Re: unable to get smtpd_recipient_restrictions working

Ty for you reply I think you misunderstood the direction of the mail i want to limit. i wanted to limit "To" and not "From" /etc/postfix# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases append_dot_mydomain = no biff = no config_directory = /etc/postfix header_checks

RE: Strange SASL Authentication Issue

> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Robert Krig > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 3:03 AM > To: Postfix users > Subject: Re: Strange SASL Authentication Issue > > I think I might have identified the problem.

Re: Postfix 2.8.7 on Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS

Am 12.01.2012 20:14, schrieb Paul Junkermann: > Robert, > thank you very much for your help! > > I am now up-to-date on Thunderbird (9), Postfix (2.8.7), and Dovecot > (2.0.16) via Christian Roessners ppa. > > I still have the problem with my attachments, but it narrows down to > SSL, as by now,

Re: Send bouncing to specific bounce-account

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/12/2012 12:04 PM, Michael Maymann wrote: > Hi Noel, > > Thanks for your kind reply...:-) ! This is for incoming mails > (perhaps it is not called bouncing then...?)... :-o When I am > about to reject an incoming mail - can I first forward this >

Re: Postfix 2.8.7 on Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS

Robert, thank you very much for your help! I am now up-to-date on Thunderbird (9), Postfix (2.8.7), and Dovecot (2.0.16) via Christian Roessners ppa. I still have the problem with my attachments, but it narrows down to SSL, as by now, Thunderbird gives me an ssl_error_protocol_version_alert. Pau

Re: Send bouncing to specific bounce-account

Hi Reindl, thanks...:-) ! point taken... case dropped...:-) ! ~maymann 2012/1/12 Reindl Harald > normally you should not even consider this > the sender is resposible for the return-path > he puts in the mail-header and this is the > bounce-address > > since this is a "do not" i never thought

Re: Send bouncing to specific bounce-account

normally you should not even consider this the sender is resposible for the return-path he puts in the mail-header and this is the bounce-address since this is a "do not" i never thought how it would be possible to set up Am 12.01.2012 19:30, schrieb Michael Maymann: > thanks for you reply...:-)

Re: Send bouncing to specific bounce-account

Hi Reindl, thanks for you reply...:-) ! this is a mailrelay for internal hosts sending to Internet... not accessible/receiving mails from Internet. The bou...@mydomain.com mailbox is externally hosted and has filtering processes configured. If I thought of doing this - how can this be done in the

Re: Send bouncing to specific bounce-account

you really will not do this because you would open a door for a DOS-attack - imagine someone does not love you and starts sending mails you are rejecting in a loop to your server until your disk is full best practice is send as less as possible generated mails and that is why you normally should r

Re: Send bouncing to specific bounce-account

Hi Noel, Thanks for your kind reply...:-) ! This is for incoming mails (perhaps it is not called bouncing then...?)... :-o When I am about to reject an incoming mail - can I first forward this mail to a external mailbox and then reject afterwards... or shouldn't I be doing this... is this consider

Re: Disable sending mails via telnet

Bill Cole: > On 10 Jan 2012, at 16:56, Dennis Carr wrote: > > If you mean the act of disabling the ability of using a telnet client > > to connect to port 25, you're best not doing this - or, just set any > > session timeouts to something short to prevent manual interaction. > > I hope that is s

Re: Global user delivery

On 11 Jan 2012, at 12:02, Andreas Berton wrote: Is it possible to use a global user address to manage the delivery to final destination. So delivery looks something like u...@myhost.tld glo...@myhost.tld u...@destination.tld There is absolutely nothing clear about that question. Really. The

Re: limiting outgoing

Hi Schrieb, i can use your solution. That match my needs. thank you again Jirka Vitek On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 16:08 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 12.01.2012 15:40, schrieb Jiri Vitek: > > Hello list, > > > > is there any way to limit outgoing messages per recipient mx-set or > > domain?

Re: Disable sending mails via telnet

On 10 Jan 2012, at 16:56, Dennis Carr wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Leslie León Sinclair wrote: Can anyone point me in the right direction, I´m stucked here and Google is not helping... If you mean the act of disabling the ability of using a telnet client to connect to port 25, you're best n

Re: Testing relocated address

On Thursday 12 January 2012 08:28:56 Pierre Girard wrote: > I have a relocated file in place and once in a while I have to > add new addresses to it. When I do I send an email to confirm > that everything is working correctly, just to be sure. Is there > a way to do that check without actually send

Re: Testing relocated address

Pierre Girard: > Hello, > I have a relocated file in place and once in a while I have to add > new addresses to it. When I do I send an email to confirm that > everything is working correctly, just to be sure. Is there a way to do > that check without actually sending en email? > > In this

Re: limiting outgoing

Am 12.01.2012 15:40, schrieb Jiri Vitek: > Hello list, > > is there any way to limit outgoing messages per recipient mx-set or > domain? I need to set rate for google mail server for example to > 1000msg/hour and for seznam.cz for 500msg/hour. > > what kind solution is best affordable for this ne

limiting outgoing

Hello list, is there any way to limit outgoing messages per recipient mx-set or domain? I need to set rate for google mail server for example to 1000msg/hour and for seznam.cz for 500msg/hour. what kind solution is best affordable for this needs? Is it possible to di it by pure postfix? please i

Testing relocated address

Hello, I have a relocated file in place and once in a while I have to add new addresses to it. When I do I send an email to confirm that everything is working correctly, just to be sure. Is there a way to do that check without actually sending en email? In this particular case I have us..

Re: Stan's List [was: free antivirus scanner ?]

On 1/12/2012 1:11 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 1/11/2012 3:56 PM, email builder wrote: > http://www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.pcre <-- Stan's big list > >> Noel, thank you for the thorough response. Thanks also to >> all the other responders. I'm definitely convinced. :) >> >> And of cours

Re: unable to get smtpd_recipient_restrictions working

On 1/12/2012 4:41 AM, Morten Frederik Kallesøe wrote: > Hi. > > My goal: > only allow mail to certains domains > > @a.com > @b.com > @c.com > > everything else should bounce. [please post in plain text only. thanks.] OK. Several problems below...

Re: Postfix 2.8.7 on Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS

Am 12.01.2012 13:03, schrieb Paul Junkermann: > Dear Users, > maybe someone has been walking along the same road as me and might help: > > I ran Postfix 2.7.0 (the package which comes with the Ubuntu Distro > 10.04.3) for some time happily, with TLS and dovecot. > > At the beginning of 2012, I ra

Postfix 2.8.7 on Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS

Dear Users, maybe someone has been walking along the same road as me and might help: I ran Postfix 2.7.0 (the package which comes with the Ubuntu Distro 10.04.3) for some time happily, with TLS and dovecot. At the beginning of 2012, I ran into the following problem: Receiving mail was working pro

Re: Strange SASL Authentication Issue

On Wednesday 11 January 2012 13:11:12 Wietse Venema wrote: > Robert Krig: This is just a quick heads up for people who might be experiencing similar issues. I think I might have identified the problem. Apparently in some situations SASLauthd can produce memory leaks. This is what I've gathered

unable to get smtpd_recipient_restrictions working

Hi. My goal: only allow mail to certains domains @a.com @b.com @c.com everything else should bounce. main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_access, reject cat /etc/postfix/recipient_access a.dk OK b.dk OK c.dk OK postmap /etc/pos

Re: spam issues

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 1/11/2012 11:15 PM, Al Zick wrote: Hi, For a while we ran Qmail. Qmail would accept all emails regardless, creating a very serious backscatter problem. Of course, switching to Postfix with it configured to only accept emails for our recipients fix