Apologies for cross-posting,
The deadline for the KBS Special Issue on New Avenues in Knowledge Bases for
Natural Language Processing has been extended to 15th November 2015. No more
extensions will be granted. For more information, please visit
http://sentic.net/kbnlp
RATIONALE
Between the
Apologies for cross-posting,
A special issue of Elsevier Knowledge-Based Systems will be dedicated to New
Avenues in Knowledge Bases for Natural Language Processing. Prospective authors
are invited to submit their original unpublished research and application
papers. Comprehensive tutorial and
Hi Carole,
the open metaData Markup Language” (odML) is new for me. After reading
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171061/ I can see a lot of
overlap with other initiatives on metadata describing properties/data
elements.Some example of other initiatives:
- FDA/PhUSE Semantic
quot; seems to mean
"data I care less about".
Best,
Oliver
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Carole Goble
wrote:
>
> heard of this?
> http://www.g-node.org/projects/odml
> open metadata markup language
>
> I'm at a workshop where this seems to be th
heard of this?
http://www.g-node.org/projects/odml
open metadata markup language
I'm at a workshop where this seems to be the favoured model for
organising and indexing experiments
Carole
--
Professor Carole Goble FREng FBCS CITP
School of Computer Science
University of Manch
thus far collected)
>
> Paul Alagna - 732 322 5641
> pjala...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> On Jun 7, 2013, at 2:41 PM, carl mattocks wrote:
>
> sentiments that you agree with
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Conor Dowling
> Date: Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:29 PM
> S
On 6/8/13 4:02 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
Hello David,
here is my contribution to the field:
An Ontology for DICOM metadata (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine):
http://purl.org/healthcarevocab/v1
A tool to extract metadata from DICOM files as RDF:
https://github.com/Bonubase/di
Nice! This looks quite useful.
Thanks,
David
On 06/08/2013 04:02 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
Hello David,
here is my contribution to the field:
An Ontology for DICOM metadata (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine):
http://purl.org/healthcarevocab/v1
A tool to extract metadata f
Hello Daniel,
On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 06:19:51AM -0700, Daniel Rubin wrote:
> This looks like nice work. Any publications from your group on it?
We have submitted a paper for the ODLS workshop in September - it would
probably not be nice to the organizers to publish it before.
> What are the us
to:bru...@netestate.de]
> Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 1:02 AM
> To: David Booth
> Cc: peter.hend...@kp.org; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; semantic-
> w...@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Yosemite Manifesto on RDF as a Universal Healthcare Exchange
> Language
>
>
> Hello David,
&g
Hello David,
here is my contribution to the field:
An Ontology for DICOM metadata (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine):
http://purl.org/healthcarevocab/v1
A tool to extract metadata from DICOM files as RDF:
https://github.com/Bonubase/dicom2rdf
Those will be presented in more detai
On 06/07/2013 01:40 PM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
Not a single word about privacy and dangers in the position statement ?
Strange...
Right. Privacy is very important, but orthogonal: privacy requirements
would apply to *any* information representation language. The intent
was to keep the
On 06/07/2013 01:40 PM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:>
> I think life sciences have been early adopters for a while so this may
> be a bit of preaching to the converted :-)
I sure hope so! :)
On 06/07/2013 02:00 PM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:44:55AM -0700, peter.hend...@
: Rich Cooper
Cc: peter.hend...@kp.org; da...@dbooth.org;
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; semantic-...@w3.org
Subject: Re: Yosemite Manifesto on RDF as a
Universal Healthcare Exchange Language
Hello Rich,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:17:27AM -0700, Rich
Cooper wrote:
> By NTSC specification, all certif
Hello Rich,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:17:27AM -0700, Rich Cooper wrote:
> By NTSC specification, all certified EHR systems
> must be able to output XML files in the CCR
> (continuity of care record) format, so there is
> already a standard for the data itself,
We are talking about healthcare in
>
> From:Michael Brunnbauer
> To:Peter Hendler/CA/KAIPERM@KAIPERM
> Cc:da...@dbooth.org, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org,
> semantic-...@w3.org
> Date:06/07/2013 11:01 AM
> Subject:Re: Yosemite Manifesto on RDF as a Universal Healthcare
> Exchan
Healthcare Exchange Language
Also, the RDF is just triplets. It doesn't say
who's model. It is RDF of a SNOMED like or HL7
like or openEHR like model? Does everyone make up
their own roles and nodes? So saying it's RDF
leaves all the same problems we have now. It&#x
From: Michael Brunnbauer
To: Peter Hendler/CA/KAIPERM@KAIPERM
Cc: da...@dbooth.org, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org,
semantic-...@w3.org
Date: 06/07/2013 11:01 AM
Subject:Re: Yosemite Manifesto on RDF as a Universal Healthcare
Exchange Language
Hello Peter,
On Fri, Jun 07, 201
Hello Peter,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:44:55AM -0700, peter.hend...@kp.org wrote:
> We'll still argue about whether we use SNOMED roles, make HL7 rim classes
> and roles or openEHR or something else.
Asking for a single extensive ontology about the world - or even about a
limited subject - tha
b , public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Date: 06/07/2013 10:42 AM
Subject:Re: Yosemite Manifesto on RDF as a Universal Healthcare
Exchange Language
Hello David,
I think life sciences have been early adopters for a while so this may
be a bit of preaching to the converted :-)
Not a sing
Booth wrote:
> FYI, there is an excellent article on SemanticWeb.com about the workshop
> held this week at the SemTech conference, on "RDF as a Universal
> Healthcare Exchange Language", which culminated in a position statement
> called the "Yosemite Manifesto":
&g
FYI, there is an excellent article on SemanticWeb.com about the workshop
held this week at the SemTech conference, on "RDF as a Universal
Healthcare Exchange Language", which culminated in a position statement
called the "Yosemite Manifesto":
http://goo.gl/eibDL
Here is
I am pleased to announce that there will be a free workshop on "RDF as a
Universal Healthcare Exchange Language" at the upcoming SemTech
Conference in San Francisco on Monday June 3:
http://semtechbizsf2013.semanticweb.com/sessionPop.cfm?confid=70&proposalid=5296
There w
FYI to others:
On 1/30/13 11:32 AM, Elías Andrawos wrote:
*We are sharing an open source framework
Quepyhttps://github.com/machinalis/quepy
<https://github.com/machinalis/quepy>
<https://github.com/machinalis/quepy>
Quepy is a framework to transform questions in natural l
ation choices, or at least they
> > should be. One could make arguments about the potential for using RDF
> > to reason about access permissions, but I think that would be somewhat
> > specious, because RDF could be used for that purpose even if the
> > information rep
nt: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 3:19 PM
To: Michael Miller
Cc: Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C]; David Booth; public-semweb-lifesci
Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
Exchange Language of Healthcare
Good to see this change. Will this make RIM more usable?
--Sivara
..@mail.nih.gov]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:01 AM
>> To: Michael Miller
>> Cc: David Booth; public-semweb-lifesci
>> Subject: RE: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
>> Exchange Language of Healthcare
>>
>> Hi Michael --
d Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
> Exchange Language of Healthcare
>
> Hi Michael --
>
> Yes...and to make sure of that fact, Lloyd McKenzie, the author of the
MIF,
> was the person who wrote the transforms. It was quite an effort which
he is
> j
...@systemsbiology.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:52 AM
To: Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C]
Cc: David Booth; public-semweb-lifesci
Subject: RE: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
Exchange Language of Healthcare
hi charlie,
and is OWL able to capture everything about the MIF so
ail.nih.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:08 PM
> To: Renato Iannella; Tom Morris; public-semweb-lifesci
> Cc: David Booth; RebholzSchuhmann; Joanne Luciano; Michel Dumontier;
> Conor Dowling; Rafael Richards
> Subject: RE: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Univer
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 6:05 AM
To: Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C]
Cc: Tom Morris; public-semweb-lifesci; David Booth; RebholzSchuhmann; Joanne
Luciano; Michel Dumontier; Conor Dowling; Rafael Richards
Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
Exchange Langua
On 16 Jan 2013, at 16:08, "Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C]"
wrote:
> HL7 has just completed its first version of the entire MIF -- RIM + data
> types + vocabulary -- in OWL
Great..any chance that someone will tell us where it is ? ;-)
Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semant
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C] <
mea...@mail.nih.gov> wrote:
> . Other activities on the radar are representation of all existing
> RIM-derived artifacts -- e.g. RMIMs and CDA templates -- in OWL. There is
> definitely movement.
+1
m.
--
Michel Dumontier
Asso
-semweb-lifesci
Cc: David Booth; RebholzSchuhmann; Joanne Luciano; Michel Dumontier; Conor
Dowling; Rafael Richards
Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
Exchange Language of Healthcare
On 16 Jan 2013, at 02:24, Tom Morris wrote:
> I think the argument would
ink the Response paper is ok (given the intended audience) - and any
examples could get complex that actually showed the inferencing advantages of
RDF/OWL
The recommendation for "The HIT Policy Committee should seriously consider
adopting RDF as a uniform, universal exchange language for
Jerven from uniprot has a paper (accepted? Not sure... At least submitted - he
sent me the submission) where he details how RDF has made his life much much
easier... It may be worth knocking on his door for additional comment at
least...
M
Tom Morris wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:41
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:41 PM, David Booth wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:24 -0500, Tom Morris wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:34 AM, David Booth wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>> > Yes, we decided that we simply didn't have time to write a long document
>> > that more fully explained t
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Kingsley Idehen
wrote:
> On 1/15/13 11:06 AM, Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C] wrote:
>>
>> The first version of the HL7 MIF in OWL is now available for comment,
>> criticism, evolution, and usage.
>
> Do you have URL from which the OWL rendition can be accessed?
Perh
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:24 -0500, Tom Morris wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:34 AM, David Booth wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > Yes, we decided that we simply didn't have time to write a long document
> > that more fully explained the benefits [of RDF].
>
> I think the argument would be greatly
On 1/15/13 11:06 AM, Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C] wrote:
The first version of the HL7 MIF in OWL is now available for comment,
criticism, evolution, and usage.
Do you have URL from which the OWL rendition can be accessed?
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company We
i; Michel Dumontier;
> Conor Dowling; Rafael Richards
> Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
> Exchange Language of Healthcare
>
> Agree with this and want to add one more - this statement from the document:
> "Meaningful Use currentl
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:34 AM, David Booth wrote:
> Hi, and thanks for your comments!
>
> On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 12:58 +, RebholzSchuhmann wrote:
>>
>> don't know how someone reads this, who does not know all these benefits
>> anyways. Reads as if you are selling RDF to somebody who knows hal
here is the comment that Rafael, Michel, Conor and I submitted to
> >>> the US government Office of the National Coordinator for Health
> >>> Information Technology, in response to their RFC on "Meaningful Use"
> >>> requirements, proposing RDF / Linked Dat
lic-semweb-lifesci; Michel Dumontier; Conor
Dowling; Rafael Richards
Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
Exchange Language of Healthcare
Agree with this and want to add one more - this statement from the document:
"Meaningful Use currently mandat
eally. The main argument is that the same techniques that are
> currently being used can still be used. Privacy and security issues are
> orthogonal to information representation choices, or at least they
> should be. One could make arguments about the potential for using RDF
> to reason
mail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 4:41 AM
> To: David Booth
> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci; Michel Dumontier; Conor Dowling; Rafael
Richards
> Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
> Exchange Language of Healthcare
>
> Thanks for doing t
here is the comment that Rafael, Michel, Conor and I submitted to
>>> the US government Office of the National Coordinator for Health
>>> Information Technology, in response to their RFC on "Meaningful Use"
>>> requirements, proposing RDF / Linked Data as a unive
. Privacy and security issues are
orthogonal to information representation choices, or at least they
should be. One could make arguments about the potential for using RDF
to reason about access permissions, but I think that would be somewhat
specious, because RDF could be used for that purpose
as a universal exchange
language of healthcare:
http://dbooth.org/2013/mu/MU-Stage3-RFC-Simple-Response.pdf
Although it is too late to change that submitted comment (as the
deadline was last night), we would still appreciate any feedback or
suggestions for improvement, as I'm sure we will have to
.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:26 PM
> To: Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C]; HCLS
> Cc: Eric Prud'hommeaux
> Subject: Re: SBIR proposal: Prototype mediation service for Open-Source,
> Universal Healthcare Exchange Language: Pilot connecting VistA and OSCAR
>
&g
;
linmd.si...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu; Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C];
mscottmarsh...@gmail.com; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
Subject: RE: An HL7 RIM navigation language based on SPARQL?
hi peter,
interesting question and discussion. i definitely agree with david's take on
the que
fesci@w3.org; ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
*Subject:* Re: An HL7 RIM navigation language based on SPARQL?
It's because clinicians will balk at the URIs. The DSL would have the same
logic exaclty but all resource names and URIs would have to be replaced
with obvious business names.
Clinicians compla
A visual representation of the underlying RIM/MIF ontology -- and probably an
equivalent SNOMED ontology -- could be helpful, however not as a "special"
language, but rather as a more friendly view of SPARQL constructs. So, I would
think that a formal RIMQL would be a dead end unles
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 19:37 +0200, Jerven Bolleman wrote:
> Is SPARQL too difficult to teach to clinicians?
My opinion:
- Yes. Clinicians should have a GUI with interactive faceted browser /
query builder. ANY query language would be too difficult to teach
clinicians who are not
> Mainly for Charlie and Eric but anyone who knows RIM.
>
> There has been talk off and on for ever about a Domain Specific Language
> for navigating RIM like graphs of data. Seems to me SPARQL can already do
> that.
> But SPARQL is too much to teach clinicians. So you could have
Mainly for Charlie and Eric but anyone who knows RIM.
There has been talk off and on for ever about a Domain Specific Language
for navigating RIM like graphs of data. Seems to me SPARQL can already do
that.
But SPARQL is too much to teach clinicians. So you could have a RIM
specific DSL that
ource,
Universal Healthcare Exchange Language: Pilot connecting VistA and OSCAR
Charlie,
the public mailing list for the HCLS is -
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org<mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
the public calendar for the HCLS is the google calendar; if you login to the
google calendar wi
> From: Michel Dumontier [michel.dumont...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:40 AM
> To: team-hcls-cha...@w3.org
> Subject: Fwd: SBIR proposal: Prototype mediation service for Open-Source,
> Universal Healthcare Exchange Language: Pilot connecting VistA and OSCAR
>
>
-
Introduction to Implementing Ontologies in the Web Ontology Language (OWL)
BioHealth Informatics group at the University of Manchester are pleased to
invite you to
Introduction to Implementing Ontologies in the Web Ontology Language (OWL)
BioHealth Informatics group at the University of Manchester are pleased to
invite you to participate in their internationally renowned OWL Ontology
tutorials.
It is to be hosted at the University of Manchester on
t; notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this
> e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them.
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> *Michael Miller *
>
> 12/17/2010 09:23 AM
> To
> Peter Hendler/CA/kaip...@kaiperm
> cc
chael Miller
12/17/2010 09:23 AM
To
Peter Hendler/CA/kaip...@kaiperm
cc
conor-dowl...@caregraf.com, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org,
public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org
Subject
RE: Wait a sec...What about the HL7 RIM An Universal Exchange Language
hi peter,
"You don't gain anythin
ystemsbiology.org;
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org;
twcl...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*Subject:* Re: Wait a sec...What about the HL7 RIM An Universal Exchange
Language
Just want to be clear about when we use the word HL7. In the USA when you
just say HL7 it is assumed yo
eb-lifesci-request
*Subject:* Re: Wait a sec...What about the HL7 RIM An Universal Exchange
Language
I want to comment on:
<>
This is not really true. Separate triples in a file/message/document are
logical ANDs, they belong together as an entity. Moreover, you can link
different elements
L can support in the
future are really just features of the decade we work in...These two
symbols in the RIM trace back to to 8000 BC. Whatever we call them,
under what language name we call them, won't change the world of
physical entities and processes that we are representing.
So to
i-requ...@w3.org
Onderwerp: RE: Wait a sec...What about the HL7 RIM An Universal Exchange
Language
hi all,
"unambiguous identifier for "things""
i agree, this has been a known issue for many years (as you well know, tim)
but its importance is just now growing as multi-om
mation
is about Actors and ..., that it's RIM-based, let's assume SNOMED is used -
it get's down to "XML blob + custom RPC" leading God knows where vs "linked
graph stores + generic query language" for both exchange and
interpretation.
Or in commercial terms: mu
ct
Re: Wait a sec...What about the HL7 RIM An Universal Exchange Language
I like Eric Neumann's description of RDF as "recombinant data".
Agreed. Choosing something other than HL7 as the lingua franca for
assertions doesn't devalue HL7! We can be happy that we got the
inform
d to being useful or meaningful. And the problem lies
> not with them, but the mechanism. It's put the focus on "truck", not
> "cargo".
>
> Conor
>
>
>>
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> michael
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> *From:* public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org [mailto:
> public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org] *On Behalf Of *peter.hend...@kp.org
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:18 AM
> *To:* ma...@illuminae.com
> *Cc:* public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; public-semweb-lifesci-requ..
ot;sameas"/identity. Once
they're in place, rule-application, entailment goes from there.
If some are interested in pursuing a semantic alternative to XML-itis and flat
code schemes, then count me in. BTW, so many semantic standards exist - what's
needed now is an implementation
eb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org] *On Behalf Of *peter.hend...@kp.org
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:18 AM
*To:* ma...@illuminae.com
*Cc:* public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org;
twcl...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*Subject:* Wait a sec...What about the HL7 RIM An Universal Exchange
>
>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From:
>> Date: Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:17 AM
>> Subject: Wait a sec...What about the HL7 RIM An Universal Exchange
>> Language
>> To: ma...@illuminae.com
>> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.or
I agree. Each technology / standard has its strengths (and weaknesses), and it
may be best to look at all of them and have a more harmonized / integrated
approach. This article (1st half) summarizes this quite well.
http://efasoft.blogspot.com/2010/12/toward-universal-exchange-language
pursuing a semantic alternative to XML-itis and
flat code schemes, then count me in. BTW, so many semantic standards exist -
what's needed now is an implementation guide,
Conor
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:17 AM, wrote:
>
> The PCAST did not take into consideration (maybe they don't
The PCAST did not take into consideration (maybe they don't even know)
there is an universal exchange language for healthcare. It is HL7 V3. The
CDA is merely one of virtually infinite structures that can be constructed
from the RIM. The meta information as well as the clinical da
enclosing one of our abstracts for
further reading
T N Bhat
-Original Message-
From: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tim Clark
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 10:55 PM
To: Mark
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: An U
Totally kidding, Mark. I guess my "sense of humor" is a bit too dry.
On Dec 14, 2010, at 11:45 PM, Mark wrote:
> Well... I defer to you on the richness... I am merely an "adherent" to the
> originally proposed technology... it was you and your collaborators who
> invented it!!
>
> Just pay
ch
> with vocabulary controlled metadata. While this shares many features with the
> universal exchange
> language that we envisage, it lacks many others. In particular, it
> perpetuates the record centric notion
> that data elements should “live” inside documents (albeit metadata t
Well... I defer to you on the richness... I am merely an "adherent" to the
originally proposed technology... it was you and your collaborators who
invented it!!
Just pay me a salary for evangelism ;-)
M
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:55:07 -0800, Tim Clark
wrote:
I think we are qualified and
I think we are qualified and should apply for the $ - we could make a YouTube
video of our application and send it in. People could learn something - and we
might get rich.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Mark wrote:
> But seriously, Tim, if we were to pursue this problem, w
Right, and those "things" mean different "things" in different contexts
(clinical, molecular, demographic, etc...)
Which means also that the relevant metadata is different in the different
contexts
On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Mark wrote:
> But seriously, Tim, if we were to pursue this problem
But seriously, Tim, if we were to pursue this problem, we would need some
form of unambiguous identifier for "things"... and given the distributed
nature of the biomedical domain, we'd want to make sure that there was
some way of resolving that identifier to obtain metadata about it from a
l Exchange Language
we, as a group, need to propose that we develop ROTFLMAO-ML and take some of
that $40 Million!
"Tim Clark" wrote:
>No kidding!
>
>And here I thought we had a whole family of languages, ROTFL, ROTFLMAO,
>ROTFLMFAO, etc...
>
>On Dec 14, 2010, at 8
anne Luciano wrote:
>
>> Tim.
>>
>> It's short for ROTFLOL.
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Connected by MOTOBLUR™ on T-Mobile
>>
>> -Original message-
>> From: Tim Clark
>> To: Mark Wilkinson
>> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, &
> Mark, that is very interesting, I was unaware of the new ROTFL
>> language, please forward details. :-)
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On Dec 14, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:54:10 -0800, Matthia
age-
> From: Tim Clark
> To: Mark Wilkinson
> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, "Matthias Löbe"
>
> Sent: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:48:41 GMT+00:00
> Subject: Re: An Universal Exchange Language
>
> Mark, that is very interesting, I was unaware of the new ROTF
Tim.
It's short for ROTFLOL.
:-)
Connected by MOTOBLUR™ on T-Mobile
-Original message-
From: Tim Clark
To: Mark Wilkinson
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, "Matthias Löbe"
Sent: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:48:41 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: An Universal Exchange Language
Mar
give me the $40M and I'll tell you all about it!
M
"Tim Clark" wrote:
>Mark, that is very interesting, I was unaware of the new ROTFL
>language, please forward details. :-)
>
>Tim
>
>On Dec 14, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> On Tue,
Mark, that is very interesting, I was unaware of the new ROTFL language, please
forward details. :-)
Tim
On Dec 14, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:54:10 -0800, Matthias Löbe
> wrote:
>
>
>> Any suggestions?
>
>
Hi Mathias --
You asked for suggestions related to a future Universal Exchange Language.
I'd suggest that the Language should look outwards towards human usability
and understandability, as well as inwards towards the technology.
Fortunately, there's a system that supports this. I
es many features with the
universal exchange
language that we envisage, it lacks many others. In particular, it perpetuates
the record centric notion
that data elements should "live" inside documents (albeit metadata tagged). We
think that a universal
exchange language must facilit
ber 14, 2010 5:09 PM
To: Matthias Löbe
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: An Universal Exchange Language
2010/12/14 Matthias Löbe
mailto:matthias.lo...@imise.uni-leipzig.de>>
Hello to all,
A central point is to create an "Universal Exchange Language" that is
architectura
Actually, I'm fairly certain from interim, high level, reports, that
they do have a semweb solutions in mind, but for unknown reasons
modified the language in the final report.
?!
On 12/14/10 2:09 PM, Jim McCusker wrote:
2010/12/14 Matthias Löbe <mailto:matthias.lo...@imise.uni-le
2010/12/14 Matthias Löbe
> Hello to all,
>
> A central point is to create an "Universal Exchange Language" that is
> architecturally neutral, XML-based, extensible, optimized for
> representing structured data, and that should have the ability to
> include/ refer
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:54:10 -0800, Matthias Löbe
wrote:
Any suggestions?
ROTFL!! :-)
M
--
Dr. Mark Wilkinson
Assistant Professor, Medical Genetics
Faculty of Medicine, UBC
Principal Investigator, Bioinformatics
Institute for Heart and Lung Health
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, BC,
ral point is to create an "Universal Exchange Language" that is
architecturally neutral, XML-based, extensible, optimized for
representing structured data, and that should have the ability to
include/ reference controlled vocabularies. That language would be
used to design fine-grained da
,
Dutch, French etc, basically most Indo-European and some east Asian languages
as much as they are provided by and through UMLS. it can also be extended
directly and out of the scope of UMLS, to account for those language
differences, still maintaining knowledge and relationships according to
I'd suggest looking at the US National Library of Medicine's Unified Medical
Language System (UMLS):
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/
It is, among other things, a metathesaurus of biomedical language built from a
couple dozen source vocabularies. I'm pretty sure that there
Hello all,
Do you know of semantic models that contain translations of biomedical
terms in different languages, preferably including Dutch?
The context is a pilot project where we want to show the use of
semantically disclosing medical surveys. The first resource we start
working on is in Du
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
