deliveries work fine - it sends the email just like I would
expect and passes SPF tests
* The problem I am having is with SRS bounces (i.e. a SRS delivery
results in a bounce - which must then be sent back to the original
sender). Here is an example of the problem (please note
open to
alternatives.
* SRS deliveries work fine - it sends the email just like I would
expect and passes SPF tests
* The problem I am having is with SRS bounces (i.e. a SRS delivery
results in a bounce - which must then be sent back to the original
sender). Here is an example
imaginable where you *never* get removed.
Your server, Your rules but don't try to influence people with bad ideas.
Backscatter is done with bounces. Not all bounces are backscatter.
José Borges Ferreira.
to me, you
get put on the deepest darkest shitlist imaginable where you *never* get
removed.
Your server, Your rules but don't try to influence people with bad ideas.
if a server is sending bounces instead reject messages it is wrong configured
Backscatter is done with bounces. Not all
, you get put on the deepest darkest shitlist imaginable where
you *never* get removed.
Your server, Your rules but don't try to influence people with bad
ideas.
Backscatter is done with bounces. Not all bounces are backscatter.
This.
The reason backscatter is a problem is because too many
? Absolutely never. If you bounce a message to
me, you get put on the deepest darkest shitlist imaginable where
you *never* get removed.
Your server, Your rules but don't try to influence people with bad
ideas.
if a server is sending bounces instead reject messages it is wrong
configured
Indeed
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Mark Goodge m...@good-stuff.co.uk wrote:
if a server is sending bounces instead reject messages it is wrong
configured
Indeed. But there are circumstances where a reject isn't possible. In
those cases, the choice is between drop or bounce. And bounce
On Nov 4, 2013, at 10:43 PM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 04 Nov 2013, at 16:50 , Jim Wright j...@wrightthisway.com wrote:
Normally, bouncing undeliverable messages is the proper behavior for a good
netizen.
*NEVER* Bounce. Ever.
Reject, yes. Bounce? Absolutely never.
? Absolutely never. If you bounce a message to
me, you get put on the deepest darkest shitlist imaginable where
you *never* get removed.
Your server, Your rules but don't try to influence people with bad
ideas.
Backscatter is done with bounces. Not all bounces are backscatter.
This.
The reason
an way for REJECTING mail on
such cases). Do I Bounce that email or drop the mail (After I have accepted
it? Surely, in this scenario the correct thing would be to BOUNCE is it
not?)?
I'm just trying to understand the ways to prevent BOUNCEs..
Check this:
http://sys4.de/en/blog/2013/04/08/postfix
configuration, reject the mail, and you bounce, like you seem to want to
do, then all it takes is for a spammer to spam that user with various
spoofed senders and you have instant backscatter.
I'm just trying to understand the ways to prevent BOUNCEs..
Prevent bounces by rejecting as much as possible
Migrating to a new server and decided I would switch to postfix. On my old
qmail server, I used validrcptto to drop emails not destines for the
virtual accts on our site.
I've read tutorials and the backscatter/local recipient pages and my
postfix is still sending out bounce message instead of
Ian Evans skrev den 2013-11-05 00:03:
Here's my main.cf [1]. Please let me know if there's more info you
need.
first question from me is, why do you mix virtual and local users ?
and show postfix logs to get more help with the bounces
On Nov 4, 2013, at 5:03 PM, Ian Evans dheianev...@gmail.com wrote:
I've read tutorials and the backscatter/local recipient pages and my postfix
is still sending out bounce message instead of just dropping the connections.
I want to be a good netizen so want to nip this in the bud.
Am 05.11.2013 00:50, schrieb Jim Wright:
On Nov 4, 2013, at 5:03 PM, Ian Evans dheianev...@gmail.com wrote:
I've read tutorials and the backscatter/local recipient pages and my postfix
is still sending out bounce message instead of just dropping the
connections. I want to be a good
Ian Evans:
Migrating to a new server and decided I would switch to postfix. On my old
qmail server, I used validrcptto to drop emails not destines for the
virtual accts on our site.
I've read tutorials and the backscatter/local recipient pages and my
postfix is still sending out bounce
?
How am I mixing them? Still getting used to the postfix way of things, so
if I'm mixing them I'm not even sure how. I don't have any mail accts that
are also unix accts. The root acct is aliased to my personal mail.
and show postfix logs to get more help with the bounces
I sent an email from
On 04 Nov 2013, at 16:50 , Jim Wright j...@wrightthisway.com wrote:
On Nov 4, 2013, at 5:03 PM, Ian Evans dheianev...@gmail.com wrote:
I've read tutorials and the backscatter/local recipient pages and my postfix
is still sending out bounce message instead of just dropping the
li...@sbt.net.au:
j...@target.tld: host target.tld[69.175.yyy.xxx]
said: 550-Please turn on SMTP Authentication in your mail client, or
login to the 550-IMAP/POP3 server before sending your message.
geko.sbt.net.au 550-[180.235.131.4]:51667 is not permitted to relay
through this server
On Fri, October 11, 2013 10:31 pm, Wietse Venema wrote:
What is the real server name?
What is the real IP address?
Wietse,
thanks, from the log entry:
corporatechange.com.au
69.175.105.186
BUT, looking at recent log entries, mail seems now delivered, THOUGH, log
now show different IP for
li...@sbt.net.au:
On Fri, October 11, 2013 10:31 pm, Wietse Venema wrote:
What is the real server name?
What is the real IP address?
Wietse,
thanks, from the log entry:
corporatechange.com.au
69.175.105.186
That IP address belongs to Singlehop.
BUT, looking at recent log
I have a low usage 'workgroup' 'mini mail list' with a virtual alias that
sends email to 8 or 10 addresses (on other servers), that works well. No
changes have been made to target emails for several month, all's good.
today I've received two Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
From: Mail
had to learn something new? Or have you forgotten about that?
-
Free English
amp; Spanish
Ecards for Birthdays, Christmas, holidays, love, amp; just because!
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Duplicate-postfix-bounces
!-- On Mon 2.Sep'13 at 9:43:47 BST, FliedRice (thepuref...@yahoo.com), wrote:
Viktor you are a class act, I thank you for making a kind effort.
Wietse see what Viktor did? It wasn't that hard to give a little extra
assistance
without attitude.
It is true Leonardo that I am over my
it.
-
Free English
amp; Spanish
Ecards for Birthdays, Christmas, holidays, love, amp; just because!
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Duplicate-postfix-bounces-to-download-tp60946p61036.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
, Christmas, holidays, love, amp; just because!
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Duplicate-postfix-bounces-to-download-tp60946p61037.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
!-- On Mon 2.Sep'13 at 9:57:06 BST, FliedRice (thepuref...@yahoo.com), wrote:
Knowing how to read and knowing exactly how to implement are 2 different
things.
Even when you were in school the teacher would give you some directions beyond
reading to assist you. What is up with you people?
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 09:49:51 +0100
From: j...@kontrol.kode5.net
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Duplicate postfix bounces to download
It's a simple case of being able to read. There is a lot documentation
and other information available
In particular if there is 'a lot
because!
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Duplicate-postfix-bounces-to-download-tp60946p61042.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: Friday, August 30, 2013 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: Duplicate postfix bounces to download
FliedRice:
I have a problem with a plesk server using postfix in which I am
receiving double bounces, duplicates of the same bounce, from my
mailing program. This means that when I download the bounces
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 07:40:35AM -0700, FliedRice wrote:
Any assistance is appreciated, thank you.
I received this question earlier off-list. and referred to
http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html#notify
(What trouble report to the postmaster).
main.cf:
#
FliedRice:
Except you missed this part Wietse:
I am pretty much a green horn, I can edit files such as main.cf but?
I do not know what to put, so if you have an answer please be explicit.
Any assistance is appreciated, thank you.
Everyone does not understand things at the level you do,
Em 31/08/13 11:40, FliedRice escreveu:
Except you missed this part Wietse:
I am pretty much a green horn, I can edit files such as main.cf but
I do not know what to put, so if you have an answer please be explicit.
Any assistance is appreciated, thank you.
Everyone does not understand things at
I have a problem with a plesk server using postfix in which I am
receiving double bounces, duplicates of the same bounce, from my
mailing program. This means that when I download the bounces in
order to filter them I have double the amount to download and would
highly prefer only 1, I do not need
FliedRice:
I have a problem with a plesk server using postfix in which I am
receiving double bounces, duplicates of the same bounce, from my
mailing program. This means that when I download the bounces in
order to filter them I have double the amount to download and would
highly prefer only 1
Is there a way to add more info to status=bounced entries? For
instance, I would like to see the from email and subject on the same
line.
Aug 25 11:40:27 mail postfix/smtp[22413]: 83A7643CEB:
to=u...@domain.com, relay=mxserver.domain.com[XX.XX.XX.XXX]:25,
delay=0.57, delays=0/0/0.41/0.16,
Am 29.08.2013 19:27, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
Is there a way to add more info to status=bounced entries? For
instance, I would like to see the from email and subject on the same
line.
grep for 83A7643CEB and you get from address and all sort of details
like the sender, client-IP and infos to
for the email. Disk space is cheap, so
i dont care if the log is a little bigger.
if you only want the bounces, maybe you can duplicate every
rule that might reject the messsage with the warn_if_reject and
the same rule, like this:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = (...)
warn_if_reject
I am using postfix as outgoing mail gateway. Outside of non-delivery
notification, is there a way to produce a report of email addresses
and the reason for the bounce of all emails, that were, in conclusion,
rejected.
Thanks in advance
Roman Gelfand:
I am using postfix as outgoing mail gateway. Outside of non-delivery
notification, is there a way to produce a report of email addresses
and the reason for the bounce of all emails, that were, in conclusion,
rejected.
Postfix and Sendmail delivery reports are formatted
module provides summary detail of bounces
as well as everything else logged by Postfix. Pflogsumm might as well,
I don't recall. I haven't use it in years.
--
Stan
The logwatch does exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks a lot
From: Stan Hoeppner
Sent: 7/25/2013 5:52 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Mail Bounces
On 7/25/2013 11:53 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
I am using postfix as outgoing mail gateway. Outside of non-delivery
notification
.
But where to deliver the bounce?
The postfix host uses A´s DNS and the transport_maps are not complete due to
not allowed zone transfers from some DNS servers in B.
I tried sender_dependent_relayhost_maps but because it only works on the
envelope sender, locally and remotely bounces are treated
MX rejects
mail from @B2 during the SMTP session, it never receives responsibility
for any bounces. Unless of course you accept the mail first and then
decide later to bounce it. But why would you do that?
-Timo
place? If the @A1 MX rejects
mail from @B2 during the SMTP session, it never receives responsibility
for any bounces. Unless of course you accept the mail first and then
decide later to bounce it. But why would you do that?
Timo you opened my eyes.
We have the same DNS information
- Original Nachricht
Von: Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Datum: 17.04.2013 17:40
Betreff: Re: Routing Control of locally generated bounces in Postfix
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:11:52PM +0200, nullnullachtfuenfz...@arcor.de
wrote
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:32:25AM +0200, nullnullachtfuenfz...@arcor.de wrote:
What problem are you trying to solve (what is your actual end-goal)?
The Postfix server has a multi instance setup.
One instance receives only mail from senders in network A for
recipients in network B and
Hi,
my Question is: Is it possible to implement routing control of locally
generated bounces in Postfix - WITHOUT impact to remotely generated bounces?
And in case it is: How can this be accomplished?
Thanks for any hint
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:11:52PM +0200, nullnullachtfuenfz...@arcor.de wrote:
my Question is: Is it possible to implement routing control of
locally generated bounces in Postfix - WITHOUT impact to remotely
generated bounces?
And in case it is: How can this be accomplished?
What problem
Thanks all who replied :)
Regards
Muzaffer
On 7 December 2012 14:08, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 12/7/2012 5:26 AM, Muzaffer Tolga Özses wrote:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail-ea0-f172.google.com[209.85.215.172]:
550 5.1.1 r...@bilgisayarciniz.org: Recipient address
On 12/06/2012 11:38 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 06/12/2012 14:58, Muzaffer Tolga Özses a écrit :
On 12/05/2012 03:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Muzaffer Tolga Özses skrev den 04-12-2012 09:10:
mydestination = localhost
try using it as default, comment it in main.cf
if it still loops then recipient
Am 07.12.2012 09:37, schrieb Muzaffer Tolga Özses:
do not accept mail unless you deliver it.
now, if you have queued mail to remove, you can use
# postsuper -d $queueid
The domain exists, but not the user. How do I achieve your suggestion?
in my setup local_recipient_maps must contain
On 12/07/2012 12:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.12.2012 09:37, schrieb Muzaffer Tolga Özses:
do not accept mail unless you deliver it.
now, if you have queued mail to remove, you can use
# postsuper -d $queueid
The domain exists, but not the user. How do I achieve your suggestion?
in
Am 07.12.2012 12:26, schrieb Muzaffer Tolga Özses:
On 12/07/2012 12:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
BEFORE any mailserver will be connected to the internet it
is a basic task to make 100% sure not accept messages which
can not be finally delivered - either you will get blacklisted
because
On 12/7/2012 5:26 AM, Muzaffer Tolga Özses wrote:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail-ea0-f172.google.com[209.85.215.172]:
550 5.1.1 r...@bilgisayarciniz.org: Recipient address rejected:
User unknown in virtual mailbox table; from=to...@ozses.net
to=r...@bilgisayarciniz.org proto=ESMTP
On 12/05/2012 03:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Muzaffer Tolga Özses skrev den 04-12-2012 09:10:
mydestination = localhost
try using it as default, comment it in main.cf
if it still loops then recipient domain is missing in mysql
virtual_mailbox_domains
virtual_alias_maps =
Le 06/12/2012 14:58, Muzaffer Tolga Özses a écrit :
On 12/05/2012 03:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Muzaffer Tolga Özses skrev den 04-12-2012 09:10:
mydestination = localhost
try using it as default, comment it in main.cf
if it still loops then recipient domain is missing in mysql
Muzaffer Tolga Özses skrev den 04-12-2012 09:10:
mydestination = localhost
try using it as default, comment it in main.cf
if it still loops then recipient domain is missing in mysql
virtual_mailbox_domains
virtual_alias_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
Hi,
Dec 4 09:57:29 kartagis postfix/pickup[21399]: D576E9988: uid=48
from=karta...@drupalizm.com
Dec 4 09:57:29 kartagis postfix/cleanup[21291]: D576E9988:
message-id=20121204075729.d576e9...@mail.bilgisayarciniz.org
Dec 4 09:57:29 kartagis postfix/qmgr[16547]: D576E9988:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:10:05 +0200, Muzaffer Tolga Özses
to...@ozses.net wrote:
...
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
inet_interfaces = all
recipient_delimiter = +
relayhost =
You don't need to be re-declaring the postfix default settings again.
Try if the following helps simplifying your
On 12/04/2012 12:38 PM, Mark Alan wrote:
(postconf -d;postconf -n)|sort|uniq -d
I was asking about how to remove that queue. Other than that, thanks for
the tips.
Muzaffer
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Muzaffer Tolga Özses to...@ozses.net wrote:
Dec 4 09:57:29 kartagis postfix/smtp[21296]: D576E9988: to=
[node:author:mail]@mail.bilgisayarciniz.org, orig_to=[node:author:mail],
relay=none, delay=0.01, delays=0.01/0/0.01/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail
for
Can I configure my postfix server to send all bounces to a single
mailbox , instead of the sender of the mail
On 2012-01-02 7:17 AM, Ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote:
Can I configure my postfix server to send all bounces to a single
mailbox , instead of the sender of the mail
In 99.9% of cases, doing this would be a very bad idea.
As you were advised in the welcome message you received when signing up
On 01/02/2012 01:17 PM, Ram wrote:
Can I configure my postfix server to send all bounces to a single
mailbox , instead of the sender of the mail
No.
--
J.
to send all bounces to a single
mailbox , instead of the sender of the mail
In 99.9% of cases, doing this would be a very bad idea.
As you were advised in the welcome message you received when signing
up for this list, please describe *the problem you are trying to
solve* (not your preconceived
headers of a message bounce from Postfix. The original sender
would as well.
At 12:59 02/01/2012, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-02 7:17 AM, Ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote:
Can I configure my postfix server to send all bounces to a single
mailbox , instead of the sender of the mail
, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-02 7:17 AM, Ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote:
Can I configure my postfix server to send all bounces to a single
mailbox , instead of the sender of the mail
In 99.9% of cases, doing this would be a very bad idea.
As you were advised in the welcome message you received
I have three email servers in my zone:
mx1.emailsrvr.compriority10
mx2.emailsrvr.compriority20
pinkie.mydomain.compriority80 --- PostFix
I want all the Non Delivery Reports from pinkie.mydomain.com to go to
i...@mydomain.com which is a mail account that exists on mx1.emailsrvr.com.
On 2011-11-20 03:06, peng...@sepserver.net wrote:
I have three email servers in my zone:
mx1.emailsrvr.compriority10
mx2.emailsrvr.compriority20
pinkie.mydomain.compriority80--- PostFix
I want all the Non Delivery Reports from pinkie.mydomain.com to go to
i...@mydomain.com which is
Zitat von Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
- Spoofed Delivered-to:. AFAIK this has never been a major
problem, and is a useful feature to detect mail loops. If it
becomes a problem, you can use header_checks to IGNORE
Delivered-to (will let a loop run until too many hops are in
the
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
- Spoofed Delivered-to:. AFAIK this has never been a major
problem, and is a useful feature to detect mail loops. If it
becomes a problem, you can use header_checks to IGNORE
Delivered-to (will let a loop run until too
Zitat von Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
- Spoofed Delivered-to:. AFAIK this has never been a major
problem, and is a useful feature to detect mail loops. If it
becomes a problem, you can use header_checks to IGNORE
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
[delivered-to loop detection]
I was not aware of this one. As far as i can see this is only a
problem if local is used, no?
Wietse:
Both local(8) and pipe(8) (one has Delivered-To: enabled by default,
the other has this off by default for historical compatibility).
Having read quite a few of the messages in this list about bounces, I really
didn't find any (though they may be there) related to preventing bounces for
resource limits, and other unpredictable and strange occurrences. That is my
question, NOT bad recipient, etc. Yes, I know bounces
On 7/18/2011 1:47 PM, Steve Fatula wrote:
Having read quite a few of the messages in this list about bounces, I really
didn't find any (though they may be there) related to preventing bounces for
resource limits, and other unpredictable and strange occurrences. That is my
question, NOT bad
My opinion is if you correctly reject -- not bounce --
spam/virus/bad recipient email, that takes care of 95%+ of the
problem bounces, and is a good practice minimum standard.
Agreed, and I do.
I guess then that I should change the after queue SPAM content filter to use
the
advanced method
Le 18/07/2011 20:47, Steve Fatula a écrit :
Having read quite a few of the messages in this list about bounces, I really
didn't find any (though they may be there) related to preventing bounces for
resource limits, and other unpredictable and strange occurrences. That is my
question
I've been tasked with catching several bounce-back conditions (no longer
subscriber, connection refused, host not found, email address invalid, etc)
and adding the offending email address from our email server's messaging
list to prevent poisoning our mailserver's IP per several ISPs rules.
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:42:09PM -0500, John Clark wrote:
Messages in my deferral queue are set to be removed after 5 days and I have
been instructed to catch the above stated conditions after 3 days to
auto-opt-out.
Just set the maximal_queue_lifetime to 3 days. If you're opting users out,
I agree. However my main question is what is the best way of capturing these
bounces and and running an SQL insert to opt out the address. Is there a way
to append a command to be run upon a message being removed from the queue
via maximal_queue_lifetime?
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Victor
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:52:45PM -0500, John Clark wrote:
I agree. However my main question is what is the best way of capturing these
bounces and and running an SQL insert to opt out the address. Is there a way
to append a command to be run upon a message being removed from the queue
via
John Clark:
I've been tasked with catching several bounce-back conditions (no longer
subscriber, connection refused, host not found, email address invalid, etc)
and adding the offending email address from our email server's messaging
list to prevent poisoning our mailserver's IP per several
an email to an
account on box1
postfix naturally checks and sees it doesn't have the box1 account and
the mail bounces
fallback_transport won't work with a non empty local_recipient_maps
and masquerade_domains demands one, so i'm stuck.
on both boxes i use virtual domain and mailbox with mysql backend
On 02/02/11 01:41, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/1/2011 7:18 PM, Dean Gibson (Mail Administrator) wrote:
Running postfix-2.2.10-1.2.1.el4_7.centos:
When I try to send eMail to a person who uses Yahoo! as their
eMail provider, but to a non-Yahoo domain, I get:
Feb 1 16:34:59 mail postfix/smtp[10551]:
Running postfix-2.2.10-1.2.1.el4_7.centos:
When I try to send eMail to a person who uses Yahoo! as their eMail
provider, but to a non-Yahoo domain, I get:
Feb 1 16:34:59 mail postfix/smtp[10551]: 8CE431140DB: host
mx1.biz.mail.yahoo.com[68.142.202.129] said: 451 Resources temporarily
not
On 2/1/2011 7:18 PM, Dean Gibson (Mail Administrator) wrote:
Running postfix-2.2.10-1.2.1.el4_7.centos:
When I try to send eMail to a person who uses Yahoo! as their
eMail provider, but to a non-Yahoo domain, I get:
Feb 1 16:34:59 mail postfix/smtp[10551]: 8CE431140DB: host
Le 02/02/2011 02:18, Dean Gibson (Mail Administrator) a écrit :
Running postfix-2.2.10-1.2.1.el4_7.centos:
When I try to send eMail to a person who uses Yahoo! as their eMail
provider, but to a non-Yahoo domain, I get:
Feb 1 16:34:59 mail postfix/smtp[10551]: 8CE431140DB: host
Good afternoon list.
We have a problem of a number of our clients which appear to have been
affected by malware/bots.
these clients use our servers as a smarthost.
The messages are similar, so creating a spam filter for spamassassin has
been done.
I have noticed that the sender is either
On 1/13/2011 4:35 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Good afternoon list.
We have a problem of a number of our clients which appear to
have been affected by malware/bots.
these clients use our servers as a smarthost.
The messages are similar, so creating a spam filter for
spamassassin has been done.
I
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:45:19AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
Once the cows get out, you can spend days rounding them up and some may
never be found. Better to keep the gate closed.
Corollary: Don't accept mail you can't deliver.
For a submission service, this means doing as much as possible
a lot for your quick reply ...
actually it is not always the same IP or host sending the error
bounces ...
the bounces are sent from hundred of different IP addresses ...
any more idea?
Usually you can do very little to prevent forging your domain and
sending spam.
Some months ago one client
09.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
hello robert,
thanks a lot for your quick reply ...
actually it is not always the same IP or host sending the error
bounces ...
the bounces are sent from hundred of different IP addresses ...
any more idea?
Usually you can do
Ram:
I dont think is supported in a hash: file
It is a special pattern for SMTPD access maps (i.e. this is
implemented in the Postfix access map code, not in the code
that implements hash or other databases).
smtpd_null_access_lookup_key (default: )
The lookup key to be used in SMTP
On 2010-07-09 Administrator Beckspaced.com wrote:
since a few weeks one of my email accounts gets bombarded with thousands
of SPAM mailer daemon error bounces.
could not deliver message ... bla bla bla ...
it's getting really annoying as there are thousands of error bounces
coming
hello there,
i'm running a postfix 2.4.6 on a opensuse box.
postfix has amawis-new with spamassasin installed ...
since a few weeks one of my email accounts gets bombarded with thousands
of SPAM mailer daemon error bounces.
could not deliver message ... bla bla bla ...
it's getting really
Am 09.07.2010 12:35, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
hello there,
i'm running a postfix 2.4.6 on a opensuse box.
postfix has amawis-new with spamassasin installed ...
since a few weeks one of my email accounts gets bombarded with thousands
of SPAM mailer daemon error bounces
hello robert,
thanks a lot for your quick reply ...
actually it is not always the same IP or host sending the error bounces ...
the bounces are sent from hundred of different IP addresses ...
any more idea?
thanks for your help fun
becki
below some logs you requested ... change the real
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Administrator
Beckspaced.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:52 PM
To: Robert Schetterer
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: email account bombarded with SPAM error bounces - what to
do?
hello
In an older episode (Friday, 9. July 2010), Kammen van, Marco, Springer
SBM NL wrote:
But there is a big spam/virus attack going on, where messages look
like NDR's but they aren't.
Various big anti spam vendors are having serious issues stopping
this.
Could you provide a URL where more
101 - 200 of 301 matches
Mail list logo
