On Friday 18 June 2004 8:59 am, Skip Montanaro wrote:
Matt There have been several discussions on the list in the last few
Matt months about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, ...
I would like to see PyGtk become part of the core Python distribution,
however
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 16:09, Michael McLay wrote:
On Friday 18 June 2004 8:59 am, Skip Montanaro wrote:
Matt There have been several discussions on the list in the last few
Matt months about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, ...
I would like to see PyGtk become part
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 20:32 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:27:28AM +0100, Matthew Bull wrote:
There have been several discussions on the list in the last few months
about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, and whilst
attending europython
trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, and whilst
attending europython recently I had an opportunity to steer
conversations in that direction with a lot of people to get a feel for
the (european at least) communities take on this, most of the people I
spoke to where non PyGTK folks
into the standard library, and whilst
attending europython recently I had an opportunity to steer
conversations in that direction with a lot of people to get a feel for
the (european at least) communities take on this, most of the people I
spoke to where non PyGTK folks, and the opinions seemed
discussion.
There have been several discussions on the list in the last few months
about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, and whilst
attending europython recently I had an opportunity to steer
conversations in that direction with a lot of people to get a feel for
the (european
Matt There have been several discussions on the list in the last few
Matt months about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, ...
Matt there where however a few buts...
Matt 1. Documentation -
...
Matt 2. Windows -
...
Matt 3.Idle -
...
4. Mac OSX
into the standard library, and whilst
attending europython recently I had an opportunity to steer
conversations in that direction with a lot of people to get a feel for
the (european at least) communities take on this, most of the people I
spoke to where non PyGTK folks, and the opinions
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 13:59, Skip Montanaro wrote:
Matt There have been several discussions on the list in the last few
Matt months about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, ...
Matt there where however a few buts...
Matt 1. Documentation -
...
Matt 2
1- PyGTK wraps GTK+ for Python. Which life-cycle do we follow, GTK's
or Python's?
Matt Both this point and the one below are best answered by the library
Matt developers, if they are in favour of the idea of course :^) (I
Matt should make it clear I _use_ pyGTK, I'm not a
Hi all,
as no nativ english speaker, I ask in advance for pardon because my bad
english.
1. Documentation -
this is something that has been discussed on the list quite a few times
and actually I think the exsisting free docs are perfectly adequate it
seemed to mostly come from people who
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:27:28AM +0100, Matthew Bull wrote:
There have been several discussions on the list in the last few months
about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, and whilst
attending europython recently I had an opportunity to steer
conversations in that direction
12 matches
Mail list logo
