[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Amen!!! And,
Baruch Atah Adonai!!!
Who hear the word of God.
Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer
Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159
"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown
http://spaces.
Ramen!
On 5/9/07, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amen!!! And, Baruch Atah Adonai!!!
>
> v/r
>
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 7:51 AM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] George Bush Is Destroying Mars Too
Ed Leafe <> wrote:
> On May 7, 2007, at 3:47 AM, Helio W. wrote:
>
>> My answer to him was, "John, when people thought the earth was flat,
>> t
Ed Leafe <> wrote:
> On May 7, 2007, at 3:47 AM, Helio W. wrote:
>
>> My answer to him was, "John, when people thought the earth was flat,
>> they were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they
>> were wrong. But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is
>> just as wrong
On May 7, 2007, at 3:47 AM, Helio W. wrote:
> My answer to him was, "John, when people thought the earth was flat,
> they were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they
> were wrong. But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is
> just as wrong as thinking the earth is fl
On Monday 07 May 2007 3:47 am, Helio W. wrote:
> Isaac Asimov - The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. 14 No. 1, Fall 1989
> The Relativity of Wrong
> pg.. 35-44
>
> http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
>
> I RECEIVED a letter the other day. It was handwritten in crabbed
> penmanship
Isaac Asimov - The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. 14 No. 1, Fall 1989
The Relativity of Wrong
pg.. 35-44
http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
I RECEIVED a letter the other day. It was handwritten in crabbed
penmanship so that it was very difficult to read. Nevertheless, I
tried
On Sunday 06 May 2007 12:28 pm, Jean Laeremans wrote:
> On 5/6/07, Pete Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I do not doubt your assertion that his content was meaningless. However,
> > the newsreels that have survived show a very enthusiastic audience
> > reaction.
>
> Ever heard about propagand
On 5/6/07, Pete Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jean!
>
> I do not doubt your assertion that his content was meaningless. However, the
> newsreels that have survived show a very enthusiastic audience reaction.
Ever heard about propaganda ?
Watch some Stalin speeches from the same era
>
>
On Sunday 06 May 2007 5:39 am, Jean Laeremans wrote:
> On 5/6/07, Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > He we are again valuing form over substance.
> >
> > The finest politician orator in modern times was Adolf
> > Hitler. The second was Bill Clinton
>
> Not by any stretch of the imagina
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 11:46 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Use of Language, was Re: [OT] George Bush Is Destroying
Mars Too
On Sunday 06 May 2007 12:03 am, William Sanders / EFG wrote:
> Yak.
>
On 5/6/07, Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He we are again valuing form over substance.
>
> The finest politician orator in modern times was Adolf
> Hitler. The second was Bill Clinton
>
Not by any stretch of the imagination
1. Churchill
followed closely by Degaulle
If you ever l
He we are again valuing form over substance.
The finest politician orator in modern times was Adolf
Hitler. The second was Bill Clinton
The first was able to persuade, with his oratory
skills, a nation into gassing six million countrymen
and turning them into soap.
The second was able to persua
On Sunday 06 May 2007 12:03 am, William Sanders / EFG wrote:
> Yak.
> with a war between Pete and Ricardo -
Hi Bill!
Oh, it doesn't rise to war. There are several key issues, R vs D, and I don't
consider GWB's English usage or deficit thereof to be of interest outside of
those who have gotten w
Yak.
with a war between Pete and Ricardo -
> > George W. Bush is literate.
> Maybe according to YOUR standards.
Oh yeah, as though the leftist critics are any judge.
--
Regards,
Pete
---
Pete - bless your heart. I know yer a staunch 'R, I used to be one, prior
to GWB becoming the guv o
Pete Theisen wrote:
> On Saturday 05 May 2007 1:07 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>> Pete Theisen wrote:
>>> On Friday 04 May 2007 7:02 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>>>
>>>
> The President has to be a natural born citizen
Meaning he can not come from artificial insemination?
>>> Hi Ricardo!
>>>
>>>
On Saturday 05 May 2007 1:07 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> Pete Theisen wrote:
> > On Friday 04 May 2007 7:02 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> The President has to be a natural born citizen
> >>
> >> Meaning he can not come from artificial insemination?
> >
> > Hi Ricardo!
> >
> > When the cons
Pete Theisen wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2007 7:02 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>
>>> The President has to be a natural born citizen
>> Meaning he can not come from artificial insemination?
>
> Hi Ricardo!
>
> When the constitution was written this was not a consideration. It means that
> he/she has
On Friday 04 May 2007 7:02 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> > The President has to be a natural born citizen
> Meaning he can not come from artificial insemination?
Hi Ricardo!
When the constitution was written this was not a consideration. It means that
he/she has to be born within the United States
Oh yeah, with all the "flying spaghetti monster"
posts, It's just this believer that they hate.
--- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > Not specifically talking about Derek, but there
> are
> > some on this list who believe the "belief in God"
> is
> > ignorant.
Michael Madigan wrote:
> Not specifically talking about Derek, but there are
> some on this list who believe the "belief in God" is
> ignorant. That's a great example of "intellectual"
> snobbery.
No, Mikey. They just don't believe in god and they think YOU are
ignorant.
>
>
> --- Virgil B
Pete Theisen wrote:
> On Thursday 03 May 2007 8:38 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> *You*, intellectual as you may be, would be hard pressed to find *any*
> Texans who would find offensive what you claim they would.
You mean because they can't read? ;c)
>>> I don't mean that at all. The majo
---Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jerry Wolper
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:29 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] George Bush Is Destroying Mars Too
>
> > But that it's happening on Mars a
Do you think Leland knows what "invective" means? LOL
--- "Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When was the last time you heard someone from New
> York use the
> term
> 'intellectual' as an invective?
>
> Only Texans would find that offensive.
>
>
When I went to school, it was said that two items of
different mass dropped from an identical height in a
vacuum, would each land at the same time.
I believe I heard that that is no longer valid.
--- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Helio W. wrote:
> > Also I meant that gravity is
Rumour has it that he stole it from the Gay Japanese.
--- "Helio W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Legend has it that Edison was not an inventor, but a
> crook who stealed
> other people's ideas.
>
> On 5/2/07, Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> > > Open you
It's a theory since you can't possibly measure the
gravity on every planet in the universe.
When I was in HS, we learned that there were 3 states
of matter. liquid,solid, and gas. Now since
graduating, they've added plasma to that. And now,
there may even be a 5th state.
http://www.edinformati
seems like ya'll were discussing it once in the past, but I was offline
for a few months so I never saw how it turned out..
I know most of the corporations I've worked at, the chairs have been
comfortable all day long.
But the chairs I buy at your typical home office store for around 200
bucks
If that doesn't involve shutting down industry while
we wait for a cleaner solution.
Global Warming is all about moving the third-world
into the first-world, not about preventing a global
meltdown.
I agree with you that we should be moving towards
wind, solar and other environmentally-friendly
> Does anybody have a great suggestion for an office chair.
> All the one's i've bought from officemax just plain arent comfortable
> for 16 hrs at a time..
>
> can't really afford one of the herman miller aeron's, but I'm definitely
> looking for a comfortable office chair that doesnt cut off the
> Not specifically talking about Derek, but there are
> some on this list who believe the "belief in God" is
> ignorant. That's a great example of "intellectual"
> snobbery.
Many would be quite surprised what I believe regarding God, science,
etc... Not something I share with many people, though.
Yes, you have a grasp on reality. It's Virgil who is
the insulting one. LMAO
--- Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 2, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Virgil Bierschwale
> wrote:
>
> > every widely accepted theory has been disproven
> once a new and better
> > theory came into place.
>
> Gr
We may be mixing terminology, but
Scientists believed the world was flat
Scientists believed the Earth was the center of the
Universe
Scientists believed that the Giant Panda and Gorilla
were both figments of the imagination.
Scientists believed the Coelacanth was extinct
Now scientists believ
We may be mixing terminology, but
Scientists believed the world was flat
Scientists believed the Earth was the center of the
Universe
Scientists believed that the Giant Panda and Gorilla
were both figments of the imagination.
Scientists believed the Coelacanth was extinct
Now scientists believ
Not specifically talking about Derek, but there are
some on this list who believe the "belief in God" is
ignorant. That's a great example of "intellectual"
snobbery.
--- Virgil Bierschwale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only because you choose to believe they are stupid.
> Open your mind and assu
I'm sure only the "greats" you disagree with.
--- Derek Kalweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > About time you stopped putting your foot in your
> mouth...
>
> > Whats that saying ?
> > Ye of closed minds ?
>
> It's saying you're rivaling some of the Profox OT
> 'greats' at saying
> blatantly
I believe Jerry Cotton labeled him, "bright boy". LOL
> On May 4, 2007, at 10:25 AM, Virgil Bierschwale
> wrote:
>
> > The funny thing about thinking of yourself as an
> intellectual or smart
> > or any such thing is that is simply a form of
> snobbishness.
Right Wing, Conservative and Republic
That ain't no lie.
Vince Teachout wrote:
> Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
>
>
>> By the way, friday down here means bbq, beer and bikini's because its
>> starting to get hot...
>>
>
> Virg, please don't take this the wrong way, but you're going to look
> damn silly in a bikini.
>
>
>
>
>
Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
>
> By the way, friday down here means bbq, beer and bikini's because its
> starting to get hot...
Virg, please don't take this the wrong way, but you're going to look
damn silly in a bikini.
--
Vince Teachout
Caracal Software
www.caracal.net
518-733-9411
_
You ever hear that ole expression about a person "Who can't see the
forest for the trees" ?
Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 4, 2007, at 10:25 AM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
>
>
>> The funny thing about thinking of yourself as an intellectual or smart
>> or any such thing is that is simply a form of sn
On May 4, 2007, at 10:25 AM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> The funny thing about thinking of yourself as an intellectual or smart
> or any such thing is that is simply a form of snobbishness.
That's ridiculous. Making the effort to educate oneself, whether
through formal schooling or othe
not me..
been too busy moving and trying to get my office set back up..
Does anybody have a great suggestion for an office chair.
All the one's i've bought from officemax just plain arent comfortable
for 16 hrs at a time..
can't really afford one of the herman miller aeron's, but I'm definitely
Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> We all put our pants on one leg at a time.
Not me! I hang my pants up between 2 chairs when I go to bed at night.
In the morning, I jump off the bed, into the pants, both legs at once,
saving roughly 20 seconds over the traditional way of putting on pants.
It is
The funny thing about thinking of yourself as an intellectual or smart
or any such thing is that is simply a form of snobbishness.
We all put our pants on one leg at a time.
I'm not comparing myself to them, but some of the greatest minds in the
world never had more then a grade school or high
Ed,
Yeah, except every reply is more absurd than the previous ones.
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Leafe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ProFox Email List"
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] George Bush Is Destroying Mars Too
> On May 3, 20
On Thursday 03 May 2007 8:38 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> >>> *You*, intellectual as you may be, would be hard pressed to find *any*
> >>> Texans who would find offensive what you claim they would.
> >>
> >> You mean because they can't read? ;c)
> > I don't mean that at all. The majority of Texans ca
On May 3, 2007, at 11:30 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> No amount of
> proof, though, can ever turn a Theory into a Law.
True enough; but Congress can, and that's precisely the concern that
gave birth to this thread in the first place.
:)
- Bob
>
> -- Ed Leafe
> -- http://leafe.com
> -- http://dabod
Pete Theisen wrote:
> On Thursday 03 May 2007 6:41 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>
>>> *You*, intellectual as you may be, would be hard pressed to find *any*
>>> Texans who would find offensive what you claim they would.
>> You mean because they can't read? ;c)
>
> Hi Ricardo!
>
> I don't mean that a
On Thursday 03 May 2007 6:41 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> > *You*, intellectual as you may be, would be hard pressed to find *any*
> > Texans who would find offensive what you claim they would.
>
> You mean because they can't read? ;c)
Hi Ricardo!
I don't mean that at all. The majority of Texans c
Pete Theisen wrote:
> On Thursday 03 May 2007 7:45 am, Ed Leafe wrote:
>> On May 3, 2007, at 7:24 AM, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote:
>>>
>>> When was the last time you heard someone from New York use the
>>> term
>>> 'intellectual' as an invective?
>>>
>>> Only Texans would find
; Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 10:21 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] George Bush Is Destroying Mars Too
>
> Ed Leaf
On May 3, 2007, at 5:59 PM, Nicholas Geti wrote:
> You are feeding a troll. You can't win.
You're probably right, but I guess given the fact that he isn't
normally a troll, he might realize at some point that he was posting
utterly absurd statements.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-
Ed,
You are feeding a troll. You can't win.
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Leafe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ProFox Email List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] George Bush Is Destroying Mars Too
> On May 2, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Vir
On Thursday 03 May 2007 7:45 am, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 3, 2007, at 7:24 AM, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote:
> >
> > When was the last time you heard someone from New York use the
> > term
> > 'intellectual' as an invective?
> >
> > Only Texans would find that offensive.
> >
>
On May 3, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Eurico Chagas Filho wrote:
> What r the differences among theory, law, principle and hypothesis ?
> If the theory of Relativity has been proven, why it's not a law ?
Laws can only describe physical events. Explanations can never be
Laws; the pinnacle that an
On 5/3/07, Eurico Chagas Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, now I am officially confused.
> What r the differences among theory, law, principle and hypothesis ?
> If the theory of Relativity has been proven, why it's not a law ?
>
> E.
http://physics.about.com/od/physics101thebasics/a/hypothes
Eurico Chagas Filho wrote:
> Ok, now I am officially confused.
> What r the differences among theory, law, principle and hypothesis ?
> If the theory of Relativity has been proven, why it's not a law ?
>
> E.
>
From that website posted earlier (http://wilstar.com/theories.htm) :
The biggest di
Ok, now I am officially confused.
What r the differences among theory, law, principle and hypothesis ?
If the theory of Relativity has been proven, why it's not a law ?
E.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/785 - Rel
Hal Kaplan wrote:
> Too bad gravity does not have an effect on threads here on this list.
> If it did, we could test it by dropping the thread.
>
>
My prediction (not theory) is that it would bounce, if we did.
> I think you are all taking Virgil too literally.
>
That's really the problem
Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 3, 2007, at 7:24 AM, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Only Texans would find that offensive.
>>
>>
>> Gee, Ed. You are living dangerously ... remember, Leland reads this
>> list, too.
>>
>
> An intellectual would understand that that
On 5/3/07, Hal Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean, mon ami, you seem to have chosen the wrong opiate. The side effects
> are quite unbecoming. You should try to find one that makes you comfortable
> without being so insecure that you cannot accept a difference of opinion.
>
> B+
> HALinN
=> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean Laeremans
=>
=> Spoken like a true believer...science reduced to a fairy tale
=>
=> A+
=> jml
=>
Jean, mon ami, you seem to have chosen the wrong opiate. The side effects are
quite unbecoming. You should try to find one that makes you comfortabl
On 5/3/07, Hal Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Too bad gravity does not have an effect on threads here on this list.
> If it did, we could test it by dropping the thread.
>
> I think you are all taking Virgil too literally. Theories come and go.
> Many theories are simply highly-educated guess
Hal Kaplan
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 9:47 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] George Bush Is Destroying Mars Too
Too bad gravity does not have an effect on threads here on this list.
If it did, we could test it by dropping the thread.
I think you are all taking Virgil too literally
Too bad gravity does not have an effect on threads here on this list.
If it did, we could test it by dropping the thread.
I think you are all taking Virgil too literally. Theories come and go.
Many theories are simply highly-educated guesses. The masses (people)
must be comfortable with their pl
On May 3, 2007, at 8:50 AM, David Crooks wrote:
> There is the Law of Gravity:
> http://wilstar.com/theories.htm
The Law describes the behavior. The Theory attempts to explain the
behavior.
We can all observe an item being dropped and measure its
acceleration. We can all meas
On Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:39 PM Ed Leafe wrote:
> Force is something that is directly measurable. Gravity is a
theory that attempts to explain that force.
>The force is a fact; gravity is a theory that explains the observed
facts very well.
There is the Law of Gravity:
http://wilstar.co
gt; 6th MDG Information System Security Officer
> Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 10:21 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT]
eorge Bush Is Destroying Mars Too
Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 2, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>
>> Actually not. "the gravitational force is proportional to the mass of
>> the objects being measured" is a FACT, an observational fact. The why
>> this happens
On May 3, 2007, at 7:24 AM, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote:
>
> When was the last time you heard someone from New York use the
> term
> 'intellectual' as an invective?
>
> Only Texans would find that offensive.
>
>
> Gee, Ed. You are living dangerously ... remember, Leland
-9994
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerry Wolper
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:29 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] George Bush Is Destroying Mars Too
> But that it's happening on Mars as well as earth in nearly
>
When was the last time you heard someone from New York use the
term
'intellectual' as an invective?
Only Texans would find that offensive.
Gee, Ed. You are living dangerously ... remember, Leland reads this
list, too.
v/r
//SIGNED//
Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF
6th MDG Da
On 5/3/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is far from settled, though. There is nothing that reliably
> explains *how* gravity works, and how it works over such huge distances.
>
Maybe the CERN experiments planned for november 2007 will shed some
light on this subject.
http://ti
> On Wednesday 02 May 2007 6:11 pm, Ed Leafe wrote:
>
>> On May 2, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
>>
>>> As you said, ignorance is not something to be proud of, even in New
>>> York
>>> City
>>>
>> When was the last time you heard someone from New York use the term
Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 2, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>
>> Actually not. "the gravitational force is proportional to the mass of
>> the objects being measured" is a FACT, an observational fact. The why
>> this happens may be a theory, but it is a FACT that a force (remember
>> 'force'
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 6:11 pm, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 2, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> > As you said, ignorance is not something to be proud of, even in New
> > York
> > City
>
> When was the last time you heard someone from New York use the term
> 'intellectual' as an in
On May 2, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> Actually not. "the gravitational force is proportional to the mass of
> the objects being measured" is a FACT, an observational fact. The why
> this happens may be a theory, but it is a FACT that a force (remember
> 'force' is not a 'thing' but a
Helio W. wrote:
> Also I meant that gravity is deeply related to matter, although you're
> right about matter -> mass -> gravity!
>
> On 5/2/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On May 2, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Helio W. wrote:
>>
>>> Gravity is a property of matter, so you will never discover a p
Also I meant that gravity is deeply related to matter, although you're
right about matter -> mass -> gravity!
On 5/2/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 2, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Helio W. wrote:
>
> > Gravity is a property of matter, so you will never discover a planet
> > without gravity.
Ok, I stand corrected! (did I use the correct expression?)
I meant that gravity is not just a "simple idea, a simple guess". But
you're right, it's a scientific theory!
On 5/2/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 2, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Helio W. wrote:
>
> > Gravity is not just a theory
How do you know you will never discover a planet without gravity ?
Have you or anybody been to all of them ?
I thought you were finally starting to open your mind when you said
"sometimes it happens"
Trust me, we do not have all the answers because we don't even have the
questions.
Look at the
On May 2, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Helio W. wrote:
> Gravity is not just a theory.
Yes, it is. Although I wonder why you used the word 'just'. In
science, it is extremely difficult to attain the status of Theory.
> Gravity is a property of matter, so you will never discover a planet
> without
Helio W. <> wrote:
> Legend has it that Edison was not an inventor, but a crook who
> stealed other people's ideas.
Today we call him Bill Gates.
Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer
Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159
"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do
Legend has it that Edison was not an inventor, but a crook who stealed
other people's ideas.
On 5/2/07, Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> > Open your brain ed.
> > you're an intelligent man.
> >
> > The man that invented the lightbulb failed a 1,000 times is wh
Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 2, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
>
>> There is no difference
>
> And therein lies your problem.
>
> Ignorance is not something to be proud of, even in Texas.
>
Now you're being foolish Ed. Everybody knows that in Texas, ignorance is
a prerequi
Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> Open your brain ed.
> you're an intelligent man.
>
> The man that invented the lightbulb failed a 1,000 times is what I read.
> Each time, he had a different theory.
> Each theory turned out to be wrong until he got it right.
>
> History proved his theory right, not hi
Robert Calco wrote:
> Perhaps you simply are uneducated about earth's elliptical orbit
> around the sun that becomes, as it were, more or less so based on
> where it is in a known cycle?
Perhaps you saw those drawings for kids about earth's orbit. But if you
can get a real scale picture of the
It doesn't mean that the already accumulated knowledge will be
replaced by totally different theories. Sometimes it happens, but
Science has a firm grasp on a multitude of phenomena.
Gravity is not just a theory. It's very far from being totally
understood, but what we already know explains a lot
have you ever thought those items that you mentioned are in their infancy ?
Has it never crossed your mind that time will bring about better things ?
Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 2, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
>
>
>> every widely accepted theory has been disproven once a new and bet
> But that it's happening on Mars as well as earth in nearly
> identical temperature shifts over a similar period of time should
> be a clue to you morons who think CO2 emissions somehow explain it
> all that you might be mistaking a symptom for a cause, which is all
> those of us who aren't read
On May 2, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> As you said, ignorance is not something to be proud of, even in New
> York
> City
When was the last time you heard someone from New York use the term
'intellectual' as an invective?
Only Texans would find that offensive.
On May 2, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> every widely accepted theory has been disproven once a new and better
> theory came into place.
Gravity. Atoms. Infection via microorganisms. Electro-magnetism.
Shall I continue? Or should I wait for you to enlighten us as t
every widely accepted theory has been disproven once a new and better
theory came into place.
But I can see that I waste my time with those that can't see past the
end of their nose.
Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 2, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
>
>
>> Explain the difference.
>> As
Only because you choose to believe they are stupid.
Open your mind and assume that you do not know everything.
Derek Kalweit wrote:
>>> About time you stopped putting your foot in your mouth...
>>>
>
>
>> Whats that saying ?
>> Ye of closed minds ?
>>
>
> It's saying you're rivaling
On May 2, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> Explain the difference.
> As you said, ignorance is not something to be proud of, even in New
> York
> City
Gee, I wish I still had my son's 7th grade science book, where all
of this stuff was covered.
A quick lookup in
you havent heard a thing I said.
Every IC inside of that computer is a sum result of millions of theories
about what would work and what wouldnt over a period of years.
Many theories failed.
The ones that worked made their way into the next batch of theories.
The ones that worked were proven corre
> > About time you stopped putting your foot in your mouth...
> Whats that saying ?
> Ye of closed minds ?
It's saying you're rivaling some of the Profox OT 'greats' at saying
blatantly stupid things. :-)
--
Derek
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe
Virgil,
The computer you're using was built on some of the "theories" you
probably think are false... Beware, if somebody prove them wrong, your
computer will suddently stop working...
On 5/2/07, Virgil Bierschwale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whats that saying ?
> Ye of closed minds ?
>
> Jean
Whats that saying ?
Ye of closed minds ?
Jean Laeremans wrote:
> On 5/2/07, Virgil Bierschwale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> There is no difference
>>
>>
> About time you stopped putting your foot in your mouth...
>
> A+
> jml
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
__
Explain the difference.
As you said, ignorance is not something to be proud of, even in New York
City
See, the difference between us is that I know that I do not know
everything and I've learned over the years not to believe things because
somebody says it is so.
How many theories do you know a
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
