You are right. file_uploads is a boolean and has nothing to do with
the allowed max upload size.
The misleading paragraph was accidentally introduced when trying to
unify how PHP parses mb, kb, b and whatelse as part of ini
values (9 years ago!).
See
I've updated the docs and removed the reference to the option being an
integer, you should see the change when the next build happens :-)
On 10 September 2013 07:22, Christian Stoller stol...@leonex.de wrote:
You are right. file_uploads is a boolean and has nothing to do with
the allowed max
Hi.
I have a question about the PHP ini directive “file_uploads” (see
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ini.core.php#ini.file-uploadshttp://www.php.net/manual/en/ini.core.php%23ini.file-uploads).
Sorry, if this is not the correct mailinglist to ask this question, but I
think the documentation is not
Hello,
The mailing list is generally here for people working on documentation and
it treats issues such as broken mirror, broken builds, etc.
But since we're already here, there are three php ini settings you are
looking at in terms of file uploads. The one you mentioned,
file_uploads[2] has in
(sorry, I forgot to CC the list :( )
The mailing list is generally here for people working on
documentation and it treats issues such as broken mirror,
broken builds, etc.
Okay, thanks for the hint.
But since we're already here, there are three php ini settings
you are looking at in terms
But the docs mentions that file_uploads accept integer values, too.
It says: When an integer is used, the value is measured in bytes.
The documentation here is indeed misleading/wrong.
file_uploads is represented internally as a boolean:
http://lxr.php.net/xref/PHP_5_5/main/php_globals.h#130
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Chris Wright daveran...@php.net wrote:
But the docs mentions that file_uploads accept integer values, too.
It says: When an integer is used, the value is measured in bytes.
The documentation here is indeed misleading/wrong.
file_uploads is represented
Hi,
I'm new to the list, so I hope this is the right place to ask my question,
if not, my excuses!
Currently I'm working on a PHP extension for Ceph (
https://github.com/ceph/phprados/https://github.com/ceph/phprados/tree/oo-interface).It's
not yet ready to be adopted by PECL.
I would like to
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Jeroen Moors jeroen.mo...@fluoline.netwrote:
Hi,
I'm new to the list, so I hope this is the right place to ask my question,
if not, my excuses!
Currently I'm working on a PHP extension for Ceph (
First off all, you need to understand how the documentation works. Please,
take a look at those pages before getting your hands dirty:
http://doc.php.net/php/dochowto/
https://wiki.php.net/doc/builds
https://wiki.php.net/doc/phd
https://wiki.php.net/doc/editor
After reading those, you can start
I would like to contribute to PHP documentation, how do I get started?
Drak
Hello,
I'm interested in helping in the translation into Portuguese.
Thank you.
Excuse me, but I couldn't understand what you are referring to. We only work
on PHP documentation, nothing else. On the other hand, next time you want to
write to the list, please press the Reply all button, otherwise you'll
write only to a single person (as it happened with me).
Yours
Hello everybody.
Can anyone take a look at this update, please? It's the first time I've done
a doc update and I'm not sure if I did it correctly. Thanks in advance!
Monnier, Braian Iván.
--- constants.xml 2010-03-29 03:55:15.0 -0400
+++ constants.xml.new 2010-12-27 08:49:05.0
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 17:09, Braian Iván Monnier x1v...@php.net wrote:
Hello everybody.
Can anyone take a look at this update, please? It's the first time I've done
a doc update and I'm not sure if I did it correctly. Thanks in advance!
Monnier, Braian Iván.
The patch looks good, but
Thank you for you quick response, Daniel. I changed listed because I found
it a little confusing and repeating, but now that you tell me that, I
realize you are right. Thank you again!
Monnier, Braian Iván.
On 5 January 2011 19:22, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 22:44, Joris van de Sande
joris.devpl...@gmail.com wrote:
The documentation for the SimpleXMLElement class only has a link to
the count method in the class synopsis. I have discoverd that this is
caused by the methodname value in the xml files for the class methods.
Hi,
With the release of v1.9.0 of IBM_DB2 extension, one documentation change
is required for db2_pconnect() API.
Attached patch file contains the changes. The change log corresponding to
this documentation can be seen at:
http://pecl.php.net/package/ibm_db2/1.9.0
Can anyone commit this
Hi Ambrish,
On 16 September 2010 16:58, Ambrish Bhargava1 abhar...@in.ibm.com wrote:
With the release of v1.9.0 of IBM_DB2 extension, one documentation change is
required for db2_pconnect() API.
Attached patch file contains the changes. The change log corresponding to
this documentation
Thanks...
Regards,
Ambrish Bhargava
Email: abhar...@in.ibm.com
If It's Going to Be, It's Up to Me
The documentation for the SimpleXMLElement class only has a link to
the count method in the class synopsis. I have discoverd that this is
caused by the methodname value in the xml files for the class methods.
Other classes (such as ArrayObject) use the format
classname::methodName as the
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:30 +0200, Philip Olson wrote:
Looks good, and you now have the karma to commit. Welcome to the PHP
Documentation team :)
Thanks :)
A few minor issues that come to mind:
- The phrase providing the perfect hashing function ... perfect? ;)
As Daniel said, a perfect
On 6/18/2010 4:09 AM, Lorenzo Castelli wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:30 +0200, Philip Olson wrote:
Looks good, and you now have the karma to commit. Welcome to the PHP
Documentation team :)
Thanks :)
A few minor issues that come to mind:
- The phrase providing the perfect hashing
Hi,
I recently created a new extension on PECL called chdb, and I would like
to commit the corresponding documentation.
This would be my first contribution to the PHP documentation, and I lack
phpdoc karma.
You can find the two patches to 'doc-base' and 'en' attached.
Lorenzo Castelli
Index:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Lorenzo Castelli wrote:
Hi,
I recently created a new extension on PECL called chdb, and I would like
to commit the corresponding documentation.
This would be my first contribution to the PHP documentation, and I lack
phpdoc karma.
You can find the two
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 18:30, Philip Olson phi...@roshambo.org wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Lorenzo Castelli wrote:
Hi,
I recently created a new extension on PECL called chdb, and I would like
to commit the corresponding documentation.
This would be my first contribution to the
Hi Philip,
The documentation editor is about to be available for production purpose.
There are always a few issus with it :
* When an anonymous user edit a new file from a folder witch doesn't exist into
his language, the editor try to commit this new folder. I must find a solution
with this
Okay, could we get documentation of the error message, PHP has encountered
an Access Violation at ...?
-Original Message-
From: Philip Olson [mailto:phi...@roshambo.org]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 13:57
To: Marshall Burns
Cc: phpdoc@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] RE: Access
Hello,
I had been working on the documentation for the Gmagick extension (hosted on
PECL) and it's finally done.
The archive of the documentation itself and the patch file can be accessed
at:
http://sites.google.com/site/gawsai/
Could someone please help me to commit this to docs CVS or even
Hi All
I spoke to Steph at PHPNW about helping out with the docs. There are a
few areas I would love to start work on right away (initially SPL) and
I just wanted to find out what the best way of contributing was? I'm
familiar with DocBook etc.
Cheers
John
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:46 AM, John Le Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I spoke to Steph at PHPNW about helping out with the docs. There are a
few areas I would love to start work on right away (initially SPL) and
I just wanted to find out what the best way of contributing was? I'm
Hi again
I want to create an Examples section within SPL for clear use cases
and examples for each of the classes / interfaces within the SPL. The
idea is that it seems that a lot of the current explanation is
targeted very strongly at software engineers post their CS degree. The
great majority
Also
Would I be able to look at breaking up 'Patterns' (Within classes and
objects PHP5) and giving each pattern it's own page? And then perhaps
adding a few more on top of Singleton and Factory...
Would there be any opposition to this?
Cheers
John
2008/11/26 John Le Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I want to create an Examples section within SPL for clear use cases
and examples for each of the classes / interfaces within the SPL. The
idea is that it seems that a lot of the current explanation is
targeted very strongly at software engineers post their CS degree. The
great majority of PHP
Sounds good to me!
I will press on with that unless we get any opposition...
Cheers
J
2008/11/26 Philip Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I want to create an Examples section within SPL for clear use cases
and examples for each of the classes / interfaces within the SPL. The
idea is that it seems
Hi All
I think that each class/interface needs to have an 'Overview' section
to give a high level view of it's purpose, some use cases, and a
simple example. This could be the same example that is on the examples
page for the class/interface. This should list each method with a link
the the
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 18:08, Philip Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to create an Examples section within SPL for clear use cases
and examples for each of the classes / interfaces within the SPL. The
idea is that it seems that a lot of the current explanation is
targeted very strongly
Please don't top-post :)
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 19:02, John Le Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I think that each class/interface needs to have an 'Overview' section
to give a high level view of it's purpose, some use cases, and a
simple example. This could be the same example that is
On Nov 26, 2007 9:29 PM, Keryx Web [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again!
I tried the site and Google to no avail. Here is my question:
Can I get all updates to the manual as an RSS or ATOM feed? Or do I have
to implement my own?
You mean a changelog of some sort so you can know which docs have
Keryx Web wrote:
Can I get all updates to the manual as an RSS or ATOM feed? Or do I have
to implement my own?
http://news.php.net/group.php?group=php.doc.cvsformat=rss
Jakub Vrana
Hi again!
I tried the site and Google to no avail. Here is my question:
Can I get all updates to the manual as an RSS or ATOM feed? Or do I have
to implement my own?
Lars Gunther
Attached is a tarball with documentation for the SVN extension.
configure.xml, constants.xml and reference.xml are complete, but only
one function is documented. I'll be working on finishing the rest later.
If someone could review these and commit them into the repository (or
give me a CVS
Attached is a tarball with documentation for the SVN extension.
configure.xml, constants.xml and reference.xml are complete, but only
one function is documented. I'll be working on finishing the rest
later.
If someone could review these and commit them into the repository (or
give me a CVS
- Whitespace is always one space, not two
Except in examples. Then use the pear standards:
http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.php
S
Philip Olson wrote:
Welcome to the documentation team! I went through your patch and
nitpicked every little detail in an effort to help you (and others)
write almost perfect commit worthy documentation. Most are small
problems that come with experience:
Thank you for the detailed and helpful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edward Z. Yang wrote:
- Whitespace is always one space, not two
I need to keep a close eye on this, since I don't use vim or emacs and
my editor is set at four spaces. Nonetheless, I can't find a spot where
I used two spaces. Could you point it
- Use example.com for all example urls
I did it for one and not the other. Will do. Does everything need
to be
anonymized? (I literally took my own repository and copied over the
output)
Yeah, for something like this the output would instead be made up to
look similar to reality and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philip Olson wrote:
Yeah, in a patch. But is this really the only extension you will document?
Do you ever get an itch to fix/enhance something else, or even fix a typo
on occasion? Committing to CVS is great fun... do it! :-)
Having a CVS
On 10/10/2006 08:13 PM, Maxim Antonuk wrote:
Hello
Sorry for my bad English
In Russian Manual You Say
http://ua2.php.net/manual/ru/features.connection-handling.php
Замечание: Вся последующая информация применима к версиям 3.0.7 и НИЖЕ.
it translate Note: The following applies to 3.0.7 and
I've cheked the the permissions, and you still have phpdoc write access. So
go ahead and commit the documentation yourself
Nuno
- Original Message -
At one point in time, I had phpdoc cvs commit access,
I guess I do not any more... (username bradmssw).
I've got a fairly substantial
Ok, now I just need to figure out why the heck I had
checked out phpdoc as 'cvsread' instead of my user...
Sorry about that, think I had one too many energy drinks
last night.
-Brad
Nuno Lopes wrote:
I've cheked the the permissions, and you still have phpdoc write access.
So go ahead and
At one point in time, I had phpdoc cvs commit access,
I guess I do not any more... (username bradmssw).
I've got a fairly substantial documentation update that
needs to be committed to phpdoc for mcve.
I've attached a .tar.gz of the mcve subdirectory of
phpdoc/en/reference/
with the exact
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Thilo Raufeisen wrote:
Hi,
I?ve created a documentation about my gnupg-pecl-extension and compiling
works so far.
But my CVS-Account (traufeisen) doesn?t have karma for committing.
Can someone please give me karma for the documentation?
Access denied:
Hi,
I´ve created a documentation about my gnupg-pecl-extension and compiling
works so far.
But my CVS-Account (traufeisen) doesn´t have karma for committing.
Can someone please give me karma for the documentation?
Access denied: insufficient karma
(traufeisen|phpdoc/en/reference/gnupg)
Hi Randy,
Thanks for the information, Gabor. How many moderators do you have? We
are very seriously considering implementing a similar workflow.
Well, I don't have an exact answer, but you can guess by looking at the
mails archived at http://news.php.net/php.notes. Look for @php.net
senders,
Hi All,
My name is Randy Nielsen
and I am a documentation manager at Macromedia. I mostly work on ColdFusion,
JRun, and Flex, but along the way, I have inherited responsibility for our
documentation commenting system, which we call LiveDocs (http://livedocs.macromedia.com/ ). This
system
Hi Randy,
My name is Randy Nielsen and I am a documentation manager at Macromedia.
I mostly work on ColdFusion, JRun, and Flex, but along the way, I have
inherited responsibility for our documentation commenting system, which
we call LiveDocs (http://livedocs.macromedia.com/ ). This system is
Randy Nielsen wrote:
Hi All,
My name is Randy Nielsen and I am a documentation manager at
Macromedia. I mostly work on ColdFusion, JRun, and Flex, but along the
way, I have inherited responsibility for our documentation commenting
system, which we call LiveDocs
Dear...
The on-line manual is very confusing (or wrong)
regarding stristr().
Right at the top it says:
stristr -- Case-insensitive strstr()
I would interpret this as strstr() being
case-insensitive, and not stristr() as the case is (no pun intended).
I noticed this when reading the danish
Hello,
That var is documented.
It is stated in the docs to use something like:
list($user, $pw) = explode(':',
base64_decode(substr($_SERVER['HTTP_AUTHORIZATION'], 6)));
I've checked the sources, and this behaviour is not true in PHP 5, as PHP5
automatically handles the 'HTTP_AUTHORIZATION'
Dear Sir/Madam,
On the documentation about basic authentication techniques
(url: http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.http-auth.php)
there is reference to the index HTTP_AUTHORIZATION of the
$_SERVER super global variable. This is in a sub-note for
users of the IIS-ISAPI version of PHP (I'm using
There are last 50 open PHP documentation bugs! It's still more than
enough but there used to be 150... If we want to close the rest we need
some experts, mainly for CHM and IIS.
These bugs are open for CHM:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=20966
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=26179
Hi,
I was reading the documentation on the web about mysql functions, and it
occours to me that on your page about mysql_fetch_array you says nothing
on the cursor repositioning. I think it could be useful documenting it.
Thanks a lot for you site, it is really a source of help.
Cristina Attori
On Thursday 02 September 2004 13:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the documentation on the web about mysql functions, and it
occours to me that on your page about mysql_fetch_array you says nothing
on the cursor repositioning. I think it could be useful documenting it.
Thanks a
On Sat Apr 17, 2004 at 12:1944AM +0200, ali wrote:
shouldn't the fink commands be apt-get install foo ?
Note the install command.
As I wrote in my initial mail, I took the commands from a mail on
pear-dev without any testing, because I don't own any Apply
hardware. But after browsing the
Attached you'll find patch for the Documentation HOWTO that adds some
basic instructions for installing OpenJade and friends on MacOS X.
Those instructions have been posted on [EMAIL PROTECTED] a while
ago and I only put them into DocBook. (I don't own Apple hardware, so I
can't test them
Hi Martin,
Feel free to commit the patch!
Nuno
- Original Message -
Attached you'll find patch for the Documentation HOWTO that adds some
basic instructions for installing OpenJade and friends on MacOS X.
Those instructions have been posted on [EMAIL PROTECTED] a while
ago and I
Hi Martin,
shouldn't the fink commands be apt-get install foo ?
Note the install command.
Ali
Am Fr, den 16.04.2004 schrieb Nuno Lopes um 20:09:
Hi Martin,
Feel free to commit the patch!
Nuno
- Original Message -
Attached you'll find patch for the Documentation HOWTO that
The notice on the documentation download page stating
that non-window versions of the documentation will be
coming soon, has been there for weeks now.
Has there been any progress towards getting that
documentation online (for download)?
If wget worked for me, I'd use it...
We have been
Hello,
The notice on the documentation download page stating
that non-window versions of the documentation will be
coming soon, has been there for weeks now.
Has there been any progress towards getting that
documentation online (for download)?
If wget worked for me, I'd use it...
Thanks
Hello!
I would like to translate in Romanian some of the PHP docs.
How should I proceed?
Thank You!
Hello dear PHP documentation team,
I suggest you add in the documentation that
1. nl2br() does *NOT REPLACE* newlines with break elements but inserts a break
element before every newline.
2. nl2br() *CHANGES THE ORIGINAL STRING* and returns a reference to it, but
does not create a new
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote:
Hello dear PHP documentation team,
I suggest you add in the documentation that
1. nl2br() does *NOT REPLACE* newlines with break elements but inserts a break
element before every newline.
From the documentation:
nl2br -- Inserts
Am Sonntag, 22. Dezember 2002 12:17 schrieb Derick Rethans:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote:
Hello dear PHP documentation team,
I suggest you add in the documentation that
1. nl2br() does *NOT REPLACE* newlines with break elements but inserts a
break element
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Erica Douglass wrote:
I was using PHP with some other people today, and one of them found out
that I had access to the manual to update it. He said he had experienced
the following problem:
Their dev server was running an older version of PHP (4.0.x). Their
production
I was using PHP with some other people today, and one of them found out
that I had access to the manual to update it. He said he had experienced
the following problem:
Their dev server was running an older version of PHP (4.0.x). Their
production server was running 4.2.x. He was using the
I have constructed documentation for the MCVE extension. It
is available for download at http://www.mcve.com/docs/phpapi.pdf
Please advise me on what needs to be done to get the relevant
info into the PHP documenatation. If nothing else, at least
have the phpdocs remove the experimental status,
The easiest would be if you could apply for a cvs account and put these
docs into PHP's docbook framework. See http://www.php.net/cvs-php.php
-Rasmus
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Brad House wrote:
I have constructed documentation for the MCVE extension. It
is available for download at
I've already got a php CVS account, though I'm not
sure if I have permission to the phpdoc areas or
not. My CVS username is bradmssw.
Anyhow, I'm not even familiar with the way PHP
documentation is structured. If someone could
point me in the right direction, I'd appreciate
it.
Thanks.
-Brad
No, you didn't have phpdoc cvs karma, but you do now. To get started,
check the phpdoc tree out from cvs.php.net and have a look at the README
and the HOWTO docs that come with it. I actually don't worry about
setting up all the tools locally myself, I just try to get the docbook-xml
correct.
Hello,
as part of the first PHP Annual Bughunt
(http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.qaarticle=5565) there are also
a few bugpacks with Documentation problems. It would be nice if some of
you could check them out. (It's about packs 14-19).
Derick Rethans
PHP QA Team
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 03:23:32PM +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
you could check them out. (It's about packs 14-19).
give me 14 and 15 to start with.
Jan
--
Q: Thank Jan? A: http://geschenke.an.dasmoped.net/
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 03:23:32PM +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
you could check them out. (It's about packs 14-19).
give me 14 and 15 to start with.
Done :)
---
Did I help
Thanks, I've corrected it in CVS. It will show up on the site in
a couple of days.
Sander
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:57:31PM -0700, Andrew Thompson wrote:
pg_field_type
(PHP 4 = 4.2.0)
In the description for pg_field_type below, there's a
note saying that it used to be called
Thanks, I've corrected it in CVS. It will show up on the website
in a couple of days.
Sander
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:57:31PM -0700, Andrew Thompson wrote:
pg_field_type
(PHP 4 = 4.2.0)
In the description for pg_field_type below, there's a
note saying that it used to be called
pg_field_type
(PHP 4 = 4.2.0)
In the description for pg_field_type below, there's a
note saying that it used to be called pg_field_type().
If it's called pg_field_type NOW, that doesn't make
sense, does it? Maybe you meant it used to be called
pg_fieldtype() ?
--Drew
Relevant section:
Colin Viebrock wrote:
Can the documentation folks use release tags like the dev folks do? For
instance, when PHP 4.2.0 is release, make a PHP_4_2_0 branch in CVS for the
docs. [...]
just some quick points:
- when you do documentation, even for your own extension,
you usually do not know
just some quick points:
- when you do documentation, even for your own extension,
you usually do not know in advance which version you stuff
will be in
it is hard to decide where to set the tag in the doc branch
unless you have your code and docs really in sync
it is even
I'm not really involved in the documentation side of things, so take what I
say with a grain of salt.
It seems to be that a lot of the time, the documentation on the website is
out of step with the latest release of PHP. In almost all of these cases,
PHP is at version X, and the online docs are
It seems to be that a lot of the time, the documentation on the website is
out of step with the latest release of PHP. In almost all of these cases,
PHP is at version X, and the online docs are describing version X+1, or
the
CVS version.
Case in point: the DOMXML extension is now much
Something like this problem was discussed on our meeting at Stuttgart.
We came up with the idea of including a Changelog on all function
pages where it is needed. We can't freeze the docs for specific PHP
versions as we often discover undocumented features let's say, from
PHP 4.0.0... That
In an IRC chat with Derrick, it was brought up that getting translators to
work with CVS branches could possibly make my idea undoable (i.e., it's
asking too much of people to learn how to use branches properly).
Personally, I disagree, but that can be discussed here as well.
An itelligent
If read the build file, there are some error messages about malformed
structure of untranslated (English) files. But the English version is
available,
as generated on April 11. What's happening? Thanks.
Just sync your language-snippets.ent with en/
slawek-
hello,
i found a small
mistake in your documentation that might confuse some none PHP experts like
me.
it's in the chapter
on mysql_fetch_array concerning the constants that can be passed to the
result_type parameter. the MSQL_ prefix is wrong, it should be
MYSQL_
The second optional
: [PHP-DOC] documentation of
mysql_fetch_array
hello,
i found a small
mistake in your documentation that might confuse some none PHP experts like
me.
it's in the
chapter on mysql_fetch_array concerning the constants that can be passed to
the result_type parameter. the MSQL_
mentioned
earlier...
Goba
- Original Message -
From:
Gabor Hojtsy
To: Jung, Bernhard ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 6:03
PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] documentation of
mysql_fetch_array
This bug has been fixed, and acorrect
copyof
that page
Hi !
I have a suggestion: I'de like to see the comments to the documentation
beginning from the newest contributions first, i.e. why not order them in
reverse order ???
And I noticed that the docuemntation of the XSLT module is incorrect for the
win-32 version. The .dll to use is simply
I have a suggestion: I'de like to see the comments to the documentation
beginning from the newest contributions first, i.e. why not order them in
reverse order ???
Sometime in the future, we will introduce a vote based ordering,
like at http://gtk.php.net/ ;)
And I noticed that the
Gabor Hojtsy writes:
Eric Tonicello wrote:
I have a suggestion: I'de like to see the comments to the documentation
beginning from the newest contributions first, i.e. why not order them in
reverse order ???
Sometime in the future, we will introduce a vote based ordering,
like at
Please, could you tell me why manual_en.chm's Contents and Index are
broken? For example, there is no mention about xslt functions neither
in Contents nor in Index. But Search gives results on xslt.
GH Can you provide us a list of some pages missing from the CHM?
GH All pages are put in
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
