had quite a while ago?? Or is it due to global rather than local settings being overridden in set_time_limit? - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.1.0 Final RC

> www.php.net/~zeev/php-4.1.0RC3.tar.gz Lets get this bitch out the window :) Release on thurs if nothing else big comes up? - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contac

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.1.0 Final RC

Win32 build with several sapis (apache, isapi and ts) and extensions all build in debug mode available from: http://phpuk.org/~james/php-4.1.0RC3-win32.zip - James > > > www.php.net/~zeev/php-4.1.0RC3.tar.gz > > Lets get this bitch out the window :) Release on thurs if nothing else big > comes u

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.1.0 Final RC

> Can you please build the sapi for Apache2? > thanks > -Jobarr It wont load for me.. might but my build or something else.. has anyone had it working on win32 yet?? - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comman

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.1.0 Final RC

> James Moore wrote: > > It wont load for me.. might but my build or something else.. has anyone > > had it working on win32 yet?? > > AFAICS, there is no (working) workspace in the PHP_4_0_7 branch to > build the sapi/Apache2Filter for Win32. I can build it (I j

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] 4.1.0 Final RC

> At 10:23 20.11.2001 +0000, James Moore wrote: > > > James Moore wrote: > > > > It wont load for me.. might but my build or something else.. has anyone > > > > had it working on win32 yet?? > > > > > > AFAICS, there is no (working) works

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0 Final RC QA Status

Win32 Builds, Apache, IIS, CGI work, Apache2 doesnt but works in latest CVS (segfaults on requests but thats a minor fix.) All modules Ive built and tested work (that is the major ones). - James - Original Message - From: "Zak Greant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0 Final RC QA Status

> On November 21, 2001 06:55 am, Jani Taskinen wrote: > > I think we should be testing the pre-compiled binaries which will > > later on become the release for win32 platforms. As we have seen many > > times before, there have been build-problems in the release which > > were not caught by tests.

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0 Final RC QA Status

> > I'm all for testing windows builds, especially if anyone wants to chuck > the Sablatron extension my way as well. > > Karl ext/sablatron is no longer existant, you need to port to ext/xslt instead. (Perhaps we should write a wrapper libaray to help people who are using ext/sablatron for now

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0 Final RC QA Status

> If it's any use to you, I bought a licence for Wise Install Builder solely > for the purpose of building the PHP windows installation stuff. I chose the > Wise software because it seemed significantly more capable than the > InstallShield stuff. Anyway, since it was bought for the job, I'd be mo

  1   2   >