On or about Tue, 8 Mar 2005 05:24:22 -0500 Don said -
Reporting in...
PB1400/133MHz; 64Mb RAM; MacOS 9.0.4; PM 4.2.1
--
Don V. Zahniser
Ah, lovely, still regret selling mine !
Now I have a Pismo 400MHz, running 10.3.8 and PM 5.1
Desktop is a BW G3 with a G4 upgrade (600MHz), 10.3.8 and PM
Hi Rein,
Opening up an old email always results in a Save Changes? dialogue when I
go to close it, even when I have done nothing to the email. I would
prefer a default that does nothing when I close an email. If I'm going
to save it I can do that without a prompt. Better yet would be a
A while back I created a filter to auto-redirect all incoming email (IMAP
server) (IMAP 4 protocol) to my previous email address. This worked very
well until I decided a while ago to stop that action. Deleting that
filter did nothing and all mail continued to redirect. I recreated the
filter
A very small issue I have is when saving an email and typing something in
the Name cell if I hit the Spacebar the text in the body of the email
(underneath the Save dialogue box) scrolls downward one section for every
time I hit the Spacebar. I'm sure this is a simple programming oversight
but
Opening up an old email always results in a Save Changes? dialogue when I
go to close it, even when I have done nothing to the email. I would
prefer a default that does nothing when I close an email. If I'm going
to save it I can do that without a prompt. Better yet would be a
preference to
A problem has arisen with a conflict between PowerMail and my Epson
Stylus Color 600 printer. Any time PM is turned on my printer fails to
function properly and I must do a factory reset (only achieved by turning
off my computer, unplugging the serial cord to the printer, resetting,
reconnecting
If you have any System 9.x you can update to 9.2.2 for free.
See: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=75288
Well, I stand corrected, big time!
I'll stick by my guns with the terminology; upgrade=$, update=free. I'll
also stick by my guns in terms of glitches with systems subsequent
Dr. D
If something works, is efficient and cheap it does not need to evolve.
Such biological metaphors in computing are tempting but possibly
misleading. There are lots of people out there with a financial interest
in such evolution but we know who they are and can try to resist them
by not
Reporting in...
PB1400/133MHz; 64Mb RAM; MacOS 9.0.4; PM 4.2.1
Don V. Zahniser
Oh, thank God! Another non-power user! ;-)
You know you can update to MacOS 9.1 for free, right? It'll fix some
known problems you may be having. Email me aside?
How long have you been using v4.2.1?
RC
Rein
Hi, I am also relatively new here. I am using OS X.3.5 with PM 5.1. I
moved to OS X at the end of December, and before that was still using 9.1
with Claris Emailer. It has been quite a project transitioning to a new
OS, but I am happy I did it. So far I am happy with PowerMail.
Yeah; I'm still
As far as 9.1, isn't 9.2 a free upgrade?
... No, MacOS 9.2 is not a free upgrade, to my knowledge.
If you have any System 9.x you can update to 9.2.2 for free.
See: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=75288
Chris
--
You can always look at the headers to see which versions people are
using. Lurk a little and they'll show up.
Duh! (slap myself up side the head) I *did* know that, but totally
forgot! Brilliant, and *done*! Looks like (for those who could really
give a ) that the predominant version is
It took me a long time to decide to upgrade from 4.2, since it really met
my needs.
As far as 9.1, isn't 9.2 a free upgrade?
I don't tend to migrate rapidly either (although I wouldn't mind
migrating annually to the BVI). ;-)
When I do migrate, the upgrade has to be a finished release with
At Tue, 8 Mar 2005 02:02:06 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must norms always be static and prevent natural evolution?
If something works, is efficient and cheap it does not need to evolve.
Such biological metaphors in computing are tempting but possibly
misleading. There are lots of people out
On 3/7/05, at 11:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Take a look at CTM's product page for the current version of PM:
http://www.ctmdev.com/powermail5.html
Take a look at CTM's posting to MacUpdate:
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/4105
So far as I can tell, the statements on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I did not realize when I purchased PW that it had such an anti-HTML
following/agenda.
You actually assumed sending of HTML was fully supported today? Didn't
you notice? If you expected that, obviously you got the wrong client.
PM 5.1 | OS X 10.3.6 | Powerbook G4/400 |
Reporting in...
PB1400/133MHz; 64Mb RAM; MacOS 9.0.4; PM 4.2.1
--
Don V. Zahniser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brand new to the list and PowerMail, as you may have seen from my
previous post earlier today. I'd very much appreciate knowing how many
individuals utilize this list, how many of those are
Janet Moe wrote:
According to the tech people at the other domain, the problem is the way
PowerMail is formatting the message ID.
With PowerMail the messge ID is like this - Message-Id:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:465
It's a bug when you don't use the standard SMTP port. It will be fixed in
the next
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 7.3.2005 um 23:19 Uhr:]
folks who
think HTML in email is actually, gasp! -inappropriate- !
Just for information: I'm also one of them. I very seldom use HTML-Mail.
--
http://www.subhash.at
Raúl Vera wrote:
You must be joking! CTM bills PM (not PW) quite clearly as a text-
centric emailer for power email users, which they define as people who
need to handle hundreds if not thousands of messages a day in a mission-
critical capacity.
Take a look at CTM's product page for the
On Thu, Mar 03, 200511:31, the following words from Tom Dillon
[EMAIL PROTECTED], emerged from a plethora of SPAM ...
I've amassed a veritable plethora of signatures in PowerMail. I just
changed addresses and need to change that info in my signatures. Is there
a file which containing them all so
Here is the full header from one such email:
X-POP3-Rcpt: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from maukdesign.com (h-66-134-44-90.snvacaid.covad.net
[66.134.44.90])
by host3.teammediaonline.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j27IDK5P004227
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Mar 2005
We have discussed the problem with Apple Mail sending double text when
the default isn't sent to plain text but I have an ew problem with those
who are using multi-part settings in Apple Mail. Besides the double
content in the email, the attachments don't show up in PowerMail. I can
guess at what
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not realize when I purchased PW that it had such an anti-HTML
following/agenda.
Must ask them! Perhaps I have erred in my purchase...
You must be joking! CTM bills PM (not PW) quite clearly as a text-
centric emailer for power email users, which they define as
Well, 'true' PM users at least remain somewhat polite, even in heated
discussion.
---marlyse
former message(s) quotes: -
HTML is for ads and web browsers, plain text is for content and e-mail.
Some rigid, typophobic, fear-based PW fundamentalist out there I see...
I
Yet, for those who understand how use such
graphic variation for clearer communication
LOL, now I feel invalidated.
I am a Graphic Designer since 25 years and I DEFINITELY know and
understand how to use such graphic variation for clearer communication -
in the right place at the right
Recently, Rein Ciarfella wrote:
I'd very much appreciate knowing how many
individuals utilize this list, how many of those are currently working
with v4.2.1 and just for yucks, how many are still holdouts on MacOS 9.1.
Can I get a show of hands? :)
If you feel like chiming in with other
Ben Kennedy said:
the established norms upon which the Internet (and the
protocol in question) has been based for several decades
meaning?
Must norms always be static and prevent natural evolution? While I'm fine
not sending HTML messages, it seems unavoidable in the long run.
Also, now we
2-Some individuals have given their input (Thanks!) on their OS, PM
version, etc., but quite a few members have not responded, which makes me
wonder whether they are receiving the List as a digest and how often/when
that goes out (?) or whether my question is just being viewed as coming
from a
Rein Ciarfella on 3/7/05 said
3-So far not one other individual has mentioned that they are still at OS
9.1 or using PowerMail 4.2.1. I'm getting really lonely here! ;-)
It took me a long time to decide to upgrade from 4.2, since it really met
my needs.
As far as 9.1, isn't 9.2 a free
A-NO-NE Music on 3/7/05 said
Sorry for a dumb question.
How are you seeing the info? I only see the number of messages per
folder. Now I am so curious how many messages I have. Message database
is about 1GB.
I thought they meant just in PM folder...
--
Barbara Needham
Mel wrote:
At the foundation of contemporary
computer technology is the digital
graphic communication machine.
OK. But that is not an argument for HTML email. That's what a web page is for.
Snail mail composed on a typewriter is virtually non-existent because
such communication is merely
Rein Ciarfella wrote:
2-Some individuals have given their input (Thanks!) on their OS, PM
version, etc., but quite a few members have not responded, which makes me
wonder whether they are receiving the List as a digest and how often/when
that goes out (?) or whether my question is just being
On Monday, March 07, 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent forth:
Snail mail composed on a typewriter is virtually non-existent because
such communication is merely verbal and the graphic encoding potential of
the page is a missed opportunity to communicate more effectively.
Your argument is too
3-So far not one other individual has mentioned that they are
still at OS 9.1 or using PowerMail 4.2.1. I'm getting really
lonely here! ;-)
I think it's going to tough going for you in that arena. I know of only a few
folks still on Mac OS 9 on a regular basis and most are on 9.2.x.
35 matches
Mail list logo
