4:47 mail postfix/smtpd[21591]: connect from my.company.sk
> [pu.bl.ic.ip]
>
> Sep 21 15:44:47 mail postfix/smtpd[21591]: 5BA29411BEE2: client=
> my.company.sk [pu.bl.ic.ip] [senders local IP address]
>
> Sep 21 15:44:47 mail postfix/cleanup[28274]: 5BA29411BEE2:
> mes
t; smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/mail.key
> smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1
> smtpd_tls_security_level = may
> smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/spool/postfix/smtpd_tls_cache
> smtpd_tls_session_cache_timeout = 3600s
> tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom
> unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
>
Met vriendelijke groet,
Martijn de Munnik
--
YoungGuns
Kasteleinenkampweg 7b
5222 AX 's-Hertogenbosch
T. 073 623 56 40
F. 073 623 56 39
www.youngguns.nl
KvK 18076568
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 15:48 +0200, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 09:41 -0400, Carlos Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Martijn de Munnik
> > wrote:
> > > I think this is not too restrictive and the sending mailserver should
> &
Hi,
It seems that e-mails which are relayed to other servers (using
relay_domains and transport_maps) don't go through content_filter. How
can I make sure that all mails go through the content_filter?
thanks,
Martijn
address_verify_map = btree:${data_directory}/verify
alias_maps = hash:/opt/csw/
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 07:38 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Martijn de Munnik:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that e-mails which are relayed to other servers (using
> > relay_domains and transport_maps) don't go through content_filter. How
> > can I make sure that a
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:46:01 -0400 (EDT), wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse
Venema) wrote:
> Martijn de Munnik:
>>
>> On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 07:38 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> > Martijn de Munnik:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > It
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 13:50 +0200, Martin Schiøtz wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm configuring a simple postfix smtp-server that is only used for
> outgoing emails for lots of users.
> I want to do some simple spam checking with postfix. I was thinking of:
>
> rbl
> spf
RBL and SPF are techniques only used f
Hi List,
Some of our customers use our mailservers as antispam/antivirus gateway.
So our server accepts mail, does some spam and virus checking and
delivers the mail to a remote server. Of course I don't want to accept
mail for non existing users so our mailserver verifies the recipient. So
far so
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 06:35 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Martijn de Munnik:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > Some of our customers use our mailservers as antispam/antivirus gateway.
> > So our server accepts mail, does some spam and virus checking and
> > delivers the mai
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:03 +0200, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 06:35 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Martijn de Munnik:
> > > Hi List,
> > >
> > > Some of our customers use our mailservers as antispam/antivirus gateway.
> > > S
On Nov 4, 2009, at 10:52 PM, Eric B. wrote:
Hi,
I'm running postfix on an internal network with an internal DNS. My
internal DNS is configured for my particular domain (ie:
mydomain.com). I
have an MX pointer that points to my postfix machine so any email
being
generated for mydomain.com
Hi,
Last night we had a issue with our mail server which went unnoticed till
this morning. Our spam filter crashed and postfix couldn't feed mails for
check to localhost:10024. The mails stayed in the queue till we noticed
that we didn't received any mail this morning. I restarted the spam filter
0 1000 * www.sdu.dk
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Martijn de Munnik
> Sent: 11. november 2009 09:54
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
&g
h!
>
> Best regards
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Martijn de Munnik
> Sent: 11. november 2009 11:31
N MX 0 a.mx.premore.net.
>
> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> a.mx.premore.net. 3093IN A 198.186.193.20
>
> However my mail server wont send to this destination address and I
> have no idea why. Can someone tell me how I can better examine this
> situation to understand where the fault lies.
>
> Thank you!
--
Martijn de Munnik
YoungGuns
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 16:27 +, Frog wrote:
> Perhaps your mail server is on a DNSBL?
>
> Regards
> Frog
Nope, this is a problem at the ip level, routing. This is not a postfix
or mail/smtp issue.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Carlos Williams"
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent
On Dec 4, 2009, at 8:08 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> I was just thinking today that if anyone knew a valid email address on
> my Postfix mail server, anyone could simply telnet to it (assuming
> they're on a trusted network / mynetworks) and send mail posed as that
> valid email address. I know t
On Dec 12, 2009, at 6:28 PM, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> After seeing these:
>
> postfix/smtpd[14497]: warning: 118.71.107.14: hostname
> adsl-dynamic-pool-xxx.fpt.vn verification failed: Name or service not known
> postfix/smtpd[14497]: connect from unknown[118.71.107.14]
> postfix/smtpd[14497]: N
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 13:32 +, Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just had a hard nut to crack, as I've got SMTP server which stores
> and forwards or I only hoped so. Why ? As I checked now if the
> remote server is down, and I use reject_unverified_recipient it gives me
> an err
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 14:24 +, Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
> Martijn de Munnik wrote:
>
> > > http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#caching
> > >
> >
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> The only problem with tha
On Dec 20, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Houssam El Hallak wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello
> this is my first post here , so If any mistake with this post please let me
> know .
>
> question 1 : is this a good postfix architecture ??
>
> I have 2 postfix Servers :
> DMZ_postfix which has basic protection (192.16
On Dec 26, 2009, at 9:08 PM, Edwin Minneboo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wonder how and why mail is delivered in the following case:
>
> I own a domain, let’s say example.com. In this domain mail for user
> w...@example.com is delivered to e...@example.com.
> Now I find mail for To: wilma.vivi...@
ake available to these servers (via SQL replication) a list of 'valid'
> email addresses from the destination mail server(s), how can the
> valid/invalid address accept/deny be deployed?
>
Look for relay_domains and relay_recipient_maps, that will solve your
problem.
--
Martijn de Munnik
YoungGuns
Hi List,
This is not a real postfix related question…
We offer e-mail services to our customers and some of our customers have a hard
time configuring their mail client. I noticed that most mail clients try to
'find' the correct settings when an account is configured. So the mail client
(at le
On Jan 10, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> On 1/10/10 10:17 PM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
>> Hi List,
>>
>> This is not a real postfix related question…
>>
>> We offer e-mail services to our customers and some of our customers have a
>> har
Hi list,
I have a problem with delivering mail to a host and get this error:
host mx2.amsterdam.nl[145.222.14.10] said: 421 enepmx02.amsterdam.nl
Error: timeout exceeded (in reply to end of DATA command)
This error only seems to occur with 'large' mails. Currently I have a mail
of ~600KB and ~8M
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:56:39 +0100, Martijn de Munnik
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have a problem with delivering mail to a host and get this error:
>
> host mx2.amsterdam.nl[145.222.14.10] said: 421 enepmx02.amsterdam.nl
> Error: timeout exceeded (in reply to end of DATA comman
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:10:50 +0100, Martijn de Munnik
wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:56:39 +0100, Martijn de Munnik
> wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I have a problem with delivering mail to a host and get this error:
>>
>> host mx2.amsterdam.nl[145.222.14
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:20:01 -0500 (EST), wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse
Venema) wrote:
> Martijn de Munnik:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I have a problem with delivering mail to a host and get this error:
>>
>> host mx2.amsterdam.nl[145.222.14.10] said: 421 enepmx02.amster
On Jan 20, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:22:56PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> The broken router then throws away the bytes with higher sequence
>> numbers than 14233.
>>
>> Workaround: turn off window scaling support on the sender's kernel.
>
> This
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:30:54 -0500 (EST), wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse
Venema) wrote:
> It's nice for a change to work with someone who provides actual
> information, instead of that dork from last week who was just
> venting his opinions and not giving people a chance to help.
I don't know how on
Hi list,
I had a problem with my primary mailserver which was not able to deliver
mail to some remote mx's. One of the mx's that we couldn't deliver to was
mx-cluster[1-2].one.com. After I modified the transport maps on
mx1.youngguns.nl (stevie.youngguns.nl) the message now is deliverd to
mx2.youn
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:35:25 -0500 (EST), wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse
Venema) wrote:
> Martijn de Munnik:
>> Jan 21 17:02:30 marcus postfix/qmgr[16421]: 523FD1C11A:
>> from=, size=650750, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
>> Jan 21 17:02:30 marcus postfix/smtp[16449]: 523FD1C11A: host
&
Hi List,
RFC2821 section 4.5.3.2 Timeouts reads
"An SMTP server SHOULD have a timeout of at least 5 minutes while it
is awaiting the next command from the sender."
When I try to connect to an one.com mx (mx-cluster1.one.com or
mx-cluster2.one.com) I notice they will close the connection after ab
On Jan 23, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
>
>> RFC2821 section 4.5.3.2 Timeouts reads
>>
>> "An SMTP server SHOULD have a timeout of at least 5 minutes while it
>> is awaiting the next command from the s
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 13:23 +0200, Razvan Cosma wrote:
> Hello,
> While moving the IMAP services to a new host, I'd need to copy all
> messages addressed to anyu...@example.com to the old inbox, and to the
> new at anyu...@tempsubdomain.example.com
> Virtual maps allows this, but needs the full li
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 15:43 +0100, Zoltan Balogh wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I have an old postfix install where I am getting "timeout after
> CONNECT from" error messages upon e-mails being send from one
> particular host. The user is complaining that he is not able to send
> out any e-mail. Other user
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:47 +0100, Ilja Beeskow wrote:
> Hello @ll
>
> I have a little problem with postfix 2.5, trendmicro viruswall and an old
> exchange 2k behind it. Perhaps somebody could give me a hint because I'm
> really confused after some days of trying different things.
>
> for incom
Hi,
Our smtp server has some issues when talking to some remote mx's. This
results in a timeout and the message not being delivered (this was
discussed on this mailinglist but there doesn't seem to be a real
solution available now). When we relay the message through another
server the remote mx ha
Hi,
Since this morning I get these error messages in maillog. This happens
for all our users:
May 19 12:43:08 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix/error[23550]: [ID 197553
mail.info] EFEAC1C176: to=, relay=none,
delay=5511, delays=5509/1.6/0/0.04, dsn=4.0.0, status=SOFTBOUNCE (User
unknown in virtual alia
# /opt/csw/sbin/postmap -q mart...@youngguns.nl
hash:/opt/csw/etc/postfix/maps/virtual
martijn-youngguns.nl
so that seems to work?
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Martijn de Munnik
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since this morning I get these error messages in maillog. This happens
> for a
-o local_header_rewrite_clients=
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Martijn de Munnik
wrote:
> # /opt/csw/sbin/postmap -q mart...@youngguns.nl
> hash:/opt/csw/etc/postfix/maps/virtual
> martijn-youngguns.nl
>
> so that seems to work?
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Marti
9-154.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.149.154])
(Authenticated sender: mart...@youngguns.nl)
by stevie.youngguns.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EABA3B5BA
for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:37:40
+0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <859284ee-dd63-4b7c-8cde-53b8baa90...@youngguns.nl>
From: Martijn de Munnik
To: munni
Op 24 aug 2010, om 14:24 heeft Edward avanti het volgende geschreven:
> Halo,
>
> We are have odd occasional problem where, some customer that have made up
> name in hostname on pc and try send mail get rejected by us
>
> submission is told use - submission inet n - n -
Hi list,
I'm trying to integrate dspam filtering into my postfix system. The
way I have it now works for local users but when a user has an alias
to an external domain the mail bounces. This server is for receiving
mail only, so no submission is needed.
---
This is the mail system at hos
Is there a way to use virtual_tranport with virtual_alias for this case?
On Sep 3, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to integrate dspam filtering into my postfix system. The
way I have it now works for local users but when a user has an alias
to an ext
Hi List,
I'm still struggling with dspam integration with postfix.
Now I have:
--
address_verify_map = btree:${data_directory}/verify
alias_maps = dbm:/etc/opt/redknot/postfix/aliases
config_directory = /etc/opt/redknot/postfix
disable_vrfy_command = yes
home_mailbox = Maildir/
mailbox_command
On Sep 8, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Martijn de Munnik:
So I'm using a mailbox_transport to call dspam. Unfortantly the mail
doesn't show up in the logs after the lmtp part (I have lmtp -v in
master.cf) and the mail isn't delivered. When I remove the
The ma
ender, reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unauth_pipelining, permit
smtpd_soft_error_limit = 3
soft_bounce = no
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 450
Met vriendelijke groet,
Martijn de Munnik
--
YoungGuns
Kasteleinenkampweg 7b
5222 AX 's-Hertogenbosch
T. 073 623 56 40
F. 073
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 450
On Jul 13, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi List,
A script just screwed my main.cf of a backup mx. Unfortunately I
don't
have a backup of the main.cf. I restored the main.cf but one thing is
still not working as before. The
On Jul 13, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi Noel, List,
Thanks for your reply! I changed things according to your settings
but I guess I overlooked a thing? Still they backup mailserver
relays everything for *...@validdomain.org. Invalid domains are not
On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi Noel, List,
Thanks for your reply! I changed things according to your settings
but I guess I overlooked a thing? Still they backup mailserver
relays
Hi,
On Jul 13, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
smtpd_recipient_limit = 25
only if you have 25 or fewer users.
I thought this means a user can send an e-mail to 25 users max at once?
soft_bounce = no
tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom
transport_maps = hash:/opt/csw/etc/postfix/transport
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/opt/csw/etc/postfix/virtual
Kind regards,
Martijn de Munnik
--
YoungGuns
Kas
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 11:40 +0200, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using a couple of anti-spam techniques which successfully reject
> (5xx) or ban (ipfilter firewall rule) most spam before even getting in
> the queue. A couple of days ago about 2600 spam messages whe
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 10:55 +0100, Simon Waters wrote:
> On Monday 27 July 2009 10:40:34 Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> >
> > I'm using a couple of anti-spam techniques which successfully reject
> > (5xx) or ban (ipfilter firewall rule) most spam before even getting in
>
On Jul 27, 2009, at 7:18 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2009 05:47:29 Simon Waters wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2009 11:13:34 Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Losing catchall seems to be the best solution but some of my
customers
want to create an emailaddress for every website the register on
What do these log entries mean and how can I fix this problem:
Jul 29 02:19:39 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix/postfix-script[24806]: [ID
197553 mail.info] starting the Postfix mail system
Jul 29 02:19:41 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix/master[24807]: [ID 197553
mail.info] daemon started -- version 2
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:56 +0200, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> I guess I need prohibit the catch all account and offer the solution
> with the delimiter instead. That way all spam to bogus email addresses
> get rejected because the address does not exist.
>
> But still I wonde
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 07:06 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 7/30/2009, Martijn de Munnik (mart...@youngguns.nl) wrote:
> > Of course we don't know which email addresses are valid so all mail for
> > the domain is accepted on our servers.
>
> That is your problem to
On Jul 30, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 7/30/2009 8:26 AM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
I assume it is better to put the reject_unknown_recipient_domain and
reject_unverified_recipient controls after the rbls en policy
services.
This way only address verification is needed when
r returned.
The 450 error triggers the spammer to retry sending the mail.
The to address is an unknown user on my system so postfix could return a
550 error. How can I do this?
I've attached postconf -n output in main.cf.
--
Martijn de Munnik
address_verify_map = btree:${data_directory}/ve
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 11:28 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Martijn de Munnik :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Sometimes our mail server is 'under attack' and we get a lot of these
> > entries in our log file:
> >
> > Aug 17 11:08:19 stevie.youngguns.
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:46 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Martijn de Munnik :
>
> > > Do you have a caching DNS server?
> >
> > Yes, but still things can go wrong and I don't want a failing DNS lookup
> > to be fatal.
>
> Postfix always returns
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:46 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Martijn de Munnik :
>
> > > Do you have a caching DNS server?
> >
> > Yes, but still things can go wrong and I don't want a failing DNS lookup
> > to be fatal.
>
> Postfix always returns
Hi list,
What is the use of mailbox_size_limit when mail is delivered to
Maildirs?
I have mailbox_size_limit > message_size_limit but I think I can safely
change it to 0?
--
Martijn de Munnik
--
YoungGuns
Kasteleinenkampweg 7b
5222 AX 's-Hertogenbosch
T. 073 623 56 40
F. 073 6
Hi list,
We are using address_verify_map to cache and limit the number of checks
on remote smtp servers. This is done because we act as a spam/virus
filter for some domains that have there own mail server. Now it seems
the address_verify_map is also used for local domains.
One of our clients crea
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 09:10 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > How can I enable the address_verify_map only for the relay_domains?
> >
> > postconf -n
> >
> > smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_rbl_
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 09:10 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > How can I enable the address_verify_map only for the relay_domains?
> >
> To answer the query:
> Replace reject_unverified_recipient with "
On Aug 22, 2009, at 7:53 PM, AMP Admin wrote:
Does anyone use iptables or something to defend against attacks?
Like if x amount of requests per x amount of time send away. If so
I would love some examples. Thanks!
Hi,
I use fail2ban with ipf on Solaris 10. When a host produces to many
On Aug 22, 2009, at 8:16 PM, AMP Admin wrote:
Ø Does anyone use iptables or something to defend against attacks?
Like if x amount of requests per x amount of time send away. If so
I would love some examples. Thanks!
Thanks for the tips guys. How does that do with search engine
bots
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 10:28 -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2009, at 10:10, Mikael Bak wrote:
> > Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
> >>
> >> The spam I see pretty much all originates in China & Brazil, with
> >> some
> >> originating in Korea & US. It also pretty much all originates on
>
> Most of this spam is also blocked using spamhaus. Also you could add SPF
> to your own domain so no other servers could send mail using your
> domain.
> http://www.openspf.org/Introduction
Off course your server should check the SPF records for incoming mail.
Hi,
How can I write a message to syslog when a check_client_access rule
matches?
thanks,
Martijn
On Aug 24, 2009, at 7:57 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Monday 24 August 2009 12:43:16 Martijn de Munnik wrote:
How can I write a message to syslog when a check_client_access
rule matches?
See the WARN result. If you mean that you want to log and to trigger
some other action, do note that REJECT
On Aug 24, 2009, at 8:31 PM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
On Aug 24, 2009, at 7:57 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Monday 24 August 2009 12:43:16 Martijn de Munnik wrote:
How can I write a message to syslog when a check_client_access
rule matches?
See the WARN result. If you mean that you want to
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:45:53 +0100, Dan Slay
wrote:
> I'm looking for some information on preventing the sending of backscatter
> from a Postfix gateway mail server.
>
> The server itself does not and will not hold a recipient list, therefore
I
> don't know what the best way forward would be? The
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:12:52 +0100, Mark Goodge
wrote:
> Dan Slay wrote:
>> Thanks, that's what I have read. Which is why this make things more
>> awkward.
>>
>> I cannot see that holding a recipient list is a solution. If, for
>> instance, you relay for thousands of domains all going to differe
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:59:20 -0400, wrote:
> I am seeing a few spams coming through with a from address (seen on my
> postfix logs) that does not match the "From" address shown on my users
> Outlook. In fact my users are seeing a "From" address as their own,
> something that my postfix server cu
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:05:42 +0100, Mark Goodge
wrote:
> wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> I am seeing a few spams coming through with a from address (seen on my
>> postfix logs) that does not match the "From" address shown on my users
>> Outlook. In fact my users are seeing a "From" addres
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:00:15 +0100, "Laurence Moughan"
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Would someone just please give me a headsup on the format for reg exp
> headerchecks files,
>
> Im not sure how to format for searching for a string within an email
> address,
>
> eg
>
> to reject all mail with the
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:29:21 +0200, Nicolas Michel
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to know if there is a way to reject connections from host not
> listed in the MX records of the domain it claims to be.
>
> For example : a host with IP WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ try so send a mail to my
> domain (we'll call i
Hi,
We have an issue with integrating a spam filter into postfix. When a
mail enters the mail system a loop start between postfix and dspam. And
I don't know why the loop start because when the mail returns to postfix
(localhost:10026) we override mailbox_transport and the mail should be
del
first.
Backscatter.org
SORBS-SPAM
UCEPROTECTL2
maybe others...
>
> Sam.
>
>
> Martijn de Munnik - Postfix List a écrit :
>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:06:42 +0100, Sam Przyswa
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On last Postfix install on new ser
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:45:55 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> Martijn de Munnik:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Our smtp server has some issues when talking to some remote mx's. This
>> results in a timeout and the message not being delivered (this was
>> discussed on this
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:17:51 +0200, "Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL"
wrote:
>>>Patric Falinder
>>Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL skrev 2010-04-14 10:50:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Searched on the web for this but couldn't find anything close to what
>> I'm looking for.
>>
>> Any of you kn
86 matches
Mail list logo
