On 6/6/2014 9:13 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Jun 6, 2014, at 9:05 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
If you are suggesting that a Windows compiler change should be
invisible to non-Windows users, I agree.
Let us assume that /pcbuild remains for those who have vc2008 and
that /pcbuild14
On 6/5/2014 4:51 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
In fact, AFAICT it's 100% correct for libraries being called by
regular python code (which is why I'm able to quote benchmarks at you
:-)). The bytecode eval loop always holds a reference to all operands,
and then immediately DECREFs them after the
On 6/4/2014 3:41 AM, Jeff Allen wrote:
Jython uses UTF-16 internally -- probably the only sensible choice in a
Python that can call Java. Indexing is O(N), fundamentally. By
fundamentally, I mean for those strings that have not yet noticed that
they contain no supplementary (0x) characters.
On 6/4/2014 3:41 AM, Jeff Allen wrote:
Jython uses UTF-16 internally -- probably the only sensible choice in a
Python that can call Java. Indexing is O(N), fundamentally. By
fundamentally, I mean for those strings that have not yet noticed that
they contain no supplementary (0x) characters.
On 6/4/2014 5:14 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
That said, and unlike previous attempts to develop a small Python
implementations (which of course existed), we're striving to be exactly
a Python language implementation, not a Python-like language
implementation. As there's no formal,
On 6/4/2014 6:52 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Well is subjective (or should be defined formally based on the
requirements). With my MicroPython hat on, an implementation which
receives a string, transcodes it, leading to bigger size, just to
immediately transcode back and send out - is awful,
On 6/4/2014 6:54 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
05.06.14 00:21, Terry Reedy написав(ла):
On 6/4/2014 3:41 AM, Jeff Allen wrote:
Jython uses UTF-16 internally -- probably the only sensible choice in a
Python that can call Java. Indexing is O(N), fundamentally. By
fundamentally, I mean for those
On 6/2/2014 3:12 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Even if we had unlimited reviewer resources (which we don't),
mechanical code cleanups tend to fall under the if it ain't broke,
don't fix it guideline. That then sets us up for a conflict between
folks just getting started and trying to be helpful, and
On 5/31/2014 2:05 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 31.05.14 05:32, schrieb Terry Reedy:
I have two areas of questions about updating turtle.py. First the module
itself, then a turtle tracker issue versus code cleanup policies.
A. Unlike most stdlib modules, turtle is copyrighted and licensed
I have two areas of questions about updating turtle.py. First the module
itself, then a turtle tracker issue versus code cleanup policies.
A. Unlike most stdlib modules, turtle is copyrighted and licensed by an
individual.
'''
# turtle.py: a Tkinter based turtle graphics module for Python
#
On 5/29/2014 1:22 AM, INADA Naoki wrote:
We would like to stress that we don't believe anything on this list is as
important as the continuing efforts that everyone in the broader ecosystem
is making. If you just want to ease the transition by working on anything
at all, the best use of your
On 5/28/2014 6:26 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
I hope it's
not controversial to say that most new Python code is still being
written against Python 2.7 today;
Given that Python 3 downloads now outnumber Python 2 downloads, I think
'most' might be an overstatement. But I think it a moot point.
On 5/19/2014 2:08 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/19/2014 1:31 AM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
To get my repo back into a usable state, I ran hg update --clean
py35% hg update --clean
% hg update --clean
abort: index 00changelog.i unknown format 2!
After exiting Workbench and rebooting, update
On 5/19/2014 10:20 AM, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
On 05/17/2014 10:26 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
When list.pop was added, the convention was changed to
do not return the 'self' parameter
Do you have a reference for this?
I think the fact that Guido accepted, in 2000, my 1999 proposal
On 5/20/2014 12:30 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
[].sort() is None
True
ABC.lower() is None
False
Is there a reference anywhere as to *why* the convention in Python is to
do it that way?
In short, reducing bugs induced by mutation of aliased objects.
Functional languages
On 5/19/2014 1:31 AM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
On May 19, 2014, at 5:52 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu
mailto:tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
I stopped at this point and ran diskcheck. I then looked at the DAG
and noticed 5 previous 3.4 patches that were not merged into 3.5: rev
90750 and 90751
An hour ago, I pulled recent commits to my local repository.
I edited a couple of files, wrote commit messages, and pulled again,
nothing new. I then did the usual: commit 2.7, commit 3.4, merge to 3.5.
Problem: merge conflicts from 6 files I have never touched.
Include/patchlevel.h
On 5/17/2014 1:14 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
During a conversation today, I realised that the convention of
returning None from methods that change an object's state isn't
captured the Programming Recommendations section of PEP 8.
Specifically, I'm referring to this behaviour:
[].sort() is None
On 5/9/2014 2:12 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
On May 9, 2014, at 1:28 PM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
I don't understand this. Why it is our responsibility to provide a
free service for a large project to repeatedly download a set of files
they need? Why does it not make more
On 5/7/2014 7:45 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2014 1:14 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/5/2014 5:32 PM, Anthony Tuininga wrote:
Hi,
I am the author of cx_Freeze which creates frozen executables from
Python scripts. To this point I have been using frozen modules (compiled
C) but this has
On 5/5/2014 5:32 PM, Anthony Tuininga wrote:
Hi,
I am the author of cx_Freeze which creates frozen executables from
Python scripts. To this point I have been using frozen modules (compiled
C) but this has the side effect of bundling parts of Python with a
cx_Freeze release -- and this has
On 5/4/2014 11:02 PM, Jessica McKellar wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to determine the greatest depth (in the ocean or underground)
and highest altitude at which Python code has been executed.
Please note that I'm interested in where the code was executed, and not,
say, where data that Python
On 4/28/2014 4:24 PM, Claudiu Popa wrote:
This issue raised too much bikeshedding. To wrap it up, I'll modify
the patch with the following:
- processes renamed to workers
- `workers` defaults to 1
- When `workers` is equal to 0, then `os.cpu_count` will be used
- When `workers` 1, multiple
On 4/28/2014 2:12 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
I don't think anyone should write code with variable width fonts,
The problem is that fixed pitch does not work well for even a half-way
complete unicode font and I don't know that there are any available. As
far as I know, my Windows 7 only came
On 4/28/2014 5:01 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Mon Apr 28 2014 at 4:58:35 PM, Mike Miller python-...@mgmiller.net
mailto:python-...@mgmiller.net wrote:
Hi, note the pep, it makes allowances for security enhancements.
The PEP in question is about fixing fundamentally broken security issues
On 4/28/2014 7:13 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu
mailto:tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
I don't think anyone should write code with variable width fonts,
The problem is that fixed pitch does not work well for even a
half-way
On 4/27/2014 3:34 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org
mailto:ba...@python.org wrote:
On Apr 26, 2014, at 12:33 AM, Janzert wrote:
So the one example under discussion is:
foo = long_function_name(
var_one, var_two,
On 4/25/2014 12:46 PM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Florian Bruhin m...@the-compiler.org wrote:
While it seems ConfigParser doesn't do any escaping as all, I'm
thinking it should at least raise some exception when such a value is
trying to be set.
I'd expect writing
On 4/25/2014 1:41 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 04/25/2014 09:46 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
At this point, it would be a backward-incompatible change, so it's
unlikely such a change could be allowed to affect existing code.
All bug-fixes are backwards-incompatible, yet we fix them anyway. ;)
It
On 4/24/2014 12:36 PM, Tim Peters wrote:
There's been a bit of serious study on this. The results are still
open to interpretation, though ;-) Here's a nice summary:
http://whathecode.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/camelcase-vs-underscores-scientific-showdown/
The linked poll is almost evenly
On 4/23/2014 3:27 PM, Claudiu Popa wrote:
* http://bugs.python.org/issue16104
`Use multiprocessing in compileall script`
This patch adds a new command line argument to `compileall`, also
a new argument to `compileall.compile_dir`, which controls the number
of worker processes used to compile
On 4/21/2014 1:39 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
OK, I've now updated the PEP to better described the *problem* (rather
than skipping ahead to proposing a specific solution - exactly what I
was asking people *not* to do at the language summit!),
Looks great. I think the analysis should be part of a
On 4/20/2014 8:25 PM, Ken Chan wrote:
Please send this instead to python-list, where you might find other
raspian users. Pydev is for development of future version of python, not
use of current versions.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
___
Python-Dev mailing
On 4/19/2014 10:52 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Does everyone involved know that for x in d.iterkeys() is equivalent
to for x in d
Looking at uses I found by searching code.ohloh.net, the answer is
either 'No, people sometimes add a redundant .iterkeys()' or 'people are
writing non-dict
On 4/18/2014 10:31 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
After spending some time talking to the folks at the PyCon Twisted
sprints, they persuaded me that adding back the iterkeys/values/items
methods for mapping objects would be a nice way to eliminate a key
porting hassle for them (and likely others),
On 4/16/2014 3:46 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
On 16.04.2014 04:35, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Well, that's the part that does import site. Anything that speeds up
the code in Lib/site.py might help. :-)
Antoine, Victor and me have implemented a couple of speed ups for
import site already. I
On 4/16/2014 12:25 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 14.04.14 23:51, schrieb Brett Cannon:
It was realized during PyCon that since we are freezing importlib we
could now consider freezing all the modules to cut out having to stat or
read them from disk.
[...]
Thoughts?
They still get read from
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:57:35 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu
mailto:tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
PS. In the user process sys.modules, there are numerous null
entries like these:
sys.modules['idlelib.os']
sys.modules['idlelib.tokenize'__]
sys.modules
On 4/16/2014 6:26 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
AP exams are starting to allow Python, but it's 10% of the AP CS exams.
AP?
(I thought that was me, but it sounds unlikely :-))
AP = Advanced Placement. US and Canadian high school students who have
taken advanced (AP) courses equivalent to
On 4/15/2014 12:15 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
I've always really liked MvL's 5-reviews-to-get-1 approach.
The only thing I don't like about it[3] is that it puts an explicit
price on core developer time (my time is worth 5x as much as
yours).
Not really true since any of the 5 could be
On 4/15/2014 5:26 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
To finish my timing work I decided to see
where Py_InitializeEx_Private() spends its time. The following is a
breakdown measured in microseconds running using -E:
INIT:
setlocale: 11
envvar: 2
random init: 2
interp creation: 15
thread creation: 6
GIL:
On 4/14/2014 1:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Some quick thoughts:
- I'd prefer a name that plays on 2 and 3, not 2 and 8. :-)
- Are you sure this isn't better directed to python-ideas first? Most
ideas have to prove their worth in that list before python-dev will give
them the light of day.
On 4/14/2014 11:32 AM, Steve Dower wrote:
To put it up front, I'm totally against CPython 2.8 ever becoming a
real thing. Anything that comes out should be seen as a migration
path, not an upgrade path. I'll also admit I'm not heavily invested
in working on it myself, but I had a number of
On 4/14/2014 5:16 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Apr 14, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
mailto:gu...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io
mailto:don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Apr 14, 2014, at 3:53 PM, Terry Reedy tjre
On 4/14/2014 5:00 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu
mailto:tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
If the company is profitable, it could afford
to fund a half- to full-time developer.
By using the vague 'fund' I meant either hire themselves
On 4/13/2014 2:46 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
As for the request Are you sure that the patch is ready: this is
*very* difficult to answer for the author. We all have experienced
that patches that we considered good were critized out of nowhere,
and I just did the same to Nikolaus. There is just
On 4/13/2014 4:11 AM, Łukasz Langa wrote:
On Apr 13, 2014, at 12:48 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Stefan Behnel, 12.04.2014 19:11:
So, what I've learned from seven years of Cython is that static typing in
signatures is actually less interesting than you might think at first
On 4/12/2014 11:08 AM, Augie Fackler wrote:
On Mar 29, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org
mailto:g...@krypto.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
mailto:solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:47:59 +
Brett
On 4/12/2014 2:58 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
I've accumulated a number of patches in the issue tracker that are
waiting for someone to review/commit/reject them. I'm eager to make
corrections as necessary, I just need someone to look the work that I've
done so far:
If I did not have several
On 4/11/2014 8:58 AM, Jakub QB Dorňák wrote:
writing a threaded application I've been surprised that there is no
object api for fcntl.flock implementing __enter__() and __exit__()
methods to be used with 'with' statement.
Several things have been turned into context managers because someone
On 4/8/2014 6:32 PM, cjw wrote:
Larry Hastings
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/133818.html
wasn't far from the truth.
Larry's note was about adding (redundant) *NON-ascii* unicode symbols,
in particular × == \xd7, as in A × B, as a synonym for '@'. Various
people have
On 4/9/2014 12:25 AM, adnanume...@gmail.com wrote:
Greeting Everyone. First of all I want to introduce my self Adnan Umer
as a student of bachelors in Information Technology.
I’ve few suggestions on improving IDLE. Here are few:
Python-list, python-ideas, or idle-dev lists might have been
On 4/7/2014 5:22 AM, victor.stinner wrote:
def cancel(self):
+Request that a task to cancel itself.
For proper English, this should be one of these:
Request that a task cancel itself.
Request a task to cancel itself.
I think the first is slightly better.
TJR
On 4/4/2014 11:21 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
https://docs.python.org/3.4/whatsnew/3.4.html#other-language-changes
1. Is this absolute name with symlinks resolved?
2. Why there is a special case for __main__?
(i.e. Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.)
Did you read the
It is again now.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Just to let those who read the list as a list (or via mail.python.org,
as I just did as a backup) know, news.gmane.org appears to have
stoppedreceiving new messages from mailing listsat about 0:30 this
morning (apr 2). (I am judging this from the last recorded post on the
super-busy linux
On 3/31/2014 2:30 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
I am working through the multiple bugs afflicting tokenize.untokenize, which
is described in the tokenize doc and has an even longer docstring. While the
function could be implemented
On 3/28/2014 5:09 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
To be clear, the proposal for Idle would be to still use the RPC
protocol, but run it over a pipe instead of a socket, right?
The was and is the current proposal, assuming that it is the easiest
thing to do that would work. While responding to
On 3/28/2014 5:12 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:58:25 -0400
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
However, the code below creates a subprocess for one command and one
response, which can apparently be done now with subprocess.communicate.
What I and others need
On 3/29/2014 11:30 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 04:44:32 -0400
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 3/28/2014 5:12 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
[for Idle]
Why don't you use multiprocessing or concurrent.futures? They have
everything you need for continuous conversation between
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
mailto:solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
I think we have reached a point where adding porting-related facilities
AFAIK, The only porting specific feature is %s as a synonym for %b. Not
pretty, but tolerable. Otherwise, I
On 3/29/2014 8:28 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
The future project already contains a full backport of a true bytes
type, rather than relying on Python 2 str objects:
http://python-future.org/what_else.html#bytes
That project looks really nice!
It seems to me that the easiest way to make any
On 3/28/2014 12:45 PM, Josiah Carlson wrote:
If it makes you feel any better, I spent an hour this morning building a
2-function API for Linux and Windows, both tested, not using ctypes, and
not even using any part of asyncio (the Windows bits are in msvcrt and
_winapi). It works in Python 3.3+.
On 3/28/2014 6:20 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Full example of asynchronous communication with a subprocess (the
python interactive interpreter) using asyncio high-level API:
Thank you for writing this. As I explained in response to Josiah, Idle
communicates with a python interpreter subprocess
On 3/27/2014 9:16 PM, Josiah Carlson wrote:
You don't understand the point because you don't understand the feature
request or PEP. That is probably my fault for not communicating the
intent better in the past. The feature request and PEP were written to
offer something like the below (or at
On 3/26/2014 4:59 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Actually, the first step is publish it on PyPI, the second is to get a
fair number of happy users there. The bar for getting something included
into the stdlib is pretty high -- you need to demonstrate that there is
a need *and* that having it as a
On 3/25/2014 6:15 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I am not sure how this meme got started, but let me be clear: the
proposed policy DOES NOT provide blanket permission to break backwards
compatibility in the affected modules. It only allows ADDING new
features to bring these modules into line with
On 3/24/2014 6:51 PM, Andrew M. Hettinger wrote:
I thought I'd wait until the 3.4 release before I bothered asking about
this: http://bugs.python.org/issue20469
I don't think I'm qualified to actually be writing code for the ssl
module, but is there anything else that I can do to help?
I could
On 3/24/2014 7:04 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Mar 24, 2014, at 5:38 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Beyond that, PEP 462 covers another way for corporate users to give
back - if they want to build massive commercial enterprises on our
software, they can
On 3/24/2014 9:43 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
And time for round 3 :)
And round 3 of my response: contrary to what I said before, I now think
that the base proposal should be the simplest possible: selectively (and
minimally) waive the 'no-enhancement in maintenance release policy' for
future
On 3/23/2014 3:29 AM, Cory Benfield wrote:
On 23 March 2014 at 04:32:17, Terry Reedy
(tjre...@udel.edu(mailto:tjre...@udel.edu)) wrote:
Instead, I think the PEP should propose a special series of server
enhancement releases that are based on the final 2.7 maintenance release
(2.7.8 or 2.7.9
On 3/23/2014 9:00 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
The download page for the final 2.7.z maintenance release could say
something like We recommend that you move to the most recent Python 3
version if at all possible. If you cannot
On 3/23/2014 8:03 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Mar 23, 2014, at 08:00 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
I'm unclear how this would be better than just biting the bullet and
making a 2.8 release. On the one hand, the 2.7.x number suggests
(based on the existing release protocol) that it should be a
On 3/23/2014 7:48 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Agreed. That's a key part of why the proposal is mainly about syncing
certain key modules with their Python 3 counterparts, rather than
piecemeal backports. That way, all you need to know is the SSL, hashlib
and hmac modules are kept in sync with Python
On 3/23/2014 7:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:44:42 -0400
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:43:14 +0100, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 20:47:28 +0100 (CET)
r.david.murray python-check...@python.org wrote:
On 3/22/2014 8:55 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Unfortunately, rudimentary SSL support is worse than nothing.
I'm going to try to find a way to steal that line and get it into the
PEP. I'm not sure yet if my proposal is the *right* answer, but this
observation gets right to the heart of the problem
On 3/18/2014 12:44 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello Xavier,
It is not obvious your message is appropriate for python-dev. It looks
like mere advertising;
The wording is typical for slightly indirect sales pitches in English.
The same non-specific (no language mentioned) message was sent to
On 3/17/2014 3:57 PM, Sean Felipe Wolfe wrote:
I'm working on some IDLE oriented bugs and I'm having some trouble
building the 3.3 branch:
Starting today, Idle for 3.3 is no more patched.
2.7, 3.4, and 3.5 will be patched for now.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
On 3/13/2014 7:34 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Christian Heimes writes:
But I don't want it to sound like an advert... Suggestions?
Not to worry. It *can't* be an advert -- it's all true, and there are
no irrelevant half-naked glistening bodies. (Former newts in the pond
don't count.)
On 3/7/2014 3:10 PM, Jurko Gospodnetić wrote:
Hi.
I just noticed that the way help() function displays a function
signature changed between Python 3.3 3.4 but I can not find this
documented anywhere. Here's a matching example in both Python 3.3
Python 3.4 for comparison:
On 3/5/2014 8:15 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 12:57:03PM -0800, Thomas Wouters wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
+Had this facility existed early in Python's history, there would have been
+no need to create dict.get() and
On 3/3/2014 7:13 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 03/03/2014 03:01 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if the cherry-picking rule still applies for
Python 3.4 final? Can I open an issue if I want to see a changeset in
the final version?
Sadly, yes.
Doc changes appear online
On 3/2/2014 1:51 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 3/1/2014 7:11 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
I have a couple of patches outstanding, notably issue 20249 [2], which
is a small change, has a patch, and has no activity or nosying since
Suppose a 2.7 standard library function is documented as taking a
'string' argument, such as these examples from the turtle module.
pencolor(colorstring)
Set pencolor to colorstring, which is a Tk color specification
string, such as red, yellow, or #33cc8c.
turtle.shape(name=None)
not a
good idea to switch from str to basestring is when the data is meant to
be binary -- but in this case it's clearly text (we can also tell from
what the same code looks like in Python 3 :-).
Thanks to both of you. 'bugfix' noted on the issue.
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Terry Reedy tjre
On 3/2/2014 4:23 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
02.03.14 22:01, Terry Reedy написав(ла):
Is this a programmer error for passing unicode instead of string, or a
library error for not accepting unicode?
Is changing 'isinstance(x, str)' in the library (with whatever other
changes are needed) a bugfix
On 3/1/2014 2:57 PM, Sebastian Kraft wrote:
Hi everybody,
more than a year ago I have submitted a patch to enhance the Wave module
with read/write support for floating point data.
http://bugs.python.org/issue16525
Up till now this patch has not been applied nor did I get feedback if
anything
On 3/1/2014 3:25 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 15:08:00 -0500
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 3/1/2014 2:57 PM, Sebastian Kraft wrote:
Hi everybody,
more than a year ago I have submitted a patch to enhance the Wave module
with read/write support for floating point data
On 3/1/2014 7:11 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Way back in 2012, Martin Löwis declared a standing offer on this list
to get issue patches reviewed: review five issues and he'll review one
of yours.
As I remember, he set a pretty low bar for 'review', lowing that I think
you are thinking.
I
On 2/28/2014 12:05 PM, Burgoon, Jason wrote:
One of the shortcuts ‘Start Menu\Programs\Python 3.3\ Module Docs’ is
not getting launched. When I launch this shortcut, it is not opening any
window.
I have tried with admin user and non-admin user.
Is this expected behavior?
No, it is a bug that
On 2/26/2014 12:34 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
The subject of this email mentions GSoC, it's probably worth
clarifying that the GSoC process is still under way and there isn't
(as far as I know, I'm not involved myself) a confirmed list of
mentors and projects in place yet.
There is a confirmed
On 2/25/2014 6:25 AM, Rik wrote:
I want to try to submit a patch for 2.7, but I don't know how to run the
tests for the 2.7 branch. `./configure` doesn't seem to create a
`python.exe` file on the 2.7 branch on OS X Mavericks, and I do need
this file according to this guide:
On 2/25/2014 8:32 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Instead of pre-generating one set of values that can be be used to DoS things
you have to pre-generate 256 sets of values and try them until you get the
right one. It’s like
On 2/25/2014 8:56 PM, Surya wrote:
Hey there,
I am Surya, studying final year of Engineering. I have looked into Core
Python's ideas list and got interested in Email module.
I've been working on Django over the past few years, and now like to
work on slightly a different layer of protocols
On 2/21/2014 2:06 AM, anju Tiwari wrote:
I have two version of python 2.4 and 2.7.
By default python version is 2.4 . I want to install need to install
some rpm
which needs python 2.7 interpreter. how can I enable 2.7 interpreter for
only those
packages which are requiring python 2.7, I don’t
On 2/20/2014 11:58 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Now that Larry is working on the 3.4.0 branch away from default, what is
default pointing to? 3.4.1 or 3.5?
Until a 3.4 branch is split off, default is effectively 3.4.1, which
means bugfixes only.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
On 2/18/2014 12:11 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
Nobody is asking for a return to the arbitrary-but-
[in]consistent mess of Python 2, only to bring
back *one* special case, i.e. None comparing less
than everything else.
For a None, that is only the fallback rule if a does not handle the
comparison.
On 2/18/2014 2:35 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
results = sorted(invoices, key=attrgetter('duedate'), none='first')
I think this is the best idea on the thread. As a pure enhancement, it
could be added in 3.5. The only tricky part of the implementation is
maintaining stability of the sort. The
On 2/18/2014 12:32 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
To make None a true bottom object, the rich comparison methods would
have to special-case None as either argument before looking at the
__rc__ special methods of either.
I don't think it would be necessary to go that far
I am working through the multiple bugs afflicting tokenize.untokenize,
which is described in the tokenize doc and has an even longer docstring.
While the function could be implemented as one 70-line function, it
happens to be implemented as a 4-line wrapper for a completely
undocumented
701 - 800 of 2415 matches
Mail list logo
