On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:21:58PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Hello fellow smart hosters,
>
> I've been running this way for 3 years now because I could never figure
> out how to wildcard "everything else". Here's the top of my transport
> file (a very small portion of it):
Three years you
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Steve Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am testing a new entry in my header_checks file:
/^Return-Path:.*mjhunter=aurora\.edu*/DISCARD From Address
Rejected 018
Sorry for the wrapping above. PCRE right? You don't need the second
"*", so the following shoul
Security Admin (NetSec) wrote:
One of my network devices seems to have issues with its hostname:
"Unexpected error from e-mail server(state=3): 504 5.5.2 : Helo
command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname."
Appears in my event log of the device when it tries to send logs to my Postfix
ga
Thank you Sahil, and Noel, works beautifully!
> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 22:14:24 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org> Subject: Re: E-mail "alias"> > Dov
> Oxenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > Sorry to be a bother, but another
> newbie que
Steve Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am testing a new entry in my header_checks file:
>
>/^Return-Path:.*mjhunter=aurora\.edu*/DISCARD From Address
> Rejected 018
Sorry for the wrapping above. PCRE right? You don't need the second
"*", so the following should work:
/^Retur
Dov Oxenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to be a bother, but another newbie question - in my main.cf, when
> creating the entry for "virtual_alias_maps =" do I have to prepend the
> path value with "hash:?" or do I just put the path to the virtual_alias
> file?
It doesn't have to be has
In my post below the question mark in the "hash:?" was a typo
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: RE: E-mail "alias"Date: Tue, 5 Aug
2008 22:05:23 -0400
Sorry to be a bother, but another newbie question - in my main.cf, when
creating the entry for "virtual_alias_maps =" do I have to pr
Sorry to be a bother, but another newbie question - in my main.cf, when
creating the entry for "virtual_alias_maps =" do I have to prepend the path
value with "hash:?" or do I just put the path to the virtual_alias file?
Thanks!
Dov
> A virtual_alias_maps entry should do what you want. Note
Security Admin (NetSec) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of my network devices seems to have issues with its hostname:
>
> "Unexpected error from e-mail server(state=3): 504 5.5.2
> : Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified
> hostname."
>
> Appears in my event log of the device when it tri
One of my network devices seems to have issues with its hostname:
"Unexpected error from e-mail server(state=3): 504 5.5.2 :
Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname."
Appears in my event log of the device when it tries to send logs to my Postfix
gateway server. Is there a filter
I am testing a new entry in my header_checks file:
/^Return-Path:.*mjhunter=aurora\.edu*/DISCARD From Address Rejected
018
in an attempt to test this header entry:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have entries for From, Subject, X-Barracuda-Connect and they work.
For some reason
Juan Miscaro wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have STARTTLS, SMTP-AUTH, and SASL running with cleartext passwords
in a SQL backend for a while now. I am trying to switch over from
cleartext to crypt in terms of my passwords stored in MySQL. I have
things running for IMAP with crypt. For SMTP-AUTH I am
Thank you Noel, that is exactly what I am looking for.
So if I understand you correctly, once I have the virtual_alias value in place,
assuming I can configure my mail client with an alternate address, matching the
value of "virtual_alias" in my Postfix, the Postfix MTA will relay the mail for
m
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Hello fellow smart hosters,
I've been running this way for 3 years now because I could never figure
out how to wildcard "everything else". Here's the top of my transport
file (a very small portion of it):
hardwarefreak.com smtp:[192.168.100.2]
earthlink.net
Tait Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a lot of messages that are being delivered to `double-bounce`
> accounts. What setting do I have that may cause this buildup?
Might be related to the existence and placement of your
reject_unverified_recipient parameter. See:
http://articl
Doh! forgot to include this
kenhat: postconf -d myhostname
myhostname = swi.spellwellinc.com
SWI.spellwellinc.com:~
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Ken Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Thanks Brian! You got me going in the right direction.
>
> I probably should have mentioned that this ru
Thanks Brian! You got me going in the right direction.
I probably should have mentioned that this running in a FreeBSD jail.
I read the archive reference you gave and pulled and compiled gethostbyaddr
& gethostbyname. I haven't used c in long time so I was pretty impressed
with myself getting the
I have a lot of messages that are being delivered to `double-bounce`
accounts. What setting do I have that may cause this buildup?
Sample log:
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
AE3FD7E833* 288 Tue Aug 5 16:57:20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello fellow smart hosters,
I've been running this way for 3 years now because I could never figure
out how to wildcard "everything else". Here's the top of my transport
file (a very small portion of it):
hardwarefreak.com smtp:[192.168.100.2]
earthlink.net smtp:[smtp.sbc.mai
Dov Oxenberg wrote:
Hello,
Please forgive the stupid question but I have done my due diligence and
was unable to locate a definitive answer in the Postfix FAQ,
Documentation, or How To.
Basically what I want to do seems simple enough I am just not sure how
to go about it. Currently I run a Ma
Hello,
Please forgive the stupid question but I have done my due diligence and was
unable to locate a definitive answer in the Postfix FAQ, Documentation, or How
To.
Basically what I want to do seems simple enough I am just not sure how to go
about it. Currently I run a Mailman mailing list usi
Aaron Bennett:
> Hello,
>
> I'm experiencing very poor performance on receipt of email with large
> numbers of multiple recipients. One particular listserv for example
> sends emails to 1600+ users in chunks of 50-60 per message. Users are
> either local (maildir) or forwarded. We do have th
Richard Wolterink:
> Wietse Venema schreef:
> > Richard Wolterink:
> >
> >> tlsmgrunix - - - 10? 1 tlsmgr
> >> flush unix n - - 10? 0 flush
> >>
> >
> > Undo these changes. They are detrimental to Postfix performance.
> >
> >
Brian Evans - Postfix List schreef:
Richard Wolterink wrote:
Wietse Venema schreef:
Richard Wolterink:
tlsmgrunix - - - 10? 1 tlsmgr
flush unix n - - 10? 0 flush
Undo these changes. They are detrimental to Postfix performan
Richard Wolterink wrote:
Wietse Venema schreef:
Richard Wolterink:
tlsmgrunix - - - 10? 1 tlsmgr
flush unix n - - 10? 0 flush
Undo these changes. They are detrimental to Postfix performance.
Wietse
Do I have to com
Wietse Venema schreef:
Richard Wolterink:
tlsmgrunix - - - 10? 1 tlsmgr
flush unix n - - 10? 0 flush
Undo these changes. They are detrimental to Postfix performance.
Wietse
Do I have to comment them out or alte
Richard Wolterink wrote:
Hello postfix-users,
The problem with the bounce warning is fixed due to the alteration
sugested in the master.cf
Now I have another one. The mailq clogs up with bounces. I have
altered main.cf and added the line local_recipient_maps = but with no
result.
What cou
Noel Jones schreef:
Richard Wolterink wrote:
Hello postfix-users,
The problem with the bounce warning is fixed due to the alteration
sugested in the master.cf
Now I have another one. The mailq clogs up with bounces. I have
altered main.cf and added the line local_recipient_maps = but with n
Richard Wolterink:
> tlsmgrunix - - - 10? 1 tlsmgr
> flush unix n - - 10? 0 flush
Undo these changes. They are detrimental to Postfix performance.
Wietse
Richard Wolterink wrote:
Hello postfix-users,
The problem with the bounce warning is fixed due to the alteration
sugested in the master.cf
Now I have another one. The mailq clogs up with bounces. I have altered
main.cf and added the line local_recipient_maps = but with no result.
What coul
Hello postfix-users,
The problem with the bounce warning is fixed due to the alteration
sugested in the master.cf
Now I have another one. The mailq clogs up with bounces. I have altered
main.cf and added the line local_recipient_maps = but with no result.
What could be wrong.
I installed a
Ken Hathaway wrote:
First off I don't think this is a postfix problem. I'm hoping someone
here has seen something similar and can help me out. Google so far has
turned up nothing for me. :(
I get this same warning from gmail, yahoo & live. The email goes
straight the the junk email folder o
First off I don't think this is a postfix problem. I'm hoping someone here
has seen something similar and can help me out. Google so far has turned up
nothing for me. :(
I get this same warning from gmail, yahoo & live. The email goes straight
the the junk email folder on all of these systems. :(
Hello,
I'm experiencing very poor performance on receipt of email with large
numbers of multiple recipients. One particular listserv for example
sends emails to 1600+ users in chunks of 50-60 per message. Users are
either local (maildir) or forwarded. We do have three ldap maps in each
rec
Wietse Venema wrote:
Richard Wolterink:
Aug 5 18:37:36 vps683 postfix/bounce[15429]: warning: unexpected
attribute W from bounce socket (expecting: nrequest)
Aug 5 18:37:36 vps683 postfix/bounce[15429]: warning: malformed request
In master.cf you have turned on the wakeup timer for the boun
Richard Wolterink:
> Aug 5 18:37:36 vps683 postfix/bounce[15429]: warning: unexpected
> attribute W from bounce socket (expecting: nrequest)
> Aug 5 18:37:36 vps683 postfix/bounce[15429]: warning: malformed request
In master.cf you have turned on the wakeup timer for the bounce service.
See: m
Hello Postfix-users
Sorry for being so rude for being a new member and immediately sending a
pleed for help.
I have been surfing the internet for serveral days now, searching for
information on the problem I am having.
I use postfix on several linux servers and I am very pleased with how
w
Ebbe Hjorth:
> Hi,
>
> On of my users asked me about, why she got an error sending mail with
> attachment in squirrelmail, i dont know - but the thing i want to ask you
> about, is that the reciever got 2 emails, one with no attachments and one
> with.
Postfix cannot remove attachments.
Hi,
On of my users asked me about, why she got an error sending mail with
attachment in squirrelmail, i dont know - but the thing i want to ask you
about, is that the reciever got 2 emails, one with no attachments and one
with.
cat /var/log/maillog | grep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aug 5 14:51:09 yyy01
the class C network of each host successfully getting spam into my
inbox. I'm down to less than 5 a day again. :)
Give it a shot. It doesn't take much time at all and the results are
well worth the effort.
Stan
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signatur
Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:21:09PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>> > > smtp_sasl_tls_verified_security_options apparently stopped working after
>> > > the upgrade.
>> >
>> > There has never been an official release where this feature is fully
>> >
Rudy Gevaert:
> Hi,
>
> Previously we were running postfix 2.1.5 (Debian Sarge) and now have
> upgraded to 2.3.8 (Etch).
>
> We have several lmtp transports in master.cf:
>
> mail1 unix - - n - - lmtp
> mail2 unix - - n - - l
Thanks Wietse,
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 09:30:44 am Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix passes the information in the SMTP client's AUTH command.
> This is how I got the Dovecot extension from Timo. If someone is
> willing to monitor his docs for changes,
it seems fairly stable. Going off the doc/auth-proto
Richard Foley wrote:
This mail is just FYI and by way of saying:
"postfix and friends do a great job - many thanks!"
Hi Richard,
I second your sentiments and would like to shout out a big thank you to
Wietse for creating Postfix!
I was at about the same point you are now for mo
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 02:40:54PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:29:34PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>>
A *better* way is force them to Authenticate using SASL.
See http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
>
On 8/4/2008 9:10 PM, fajar wrote:
Why are you using sender verification? You should NOT use SAV for all
messages, only for messages destined to domains that you control or have
already gotten permission to do SAV for, or you WILL evenutally get
blacklisted.
Please post postconf -n output...
T
Hi,
Previously we were running postfix 2.1.5 (Debian Sarge) and now have
upgraded to 2.3.8 (Etch).
We have several lmtp transports in master.cf:
mail1 unix - - n - - lmtp
mail2 unix - - n - - lmtp
mail3 unix - -
Seblu:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hello,
>
> i use postfix postfix 2.5.1 on an OpenBSD 4.3 and i have a stange
> behaviour (for me) with DNS lookup in logs.
>
> i've a local dns, which resolv 192.42.42.1 to toto.titi
>
> # host 192.42.42.1
> 1.42.42.192.in-addr.arpa doma
Tait Grove:
> Why would I be getting this error message? I am experiencing message delays
> with this too.
>
>
>
> Aug 4 22:46:56 app1 postfix/pipe[54935]: fatal: watchdog timeout
>
> Aug 4 22:48:21 app1 postfix/pipe[54454]: fatal: watchdog timeout
>
> Aug 4 22:50:22 app1 postfix/pipe[5554
Hi all,
When I first ran postfix, on my own machine instead of having my mail hosted
by an ISP, the set up was as it came 'out of the box' - I was absolutely
swamped by spam, probably one every second or two - and I almost panicked
when I saw what a horrendous volume of crap I was recieving. A
Why would I be getting this error message? I am experiencing message delays
with this too.
Aug 4 22:46:56 app1 postfix/pipe[54935]: fatal: watchdog timeout
Aug 4 22:48:21 app1 postfix/pipe[54454]: fatal: watchdog timeout
Aug 4 22:50:22 app1 postfix/pipe[55545]: fatal: watchdog timeout
Aug
51 matches
Mail list logo
