Michael Madigan wrote:
> I bet that's funnier en espanol.
That's only if you can SPELL 'español', but I guess you don't have that
letter in your brain...er... keyboard.
>
>
> --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Kristyne McDaniel wrote:
>>> Madigan,
>>>
Don't worry, Carbon Di
I bet that's funnier en espanol.
--- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kristyne McDaniel wrote:
> > Madigan,
> >
> >> Don't worry, Carbon Dioxide is plant food.
> >
> > So that must mean you're planting lots of trees?
> >
> > Kristyne McDaniel
> >
>
> Nope, that means that he's a
Kristyne McDaniel wrote:
> Madigan,
>
>> Don't worry, Carbon Dioxide is plant food.
>
> So that must mean you're planting lots of trees?
>
> Kristyne McDaniel
>
Nope, that means that he's a vegetable (no brains). hahaha
___
Post Messages to: ProF
> Computer Technology Solutions
> 585-944-3823
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.ComputerTechnologySolutions.org
> FTP://MikeWohlrab.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Michael Madigan
> Sent: Tuesday,
MAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael Madigan
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:16 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
My grass is growing faster.
IF burning coal adds CO2 to the air, and coal is made
from plants, where did those plant
My grass is growing faster.
IF burning coal adds CO2 to the air, and coal is made
from plants, where did those plants get their carbon
from? The atmosphere!
--- Kristyne McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Madigan,
>
> > Don't worry, Carbon Dioxide is plant food.
>
> So that must mean you
Madigan,
> Don't worry, Carbon Dioxide is plant food.
So that must mean you're planting lots of trees?
Kristyne McDaniel
Whether you think you can, or you think you can't you are right.
-- Henry Ford
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Su
gt;
> PS does my carbon footprint get smaller if I stand
> on my toes?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
> Crozier
> Sent: 03 April 2007 09:42
> To: 'ProFox Email List'
> Subject: RE: [N
rozier
Sent: 03 April 2007 09:42
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
Andy,
Can't beat an oil burner. I've just had the X-Type Jag for 6 months and have
averaged 52.3 mpg for the entire period.
At times cruising at 70 on the motorway
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Andy Davies
Sent: 03 April 2007 09:27
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
Johm Weller said "Just going through my emails on my return from visiting
my mother ..."
just got *back*
Johm Weller said "Just going through my emails on my return from visiting
my mother ..."
just got *back* to Manchester after ditto - 45mpg in my Audi A6
oilburner** - 120 miles of motorway driving and I was clearly reminded of
why I chose an older bigger car instead of a newer smaller one!
**
bject: Re: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
>
>
> Fact Checking, as usual it's not as simple as a sound bite:
>
> 15% VAT tax (think sales tax)
> 60% Duty
> 20% Refiner
> 5% Retailer
>
___
Post Messages to:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of
> >>>
> >> Michael Madigan
> >>
> >>> Sent: 01 April 2007 03:18
> >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Subject: RE: [NF] - RE: Energy efficie
Weller
>> 01380 723235
>> 07976 393631
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
>>>
>> Michael Madigan
>>
>>> Sent: 01 April 2007 03:18
>>> To: [
Fact Checking, as usual it's not as simple as a sound bite:
15% VAT tax (think sales tax)
60% Duty
20% Refiner
5% Retailer
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/world/2000/world_fuel_crisis/933648.stm
"Fuel duty is higher in the UK than most other EU countries but the full
basket of motoring ta
Madigan
> > Sent: 01 April 2007 03:18
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
> >
> >
> > That's criminal to pay that much. How much of
> that is
> > taxes?
> >
> >
> > --- John Weller
35
07976 393631
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen the Cook
> Sent: 01 April 2007 13:17
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
>
>
> Michael Madigan <> wrote:
> >
Michael Madigan <> wrote:
> That's criminal to pay that much. How much of that is taxes?
It could be healthcare, schools, roads, and housing.
Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer
Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159
"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do
About 75% I think.
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Madigan
> Sent: 01 April 2007 03:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
>
That's criminal to pay that much. How much of that is
taxes?
--- John Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just going through my emails on my return from
> visiting my mother in
> Manchester. A journey that returned 44 mpg in my
> Toyota Avensis - which is
> just as well as we are paying nearly
Ed Leafe <> wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
>
>> That's why it is impossible to have a boiled egg when you are
>> climbing Everest. One good reason why I don't want to go.
>
> Boil 'em before starting the climb. Makes the eggs a bit more
> durable, too.
You cou
Just going through my emails on my return from visiting my mother in
Manchester. A journey that returned 44 mpg in my Toyota Avensis - which is
just as well as we are paying nearly $2 per litre for petrol, nearly $9 per
UK gallon.
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
> You heard it here first.
Michael Madigan wrote:
> The first funny thing you've ever said.
>
Michael! You devil!
You keep this and we'll end up dating ,c)
>> Wow! You really have high temperatures over there.
>> Around here water
>> boils at 100°.
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
__
2007 15:49
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
Dave Crozier wrote:
> The egg can never cook because the water boils at about 91 degrees. Hence
> SNOTTY eggs!
>
>
How can I tell it's Friday afternoon ;-)
Peter
[excessive quoting
Dave Crozier wrote:
> The egg can never cook because the water boils at about 91 degrees. Hence
> SNOTTY eggs!
>
>
How can I tell it's Friday afternoon ;-)
Peter
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mail
> > That's why it is impossible to have a boiled egg when you are climbing
> > Everest.
> The egg can never cook because the water boils at about 91 degrees. Hence
> SNOTTY eggs!
The post says "have", not "cook"...
--
Derek
___
Post Messages to: Pr
The egg can never cook because the water boils at about 91 degrees. Hence
SNOTTY eggs!
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Derek Kalweit
Sent: 30 March 2007 15:07
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient
I wonder what they taste like frozen (easier than boiling and more
lasting!)?
Bit chewy?
BAAA ;)
--
Regards
Michael.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:
> "Sheep!" (--> [OT])
>
Honestly, I don't think sheep are all that energy efficient, as a means
of transportation.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/pr
Dave Crozier wrote:
> Michael,
> That's why it is impossible to have a boiled egg when you are climbing
> Everest. One good reason why I don't want to go.
>
Can't you simply boil the egg BEFORE you go, and keep it warm in a
vacuum container? :-)
__
> That's why it is impossible to have a boiled egg when you are climbing
> Everest.
What happens to a boiled egg when you climb Everest? :-)
--
Derek
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/
On Mar 30, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> That's why it is impossible to have a boiled egg when you are climbing
> Everest. One good reason why I don't want to go.
Boil 'em before starting the climb. Makes the eggs a bit more
durable, too.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
--
"Sheep!" (--> [OT])
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
Depends on altitude/relative density of the atmosphere.
--
Regards
Michael.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Su
> Depends on altitude/relative density of the atmosphere.
Hence 'or there abouts'...
--
Derek
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/ma
Depends on altitude/relative density of the atmosphere.
--
Regards
Michael.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/m
> > Overall high: 117º
> Wow! You really have high temperatures over there. Around here water
> boils at 100°.
Water here boils at 100º, 212º, and 373.15º-- or there abouts...
--
Derek
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance
On Thursday 29 March 2007 1:33 pm, Chet Gardiner wrote:
> Not when you don't have to factor in the cost of a bloated military to
> insure that we continue get "OUR" cheap oil... ;-)
>
> Also neither the environmental cost nor the health costs of burning
> petroleum in cars and trucks are paid for
You got that right. Tucson downtown is at about 2600' -- then there's
where the rich folks live up the mountain -- much higher...
They had one storm last winter with about 2" of snow that stuck on the
ground (and took out a LOT of foliage).
But I can always head south into Mexico for the winte
Chet Gardiner <> wrote:
> Tucson Average Temperatures
>
> Jan: 51.3
> Feb: 54.4
> Mar: 58.7
> Apr: 65.8
> May: 74
> Jun: 83.8
> Jul: 86.6
> Aug: 84.5
> Sep: 80.4
> Oct: 70.4
> Nov: 70.4
> Dec: 52
>
> Chet Comfort Zone: 85% to 100% F Ambient
>
> I'm worried about the cold winters though.
>
> Eur
The first funny thing you've ever said.
> Wow! You really have high temperatures over there.
> Around here water
> boils at 100°.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version
Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2007, at 6:56 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>
>> Lucky me, we are paying around U$ 0.50/Litre. And still we complain!
>
> What's worse is people who complain about $3/gallon for gasoline,
> but merrily pay $1 for a pint of water.
>
Spent some time in UK and alway
Derek Kalweit wrote:
>> Tucson Average Temperatures
>> Jun: 83.8
>> Jul: 86.6
>> Aug: 84.5
>
> Yep, which means 90's and 100's during the day, eh?
>
> Avg highs:
> June: 100º
> july: 99º
> August: 97º
>
> Overall high: 117º
>
Wow! You really have high temperatures over there. Around here
On Mar 29, 2007, at 6:56 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> Lucky me, we are paying around U$ 0.50/Litre. And still we complain!
What's worse is people who complain about $3/gallon for gasoline,
but merrily pay $1 for a pint of water.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_
Andy Davies wrote:
> Chet said:
>> I predict $4 per gallon gas by the end of '07.
>
> I make that around £0.54 / litre - we're paying around twice that in the UK
> - most of europe is comparable.
>
Lucky me, we are paying around U$ 0.50/Litre. And still we complain!
___
Chet believes the TV infomercials too. "All the Rage
in Europe", "Most popular can opener in Europe",
"Europe's favorite pasta fork, The Eurofork".
LMAO
--- Derek Kalweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/29/07, Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Europe was "stupid" enough to inves
We took the trains from ingolstadt to Munich and back
several times while I was in Germany.
We loved the cleanliness and convenience of the trains
as well as the Munich subway.
However.
In the US there is no real rail alternatives and
people are not going to get behind rail travel except
for l
> Tucson Average Temperatures
> Jun: 83.8
> Jul: 86.6
> Aug: 84.5
Yep, which means 90's and 100's during the day, eh?
Avg highs:
June: 100º
july: 99º
August: 97º
Overall high: 117º
> Chet Comfort Zone: 85% to 100% F Ambient
I guess that's why we have people living over the whole earth-
On Mar 29, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> Darcy won't be the only one unsubscribing if we keep trashing the
> mailing list like this.
I have a splinter in my finger, so I'll cut off my arm.
Twit filters are a much better solution than unsubscribing when the
problems stem
Tucson Average Temperatures
Jan: 51.3
Feb: 54.4
Mar: 58.7
Apr: 65.8
May: 74
Jun: 83.8
Jul: 86.6
Aug: 84.5
Sep: 80.4
Oct: 70.4
Nov: 70.4
Dec: 52
Chet Comfort Zone: 85% to 100% F Ambient
I'm worried about the cold winters though.
Europe's too cold...
As for the spelling: think "Tuck Son"
Derek
Where do you read that???
Silly Derek...
Derek Kalweit wrote:
> On 3/29/07, Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Europe was "stupid" enough to invest in a great inter-city rail system
>> including in many cases high-speed rail. The great cities of Europe are
>> also laid out in such
On 3/29/07, Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not when you don't have to factor in the cost of a bloated military to
> insure that we continue get "OUR" cheap oil... ;-)
Oh, for cripes sake. Tell me you don't think this is Off-Topic. Take
it there, please. All you have to do is alter th
> > Chet, why are you moving to Tuscon instead of Europe? Seems you like
> > everything there better...
> There are terrorists over there, cuz they do not have a wonderful leader
> like our very own, home grown , GW Bush to save them. Hence, it is
> unsafe to be in Europe, anywhere else in fact o
Funny place, Arizona, with all of its
strange spellings
Gil
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derek Kalweit
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 2:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] - RE: Energy ef
On 3/29/07, Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Europe was "stupid" enough to invest in a great inter-city rail system
> including in many cases high-speed rail. The great cities of Europe are
> also laid out in such a way that most of the time one doesn't need a car
> around town either...
Not when you don't have to factor in the cost of a bloated military to
insure that we continue get "OUR" cheap oil... ;-)
Also neither the environmental cost nor the health costs of burning
petroleum in cars and trucks are paid for in the cost of OUR gasoline...
Europe was "stupid" enough to
Derek Kalweit wrote:
> $1M gross income isn't always that much money... Depends on # of
> employees, cost of other expenses, etc.
>
>
>
True...true
--
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS
> > Recycle aspects of batteries is a big business. I tried to do a custom app
> > for one who works with forklifts. They only wanted to pay 1000. in total.
> > Said replacing their novel 3.12 box was getting expensive as well as this
> > new program.
> LOL! Yeah, we just had a company who make
On 3/29/07, john harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, but driving "cross-country" is about 100 miles. Here it's thousands!
>
May i suggest that when you're travelling thousands of miles a car
might not be the appropriate mode of transport ?
A+
jml
__
Yeah, but driving "cross-country" is about 100 miles. Here it's thousands!
JH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Andy Davies
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:27 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient
Chet said:
> I predict $4 per gallon gas by the end of '07.
I make that around £0.54 / litre - we're paying around twice that in the UK
- most of europe is comparable.
Andrew Davies MBCS CITP
- AndyD 8-)#
**
This ema
> > Depending on what you drive -- SUV at 10mpg - $2100/year -- only about
> > 49 years and it's paid for :-)
> Is electricity for free in the USA?
Beyond the initial equipment investment, sometimes(solar/wind/etc.).
> Is electricity generation non-polluting?
Some methods, yes. Not all elect
> Detroit is also developing the same technology.
of course thay are - they would hardly ignore all that 'non-polluting
engines' pork!
Andrew Davies MBCS CITP
- AndyD 8-)#
**
This email and any files transmitted with
> 1. The Electric motor in general is nearly 90%
> efficient. The gasoline engine is 30%
and the engine that generates the electricty? 40% - 60% at best (in a
combined power/heat setup, but they're rare). Then the *best* chargers are
around 85% efficient; say 45% overall *at best*.
> 2. The Tes
ll save in not using gasoline for the
>> 7,000 miles per year I drive on average!
>>
>> Gil
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software Solutions
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote:
> There goes the neighbourhood. :)
Isn't this the same Darcy from the prior list? Or am I confused :)
Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer
Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159
"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do them absolutely n
Eugene Vital <> wrote:
> Stephen the Cook wrote:
>> Michael Madigan <> wrote:
>>
>>> 1. The Electric motor in general is nearly 90% efficient. The
>>> gasoline engine is 30%
>>>
>>> 2. The Tesla uses no gasoline, just electric and batteries. When
>>> you charge batteries, they don't get heav
Stephen the Cook wrote:
> Recycle aspects of batteries is a big business. I tried to do a custom app
> for one who works with forklifts. They only wanted to pay 1000. in total.
> Said replacing their novel 3.12 box was getting expensive as well as this
> new program.
>
LOL! Yeah, we just had
Chet Gardiner wrote:
> You heard it here first.
>
> I predict $4 per gallon gas by the end of '07.
>
> I predict $6+ per gallon by the time of the next inauguration in '09
> (with a slight dip in the weeks before the '08 election so the oil
> companies can try to elect a republican again).
>
> Ga
Welcome back!
-Kevin
CULLY Technologies, LLC
Sponsor of FoxForward 2007
foxforward.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually, I think I'm still in. :)
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo
There goes the neighbourhood. :)
;)
>-Original Message-
>From: MB Software Solutions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 12:39 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
>
>Andy Davies wrote:
>>> unsu
TECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 11:23 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
>
>> unsubscribe
>
>Darcy White has just left the mailing list!
>
>Andrew Davies MBCS CITP
> - AndyD 8-)#
>***
Stephen the Cook wrote:
> Michael Madigan <> wrote:
>
>> 1. The Electric motor in general is nearly 90% efficient. The
>> gasoline engine is 30%
>>
>> 2. The Tesla uses no gasoline, just electric and batteries. When
>> you charge batteries, they don't get heavier. When you fill up a
>> car
Michael Madigan <> wrote:
> 1. The Electric motor in general is nearly 90% efficient. The
> gasoline engine is 30%
>
> 2. The Tesla uses no gasoline, just electric and batteries. When
> you charge batteries, they don't get heavier. When you fill up a
> car, it gets heavier.
>
> 3. Batter
gt; >
> >> Depending on what you drive -- SUV at 10mpg -
> $2100/year -- only about
> >> 49 years and it's paid for :-)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mai
- $2100/year -- only about
>> 49 years and it's paid for :-)
>>
>>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chet Gardiner
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 3:11 AM
>> To: [EMAI
At least Elvis is still here.
--- Vince Teachout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andy Davies wrote:
> >> unsubscribe
> >>
> >
> > Darcy White has just left the mailing list!
> >
>
> Oh No
>
>
>
> ___
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.co
They're going to be making a sedan that will be under
50k
I think they want to make a splash with a
high-performance car and sell those cars to
celebrities with high profiles.
--- Derek Kalweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would it be safe to say that Big Oil and Detroit
> are going to do
>
No, because Detroit is also developing the same
technology.
--- MB Software Solutions
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > 1. The Electric motor in general is nearly 90%
> > efficient. The gasoline engine is 30%
> >
> > 2. The Tesla uses no gasoline, just electric and
> > b
Andy Davies wrote:
>> unsubscribe
>>
>
> Darcy White has just left the mailing list!
>
Oh No
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http:/
> Would it be safe to say that Big Oil and Detroit are going to do
> whatever they can to suppress Tesla and others like them?
Detroit? What year do you think this is? ;-)
I'd say the Tesla's price will be restrictive enough to keep
wide-spread adoption. Maybe once they figure out a way to make i
Michael Madigan wrote:
> 1. The Electric motor in general is nearly 90%
> efficient. The gasoline engine is 30%
>
> 2. The Tesla uses no gasoline, just electric and
> batteries. When you charge batteries, they don't get
> heavier. When you fill up a car, it gets heavier.
>
> 3. Battery techno
1. The Electric motor in general is nearly 90%
efficient. The gasoline engine is 30%
2. The Tesla uses no gasoline, just electric and
batteries. When you charge batteries, they don't get
heavier. When you fill up a car, it gets heavier.
3. Battery technology has gotten much better lately.
Andy Davies wrote:
>> unsubscribe
>>
>
> Darcy White has just left the mailing list!
>
>
There wasn't enough policing/moderation in place!
--
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom
> unsubscribe
Darcy White has just left the mailing list!
Andrew Davies MBCS CITP
- AndyD8-)#
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or enti
"it is six times as efficient and produces one-tenth the pollution, all
while achieving the same performance and acceleration"
dream on - I just don't trust their figures - why are their vehicle
efficiency figures better than three times the opposition, *and* their
well-to-wheel figures better tha
unsubscribe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of mrgmhale
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
My SUV (2005 Suzuki XL-7, excellent vehicle, less than 19,000 miles on it
alf Of Chet Gardiner
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 3:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Energy efficient vehicles
>
>
> Depending on what you drive -- SUV at 10mpg - $2100/year -- only about
> 49 years and it's paid for :-)
>
> mrgmhale wrote:
> &g
]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software Solutions
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:52 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Energy efficient vehicles
>>
>>
>> Chet Gardiner wrote:
>>
>>> Cute.
>>>
>&
on average!
Gil
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software Solutions
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Energy efficient vehicles
>
>
> Chet Gardiner wrote:
> >
Yep. They've already sold out their first production run.
MB Software Solutions wrote:
> Chet Gardiner wrote:
>
>> Cute.
>>
>> Here's a real energy efficient vehicle:
>>
>> http://www.teslamotors.com/index.php?js_enabled=1
>>
>>
> ?!?!? Wowis that for real?
>
>
>
___
I liked mine better!
JH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MB Software Solutions
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:52 PM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Energy efficient vehicles
Chet Gardiner wrote:
> Cute.
>
> Here's
Chet Gardiner wrote:
> Cute.
>
> Here's a real energy efficient vehicle:
>
> http://www.teslamotors.com/index.php?js_enabled=1
>
?!?!? Wowis that for real?
--
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, w
Cute.
Here's a real energy efficient vehicle:
http://www.teslamotors.com/index.php?js_enabled=1
john harvey wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVTsNsJV6HU&NR
>
> JH
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVTsNsJV6HU&NR
JH
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unle
95 matches
Mail list logo
