RE: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Matt Benz
Their recorded efforts don't do anything for me. The same is true of the Sovines. Their cassette, Owner Operator was okay, But their live show kicks ass. [Matt Benz] Well, in our defense, that cassette was done so we could get used to our studio, see what worked, how to record

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Steve Gardner
I agree with Jeff. Often the live recording captures a bands excitement more than a studio record. I know some people who hate live albums and I just can't figure out why. If I am going to try out a group, and they have tons of CDs in their section, I'll always choose the live album. As much

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Masonsod
In a message dated 3/29/99 2:36:11 PM !!!First Boot!!!, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bands where their best album is the live one: Backsliders, IIIrd Tyme Out, Jerry Lee Lewis, the Who, Guy Clark, Graham Parker, and from bootlegs Richard Thompson, Gillian Welch, Loudon Wainwright III, V-Roys

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Will Miner
Steve Gardner wrote: Bands where their best album is the live one: You left out the greatest of all: The Allman Brothers (Live at the Fillmore East). An odd one is Robert Earl Keen, who I have always loved live. Something is missing on his studio records, but, oddly enough, I like his

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread RoCogs
In a message dated 99-03-29 09:35:27 EST, Steve writes: As much as I love Del McCoury and his new band, I don't think he has ever captured the sheer brilliance and energy of their live set on record. I pray for a live album. The band I see each year at Merlefest is way superior to the one

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Carl Abraham Zimring
Excerpts from internet.listserv.postcard2: 29-Mar-99 Re: Better Live? by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thast is SURELY and opinion statement, because IMHO, "Live at Leeds," while a great album, is surely not the best thing The Who ever put out. That would be the Who's RxR Circus version of &q

RE: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Jon Weisberger
I know Doyle Lawson cleans up at the table, In fact I have heard that he does better at the record table than anywhere else. Is this same thing also true for other acts? Do most Bluegrass bands do better at the table than through paid label royalties? Well, sure, for two reasons: 1) the

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Jerry Curry
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Elena Skye P.S. I also happen to adore "Deeper Shade Of Blue." I think it's a stellar studio album for Del. To use my one "I agree" quote for the weekwell, I agree. As a matter of fact, that CD kept me company all the way to work this

Steve/Del in Chicago, was == Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread KATIEJOM
Hi all, Sorry if any of this has been posted, have been off P2 for a few days. Saw Del/Steve et al while in Chicago. They played at The Vic, which is a big old theater with all the seats pulled out. Nice idea except when most of the folks are drunk and smoking like chimneys. The single mic

Re: Steve/Del in Chicago, was == Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Stick
Steve looked very dapper in his gray button-down wool vest and plaid cap. Looks like the McCoury's are affecting Steve's grooming habits ;-)) Now in the Borders show at D.C. Steve was in a Black T-shirt with the white letters "The Beatles". Sorta neat. Stick

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Steve Gardner
You left out the greatest of all: The Allman Brothers (Live at the Fillmore East). What do I look like to you? Some damn hippie? :^) -- == Steve Gardner * Sugar Hill Records Radio Promotion [EMAIL PROTECTED] * www.sugarhillrecords.com

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Steve Gardner
While I have some sympathy for Steve's POV, I'd like to add that there are fine songs out there that simply sound superior in-studio. I didn't say every live recording is better than every studio recording. Steve Earle's, for instance, is far inferior to everything he's done since. I just

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Tar Hut Records
I agree. I think, for example, that Kiss's "Alive 2" is far better than, say, "Lick It Up" Hello everyone. -Original Message- From: Steve Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: passenger side [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday, March 29, 1999 3:33 PM Subject: Re: Better Live?

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Steve Gardner
I'm sorry now that I didn't combine these posts into one email. Slogging through digest are kinda cumbersome... - Elena Skye P.S. I also happen to adore "Deeper Shade Of Blue." I think it's a stellar studio album for Del. That is a great album...but it still doesn't even come close to

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Bob Soron
At 3:29 PM -0500 on 3/29/99, Steve Gardner wrote: While I have some sympathy for Steve's POV, I'd like to add that there are fine songs out there that simply sound superior in-studio. I didn't say every live recording is better than every studio recording. Steve Earle's, for instance, is far

RE: Better Live?

1999-03-29 Thread Larry Slavens
Since the general consensus seems to be that, at least for some acts, live music *is* better, let me tell about these killer tapes that I have. . . g Larry

Better Live?

1999-03-28 Thread Jeff Wall
How come some acts, usually the Alt Country, Bluegrass, etc, etc, sound so much better live than they do on disc, and others, Big name rock, Country, etc sound so much better on disc than they do live. With zero experience in the studio, Is it that difficult to capture the spirit or energy

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-28 Thread meshel
Jeff Wall: How come some acts, usually the Alt Country, Bluegrass, etc, etc, sound so much better live than they do on disc, and others, Big name rock, Country, etc sound so much better on disc than they do live. With zero experience in the studio, Is it that difficult to capture the spirit

RE: Better Live?

1999-03-28 Thread Jon Weisberger
I think it's hard to come up with general rules here. The studio can be a pretty dead place, but there have been some mighty fine, spirited, *exciting* studio albums made. Recording with minimal overdubbing can sometimes result in a livelier album, but on the other hand, the Lonesome River

RE: Better Live?

1999-03-28 Thread Jeff Wall
Dunno much about outside of bluegrass, but record table money in bluegrass is a lot more than gravy; it can be half the take or more. Big bluegrass acts can do $1200 and up at the table. I know Doyle Lawson cleans up at the table, In fact I have heard that he does better at the record table

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-28 Thread Joe Gracey
Jeff Wall wrote: How come some acts, usually the Alt Country, Bluegrass, etc, etc, sound so much better live than they do on disc, and others, Big name rock, Country, etc sound so much better on disc than they do live. If it is a relatively unknown act live, you tend to overlook slop

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-28 Thread Jeff Wall
At 08:40 PM 3/28/99 -0600, Gracey wrote: Touring at the $500-$1000 a night level is not very much fun unless you are in your twenties, single-ish, and ready for anything. On the other hand, this is why I am 48 and look 84. Come on Joe, you don't look a day over 80. well maybe a day, but not

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-28 Thread Joe Gracey
Jon Weisberger wrote: Nashville studios rarely spend an hour trying to get one lick from anybody, never mind the rhythm guitarist; the guys who do most of the work there don't *need* an hour to get a lick right, which is why they're in such demand. A lot more of that stuff than you'd think is

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-28 Thread Debnumbers
Jeff, Donna Jane called me and I'm meeting her for lunch tomorrow. I'm picking up your new DBT CD from her tomorrow and will express mail it. Can't have you out there on a boat without some kickass redneck music g Deb Sommer

Re: Better Live?

1999-03-28 Thread Debnumbers
Whoops! Sorry, private to Jeff. Anyone interested in review copies of the new Drive-By Truckers CD -- I'll be glad to forward the requests to the non- email, technophobe Patterson or I think you can send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and someone will answer it. But the band is one the road in