problems on the listserver? i sent this message last friday but never
received it.
===
in order to get a result from a search I have to restart pm otherwise i
got only a _no item found_. i m on a macbook so i have pm and others
apps running all the time, maybe this hint can help.
it has been
in order to get a result from a search I have to restart pm otherwise i
got only a _no item found_. i m on a macbook so i have pm and others
apps running all the time, maybe this hint can help.
it has been happening to me for a long time http://www.mail-archive.com/
Hi folks,
Is there a way to search my PowerMail database by Message-ID?
You know, those unique identifiers (shown in the full headers)
that look like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If not, the ability to do so would be a welcome addition to
the already powerful search capabilities of this
Marco Piovanelli said:
Hi folks,
Is there a way to search my PowerMail database by Message-ID?
You know, those unique identifiers (shown in the full headers)
that look like this:
I think the header is not fully indexed. You can search with a script
though, but it takes a very long time.
'PowerMail Files' folder, I see that the 'Message
Database index' dates from my last major PM upgrade in October 2006 and
carries neither type nor creator (so the Finder doesn't what to use to
open it) .
Is such slowing searching normal? And, if so, would FoxTrot be equally
slow if I invested
- PowerMail Engineering
-
PowerMail is the email client for me for several reasons:
(1) the integrity of the database,
(2) the incredible searching speed,
(3) the filtering system meets all my needs,
(4) I absolutely
it) .
Is such slowing searching normal? And, if so, would FoxTrot be equally
slow if I invested in it as a standalone?
-- Charles
PM 5.5.3 - Intel iMac - OS 10.4.8
Interesting. My Message database is around 1GB, the Message Database
index is 248mb and it took 7 seconds to 'sort and optimize'.
--
Derry
Sorry, Rick, I migrated to an new Dual G5 some months ago and I was sure
that I made a backup of all the 'non-critical' stuff on a few DVD's, but
I have not been able to locate the script so far. Unfortunately for you
I'm out for some skiing the next few days so I won't be able to look
further
searching where it is.
Karel
I think you should make a backup of your PM folder here and perform the
filter on this backup. And -for instance- move the potentially suspect
messages to a separate folder.
Karel
Op vrijdag, 24 februari 2006 schreef Rick Lecoat:
My problem with the filtering option is that the filter needs to
My problem with the filtering option is that the filter needs to DO
something to the message. And I don't want to move these messages, or
relabel them, or anything like that. I just want to leave them as they
are and see them displayed in a window.
Maybe I'll just *have* to move them to a
Ah, gotcha Karel. Sorry, your follow-up message arrived before the first
one for some reason. So I was pointing out mistakes where none existed.
Sorry about that.
--
G5 2GHz x2 :: 2GB RAM :: 10.4.3 :: PM 5.2.3 :: 3 pane mode
Shark Attack: A Design Studio
www.sharkattack.co.uk
--
Only one problem with that Karel; the Other field option appears in
Filters but not in Search. At least, it doesn't seem to appear in my
search dialogue box. I had thought that searching by Other headers was
the way to go too -- until I tried it and realised that the options was
not there.
I
Just an afterthought (I hit the send button too soon)
You could also try:
Other Field... Content-Type does not contain plain AND Other
Field Content-
Type Contains Windows-1252
This might narrow your search,as most likely your spam message is of the
1252-type.
Karel
Op vrijdag, 24 februari
Hi Rick,
In stead of performing a search, you could try defining a filter here:
In a filter set Other Field... Content Type does not contain
plain. I think this will catch HTML messages.
Karel
Op vrijdag, 24 februari 2006 schreef Rick Lecoat:
Anybody have anything to suggest? How can I
the message is put together.
I thought I'd try searching for any message who's content did NOT
contain the phrase Content-Type: text.plain (which assumes that the
'Content' parameter in the search dialogue box includes headers, which
is not explicitly stated). But discovered that you can't search for
'does
Alan Harper said:
I search for From includes all the words cpalmer135 and it comes up,
while a search for From includes all the words Craig does not. Are you
sure that the word David doesn't appear somewhere else and that is why
you are finding it?
Yes.
Otherwise, we are just getting different
PROTECTED]
I search for From includes all the words cpalmer135 and it comes up,
while a search for From includes all the words Craig does not. Are you
sure that the word David doesn't appear somewhere else and that is why
you are finding it?
I have found that searching for at least one of the words
Mikael
I do not get the same results as you do.
I just rebuilt the index in the way you suggested. I have an email that says:
-- RFC822 Header Follows --
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and my address book has
Craig Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I search for From
Alan Harper said:
It would be so helpful if one could search for emails by the person's
name, and not just their email address.
This is already possible. It used to be the other way around, that one
could only search for the displayed name and not the email address.
To prove the current
Something that I think need to be addressed at some point is the sorting
and optimizing that takes place if you have received messages since your
last search. If you check mail every five minutes or something like that,
you have to wait about every second time you conduct a search and once a
day
At Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:01:03 +0100 PowerMail Engineering wrote:
The mark as good command indexes the message, if the spam filter was
set to not index spam. You can also set the preferences to automatically
mark messages as good when you move them out of the spam folder.
No it doesn't. At least
Alan Harper wrote:
1) When indexing is turned off by an action (say, in the spam filter),
there is no way to turn it back on.
The mark as good command indexes the message, if the spam filter was
set to not index spam. You can also set the preferences to automatically
mark messages as good when
I have two big gripes with Powermail and they are driving me crazy. By
far the most important thing when, like me, you keep everything and want
to refer to it later is SEARCHING (we're talking 100s of 1000s of
emails). Powermail is (rightfully) proud of its searching, and
integration
One of my biggest frustrations with PowerMail is its inability to
associate the from address with the human readable name in the address book.
For instance
I have a friend Craig Smith who sends mail from home using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and from work using [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
When I get email from
time for maintenance:
quit PM. launch PM with option-command keys down - reindex database.
---marlyse
former message(s) quotes: -
I had to erase my main drive due to problems unrelated to PowerMail. Re-
installing PowerMail in the new setup I copied over the PM
Hello all,
Is there a way to search the full headers of emails?
Thanks,
Kename
My Spam filters include the action Do not index message content. If I
then want to search through the Spam folder (to make sure that a specific
email hasn't been marked as Spam by mistake, for example), how can I
manually index the folder to make those mails searchable?
TIA
Rick
--
G5 2GHz x2
david.gordon on 5/18/04 said
It would be better to have an OR search though wouldn't it? The search
entry box is quite small to get a lot of info into if you want to find
messages from (say) five people.
For those of us used to Boolean searches it would make it a lot clearer,
anyway.
--
Richard Hart wrote on Tue 18 May 2004 at 07:07 -0700
It sounds as though you're searching for John AND Jane. They can't both
send the same message.
Yes, that's it!
What you want is to find a message from John OR Jane.
Exactly!
I cannot find a way to perform an OR search, though. So how
Richard Hart wrote:
What you want is to find a message from John OR
Jane. I cannot find a way to perform an OR search, though. So how are you
doing the OR part?
It MIGHT work if you do a
[From] [contains at least one of the words] [Jane John]
and there are no other Johns or Janes in that
Richard Hart on 5/18/04 said
David Gordon wrote:
I can't find _any_ messages when I try to
find them both at the same time
It sounds as though you're searching for John AND Jane. They can't both
send the same message. What you want is to find a message from John OR
Jane. I cannot find a way
David Gordon wrote:
I can't find _any_ messages when I try to
find them both at the same time
It sounds as though you're searching for John AND Jane. They can't both
send the same message. What you want is to find a message from John OR
Jane. I cannot find a way to perform an OR search, though
I want to find messages from two people in one mail box (imagine I want
to find all the messages John and Jane had sent to this list).
I can find messages from John
Search [in selected folder (PowerMail) only] for messages whose:
From or To - includes at least on of the words - John
OR
Hi,
I have an odd mailbox error: a line of an attachment appears across the
mailbox listing (I cannot include a snapshot, alas, to the maillist). It
overlaps with the regular list. It is the first line of an attachment
(but never of either subject of body field). It does not disappear when
Hi all,
Here's one for the wish list, having to do with the Address Book:
When I use the View Only text field to filter the Address Book display,
the resulting list includes both individual addresses that meet my
criteria, and any Groups that those addresses are a part of. I would
really like
Gregor, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The filter I use is: OTHER FIELD Content-type CONTAINS text/html
FROM is not in address book
If all conditions are met: Move to trash
Of course! Works perfectly, thanks a lot!
Except of course that not all mail with HTML have text/html as value in
that header
Hi L.,
Like many folks - I get some long digests. W/ ver. 4.2 is it no longer
possible to search within a specified message skip to where that word
or string appears in the message? I thought it was possible in previous
version, but maybe my memory is foggy.
Look at 'Find in Current
hi all.
Like many folks - I get some long digests. W/ ver. 4.2 is it no longer
possible to search within a specified message skip to where that word
or string appears in the message? I thought it was possible in previous
version, but maybe my memory is foggy.
thanks
Rick Lecoat wrote on Thu 11 Sep 2003 at 14:50 +0100
Filters *can* recognise specific headers. So,
create a filter that looks for the header field that you want to search
for, and set it to assign a particular label to any message with that
field. Run this filter through all your messages (a bit
I don't think that you can search via headers directly, but a possible
workaround occurs to me: Filters *can* recognise specific headers. So,
create a filter that looks for the header field that you want to search
for, and set it to assign a particular label to any message with that
field. Run
Gregor Schmidpeter wrote:
4.2 final does not filter nor search any content (my favorite new
feature) of those typical HTML spam mails :
W!--u410n82qmyg6h--hy etc., etc.
etc., etc., etc.
etc.
Why not?...
You'll notice I've altered the above typical html spam content to only
one
Am 07.09.2003 um 18:08 Uhr schreibt Barbara Needham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
and filtering on content-type
Am 07.09.2003 um 21:25 Uhr schreibt Chris Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I'm assuming that you are trying to remove spam.
The filter I use is: OTHER FIELD Content-type CONTAINS text/html
FROM
On Sun, Sep 7, 2003, it is attributed to Don V. Zahniser to have said:
Or am I missing something on being able to search/filter on these kinds
of characters?
I am guessing that a grep and using 'search pattern' might work. Don't
know grep, so it remains a guess. You are correct, tho, that
I have been trying (on-and-off) to come up with a filter to detect HTML
mail, also with no success. One of the difficulties that I have run into
is that PowerMail (in searches, at least) seems to ignore any characters
that are not actually alphabet or numbers. For example: If I try to do
a
Gregor Schmidpeter on 9/7/03 said
Why not? How should I filter those html mails? Wouldn't it be a nice
feature anyway to make a filter with any mail which contains html?
You can do that somewhat successfully by using any header in the filter
and filtering on content-type. Not perfect, but
Hi all,
4.2 final does not filter nor search any content (my favorite new
feature) of those typical HTML spam mails :
W!--u410n82qmyg6h--hy Spe!--32uyer3l93g--nd M!--whk7h93gffuk--
ore!--bdz2tv23jxjoh-- Tha!--xa11cg1p9n56--n Yo!--49quwkocar8k2--u
Have!--bt7spqjbbzwl-- To?
Why not?
47 matches
Mail list logo
