On 2011-07-19 01:53, Robert Schmid wrote:
On Jul 18, 2011, at 5:47 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 18/07/2011 21:41, Robert Schmid a écrit :
Ever since I discovered wildcard addressing in qmail (recipient delimiters in
postfix) I have been using them to identify which companies and organizations
sell
On 2011-07-19 00:52, mouss wrote:
Le 18/07/2011 23:38, Pablo Chamorro a écrit :
Could somebody please tell me if it's possible to setup Postfix in order to
make the reception date is shown instead of the email-messages sent-date?
The Date: header is defined by the standard as the date the
On 2011-07-19 00:31, mouss wrote:
Le 18/07/2011 19:01, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 2011-07-17 20:19, mouss wrote:
Le 17/07/2011 12:49, Thomas Zehbe a écrit :
Hello List,
I have an installtion using bitdefender as a virus scanner using the
content_filter option.
bitdefender's smtp daemon
Zitat von Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
- Spoofed Delivered-to:. AFAIK this has never been a major
problem, and is a useful feature to detect mail loops. If it
becomes a problem, you can use header_checks to IGNORE
Delivered-to (will let a loop run until too many hops are in
the
Hi Mouss,
That sounds just like what I need - thanx - I'll go play with my testserver!
- TvE
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:54 AM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
Le 18/07/2011 23:50, Thomas von Eyben a écrit :
Hi List,
I have been searching google and man pages etc. but been unable to
find
Bernhard Rohrer wrote:
seconded, only that submission is 587 ;)
Yes, of course! Stupid me :-)
Hi All
I am getting the following error on a new installation
...@xxx.com: host smtphost.x.com[xxx.xxx.xx]
said:
553 5.7.1 ...@xxx.com: Sender address rejected: not
logged in (in reply to RCPT TO command)
x@x: host smtphost.x.com[..] said: 553 5.7.1
Am 19.07.2011 14:26, schrieb Dave Johnson:
Hi All
I am getting the following error on a new installation
...@xxx.com: host smtphost.x.com[xxx.xxx.xx]
said:
553 5.7.1 ...@xxx.com: Sender address rejected: not
logged in (in reply to RCPT TO command)
x@x:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
- Spoofed Delivered-to:. AFAIK this has never been a major
problem, and is a useful feature to detect mail loops. If it
becomes a problem, you can use header_checks to IGNORE
Delivered-to (will let a loop run until too
Zitat von Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
- Spoofed Delivered-to:. AFAIK this has never been a major
problem, and is a useful feature to detect mail loops. If it
becomes a problem, you can use header_checks to IGNORE
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
[delivered-to loop detection]
I was not aware of this one. As far as i can see this is only a
problem if local is used, no?
Wietse:
Both local(8) and pipe(8) (one has Delivered-To: enabled by default,
the other has this off by default for historical compatibility).
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 08:59:24AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
I use a (relatively) simple regex header check to winnow out old or
impossible dates; alas, it is not possible to compare two headers with
header_checks.
Rejecting old dates is not very safe, messages can be Resent, in some
Header checks is most profitably used to reject time-traveling messages
from the future.
But then you wouldn't want to block these, for obvious reasons.
;-)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hi Wietse,
the unix socket can't be used by other users than root or postfix.
Is there a way to configure ownership and/or permissions for the socket?
I thought under Linux the filesystem permissions reflect the permissions to
the unix socket.
Here is my config and the socket:
master.cf:
Am 19.07.2011 17:02, schrieb Lars Täuber:
Hi Wietse,
the unix socket can't be used by other users than root or postfix.
Is there a way to configure ownership and/or permissions for the socket?
I thought under Linux the filesystem permissions reflect the permissions to
the unix socket.
Hi Matthias,
Am Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:11:57 +0200
Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de schrieb:
Am 19.07.2011 17:02, schrieb Lars Täuber:
Hi Wietse,
the unix socket can't be used by other users than root or postfix.
Is there a way to configure ownership and/or permissions for the
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:02:34PM +0200, Lars T??uber wrote:
The unix socket can't be used by other users than root or postfix.
Is there a way to configure ownership and/or permissions for the socket?
No, the parent directory: $queue_directory/private, must be protected
from users other than
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:11:57PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
If that's indeed the situation, review the security implications; you
can either use ACLs to permit the dspam user execute permission fix that
up (if supported and enabled on your /var filesystem), or you can
consider making
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:29:57PM +0200, Lars T??uber wrote:
If that's indeed the situation, review the security implications; you
can either use ACLs to permit the dspam user execute permission fix that
up (if supported and enabled on your /var filesystem), or you can
consider making
All,
I wanted to use one of the built-in variables for the user= portion of a
pipe in master.cf, but it seems postfix does not substitute it for that
part.
Is this the case? Is it possible to do something like:
procmail unix -n n - - pipe
-o flags=RO
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:01:43AM -0700, Brian Andrus wrote:
I wanted to use one of the built-in variables for the user= portion of a
pipe in master.cf, but it seems postfix does not substitute it for that
part.
Correct, reasonable and not surprising. Only the argv list supports
variable
On 7/19/2011 7:26 AM, Dave Johnson wrote:
Hi All
I am getting the following error on a new installation
...@xxx.com: host smtphost.x.com[xxx.xxx.xx]
said:
553 5.7.1 ...@xxx.com: Sender address rejected: not
logged in (in reply to RCPT TO command)
x@x: host
I thought as much, unfortunately, since the local accounts have an '@'
sign in them, using procmail as local delivery seems to not be happy.
So now the question becomes:
Is there a way to get postfix to allow '@' signs as part of a user name
when using the local transport?
eg: for my email
Brian Andrus:
I thought as much, unfortunately, since the local accounts have an '@'
sign in them, using procmail as local delivery seems to not be happy.
For a Postfix procmail example, see:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mailbox_command
Wietse
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:26:46AM -0700, Brian Andrus wrote:
I thought as much, unfortunately, since the local accounts have an '@' sign
in them, using procmail as local delivery seems to not be happy.
So now the question becomes:
Is there a way to get postfix to allow '@' signs as part
Hello,
I am using postfix 2.7.2, dovecot 2.0.8 and fetchmail 6.3.17 from
pkgsrc on netbsd 5.1 x86 on my home LAN. I am sorry if this turns out
to be a fetchmail or dovecot question.
I want to have messages filtered using sieve in dovecot, but postfix
appears to be storing messages directly into
Le 19/07/2011 01:53, Robert Schmid a écrit :
On Jul 18, 2011, at 5:47 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 18/07/2011 21:41, Robert Schmid a écrit :
Ever since I discovered wildcard addressing in qmail (recipient delimiters
in postfix) I have been using them to identify which companies and
organizations
Le 19/07/2011 09:05, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 2011-07-19 00:31, mouss wrote:
Le 18/07/2011 19:01, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 2011-07-17 20:19, mouss wrote:
Le 17/07/2011 12:49, Thomas Zehbe a écrit :
Hello List,
I have an installtion using bitdefender as a virus scanner using the
Hmph..no wonder my foot hurts!
I do use virtual domains and have all that working, I just wanted to
allow for folks with virtual domain accounts to have their own
.procmailrc to have individualized spamassassin rulesets.
I haven't given up. I am thinking maybe a limited pipe to sudo :)
Le 19/07/2011 22:00, Kendall Shaw a écrit :
Hello,
I am using postfix 2.7.2, dovecot 2.0.8 and fetchmail 6.3.17 from
pkgsrc on netbsd 5.1 x86 on my home LAN. I am sorry if this turns out
to be a fetchmail or dovecot question.
I want to have messages filtered using sieve in dovecot, but
As specified on the http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html page.
So, here is my current setup from master.cf:
smtpinetn - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=dspam:unix:/var/dspam/dspam.sock
dspam unix- - n - - lmtp -o
Jul 19 19:25:35 myserver postfix/error[14000]: D075AA21004: to=
z...@comcast.net, relay=none, delay=0.36, delays=0.36/0/0/0, dsn=4.0.0,
status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: host
mx2.comcast.net[76.96.30.116]
refused to talk to me: 554imta33.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net comcast
On 7/19/2011 4:23 PM, Donovan Bray wrote:
Jul 19 19:25:35 myserver postfix/error[14000]: D075AA21004:
to=z...@comcast.net mailto:z...@comcast.net, relay=none,
delay=0.36, delays=0.36/0/0/0, dsn=4.0.0, status=deferred (delivery
temporarily suspended: host mx2.comcast.net
Donovan Bray:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Jul 19 19:25:35 myserver postfix/error[14000]: D075AA21004: to=
z...@comcast.net, relay=none, delay=0.36, delays=0.36/0/0/0, dsn=4.0.0,
status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: host
mx2.comcast.net[76.96.30.116]
refused
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 01:00:50PM -0700, Kendall Shaw wrote:
RCPT TO:kshaw@localhost
In the log, messages about delivery for that message look like:
... postfix/qmgr[9145]: 41B0F692043: from=bl...@blarg.bl,
size=2763, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
... postfix/local[7649]: 41B0F692043:
On 07/19/2011 01:32 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 19/07/2011 22:00, Kendall Shaw a écrit :
Your setup is ok, but your test is not...
you have defined virtual_transport to be dovecot, but this only applies
to virtual_mailbox_domains.
you didn't explicitely specify mydestination, so the default applies:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 01:30:24PM -0700, Brian Andrus wrote:
Hmph..no wonder my foot hurts!
I do use virtual domains and have all that working, I just wanted to allow
for folks with virtual domain accounts to have their own .procmailrc to
have individualized spamassassin rulesets.
I
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 03:03:38PM -0700, Kendall Shaw wrote:
Okay, but I am not sending mail to @localhost. I send to
ks...@kendallshaw.com. Fetchmail sends RCPT TO:eekshaw@localhost. There
is the header To: ks...@kendallshaw.com in the message. Does postfix decide
on the destination
Thanks to all who have tried to help me so far.
I'm sorry to be such a pest. I've tried a number of things and still
can't get it.
Management wants email to
user@ a non-existent machine .arlut.utexas.edu
will be treated as though it had been addressed to
u...@arlut.utexas.edu
On 07/19/2011 05:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
smtp_skip_5xx_greeting (default: yes)
Skip SMTP servers that greet with a 5XX status code (go away, do not
try again later).
By default, the Postfix SMTP client moves on the next mail exchanger.
Specify
On 7/19/2011 6:45 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
Thanks to all who have tried to help me so far.
I'm sorry to be such a pest. I've tried a number of things and still
can't get it.
Management wants email to
user@ a non-existent machine .arlut.utexas.edu
will be treated as though it had been
Michael Orlitzky:
On 07/19/2011 05:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
smtp_skip_5xx_greeting (default: yes)
Skip SMTP servers that greet with a 5XX status code (go away, do
not
try again later).
By default, the Postfix SMTP client moves on the next mail
On 07/19/2011 09:39 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
I think it would be useful to maintain a list of the parameters with
non-standard default values. I for one still notice and fix things like
this every few months.
I'd be willing to look through the main.cf documentation for settings
labeled as
Am Dienstag 19 Juli 2011, 22:20:25 schrieb mouss:
Le 19/07/2011 09:05, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 2011-07-19 00:31, mouss wrote:
Le 18/07/2011 19:01, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 2011-07-17 20:19, mouss wrote:
Le 17/07/2011 12:49, Thomas Zehbe a écrit :
Hello List,
I have an
44 matches
Mail list logo
