* Gabriel Hahmann gabriel.hahm...@gmail.com:
Good morning,
I'm looking for a tool that can handle confirmation emails with
captcha and that works with postfix.
The idea is, when somebody sends me an email and this address have
never sent me any other mail, automatically the sender
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 09:24:09 AM +0200, Gabriel Hahmann wrote:
Good morning,
I'm looking for a tool that can handle confirmation emails with
captcha and that works with postfix.
...
Using a tool like this I can stop all spam mail that arrives my inbox.
Gabriel,
tools like these are
I scanned the Postfix documentation for stress_expire_time and could only find
it in master_avail.c, where it is set to 1000s.
So the stress recheck interval is 1000s, correct?
Did I miss that in the official documentation? I believe it should be part of
the official documentation. I can write a
* Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de:
I scanned the Postfix documentation for stress_expire_time and could only find
it in master_avail.c, where it is set to 1000s.
So the stress recheck interval is 1000s, correct?
Did I miss that in the official documentation? I believe it should
Dear Pros'
I am facing a problem in getting system generated mails to my local mailbox.
let me explain the scenario.
Postfix Mail Server --- Firewall --- External Mail Hosting
example.comexternal.com
To our internal Postfix Mail Server, we are receiving
Dear Pros.
The following is my setup
H.O
^
|
|
point
to
point
|
|
Postfix--- Firewall --- External Mail Hosting
Mail Server
Postfix Mail Server (postfix-2.3.3-2) on CentOS 5.2;
a. receives mails from local client via outlook and send to out side (internet)
directly
b.
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:52:32 -0700
Michael Wang postfix-u...@pandadesigns.com wrote:
I've been running my current email system using Postfix 2.3.X since
the end of 2006. It's a very small system since it's just my personal
email on various domains I own. However I'm loathe to mess with it
since
* Harakiri harakiri...@yahoo.com:
Is it possible to specify the blackhole servers in a separate file? I
only found the option, that you specify reject_rbl_client in the
main.cf multiple times. My problem is that i have a cluster of postfix
servers and settings like transport map and relay
Michael Wang:
I've been running my current email system using Postfix 2.3.X since the
end of 2006. It's a very small system since it's just my personal email
on various domains I own. However I'm loathe to mess with it since it
has been running rock solid and it does have quite a few moving
On 6/10/2009 12:16 AM, June Qiu wrote:
I can send short emails (1KB) from my mailserver (abc.domain.com) to
gmail account (t...@gmail.com), but for larger emails (7KB), it
fails. It gets deferred on the mail queue forever. But this same mail
can be sent to yahoo.
Am I missing something?
Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Wang:
[...snip...]
Is 2.3 end-of-life coming any time soon?
Updates for Postfix 2.2 stopped last year.
So that sounds like 2.3 patches may end this year. Assuming that, I have
(very) roughly 6 months + some unknown amount of time past that if or
when a
Thank You for Your time and answer, Wietse:
See my other reply. The server does not announce STARTTLS support.
I got it already, also I have posted here my current configuration (postconf
-n), could You please tell me what to edit, or how I can find the culprit?
Patrick Ben Koetter:
I scanned the Postfix documentation for stress_expire_time and could only find
it in master_avail.c, where it is set to 1000s.
So the stress recheck interval is 1000s, correct?
Yes, and this is not configurable. The benefits are less than the
cost of having to explain
Thank You for Your time and answer, Rainer:
454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem
And what is the local problem? Some permissions?
Read the log (and post it if you need help).
I do not know why but now I get error:
502 5.5.1 Error: command not implemented
on server side I
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 13:46:08 Sthu Pous wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Wietse:
See my other reply. The server does not announce STARTTLS support.
I got it already, also I have posted here my current configuration
(postconf -n), could You please tell me what to edit, or how I
Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Wang:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Wang:
[...snip...]
Is 2.3 end-of-life coming any time soon?
Updates for Postfix 2.2 stopped last year.
So that sounds like 2.3 patches may end this year.
I can't predict when that would happen. Updates for Postfix 2.3
will
Michael Wang:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Wang:
[...snip...]
Is 2.3 end-of-life coming any time soon?
Updates for Postfix 2.2 stopped last year.
So that sounds like 2.3 patches may end this year.
I can't predict when that would happen. Updates for Postfix 2.3
will cease when it
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 14:00:28 Sthu Pous wrote:
Read the log (and post it if you need help).
I do not know why but now I get error:
502 5.5.1 Error: command not implemented
on server side I see:
lost connection after STARTTLS from unknown[1.2.3.4]
Honestly, you don't sound like you
Hi folks,
I have postfix 2.3.3 installed and have just found some info on
Anvil(8) which looks like it should be good as part of my anti-spam
implementation. I can see anvil in /usr/libexec/postfix/ but when i
enable the config within main.cf smtpd_error_sleep_time = 1s and grep
on maillog
2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Simon Jones simonmjo...@gmail.com:
Hi folks,
I have postfix 2.3.3 installed and have just found some info on
Anvil(8) which looks like it should be good as part of my anti-spam
implementation. I can see anvil in /usr/libexec/postfix/
I have postfix 2.3.3 installed and have just found some info on
Anvil(8) which looks like it should be good as part of my anti-spam
implementation. I can see anvil in /usr/libexec/postfix/ but when i enable
the config within main.cf smtpd_error_sleep_time = 1s and grep on maillog
there's no
* Simon Jones simonmjo...@gmail.com:
http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html#conn_limit
ok thanks - I added those to main.cf
What EXACTLY did you add?
but it still doesn't do anything,
Of course it doesn't do anything per se!
Shit needs to hit the fan before something happens. Did
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
Shit needs to hit the fan before something happens. Did you throw enough
shit in the general direction of the fan to faicilitaty a hitting of the
fan?
If the shit doesn't hit the fan, Postfix will log some info - in my
case every 10 minutes:
2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Simon Jones simonmjo...@gmail.com:
http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html#conn_limit
ok thanks - I added those to main.cf
What EXACTLY did you add?
but it still doesn't do anything,
Of course it doesn't do anything per se!
* Simon Jones simonmjo...@gmail.com:
This is the part I'm missing, how do I enable the shit flinger?
You COULD use smtp_source
OR
your could set ridiculous low limits (1/60s) and then test it manually using
telnet.
Keep in mind, though:
smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions = $mynetworks
Hello,
M. Fioretti wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 09:24:09 AM +0200, Gabriel Hahmann wrote:
Good morning,
...
if you aren't convinced yet, there is also
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/cr/index.html
If you're still not yet convinced, take a look at w3.org opinion :
Zitat von Michael Wang postfix-u...@pandadesigns.com:
Gerard wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:52:32 -0700
Michael Wang postfix-u...@pandadesigns.com wrote:
I've been running my current email system using Postfix 2.3.X since
the end of 2006. It's a very small system since it's just my personal
You didn't specify enough details. What firewall you are using, what
your DNS servers run, etc. But, I had a similar situation at my last
company. We were using BIND for DNS and setup a different view for the
firewall. That may be one option.
It may be a better option just to setup a rule on
Michael Wang wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Wang:
[...snip...]
Is 2.3 end-of-life coming any time soon?
Updates for Postfix 2.2 stopped last year.
So that sounds like 2.3 patches may end this year. Assuming that, I
have (very) roughly 6 months + some unknown amount of time past that
On 10-Jun-2009, at 03:52, Michael Wang wrote:
I've been running my current email system using Postfix 2.3.X since
the end of 2006. It's a very small system since it's just my
personal email on various domains I own. However I'm loathe to mess
with it since it has been running rock solid and
On 10-Jun-2009, at 01:24, Gabriel Hahmann wrote:
I'm looking for a tool that can handle confirmation emails with
captcha and that works with postfix.
The idea is, when somebody sends me an email and this address have
never sent me any other mail, automatically the sender receives a
message with
-Original Message-
From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 4:00 PM
To: Michael Glenney
Cc: postfix-us...@cloud9.net
Subject: Re: Need to create a mail dead-end or super catch-all
Michael Glenney:
I have a request from one of our
Michael Glenney:
-Original Message-
From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 4:00 PM
To: Michael Glenney
Cc: postfix-us...@cloud9.net
Subject: Re: Need to create a mail dead-end or super catch-all
Michael Glenney:
I have a
I told you to use a virtual alias MAP. I did not tell you to use
a virtual alias DOMAIN.
My example requires that you can already receive mail at
u...@example.com. Never will Postfix create an account just
because you send mail to it.
See http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html if
Michael Glenney:
I set it up as a map as you specified.
And you failed to create the destination email account first.
My example requires that the address u...@example.com as used in
the example already works.
/etc/postfix/main.cf
virtual_alias_maps = static:u...@example.com
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:40:58 -0600
LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
This is known as a Prove You Love Me scheme and is, essentially,
offloading your spam problems onto everyone else who sends you mail.
You will find a LOT of people are pissed off by these PYLM emails,
and will not reply.
-Original Message-
From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:20 PM
To: Michael Glenney
Cc: postfix-us...@cloud9.net
Subject: Re: Need to create a mail dead-end or super catch-all
Michael Glenney:
I set it up as a map as you specified.
This would be a good time to confess you are using my virtual
alias and sending mail to another virtual alias.
Don't do that. Your catch-all destination needs to be a non-virtual
address.
Wietse
Harakiri a écrit :
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
Subject: Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file?
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 6:45 AM
* Harakiri
Truth Seeker a écrit :
Dear Pros'
I am facing a problem in getting system generated mails to my local mailbox.
let me explain the scenario.
Postfix Mail Server --- Firewall --- External Mail Hosting
example.comexternal.com
To our internal Postfix
Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
* Gábor Lénárt l...@lgb.hu:
This is a backscatter source and will get you blacklisted in no time.
Hmm, what would be if someone use a policy server, rejecting the mail with
the link for the captcha URL in it.
That sound interesting. It could work! It definitely
This would be a good time to confess you are using my virtual
alias and sending mail to another virtual alias.
Don't do that. Your catch-all destination needs to be a non-virtual
address.
Wietse
After this message I was starting to think you were just some guy who's
screwing with
mouss wrote:
Harakiri a écrit :
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
Subject: Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file?
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 6:45 AM
* Harakiri
On Wed June 10 2009 17:50:34 Michael Glenney wrote:
After this message I was starting to think you were just some guy
who's screwing with me. Then I took a second and googled your name
:) I guess I'm not coming across as genuine if you feel I'm
deceiving you in some way. I'll give this one
Michael Glenney wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:20 PM
To: Michael Glenney
Cc: postfix-us...@cloud9.net
Subject: Re: Need to create a mail dead-end or super catch-all
Michael Glenney:
I set it up as a map as
-Original Message-
From: Noel Jones [mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:09 PM
To: Michael Glenney; postfix users list
Subject: Re: Need to create a mail dead-end or super catch-all
Michael Glenney wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wietse
Michael Glenney:
Can Postfix do this?:
Yes, but it does not help when you add a virtual alias DOMAIN,
when I ask you to add only a virtual alias MAP.
Wietse
/dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wed June 10 2009 17:50:34 Michael Glenney wrote:
After this message I was starting to think you were just some guy
who's screwing with me. Then I took a second and googled your name
:) I guess I'm not coming across as genuine if you feel I'm
deceiving you in some way.
Yes, but it does not help when you add a virtual alias DOMAIN,
when I ask you to add only a virtual alias MAP.
Wietse
Wietse, sorry my last reply went straight to you. Forgot to change the
addresses. Wanted to post here in case anyone else has this issue
though it's a strange
Noel Jones:
Don't bash OP too hard. He got bit by the interaction of the
default value of virtual_alias_domains = $virtual_alias_maps
and a static map in virtual_alias_maps. That made every
domain match the virtual_alias_domains lookup.
Just a funny interaction with a seldom-used
On Wed June 10 2009 18:28:44 Noel Jones wrote:
Don't bash OP too hard. He got bit by the interaction of the
default value of virtual_alias_domains = $virtual_alias_maps
and a static map in virtual_alias_maps. That made every
domain match the virtual_alias_domains lookup.
Just a funny
Long story - but to jump to end I changed platforms (Debian etch which
I am no comfortable with yet - from SuSE 6.2 system that serverely ate
itself with a heat spell)
I followed an ISP online how-to guide to set up the perfect debian ISP
server (I am NOT an ISP - but I do let family and
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
i agree. But now i have to do it with postsuper -d QUEUE_ID
in this situation how can i notify the user? i believe there will be somehow
a way to inform the user!!!
There is no automatic notification for postsuper -d. If you want to notify
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, William Michael wrote:
Long story - but to jump to end I changed platforms (Debian etch
which
I am no comfortable with yet - from SuSE 6.2 system that serverely ate
itself with a heat spell)
Wietse Venema:
Noel Jones:
Don't bash OP too hard. He got bit by the interaction of the
default value of virtual_alias_domains = $virtual_alias_maps
and a static map in virtual_alias_maps. That made every
domain match the virtual_alias_domains lookup.
Just a funny interaction
William Michael wrote:
Long story - but to jump to end I changed platforms (Debian etch which
I am no comfortable with yet - from SuSE 6.2 system that serverely ate
itself with a heat spell)
I followed an ISP online how-to guide to set up the perfect debian ISP
server (I am NOT an ISP -
Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
Noel Jones:
Don't bash OP too hard. He got bit by the interaction of the
default value of virtual_alias_domains = $virtual_alias_maps
and a static map in virtual_alias_maps. That made every
domain match the virtual_alias_domains lookup.
Just a funny
57 matches
Mail list logo
