writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
> developer is a trade-off you're going to have to make for ANY of the
> frameworks out there.
>
hi,
all php frameworks have overheads which you don't have to worry about.
those overhead codes are ther
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
developer is a trade-off you're going to have to make for ANY of the
framework
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
wrote:
> haliphax wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
>> discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
>> writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
>> dev
Jason Norwood-Young wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
developer is a trade-off you're going to have to m
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity
Jason Norwood-Young wrote:
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overh
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> haliphax wrote:
>>
>> Framework = Overhead (when compared to vanilla PHP). Period. I'm not
>
> by vanilla do you mean vanilla from lussimo? [http://getvanilla.com/] ?
You know damn well I didn't. :)
--
// Todd
--
PHP General Mailing List
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Framework = Overhead (when compared to vanilla PHP). Period. I'm not
by vanilla do you mean vanilla from lussimo? [http://getvanilla.com/] ?
You know damn well I didn't. :)
I'd love to lol - but really n
This one time, at band camp, Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, etc etc.
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:35 -0400, Gabe wrote:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, etc etc.
>
OK, from m
-
> From: Gabe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 12:36 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] PHP Frameworks - Opinion
>
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to
> use for application development? There seems t
There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots and
lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
Satyam
- Original Message -
From: "Gabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 6:35 PM
Subject: [PHP] PHP Framework
Satyam wrote:
There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots and
lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in the
near future and would like t
At 10:46 PM +0100 8/1/06, Colin Guthrie wrote:
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in
the near future and would like to think Zend would be a good horse
to back, but the fact no-one here has mentioned it
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:44:28 +0200
"Satyam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots and
> lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
I would be very skeptical of any "suggestions" because only someone
who tried multiple frameworks would b
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:35 -0400, Gabe wrote:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, etc etc.
>
> Thoughts?
Steve Turnbull wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:35 -0400, Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:40 +0100, Steve Turnbull wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:35 -0400, Gabe wrote:
> > What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> > application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> > but I'm not sure which one's are the mos
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 18:17 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 10:46 PM +0100 8/1/06, Colin Guthrie wrote:
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
snip.
I own Zend Professional, but don't use it (not good or bad).
snip.
An IDE is not a framework. it's an
Robert Cummings wrote:
[chop]
An IDE is not a framework, it's an IDE :)
Cheers,
Rob.
I think Rob is being unduly modest - correct me if I am wrong but he is
the core developer of the InterJinn php framework ->
http://interjinn.com - it's been out there for a while now (read:
robust, fully
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 04:15 +0200, rich gray wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > [chop]
> > An IDE is not a framework, it's an IDE :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rob.
> >
> I think Rob is being unduly modest - correct me if I am wrong but he is
> the core developer of the InterJinn php framework ->
>
What about CakePHP and Code Igniter?
I know working with Code Igniter easier than CakePHP, but CakePHP is more
capable than Code Igniter.
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 04:15 +0200, rich gray wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
[chop]
An IDE is not a framework,
Hidayet Dogan schreef:
What about CakePHP and Code Igniter?
I know working with Code Igniter easier than CakePHP, but CakePHP is
more capable than Code Igniter.
Hi,
Lately frameworks have become a real *hype*. Currently, there are more
than 40 frameworks out there, and new ones are being re
"Gabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, et
--=neXtPaRt_1154507404
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Personally, I think that the community at the Zend Framework is doing a
> pretty good job. Everything is coded very well, with a lot of
> possibilities to extend things to your personal needs (if nessecary).
Tony Marston wrote:
"Gabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
Thoughts?
Sounds like it's just personal preference.
Hello,
on 08/01/2006 01:35 PM Gabe said the following:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, etc etc.
>
> Thou
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there, but
I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed, secure, etc
etc.
Thoughts?
I echo others in th
Matt Todd wrote:
In my experience with the other frameworks (primarily Wasp, CakePHP,
Symfony, eZ Components, and Zend Framework), I've found that I was not
satisfied with the quantity of low-quality code they advocate. I have
a high standard for code quality, readability, maintainability, and
(m
2006/4/27, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> A funny PHPClasses article...
>
>
> http://www.phpclasses.org/blog/post/52-Recommended-PHP-frameworks.html
One thing I understood after hitting my head many times to a wall is that "a
good idea can be, and should be, explained in just three line
Robert Cummings wrote:
A funny PHPClasses article...
http://www.phpclasses.org/blog/post/52-Recommended-PHP-frameworks.html
I find it telling that the guy who runs the PHP Classes site only uses
his own code *lol*. Oh btw, the article says virtually nothing useful
about frameworks, but it
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 17:49 +0100, Petr Smith wrote:
> >
> > Can anyone point me to a good php MVC framework?
> What about http://www.symfony-project.com/ ?? Anyone using it?
>
There is also a relatively new application framework, out of Africa,
called KINKY. http://avoir.uwc.ac.za/projects/nex
Hi,
I need to select a PHP framework for a small project about 20-25 pages (but
expected to grow in the future). I was looking at the comparison chart at
http://www.phpframeworks.com/.
After browsing through some forums seems like CodeIgniter is the popular
option. *** But I really like event dri
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Jerome Covington wrote:
> I was specifically curious if there are frameworks which use the convention
> of passing config objects to functions/methods in the same way that
> contemporary JS libraries like jQuery do.
We use Zend Framework along with its MVC frame
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 18:17 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 10:46 PM +0100 8/1/06, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> >I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
> >
> >I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in
> >the near future and would like to think Zend would be a goo
Colin Guthrie wrote:
Satyam wrote:
There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots
and lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in the
near
karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
> Tony Marston wrote:
>> "Gabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
>>> application development? There seems to be a number of them out
>>> there, but I'm not sure w
Jochem Maas wrote:
Stut wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
I'll have it ready for you next week, what kind of license do you want?
One license to kill to go please.
006.5 your lic is in the post. and while I'm at it can I port an obscure
OS to the hardware of your choice during
Jochem Maas wrote:
I'll have it ready for you next week, what kind of license do you want?
One license to kill to go please.
-Stut
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Stut wrote:
> Jochem Maas wrote:
>> I'll have it ready for you next week, what kind of license do you want?
>>
>
> One license to kill to go please.
006.5 your lic is in the post. and while I'm at it can I port an obscure
OS to the hardware of your choice during my lunch break?
>
> -Stut
--
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
>
> Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
> framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool features like
> "Inversion of Control", "Dependency Injection" etc.
Sounds similar to the service sy
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:50 -0400, Gabe wrote:
> Gabe wrote:
> > What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> > application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> > but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> > secure, et
> Too bad there isn't a skeleton sort-of system that you essentially then
> just plug in the modules that you want/need to "flesh" it out. Then
> you'd have your own customized framework for each app that is developed
> and keeps *all* of the modules relevant to that app. Nothing extra
> wou
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 18:08 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
> >> Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
> >> framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool features like
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:50 -0400, Gabe wrote:
Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 18:08 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
framework in Java called Spring which has
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
>> Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
>> framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool features like
>> "Inversion of Control", "Dependency Injection" etc.
>
> So
Paul Scott wrote:
Too bad there isn't a skeleton sort-of system that you essentially then
just plug in the modules that you want/need to "flesh" it out. Then
you'd have your own customized framework for each app that is developed
and keeps *all* of the modules relevant to that app. Nothing e
> I see that there are a few different Universities in Africa supporting
> that framework. How active is the developer community? How long has
> KINKY/Chisimba been around?
>
The AVOIR Project has been going for about 2 years now. KINKY and
KEWL.NextGen were the first products of that projec
I'm not going to comment on the rest of the stuff that was said, which
is why I snipped it. I'm not a purist when it comes to OO at all. But I
do have to say that while iterators in ruby are amazingly powerful that
leave me going wow.. that is so cool.. The thought of how they could be
abused and t
Kilbride, James P. wrote:
> I'm not going to comment on the rest of the stuff that was said, which
> is why I snipped it. I'm not a purist when it comes to OO at all. But I
> do have to say that while iterators in ruby are amazingly powerful that
> leave me going wow.. that is so cool.. The thought
dation for
any framework but instead try to pimp phpclasses. From what I gathered
you haven't even actually tried anywhere in the vicinity of 10% of the
frameworks in existence and yet you feel obliged to write a commenatary
called "Recommended PHP Frameworks" in which you don't eve
o recommendation for
> any framework but instead try to pimp phpclasses. From what I gathered
> you haven't even actually tried anywhere in the vicinity of 10% of the
> frameworks in existence and yet you feel obliged to write a commenatary
> called "Recommended PHP Frameworks
gt; >>
> >> http://www.phpclasses.org/blog/post/52-Recommended-PHP-frameworks.html
> >
> > I've read it before... it was crud. You provide no recommendation for
> > any framework but instead try to pimp phpclasses. From what I gathered
> > you have
> You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
>
I agree with Rob! I am a botanist. I have never been trained in Computer
Science, as far as "industry" is concerned, I am not qualified to turn
on a PC. Fortunately for me, I am also a geek. My PHP experiences
started when ru
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Paul Scott wrote:
>
>> You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
>>
>
> I agree with Rob! I am a botanist. I have never been trained in Computer
> Science, as far as "industry" is concerned, I am not qualified to turn
> on a PC. Fortunately
ochem Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 August 2006 12:37
To: Paul Scott
Cc: Robert Cummings; Manuel Lemos; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Paul Scott wrote:
>
>> You mean we should all be happy that so much
Sent: 03 August 2006 12:37
> To: Paul Scott
> Cc: Robert Cummings; Manuel Lemos; php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
>
>
> PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
>
> :-)
>
> Paul Scott wrote:
>>> You mean we should all be happy that
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:43 +0200, Arno Kuhl wrote:
> I'm not so sure if the botanist wasn't saying in a rather confused way that
> he was playing on the same side as PHPClasses, even if he did profess to be
> in the other team. Did he say he was rolling his own (in a way only
> botanists can do)
On Wed, August 2, 2006 9:50 am, Gabe wrote:
> Gabe wrote:
>> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
>> application development? There seems to be a number of them out
>> there,
>> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively
>> developed,
>> secure, etc et
tried anywhere in the vicinity of 10% of the
>>> frameworks in existence and yet you feel obliged to write a commenatary
>>> called "Recommended PHP Frameworks" in which you don't even recommend a
>>> framework. Additionally somehow while pimping phpclasse
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 07:37 AM Jochem Maas said the following:
> PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
>
> :-)
Erm
Paul Scott is a good contributor of the PHPClasses site:
http://www.phpclasses.org/browse/author/145758.html
Several of his classes have been nominated to the PHP Programming
Innovation A
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:17 AM Jochem Maas said the following:
> Arno Kuhl wrote:
>> I'm not so sure if the botanist wasn't saying in a rather confused way that
>> he was playing on the same side as PHPClasses, even if he did profess to be
>> in the other team. Did he say he was rolling his own (in
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the following:
> The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
> place was :
>
> "Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
> we have a never ending choice of PHP database abstraction layers that
>
mework but instead try to pimp phpclasses. From what I gathered
> >>> you haven't even actually tried anywhere in the vicinity of 10% of the
> >>> frameworks in existence and yet you feel obliged to write a commenatary
> >>> called "Recommended PHP Fram
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:42 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the following:
> > The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
> > place was :
> >
> > "Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:43 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
>
> Hello,
>
> on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the follo
2006/8/3, Manuel Lemos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
on 08/01/2006 01:35 PM Gabe said the following:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, a
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Jens Kleikamp wrote:
Matt Todd wrote:
Because of this, I determined to build my own framework. This was a
few months ago, and Canvas[1] was the result of my labor. I produced
this framework while working on numerous projects at the university I
work at. This allowed me to
> documentation and source code fully deduce the usefulness of something.
> I bow before you.
Be seriuos. Nobody needs to actually use any framework to see that it is
not suitable for your needs, when you can just browse the source code
and documentation. It would be insane to try all PHP fram
t using my own
> >> solutions for my own purposes.
> >
> > Aaaah, so you are trully a genius to be able to at a glance of
> > documentation and source code fully deduce the usefulness of something.
> > I bow before you.
>
> Be seriuos. Nobody needs to actually use any fram
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
>>> The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
>>> place was :
>>>
>>> "Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
>>> we have a never ending choice of PHP database abstraction
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:52 PM Kilbride, James P. said the following:
>> I admit I have not expressed myself clearly. What I meant is
>> not that people should be disallowed to implement alternative
>> APIs, but rather that they should not feel the need to do it.
>>
>> In the Java world, JDBC is
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:23 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
> >>> The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
> >>> place was :
> >>>
> >>> "Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 05:18 PM Martin Alterisio said the following:
>> Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
>> of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what suits
>> best for you:
>>
>> http://www.phpclasses.org/blog/post/52-Recommended-PHP-fr
"Robert Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:23 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
>> >>> The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
>> >>> pla
es.
>>> Aaaah, so you are trully a genius to be able to at a glance of
>>> documentation and source code fully deduce the usefulness of something.
>>> I bow before you.
>> Be seriuos. Nobody needs to actually use any framework to see that it is
>> not suitab
>>> I bow before you.
> >> Be seriuos. Nobody needs to actually use any framework to see that it is
> >> not suitable for your needs, when you can just browse the source code
> >> and documentation. It would be insane to try all PHP frameworks that
> >>
you mean by introduction. Usually there is a summary
that goes in the RSS feed that is no longer than 3 or 4 paragraphs.
I mean all the things you need to say before actually getting into what you
want to talk about. Just take for example the post about "recommend php
framework", look how much
Hello,
on 08/05/2006 11:47 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
This is necessary to escape wildcards characters that should be taken
literally in patterns. It is needed to implement the auto-complete
feature using SQL conditions of type field LIKE 'typed-text%'. If
typed-tex
ly there is a summary
>> that goes in the RSS feed that is no longer than 3 or 4 paragraphs.
>
>
> I mean all the things you need to say before actually getting into what you
> want to talk about. Just take for example the post about "recommend php
> framework", lo
Dhanushka Samarakoon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to select a PHP framework for a small project about 20-25 pages (but
> expected to grow in the future). I was looking at the comparison chart at
> http://www.phpframeworks.com/.
>
> After browsing through some forums seems like CodeIgniter is the popul
Thanks :-)
Tried searching the archives, but maybe I was not using the correct search
terms.
Will give it another try.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Dhanushka Samarakoon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need to select a PHP framework for a small project about 20-25 pages
> (bu
Hi Guys,
I have been using cakephp for a while as a development framework.
I'm also thinking for a while to use another framework and leave cakephp
alone (too much babbling.. it takes too much time until you get to the code
itself..), now I have decided to move on and here comes my question.
Do
I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
engine other than smarty.
I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does anyone
have any recommendations for one that is easy to pick up and run with?
Finally, does anyone have any suggestions for a go
In my experience with the other frameworks (primarily Wasp, CakePHP,
Symfony, eZ Components, and Zend Framework), I've found that I was not
satisfied with the quantity of low-quality code they advocate. I have
a high standard for code quality, readability, maintainability, and
(more generally) sem
Hi,
> ...
I doubt you'll get a reasoned bunch of suggestions, more a religious
war... :-) Still, I like PEAR components.
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 graphing: RGraph - www.rgraph.net (updated 8th November)
Lots of PHP and Javascript code - http://www.phpguru.org
--
PHP General Mailing List (http:/
I doubt you'll get a reasoned bunch of suggestions, more a religious
war... :-) Still, I like PEAR components.
Exactly.
You have to visit the websites of frameworks, comparison articles, etc
and find out for yourself which one suits you best.
Currently, if I get to decide, I choose ZF
Which framework to use is more of a religious war than anything, but I would
recommend Symfony. It has a nice architechture and is very extendable.
++Tim Hinnerk Heuer++
http://www.ihostnz.com
2009/11/13 Sudheer Satyanarayana
>
> I doubt you'll get a reasoned bunch of suggestions, more a rel
Don't forget to attach the message to the list.
Regarding the frameworks, which of them, for your opinion, will take the
fastest time to learn and get into code?
Thanks
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Graham Christensen <
graham.christen...@iamgraham.net> wrote:
> Look into Doctorine &|| Prope
Qcodo and symfony both have an ORM layer that can do that. They will
provide/return and basic set of classes that interact with those tables.
Bastien
Sent from my iPod
On Mar 22, 2009, at 11:52, Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have been using cakephp for a while as a development framewor
"Nitsan Bin-Nun" wrote in message
news:d47da0100903220910q7bb66706s6255f0fc89b98...@mail.gmail.com...
> Don't forget to attach the message to the list.
>
> Regarding the frameworks, which of them, for your opinion, will take the
> fastest time to learn and get into code?
Generally speaking if s
> Finally, does anyone have any suggestions for a good PHP database
> abstraction library?
PHP5 has PDO for database abstraction; check the manual for information on
that one. If you're stuck with PHP4 then PEAR has several offerings:
http://pear.php.net/package/DB/
http://pear.php.net/package/MDB
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Jay Paulson wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
engine other than smarty.
PEARs HTML_Template_IT... or mix it with other HTML_Template*
I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does anyone
have any recom
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, KermodeBear wrote:
http://pear.php.net/package/DB/
This one has no more development, besides bug fixes. It was merged to
create the one below.
http://pear.php.net/package/MDB2/
--
21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0 users, load average: 0.92, 0.37, 0.18
-
Hello,
on 06/30/2006 11:38 AM Jay Paulson said the following:
> I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
> engine other than smarty.
>
> I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does anyone
> have any recommendations for one that is easy to
Jay Paulson wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
engine other than smarty.
I like ezTemplate. (E_STRICT)
I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does anyone
have any recommendations for one that is easy to pick up and run wi
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 08:37, Jens Kleikamp wrote:
Jay Paulson wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
engine other than smarty.
I like ezTemplate. (E_STRICT)
YOU DO?? I hope it's changed then from the one used on a site I'm now
Manuel Lemos wrote:
on 06/30/2006 11:38 AM Jay Paulson said the following:
I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
engine other than smarty.
I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does anyone
have any recommendations for one that is e
101 - 200 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
