On 1/24/11 4:52 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
What MySQL makes of such data is up to the MySQL client and server
libraries, but Postfix does not promise that the input will be well-formed
UTF-8, or ISO Latin or anything of the sort. Just an array of bytes.
Right, as it should be. Envelope addresses
On 1/24/11 8:07 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Urgh. Which RFC are you reading ?
I quote:
Systems MUST NOT define mailboxes in such a way as to require the use
in SMTP of non-ASCII characters
True (tell it to generators of malicious mail or just incompetent sending sw
On 1/24/11 9:33 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Just curious, how does the script handle BCC ?
Eg. where none of the TO and CC headers actually contain a valid email for
the domain because that was in the BCC?
I suppose it doesn't matter in the slightest.
If the script goes off the header addresses
On 1/23/11 1:34 PM, IT geek 31 wrote:
On 23 January 2011 10:15, moussmo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
Le 23/01/2011 03:45, IT geek 31 a écrit :
A recent poster asked for configuration to be checked, and it has made
me question my own sender and recipient restrictions:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
On 1/19/11 8:54 PM, con...@stz-bg.com wrote:
My mailserver is a low load average and i did not enable blacklists, i
have them commented because i checking sieve delivery to spam folder. The
things that i wanna ask it is how to disable email like this one to be
received.
As i see header i
On 1/18/11 3:55 PM, James Chase wrote:
I have a workign mx server (virtual) which I cloned to create a second
mx server. I changed the hostname and /etc/hosts and any reference I
could find to the old mx4 name to mx2. I also made sure reverse
dns and dns is OK.
It isn't. See below.
On 1/19/11 10:15 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/19/2011 3:06 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated, check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfix/fake_domains [, anything else you have]
and in /etc/postfix/fake_domains:
@yourdomain.com REJECT
On 1/16/11 6:33 PM, James wrote:
I set message_size_limit = 0 in main.conf and postfix started ok but I
wasn't getting mail so I read the docs.
It said mailbox_size_limit must be larger than message_size_limit so I
set it to It said
mailbox_size_limit = 0 and I got mail. :-)
The goal was to be
On 1/17/11 7:18 AM, Jaques Cochet wrote:
If postfix alone is running on the server, let's say as a mail router
or backend delivey system, would postfix processes make use of all
cores?
That's a loaded question, since postfix is not a process that consumes
CPU.
In one (1) postfix instance,
On 1/17/11 8:27 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Buzai Andras buzai.and...@gmail.com:
Actually he is right.
www is just a sub-domain.
The common practice (although it is not mandatory) is to have www
setup as a CNAME for domain.tld.
Personally I think it would be nice to have
On 1/16/11 9:37 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Hi List,
I want to cc one incoming email, when incoming (from) field contains
one email address. Is this possible in postfix?
If you're talking about the MAIL FROM address, yes; use sender_bcc_maps
as documented in
On 1/14/11 3:41 PM, Markus Treinen wrote:
Am 14.01.2011 00:02, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
You alias VIRTUAL addresses to REAL users, not the other way around.
The real user already has a real mailbox - why does he need to go
through at least 2 extra translation steps ?
Because I don't want
On 1/12/11 4:34 PM, Markus Treinen wrote:
Hi,
your point is well taken. The reason for my setup is this:
I wanted to have virtual addresses for all my domains, which are
mapped separately to virtual users (meaning Maildirs delivered via
dovecot (mainly to use sieve)). Those virtual users would
On 1/13/11 8:34 AM, Mark (Lunatechnologies) wrote:
Hi there,
I'm using a virtual vacation script (version 3.2), which runs as a
content filter for a while - but I have one makjor problem.
Yes. Why would you run a per-user reply script through a system-wide
content_filter ?
Enable
On 1/14/11 12:24 AM, Mark (Lunatechnologies) wrote:
Thanks Jeroen,
Finally cracked it tonight. You're right - the content filter itself
was unnecessary and was being run against every mail in and out.
so removed that and just left the vacation transport to handle
anything with an
On 1/14/11 2:00 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
Understand that address rewriting is at the heart of Postfix - but I
struggle to configure Postfix to deliver messages which are sent to the
domain @nottheoilrig.com, to localhost via LMTP, with envelope recipient
nottheoilrig
virtual_alias_maps:
On 1/11/11 11:33 AM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Isn't it generally insecure to give direct access to each repective
customer instance from outside directly?
Also, how do ISPs deal with this? Each customer doesn't have their own
IP...
ISPs deal with this by allowing their customers to send
On 1/10/11 4:28 PM, Markus Treinen wrote:
Hello list,
I have a nicely running Postfix installation which uses both virtual
and local users.
To prevent local mail being delivered to spool files, I have to alias
(via /etc/aliases) the relevant users to a virtual user, which is not
very elegant.
On 1/10/11 10:04 PM, Bryan Harrison wrote:
I've recently migrated services to a new mailserver, which has of
course promptly started kicking out dire errors that didn't show
during testing.
Here's an example transcript, postconf -n is below
Out: 220 gilded-bat.laughingboot.net
On 1/10/11 10:13 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
I am using local transport to process messages from Postfix. When
message arrives, Postfix will call a script, passing in the message,
which we will process.
If user sends a message with multiple recipients (in two different
domains) to Postfix,
On 1/10/11 10:40 PM, Bryan Harrison wrote:
Jan 10 13:00:39 gilded-bat postfix/smtpd[3076]: warning: No server certs
available. TLS won't be enabled
As Victor correctly surmised.
--
J.
On 1/4/11 8:32 PM, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
The only rejects that I get calls or emails about are:
reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
reject_unknown_helo_hostname,
reject_unknown_client_hostname,
Don't blindly use that. It causes a LOT of false positives.
On 1/4/11 10:04 PM, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
I'm trying to stop the chain of:
Sender calls recipient, recipient calls their tech, recipient's tech
calls me... Then I tell them to contact the sender's admin... Then the
sender's admin claims that everyone else accepts their email, even
On 1/1/11 9:36 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Wietse Venema put forth on 1/1/2011 9:50 AM:
Stan Hoeppner:
jason hirsh put forth on 12/31/2010 3:38 PM:
Dec 31 15:24:21 tuna postfix/smtpd[2514]:
asmtpout029.mac.com[17.148.16.104]: 554 5.5.1 Error: no valid recipients
Am I the only one that noticed
On 12/30/10 11:05 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:00:17PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 12/30/10 10:09 PM, Steve Pribyl wrote:
Afternoon,
I am trying to setup a null or satellite client on debian system.
Then you can install a null client, such as ssmtp or nullmailer
On 12/29/10 10:55 AM, K bharathan wrote:
hi all
how can i get (trap) spam messages recd by my mail users or users can
send to a particular email-id the messages that they consider spam so
that i can make these messages available to spamassassin for learning
That's not directly related to,
On 12/29/10 2:44 PM, Philip Van Pelt wrote:
I've set up a mailserver with postfix, dovecot, amavis and spamassassin.
Everything has been up and running for a year now until I noticed my
spamfilter wasn't performing as it should; spam mails sent to a normal
user were getting the right treatment
On 12/29/10 4:14 PM, Joan Moreau wrote:
But I have no car to fix . What is that story about ?
Now, I did not rule out anything in any email.
Can you just tell me how to put the mailing queue in a DB (mysql
database in my case) ?
Exactly which part of NO YOU CAN NOT PUT THE QUEUE IN A
On 12/28/10 7:58 AM, Alexander Moisseev wrote:
m...@domain.tld has an alias al...@domain.tld and mail sent to alias.
X-Original-To: al...@domain.tld prepends to the message. It's OK.
If the before-queue content filter enabled as shown below then
X-Original-To: is m...@domain.tld. Why did this
On 12/28/10 2:41 PM, mouss wrote:
your postfix has support for AUTH. If you also have dovecot, then it's
easier to use dovecot-auth. otherwise, use cyrus sasl.
If he doesn't have dovecot, it is still easier than cyrus :)
--
J.
On 12/26/10 1:58 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
mouss put forth on 12/26/2010 4:13 AM:
Le 26/12/2010 05:12, Roman Gelfand a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Stan Hoeppners...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/24/2010 10:45 AM:
I neglected to mention the exchange
Post the output from postconf -n, and a relevant section of the mail logs.
--
J.
On 12/22/10 10:07 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
is it possible to immediately send bounce to a sender in case
of problem on my server instead of delaying it ?
What kind of a problem ?
You should not arbitrarily alter the default status codes postfix sends
to clients; even though you can,
On 12/22/10 1:10 PM, Hari Hendaryanto wrote:
hai
can i define multiple lookup tables in header_checks?.ie:
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header.regexp,
pcre:/etc/postfix/header.pcre
thanks
As documented:
header_checks (default: empty)
Optional lookup tables for content
On 12/22/10 2:41 PM, David Touzeau wrote:
Dear Postfix Masters
Some users have made mistake in the recipient email address.
So the message turn into bounce queue that is normal.
I would like to know :
How to modify mails stored in the bounce queue to change the recipient
addresses and put
was spoofed, and you
should not have accepted the message in the first place.
Please reply to the LIST.
Better is to try to modify it
Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 14:51 +0100, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 12/22/10 2:41 PM, David Touzeau wrote:
Dear Postfix Masters
Some users have made mistake
On 12/21/10 11:31 AM, David Brophy wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to set Postfix up as a high performance MTA for sending high
volumes of mail.
Our website (dontstayin.com http://dontstayin.com) sends about
100,000 mails per day (message notifications etc.)
We also send about 1-2 million bulk mails
On 12/21/10 1:42 PM, ev...@meulie.net wrote:
Hi all,
Since yesterday I am suddenly seeing quite a few lines like:
Dec 21 10:32:24 yips postfix/sendmail[3086]: fatal: www-data(33): No
recipient addresses found in message header
in my log. Is there any way I can determine which
On 12/21/10 2:43 PM, ev...@meulie.net wrote:
On 12/21/10 1:42 PM, ev...@meulie.net wrote:
Hi all,
Since yesterday I am suddenly seeing quite a few lines like:
Dec 21 10:32:24 yips postfix/sendmail[3086]: fatal: www-data(33): No
recipient addresses found in message header
in my log. Is there
On 12/20/10 3:49 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I receive periodically some spams that pretend to be from my domain.
If this is in the From: header, there's not much you can do about that.
The envelope sender you can trivially protect.
After you have allowed submission, and have passed
On 12/20/10 4:29 PM, Ronald Klop wrote:
Hello,
I would like to have a program called when a message is delivered in a
mailbox. I'm currently trying this with a filter, which gives me a
race condition between real delivery and the moment my hook/filter runs.
That sounds wrong. Any of the
On 12/18/10 8:16 PM, John Brahy wrote:
Hello,
I'm having a problem configuring what I thought would be a postmaster
account alias but I'm not getting all my non-deliverable mail reports
and host not found reports. How do I get all that mail to go to a
specific email address?
On 12/17/10 10:47 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
I added code in the
heavy-lifting Java program to send a message back to SMTP server. I got
an error:you must issue STARTTLS first.
You apparently configured postfix to require encryption on mail submission.
I have no idea why Postfix asks for
On 12/15/10 9:50 PM, Ted To wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:41:11 -0800
Bradley Giesbrechtbradley.giesbre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 15, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Ted To wrote:
Hi,
I have a configuration using dovecot that works for sending and
receiving email. Mail collection by my MUA can be SSL
On 12/15/10 10:24 PM, Ted To wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:16:45 +0100
Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
Oh FGS just *include it in the mail*.
Sorry -- I thought I was making the email more readable...
This expands aliases:
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
virtual_alias_maps
On 12/14/10 4:04 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Matt Hayes wrote:
On 12/13/2010 9:31 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
How would you store a CC of all mailings relayed through postfix, sent
by our users. We have plenty of logs but they dont tell us if someone
sends spam and how much, so that we may reprimand
On 12/14/10 5:43 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 12/14/10 4:04 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Matt Hayes wrote:
BCC'ing all of your user's email is unethical IMHO. Scan outgoing and
incoming email for spam; done. That way you aren't compromising your
users' private
On 12/14/10 6:44 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
This is on a Fedora system.
In the Postfix install documentation I found that I need to do the
following:
/usr/sbin/alternatives --config mta
And select '2' to switch to Postfix.
Is there a way to put this into an install script?
Something
On 12/13/10 4:11 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
I am integrating Postfix 2.3.3 with LDAP. Everything works fine in
development and QA environments, but when the app. moves into our stage
environment, it fails. I do not understand why, but I do know our Stage
environment has tighter control,
On 12/12/10 1:18 AM, Wesley wrote:
right. something like that. i wonder if there's any solution for this.
There are any number of ticketing systems freely available.
We use RT, you can use whatever you like.
--
J.
On 12/12/10 12:15 PM, R.A. Imhoff wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has succeeded to configure Postfix running on a server hosting multiple
virtual domains such that outgoing mail to remote destinations get the Return-Path and
the domain of the message-id match the From: header?
No.
On 12/11/10 7:18 PM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is maybe a little off-topic, but is anyone having any problems
with their mysql servers today?
That is an odd - and disturbingly non-technical - assertion, that the
date has anything to do with how a product deployed on
On 12/8/10 1:09 PM, VALOIS, Pascal wrote:
Hello,
does anyone know how to configure postfix to add an automatic footnote
at mail send by postfix for a specific virtual domain ?
This is A. not an MTA's job, and B. will break functionality like PGP
signing.
Configure a signature in your MUA.
On 12/7/10 11:16 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
I keep getting this error, and I have no clue where it comes from. I
have no localhost in my fetchmailrc file.
here is some of the entries in /var/log/mail.err:
Dec 7 16:00:38 paulandcilla fetchmail[16761]: connection to
localhost:smtp [::1/25]
On 12/7/10 11:10 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On 12/07/2010 04:48 PM, Steffan A. Cline wrote:
CIDR blocking all of China with an auto whitelist for those that you email
directly?
I don't know anyone in China, I know someone who travels there, but he
has a Bellsouth address..
so how do you
On 12/02/2010 10:10 AM, michael.h.gr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for the config hint.
It works fine if I add an email address like this to generic
laserjetscan...@domain.local notificati...@domain.com
It does not work if I want to do the following:
@domain.com notificati...@domain.com
On 12/01/2010 01:35 PM, Dan wrote:
There is no setgid bit set.
I had to chmod 777 the /website/vuser directory just so that new user
creates would work otherwise when it changes uid to some virtual id
such as 2003, it would not be allowed to create anything in the
directory to begin with no
: d56d6d643534fe618b26807948b3cfe43c02b3f7abf7f4a073778c9c1666d1eb
The difference between original and compromised file (rootkit) is
attached to this e-mail.
Dan.
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 12/01/2010 01:35 PM, Dan wrote:
There is no setgid bit set.
I had to chmod 777
On 11/30/2010 04:27 PM, Gustavo Villaran wrote:
Hi, i just installed postfix on my company and is working fine, now
the company management has asked me to
implement a group security model that i dont know if i could do it in
postfix, it goes like this :
1. We want to have a group of persons
On 11/30/2010 07:49 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:22:39PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 11/30/2010 04:27 PM, Gustavo Villaran wrote:
Hi, i just installed postfix on my company and is working fine, now the
company management has asked me to
implement a group
On 11/28/2010 02:50 PM, Marnix Petrarca (DaemonLabs.com) wrote:
Hello everyone,
Hi!
DO NOT post NEW questions to OLD threads.
i'm running postfix from the Fedora Core 12 x64 distribution. The
postfix box is on a 10.x.x.x segment of my firewall, and i'm
connecting from a 192.x.x.x
On 11/28/2010 03:50 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
... which failed until I added /var/spool/postfix/etc/hosts
As I said.
there are not any y on any non-commented line in master.cf.
As mouss already told you, that does not mean it isn't chrooted. there
are defaults. the default for
On 11/28/2010 10:06 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Hi,
I want to masquerade domain.fi with domain.com on outgoing mail? How
to do this on postfix?
With the masquerade_domains setting in main.cf.
Thanks,
--
Eero
--
J.
On 11/27/2010 10:43 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
Nov 26 15:23:02 mgw1 postfix/smtpd[92264]: fatal: host/service localhost/10023
not found:
Find where you told postfix to connect there, and correct it.
Smtpd(8) runs chrooted by default, so make sure that localhost is in
fact also present in
On 11/24/2010 06:35 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
I'm running postfix (version 2.5.5, from debian lenny package)
with amavis and spamassassin for spam checks.
For amavis and SA to work, we have 2 postfix instances, the main
one running in port 25 and other running in other port
On 11/24/2010 10:38 AM, Laszlo Kupor wrote:
Hello!
I manage a mixed mail system (postfix, sendmail, etc).
Meaning ?
You shouldn't run multiple MTAs on the same system.
The mail routing works with internal email addressing.
That's quite normal.
I don't want to communicate
On 11/19/2010 05:56 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
I did say fixed by running postfix-install, wasn't clear that postfix-install
fixed postfix fail-to-run problem.
fsck or whatever Linux RH does to fix filesystems apparently converted private/scan=
socket to private/scan dir, into which we got 2176
On 11/19/2010 09:59 PM, Jerry wrote:
If I were to place this in my main.cf file:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
...
reject_plaintext_session
Wouldn't that effectively enforce TLS or am I failing to understand the
directive?
Yes.
To enforce TLS, use
smtpd_tls_security_options =
On 11/18/2010 03:11 PM, Jerry wrote:
To a point I would agree with you. I have often wondered what moron
came up with certain standards that are now in effect.
That would be the morons without whom you would not HAVE internet.
Get a clue, please.
--
J.
On 11/18/2010 05:44 AM, George Forman wrote:
What's going on postfix-us...@postfix.org? Making money from home is
the new thing, you've gotta get on this. I want you to get in on this
with me, I've already make $1200 this week. Go to this article and go
over it then get the kit on the page,
On 11/15/2010 12:22 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 11/15/2010 11:55 AM, Catalin Iacob wrote:
Hello everybody,
I use pipe to start my own script when an email to a certain address
is received. The script will do it's own logging and I want to be able
to correlate that logging with the Postifx
On 11/15/2010 01:01 PM, Mariel Sebedio wrote:
Hello, I am new in the list and Have this problem:
I had RHEL 5.4 64 bits server wiht
openldap-servers-2.3.43-3.el5 (aliases and authorization method)
dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5
postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2 (implementation with mbox)
The problemas was:
When
On 11/15/2010 01:31 PM, Ignacio García wrote:
Hi there.
Is it possible to block sending emails from local accounts if many
bounces have been generated from this local account? Example, a user
is sending many messages to wrong addresses. I want postfix not to let
him send more messages
On 11/15/2010 06:03 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Do Milters and smtpd_proxy_filter work together i.e. can I run a Milter and
smtpd_proxy_filter together and both are effective?
http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html has this to say:
When you use the before-queue content filter for
On 11/14/2010 05:54 PM, Scott B. wrote:
--
Scott Berry
MCP and A Plus Certified
That doesn't really inspire a lot of confidence, especially when you put
the body of your message /below/ your signature.
Some MUAs will silently ignore it when replying.
Hello there,
I am new at setting
On 11/14/2010 11:39 PM, flip side wrote:
Thanks for the reply, Wietse. I had read that already -- I'm not quite
sure it is you're wanting me to do.
What the DEBUG_README asks you to.
I would provide more details if I had any, but I can't find any
logging information.
That's nonsense.
On 11/14/2010 11:06 PM, Simon wrote:
Hi There,
We have two postfix servers (postfix from debian lenny). Is there any
way to move all deferred mail from one server to another?
On the one with the deferred mail, add
relay_host = [name.or.ip.of.other.postfix]
to main.cf, then run
On 11/13/2010 05:28 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 11/13/2010 11:01 AM, John Hinton wrote:
OK, on a CentOS 5.X server with Amavisd-new and Postfix.
I think I still need some suggestions for tuning. I notice in my
logs, that dictionary attacks are normally being rejected by RBL,
mainly Spamhaus
On 11/13/2010 06:51 PM, t...@diogunix.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have to setup a postfix mailserver with speecial requirements from the
customer side:
They do not want their sender IP addresses being visible in the mailheader
as seen by the recipients. Reason: They sometimes also
On 11/12/2010 10:36 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 11/12/2010 09:05 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
I'm trying to setup an SMTP service on port 587, TLS required,
authentication in plaintext allowed.
What I can't understand is the following:
with smtpd_tls_security_level
On 11/12/2010 11:16 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Steven King wrote:
Hey everyone,
Does anyone have any good documentation on how to rewrite the
envelope_sender based on an regexp map?
I need to do the following. I have an application that is broken, and
sets the mail from envelope-sender value
On 11/12/2010 12:40 PM, Mingliang Zu wrote:
Hi,
I'm using postfix 2.3. My intention is to reject MAIL FROM command
(give a 501 syntax error) if the sender doesn't contains '@'.
Add reject_non_fqdn_sender to your restriction list.
Reject a sender is not the same as a syntax error; however,
On 11/12/2010 01:00 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Mingliang Zu mingliang...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I'm using postfix 2.3. My intention is to reject MAIL FROM command
(give a
501 syntax error) if the sender doesn't contains '@'. I have worked
on it
for two days but without any luck.
The
On 11/12/2010 01:07 PM, Mingliang Zu wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply Jeroen,
But it looks reject_non_fqdn_sender doesn't help:
[r...@rhel5 postfix]# grep fqdn main.cf http://main.cf
smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_sender
sigh. did you change the order of the restrictions ?
On 11/12/2010 01:17 PM, Mingliang Zu wrote:
sigh. did you change the order of the restrictions ?
Yes. reject_non_fqdn_sender is now the only restriction. And these
configurations are at the last lines of main.conf. Is this OK?
[r...@rhel5 postfix]# tail main.cf
# readme_directory: The
On 11/12/2010 01:42 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/12/2010 6:20 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 11/12/2010 01:17 PM, Mingliang Zu wrote:
sigh. did you change the order of the restrictions ?
Yes. reject_non_fqdn_sender is now the only restriction. And
these
configurations are at the last lines
On 11/12/2010 03:19 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi , this isnt really a dovecot/postfix question
in dove lda, there is sendmail_path =
someone tried other progs here like mini_sendmail ?
http://www.acme.com/software/mini_sendmail/
i.e for using a default from forwarder address when sending
On 11/12/2010 07:06 PM, Rob Tanner wrote:
Hi,
Our admissions office sends out mass mailings to prospective students,
anywhere from 5,000 to 25,000 at a time. They are mail-merged and
sent via outlook to the postfix server, one recipient per message.
The user reports that outlook sends out
On 11/12/2010 06:58 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:15:03AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/12/2010 6:47 AM, Mingliang Zu wrote:
smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_sender
Good, that setting does what you have asked. Testing that here gives:
...
MAIL
On 11/12/2010 10:41 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Wietse Venema wrote:
Trick question: does running the command postfix check produce
the same warnings? If not, perhaps the warnings are from a different
point in the space-time continuum.
Wietse,
No, postfix check does not
On 11/13/2010 12:34 AM, Pete wrote:
Hello all,
I have finally attained the unenviable position of being able to effortlessly
see
the entire wood without being able to clearly identify a single tree. IOW, I'm
completely stuck.
OS = Centos 5.5 (2.6.18-194.26.1.el5) x86_64
Postfix =
On 11/11/2010 03:14 PM, Pedro Axelrud wrote:
Hello guys,
We have a startup with an email marketing web app, we are very rigid
with our clients to not allow spammers.
One of our client's wants to send a message to two million contacts
HOW will they be sending these messages ?
That's the most
On 11/11/2010 05:10 PM, Pedro Axelrud wrote:
Yeah, what Mark said is totally correct, the message is almost the
same to the two million recipients, but each delivery has one
recipient and different links to track clicks, let him/her
u_n_s_u_b_s_c_r_i_b_e (my reply before this
On 11/11/2010 08:16 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
Simon also publishes SRPMs, so you can build an equivalent RPM on any
latest/greatest release of an O/S, for which Simon has not yet uploaded
a binary
On 11/11/2010 09:12 PM, Pedro Axelrud wrote:
Sorry, I don't exacly got it. What is the problem of having a high
minimal_backoff_time in a normal a MTA?
Delays in mail delivery ?
You suggest me to have a fallback_relay only to try to deliver that
messages, right?
I didn't, but it's not a
On 11/10/2010 08:37 AM, Toomas Vendelin wrote:
Jeroen, thank you for taking time to answer.
The problem was that I have put /sbin/nologin for a login shell
instead of /bin/false. Don't ask, why on Earth did I do that (I'm
asking that myself). Anyway, with this changed, mail goes through as
On 11/10/2010 08:17 AM, Steven King wrote:
Hey everyone,
Does anyone have any good documentation on how to rewrite the
envelope_sender based on an regexp map?
I need to do the following. I have an application that is broken, and
sets the mail from envelope-sender value to From:user@domain.tld.
On 11/10/2010 11:49 PM, PA wrote:
1^st thanks for reading this email.
Recently I been getting hit with a lot of dictionary attacks and I was
wondering if someone can shed some light on this.
I using the following postfix options:
smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
On 11/09/2010 06:15 PM, Toomas Vendelin wrote:
Hi there!
I run Postfix on CentOS 5.5 with virtual domains. Mail is supposed to
be delivered to maildirs.
Don't you mean I have configured postfix to deliver to maildirs.
If that's not what you mean, it's an unwarranted - and quite dangerous -
On 11/08/2010 06:55 AM, ahmad riza h nst wrote:
hello,
currently i am new to postfix and at the moment i have a task to setup
mail server with postfix, dovecot and webmin.
Ugh. Don't attempt to manage the system with webmin until you have solid
expierence in configuring it by hand.
In
401 - 500 of 716 matches
Mail list logo
