On Jun 7, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> There are several features in PHP that are "not implemented [yet]", including
> roughly 13 DOM classes. Well, they are sorta (but not really) implemented.
>
> How should we deal with this?
Just my 2¢ but if something is not (yet) implemented,
On Sep 9, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 13:20, Brandon
Savage wrote:
This documentation already exists in that section.
I'll amend my diff to reference this section. Something along the
lines of
"PHP 5's object model also significantly changes the way ob
On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Moacir de Oliveira > wrote:
Patch Explanation
Outstanding explanation. Gave me some ideas for how to improve my own
code.
Ted Stresen-Reuter
On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:18 PM, Niel Archer wrote:
Why is this a problem? SVN revision numbers are incremental as well.
I don't see the difference between tying a translation to CVS-123456
and SVN-123456?
I'm not particularly familiar with CVS (fortunately), so someone
please
correct me if I'm
On Jul 9, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
Create an md5 hash on the version you are translating and use that to
"uniquely" identify it. If the EN version is modified by even a
single
space, the hash will change and you'll know the files are out of
sync. What
you won't know is just
On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:24 AM, Philip Olson wrote:
How are CVS Revision numbers used today? The best feature of po is
that translation text is marked as 'fuzzy' when the main text is
changed. If we could do the same with our docbook translation files
whenever the en file is committed then we
On Jul 5, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Peter Beverloo wrote:
With the documentation moving to PO files soon (as well as changes
around the PhD editor GSoC project)
I follow this list pretty closely but I must have missed this (rather
important) news item. When will the documentation move to PO files?
On Jul 5, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Peter Cowburn wrote:
For what it's worth, I'd rather see "kick-ass awesome" in there than
it being left out. :)
I agree!
Ted S-R
http://tedmasterweb.com
On Jun 15, 2009, at 6:26 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 1:18 AM, G. T. Stresen-Reuter wrote:
Hi,
I'm not a big contributor (in fact, haven't done much more than
test PhD and send some feedback) but I do work with the raw
documentation quite a bit.
I've foun
Hi,
I'm not a big contributor (in fact, haven't done much more than test
PhD and send some feedback) but I do work with the raw documentation
quite a bit.
I've found some apparent irregularities in how classes are documented.
For example, the tidy.html has both procedural and OO versions
Hi,
On May 1, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Moacir de Oliveira wrote:
Another example of theme would render the funcindex.xml file from
the PHP documentation source.[4]
[4] - http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47651
I have one or two XSL stylesheets that were able to produce a complete
list of "keyword
really does
understand how it should be done.
Also, it should be noted that for people who aren't able to render the
JS (such as screen readers), accessibility is maintained.
1+ for using this approach...
G. T. Stresen-Reuter
Web: http://tedmasterweb.com
Blog: http://tecnotertulia.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/tedmasterweb
guess is the latter...
Thanks in advance.
G. T. Stresen-Reuter
Web: http://tedmasterweb.com
Blog: http://tecnotertulia.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/tedmasterweb
On Dec 24, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
No need for the rendered docs to be XML parsable, if you need to do
some magic against the docs then use the DocBook XML.
Good point and in fact, I've changed my mind on the need for totally
valid XHTML...
I'll keep watching the list for
On Dec 23, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
There are several cases which we simply cannot fix
Do you have one documented? I do a lot of XSLT-type stuff and it
seems to me that if we're starting with valid XML (.manual.xml) and
XHTML is in many respects HTML XMLified that it shoul
Hi,
On Oct 3, 2008, at 8:51 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 15:42, Brandon Savage
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some of the challenges: I'm using a Mac and the PEAR package gave
me some
trouble. Once I resolved that, everything went smoothly. However,
I'm not
I don't
On Oct 2, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 13:06, Anthony Bedford
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
has anyone out there written a script that will help reformat an
XML doc to
the PHP doc style? I have a large(ish) table in particular that I
don't want
to r
I'm trying to build the PHP docs locally but configure.php is failing
with the following error:
==
Loading and parsing manual.xml... failed.
ERROR (/Users/tedsr/phpdoc2/phpdoc/en/install/pecl.xml:147:21)
&url.pecl.submit.
-
On Aug 22, 2008, at 1:39 AM, Jean-Sébastien Goupil wrote:
That looks like really nice for now.
I have just few comments about the new design.
Personally, the first thought I had was "Mmm, it looks like a
little less professional, but looks like the new era of web".
And I spent just 10 minut
On Jul 28, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 13:14, Richard Quadling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How are these appearing on the list?
[snip] I thought you had to be a
subscriber?
Nope. But you do have to respond to the challenge/response mail.
I have no idea h
On Jul 24, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Brett Bieber wrote:
pear uninstall __uri/phd
pear install doc.php.net/phd-beta
BINGO! Thanks for the lessons (and for PhD)!
Ted S-R
Getting there... see below... Are you sure you want to go down this
path with me? Your help is greatly appreciated, but if I poke around
enough I'll eventually get it installed...
On Jul 24, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 23:37, G. T. Stresen-R
On Jul 24, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I'm pretty sure I'm running either 0.2.6 or 0.2.7... Any way I can
find out
for sure?
phd -V gives you the installed version.
/usr/local/php5/bin/phd -V
[23:35:40] PhD version: 0.2.3
[23:35:40] Copyright (c) 2008 The PHP Documentation
On Jul 24, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
Hi all!
Next minor release of PhD, 0.3.0, has been released!
For a full release history, see http://doc.php.net/phd/
To upgrade from previous releases:
pear upgrade doc.php.net/phd-beta
Hi Hannes,
I'm looking forward to trying out the
On Jun 4, 2008, at 12:23 AM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
Ben Dilts wrote:
I can't seem to find information on how to make complete XML files of
the reference docs. The en/reference/*/functions/*.xml files are not
actually valid XML, as they don't have a DOCTYPE and don't define all
the custom XML en
Hi,
First, this is only my second time writing to the list so just a
quick thanks to those of you who actively participate, translate, and
maintain the PHP documentation. It's an amazing project and I can
appreciate the amount of work that goes into it.
I'm writing because I maintain a st
26 matches
Mail list logo
