Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-26 Thread Joe Gracey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joe Gracey writes: .One example I have always found particularly grating was the Dead's vocals, which are like fingernails on chalkboards to me, but which apparently don't bother their fans. I find Dylan's early stuff to be engaging, his later stuff to

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-25 Thread john friedman
I'm chiming in midstream, so I'm not really sure where this thread has been or eventually went, but Dylan has his "own thing" and for that alone he should be revered. I mean Celine Dion has a great voice, but she still sucks. Occassionally, I forget that Dylan actually *did* have a genuinely

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-25 Thread TCMNjx
Joe Gracey writes: .One example I have always found particularly grating was the Dead's vocals, which are like fingernails on chalkboards to me, but which apparently don't bother their fans. I find Dylan's early stuff to be engaging, his later stuff to be almost painful, vocally...

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-24 Thread Joe Gracey
Tom Ekeberg wrote: Carl W.: As a footnote to our discussion, see the new issue of the Atlantic, including an article arguing that Dylan changed pop music more than any other single figure, "including Sinatra, Elvis or the Beatles." Of course. He single handedly made it all

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-24 Thread Jerry Curry
On Sat, 24 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: really isn't all that good. And while we're goin' down that roadEmmylou on lead these days isn't all that appealing, yet as backup/harmony is quite nice. Oh, that's open to a serious rebuttal, but we are talking about subjective opinions.

RE: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-24 Thread Tom Ekeberg
His Royness: Tom Ek. wrote: Of course. He single handedly made it all right not to know how to sing, not to know how to play Bob knew how to sing and knew how to play. Still does. Everything is true in some sense, false in some sense, meaningless in some sense, true and false in some

RE: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-24 Thread Roy Kasten
Tomness writes: Seeing the sense in which Bob Dylan don't know how to sing shouldn't be too hard. Seeing the sense in which Bob Dylan don't know how to play harmonica should be a no brainer. Ah, if I only had a brainIn what sense does Bob not know how to sing? He doesn't know how

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-24 Thread Joe Gracey
Tom Ekeberg wrote: Seeing the sense in which Bob Dylan don't know how to sing shouldn't be too hard. This is what I actually disagree with. Not being able to sing very well and not knowing how to sing are two different things. I think Dylan made amazingly effective use of a very

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-24 Thread KATIEJOM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Flat Out Worst Singer that is horrible but does not spoil the music in any way, shape, or form - Neil Young = Nicely put! best, Kate

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-24 Thread Tom Ekeberg
At 15:26 24.04.99 -0500, you wrote: Tom Ekeberg wrote: Seeing the sense in which Bob Dylan don't know how to sing shouldn't be too hard. This is what I actually disagree with. Not being able to sing very well and not knowing how to sing are two different things. Okay. That's what I

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-24 Thread JKellySC1
In a message dated 4/24/99 3:25:09 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I also noticed that he didn't have the strongest voice in the world. However, he figured out strategies for evading those problems and became a great singer. I would beg to differ as the King got into

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-24 Thread David Cantwell
At 05:30 PM 4/24/99 EDT, you wrote: where what I believe was his last televised concert he sang "Unchained Melody" accompanying himself on the piano. It is one of the most emotional and powerful musical moments I have ever seen. He looks like hell, but that voice is strong and perfect. It

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-24 Thread JKellySC1
In a message dated 4/24/99 4:50:39 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But it makes me cry precisely because his voice CAN'T do it anymore, which isn't so suprising since he's like only a few weeks away from being dead. He can't hit the high notes at all, or the low ones

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-24 Thread John Kinnamon
I'm sort of surprised by Joe's reference to Willie and Waylon as examples of singers with deficient voices. Townes I'll buy, but to my ears, both Waylon and Willie have great instruments. Curiously, though, of the three only Townes can deliver a song or a phrase right to the center of me and

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-24 Thread Joe Gracey
John Kinnamon wrote: I'm sort of surprised by Joe's reference to Willie and Waylon as examples of singers with deficient voices. Townes I'll buy, but to my ears, both Waylon and Willie have great instruments. Willie doesn't have a "big" voice, although it can be loud if he wants to. he's a

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-23 Thread cwilson
As a footnote to our discussion, see the new issue of the Atlantic, including an article arguing that Dylan changed pop music more than any other single figure, "including Sinatra, Elvis or the Beatles." (No mention of Der Bingle.) Read and discuss (I haven't,

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-23 Thread Tom Ekeberg
Carl W.: As a footnote to our discussion, see the new issue of the Atlantic, including an article arguing that Dylan changed pop music more than any other single figure, "including Sinatra, Elvis or the Beatles." Of course. He single handedly made it all right not to know how

Re: single most influential, cont.

1999-04-23 Thread David Cantwell
At 09:36 PM 4/23/99 +0200, Tom wrote: Of course. He single handedly made it all right not to know how to sing, not to know how to play and still be a big star. I have no comment. Just wanted to say how great it was to see a Tom Ekeberg post! --david cantwell