On 2011-03-16 08:22:10 +0200, Henrik K wrote:
Postfwd ftw.
http://postfwd.org/doc.html
ctrl+f action==size
Thanks. It also has other nice features, such as scoring.
--
Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: http://www.vinc17.net/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 07:16:38PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Vincent Lefevre put forth on 3/15/2011 9:09 AM:
Exactly what are you asking here? Are you trying to limit what emails
come into your system via the internet, or limiting how much data is
written to user mail storage?
I'd
On 2011-03-14 12:04:49 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Vincent Lefevre put forth on 3/14/2011 11:17 AM:
On 2011-03-14 11:04:02 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Vincent Lefevre put forth on 3/14/2011 9:34 AM:
But there's also mailbox_size_limit to track. Wouldn't it be better
to set both
Vincent Lefevre put forth on 3/15/2011 9:09 AM:
Exactly what are you asking here? Are you trying to limit what emails
come into your system via the internet, or limiting how much data is
written to user mail storage?
I'd like something like that: each IP is allowed to send me up to
50 MB
Vincent Lefevre put forth on 3/13/2011 5:44 PM:
On 2011-03-13 07:52:11 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
If you use virtual_mailbox_limit with strictly maildir mailboxes, you
may as well set message_size_limit=0 and leave it alone, so you only
have one setting to keep track of.
Is 0 accepted for
On 2011-03-14 08:22:53 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Vincent Lefevre put forth on 3/13/2011 5:44 PM:
On 2011-03-13 07:52:11 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
If you use virtual_mailbox_limit with strictly maildir mailboxes, you
may as well set message_size_limit=0 and leave it alone, so you only
On 2011-03-14 10:34 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
But there's also mailbox_size_limit to track. Wouldn't it be better
to set both mailbox_size_limit and virtual_mailbox_limit to much
larger values (or zero) and modify message_size_limit only, so that
one can focus to one parameter only?
Imo,
On 2011-03-14 11:12 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2011-03-14 10:41:16 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Imo, zero/unlimited is *never* a good idea...
Why (for mailbox_size_limit and virtual_mailbox_limit)?
Because... *unlimited* *anything* is never a good idea... too much room
for error.
I
Vincent Lefevre put forth on 3/14/2011 9:34 AM:
But there's also mailbox_size_limit to track. Wouldn't it be better
to set both mailbox_size_limit and virtual_mailbox_limit to much
larger values (or zero) and modify message_size_limit only, so that
one can focus to one parameter only?
I
On 2011-03-14 11:30:14 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-03-14 11:12 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2011-03-14 10:41:16 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Imo, zero/unlimited is *never* a good idea...
Why (for mailbox_size_limit and virtual_mailbox_limit)?
Because... *unlimited* *anything*
On 2011-03-14 11:04:02 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Vincent Lefevre put forth on 3/14/2011 9:34 AM:
But there's also mailbox_size_limit to track. Wouldn't it be better
to set both mailbox_size_limit and virtual_mailbox_limit to much
larger values (or zero) and modify message_size_limit
On 2011-03-14 12:11 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2011-03-14 11:30:14 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-03-14 11:12 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2011-03-14 10:41:16 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Imo, zero/unlimited is *never* a good idea...
Why (for mailbox_size_limit and
Vincent Lefevre put forth on 3/14/2011 11:17 AM:
On 2011-03-14 11:04:02 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Vincent Lefevre put forth on 3/14/2011 9:34 AM:
But there's also mailbox_size_limit to track. Wouldn't it be better
to set both mailbox_size_limit and virtual_mailbox_limit to much
larger
On 2011-03-12 10:58:41 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
No, it's not a bug. As you know maildir storage format stores one email
_per file_. virtual_mailbox_limit is a _per file_ size restriction.
With maildir storage it will prevent individual emails (individual
files) greater than (default:
Vincent Lefevre put forth on 3/13/2011 4:24 AM:
On 2011-03-12 10:58:41 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
No, it's not a bug. As you know maildir storage format stores one email
_per file_. virtual_mailbox_limit is a _per file_ size restriction.
With maildir storage it will prevent individual
On 2011-03-13 07:52:11 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
If you use virtual_mailbox_limit with strictly maildir mailboxes, you
may as well set message_size_limit=0 and leave it alone, so you only
have one setting to keep track of.
Is 0 accepted for this option? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
This is a bit old, but...
On 2011-02-17 07:47:29 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/17/2011 7:32 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Thanks Witsie,
Could the use of an IMAP client program (workstation-based or
web-based, like Squirrelmail) to access the incoming (new/
Maildir) mailbox, somehow override
Vincent Lefevre put forth on 3/12/2011 9:51 AM:
The maximal size in bytes of an individual virtual(8) mailbox or
maildir file, or zero (no limit).
Is it a bug in the documentation?
No, it's not a bug. As you know maildir storage format stores one email
_per file_.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 04:51:22PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
This is a bit old, but...
On 2011-02-17 07:47:29 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/17/2011 7:32 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Thanks Witsie,
Could the use of an IMAP client program (workstation-based or
web-based, like
On 12/3/2011 7:03 μμ, /dev/rob0 wrote:
That ONE message, a maildir file, is subject to
virtual_mailbox_limit. The maildir structure itself is not.
As discussed earlier in this thread, in order to enforce maildir quotas
the best solution is to use Dovecot with LDA or LMTP and define quotas
Le Sat 12/03/2011, Vincent Lefevre disait
This is a bit old, but...
On 2011-02-17 07:47:29 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/17/2011 7:32 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Thanks Witsie,
Could the use of an IMAP client program (workstation-based or
web-based, like Squirrelmail) to access the
* Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr:
Wietse,
Would you have any plans to integrate in Postfix support for global
AND per user mailbox quotas supporting both Maildir and MBOX?
But why? dovecot (which has an LMTP server and a LDA) can do both.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:23:23 +0200, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote:
Would you have any plans to integrate in Postfix support for global AND
per user mailbox quotas supporting both Maildir and MBOX?
mailBOX is working in postfix core
mailDIR needs vda patch
vda have being working since
Am 18.02.2011 08:23, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
Would you have any plans to integrate in Postfix support for global AND per
user
mailbox quotas supporting both Maildir and MBOX?
This is a frequently needed feature
Quota on the MTA is totally useless since sent messages are coming from
the
OK guys,
I'll set up quotas in Dovecot and see how it goes.
I've also just installed (compiled from source on CentOS 5.5) Postfix
2.8.0 with VDA (just published for 2.8.0), and I will experiment with
all the available settings.
Just a question: If quota is useless on the MTA, why there is
Nikolaos Milas:
Wietse,
Would you have any plans to integrate in Postfix support for global AND
per user mailbox quotas supporting both Maildir and MBOX?
This is a frequently needed feature, as I am sure you are aware. Of
course, everything is always a matter of priorities and policies
I have a problem.
I am trying to set:
virtual_mailbox_limit = 4294967296
(that is 4GB)
However, postfix doesn't accept it; I copy from the log:
Feb 18 16:58:31 vmail postfix/virtual[18849]: fatal: bad numerical
configuration: virtual_mailbox_limit = 4294967296
Feb 18 16:58:32 vmail
Nikolaos Milas:
I have a problem.
I am trying to set:
virtual_mailbox_limit = 4294967296
Specify a limit of zero, or a limit under 2GB.
Wietse
Nikolaos Milas:
Hello,
Although I'm using virtual_mailbox_limit (in main.cf), it seems it's not
being observed. I set it to: 314572800 (300MB), but I see our users have
sometimes larger mailboxes.
There is no virtual_mailbox_limit in Postfix. It is a third-party patch.
Wietse
Nikolaos Milas:
Hello,
Although I'm using virtual_mailbox_limit (in main.cf), it seems it's not
being observed. I set it to: 314572800 (300MB), but I see our users have
sometimes larger mailboxes.
virtual_mailbox_limit (not the quota that I was confused with) limits
the size that POSTFIX
Thanks Witsie,
Could the use of an IMAP client program (workstation-based or web-based,
like Squirrelmail) to access the incoming (new/ Maildir) mailbox,
somehow override the directive?
Or, what other, common tools could cause such an override?
Our users are virtual, and don't have shell or
On 2/17/2011 8:32 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Thanks Witsie,
Could the use of an IMAP client program (workstation-based or
web-based, like Squirrelmail) to access the incoming (new/ Maildir)
mailbox, somehow override the directive?
Or, what other, common tools could cause such an override?
Nikolaos Milas:
Thanks Witsie,
Could the use of an IMAP client program (workstation-based or web-based,
like Squirrelmail) to access the incoming (new/ Maildir) mailbox,
somehow override the directive?
As documented, virtual_mailbox_limit is a mailBOX limit not a mailDIR limit.
On 2/17/2011 7:32 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Thanks Witsie,
Could the use of an IMAP client program (workstation-based or
web-based, like Squirrelmail) to access the incoming (new/
Maildir) mailbox, somehow override the directive?
The postfix limit is for mailBOX, not mailDIR.
The postfix
On 02/17/2011 02:47 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/17/2011 7:32 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Thanks Witsie,
Could the use of an IMAP client program (workstation-based or
web-based, like Squirrelmail) to access the incoming (new/
Maildir) mailbox, somehow override the directive?
The postfix limit is
Am 17.02.2011 14:49, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
If all users are virtuals how to enforce filesystem quota?
postfix is simply the wrong instance
quotas should do the imap/lmtp-server
as example in dbmail you have in the users table a field
for max mailbox size in bytes and the dbmail-lmtp
rejects
On 2/17/2011 7:49 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
On 02/17/2011 02:47 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/17/2011 7:32 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Thanks Witsie,
Could the use of an IMAP client program (workstation-based or
web-based, like Squirrelmail) to access the incoming (new/
Maildir) mailbox, somehow
Wietse,
Would you have any plans to integrate in Postfix support for global AND
per user mailbox quotas supporting both Maildir and MBOX?
This is a frequently needed feature, as I am sure you are aware. Of
course, everything is always a matter of priorities and policies for the
Postfix
38 matches
Mail list logo
