Internet Advertising Consultant Business
*Cash in on the Explosive Growth of the Internet*
We will help you start your own Internet Consulting
Business right from your home!
You'll be an authorized Advertising Consultant for
one of the largest shopping malls on the
Hello all.
I have read and searched around qmail site, but didn't get an idea of...
on the same machine IP using qmail which is hosting a
abc-mart.com and xyz-mart.com on shops.com what if all three
want to have sales, info, help etc. Is it a way to set
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Sam, I changed the MX record and all is well.
Now all the mail is getting passed from ns.compusense.com running qmail to
mail.int.compusense.com running qmail. I can read my mail with an IMAP
client no problem.
Is there a standard way to configure the IMAP client in terms of outbound
Dear
All,
I have a server
running qmail, managing a site that is not connected to
Internet.
However, all the
users have different accounts with different (id's and passwd's ) , so
we would like to
have a script that will send first all remote mail to internet, when connecting
to
our
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Robert Adams wrote:
user on the system. Anyone know of a way to get around this? Say, to tell
qmail to drop all mail to something like /mail/u/s/username?
Virtual hosting. I do the same.
Regards: Jul
--
#!/bin/perl -sp0777iX+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0j]dsj
Hi,
just wandering when/if the next version is comming out? I see lots of
patches and fixes that could be bundled together for a new qmail: ldap, uce,
oversize dns, and many more. I always see "qmail 2" mentioned in the mailing
list...
If there was a turn on/off method for these extras, instead
- Van Liedekerke Franky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| just wandering when/if the next version is comming out?
This should probably make it into the FAQ... The obvious answer is
that qmail 2 is released when it is finished. Like most people who
develop free software while having many other commitments,
On Thu 1999-01-21 (04:40), Russell Nelson wrote:
Fred Lindberg writes:
On 19 Jan 1999 20:11:56 -, Russell Nelson wrote:
Okay, VERP has solved the bounce problem. Now we need VERB (Variable
Envelope Recipient in Body) to solve the unsubscribe problem.
Basically, we need
Dear All,
Once again, I'd like to know how to setup dot-qmail to be able using
both maildir and mailbox in every home directory?
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 08:39:48PM +0700, A.Y. Sjarifuddin wrote:
Dear All,
Once again, I'd like to know how to setup dot-qmail to be able using
both maildir and mailbox in every home directory?
./Mailbox
./Maildir/
--
---
Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
As you may know the ORBS "open relay" listing service is back in
business. There is a thread on news.admin.net-abuse.email (ref:
Message-Id: 785s3a$[EMAIL PROTECTED]) which hints that ORBS
will be listing qmail sites due to the "bounce to forged sender"
attack that Russ noted here some time ago.
For those who are not fans of obscurity, here is the news post that was
referred to RE: ORBS
--Adam
-Original Message-
From: Paul Schmehl TINLC#[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: ORBS Returns
:On 21 Jan 1999
Sorry, I had assumed that folks are generally competent enough to
retrieve the article from, say, dejanews given the message-id. Three
clicks, 1 cut/paste. My error. -- Jeff
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Adam D. McKenna wrote:
For those who are not fans of obscurity, here is the news post that was
Sorry to follow up my own post but I note that as of now ORBS
(http://www.orbs.org) is *not* listing the host mentioned in the
referenced usenet article, so this may have been a false alarm.
-- Jeff
I just tried this little "exploit" on the qmail 1.01 machine at my
house:
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail.soffen.com ESMTP
HELO testing
250-mail.soffen.com
250-PIPELINING
250 8BITMIME
MAIL FROM:testing
250 ok
RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
553 sorry,
This may not be the appropriate list, but does
anyone have an explanation for a fully working and
stable version of pine on a system where pine.conf
does not appear to exist? I'm stumped.
~Chris
I don't know what the guy's problem is. It says quite clearly in RFC821
that the MAIL command can only be used to set the return-path. I've replied
via news.
I hate it when clueless people start admining things like this.
--Adam
From: Soffen, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
:MAIL TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:503 one MAIL per message (#5.5.1)
This was probably changed later on because the RFC says that the MAIL
command should clear
As I said, I think that his qmail has been hacked (by someone who didn't
know what they were doing).
Matt Soffen
Webmaster - http://www.iso-ne.com/
==
Boss- "My boss says we need some eunuch programmers."
Dilbert - "I think he means UNIX and I
Ok.. It must have been changed in qmail 1.02 or 1.03 (Sorry.. Then I
guess it wasn't hacked).
Matt Soffen
Webmaster - http://www.iso-ne.com/
==
Boss- "My boss says we need some eunuch programmers."
Dilbert - "I think he means UNIX and I already know
Van Liedekerke Franky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just wandering when/if the next version is comming out? I see lots of
patches and fixes that could be bundled together for a new qmail: ldap, uce,
oversize dns, and many more. I always see "qmail 2" mentioned in the mailing
list...
If there was a
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 09:11:00AM -0600,
Fred Lindberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 Jan 1999 20:11:56 -, Russell Nelson wrote:
There is rfc2069 which describes how to put unsubscribe info into
headers. I think putting it there, maybe doing VERH expansion like VERP
-@[] or separate
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999 10:26:54 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I think you mean RFC 2369 (The Use of URLs as Meta-Syntax for Core Mail List
Commands and their Transport through Message Header Fields). RFC 2069 is
the HTTP RFC.
Sorry ... Yes. Thanks!
It's a standards-track rfc and proposes the
I just converted a system to qmail wtih Maildir delivery. Most clients seem
fine but one client rang up who said that Netscape would connect, start
downloading headers and then hang. I assumed this was to do with Netscapes
inaccurate progress bar and a large message but later that day got a
So between this exmaple and the fact that his qmail seems to have been
hacked so that it allows the directive MAIL TO to work, I don't know
what to believe.
I think `mail to' is interpreted as `mail from' under qmail-smtpd.
You can even use `mail cookie' if you want to, like
mail
For those who are not fans of obscurity, here is the news post that was
referred to RE: ORBS
How does that post show that a qmail host is an open relay? Qmail
simply sent a bounce to the envelope sender about an unknown local
mailbox. Perhaps the poster thought that if qmail-smtpd
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote:
For those who are not fans of obscurity, here is the news post that was
referred to RE: ORBS
How does that post show that a qmail host is an open relay? Qmail
simply sent a bounce to the envelope sender about an unknown local
mailbox.
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 11:46:06AM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
#
#:RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#:553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
#:MAIL TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#:503 one MAIL per message (#5.5.1)
#
# I do not get this in 1.03 anymore (I can
:RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
:MAIL TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:503 one MAIL per message (#5.5.1)
I do not get this in 1.03 anymore (I can specify as many MAIL as I want).
Mate
[ I sent this to qmail-help a month or so ago, but had no response. ]
I'm using qmail as the outbound mail agent on a machine that runs
sendmail for incoming mail. I would like to modify qmail to use "+"
in constructing per-recipient VERPs on outgoing mail. That's
necessary to make sendmail
Keith Burdis writes:
How about a header like:
X-Append: To unsubscribe send mail to: qmail-unsubsribe-$USER=$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And then the contents of that header get appended to the end of the message.
That way you don't actually have to alter the contents of the message at all.
On 19 Jan 1999 16:05:32 -0800, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Racer X [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course there is. Blocking port 25 for all their dialup lines is a
simple router configuration. Re-enabling it on a customer-by-customer
basis on dynamic dialups requires software to
Hi folks
Maybe this is out of topic. On sun with solaris 2.5.1 are running mail
server and web server, I got error msg, something like ' out of file descriptors,
too many open files'..
What I should do?, how I may to increase file descriptors?, if this is posible...
Any ideas..
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 02:25:16PM -0500, Jozef Gniadek wrote:
Hi folks
Maybe this is out of topic. On sun with solaris 2.5.1 are running mail
server and web server, I got error msg, something like ' out of file descriptors,
too many open files'..
What I should do?, how I may to
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Peter C. Norton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 02:25:16PM -0500, Jozef Gniadek wrote:
Hi folks
Maybe this is out of topic. On sun with solaris 2.5.1 are running mail
server and web server, I got error msg, something like ' out of file descriptors,
too many open
hi,
I sent few hundred emails, after few days I got almost all of them back
with the same error below :
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at .
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
I am having an odd problem routing a message to a pipe.
There is a file /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-eztest that contains:
|/home/arcamax/ezinesub
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The intent is to forward mail that ezinesub rejects to the specified user.
This works fine. There are actually several identical alias
Bryan White writes:
I am having an odd problem routing a message to a pipe.
There is a file /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-eztest that contains:
|/home/arcamax/ezinesub
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The intent is to forward mail that ezinesub rejects to the specified user.
This works fine. There
I am having an odd problem routing a message to a pipe.
There is a file /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-eztest that contains:
|/home/arcamax/ezinesub
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The intent is to forward mail that ezinesub rejects to the specified
user.
This works fine. There are actually several
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Daniel Garcia wrote:
hi,
I sent few hundred emails, after few days I got almost all of them back
with the same error below :
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at .
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent
Bryan White writes:
Bingo! /home/bryan was 770 and thus 'alias' had no access. I should have
checked the log file in the first place. Sorry.
You gotta watch that if you're using qmail-getpw as well. qmail-getpw
is trusted about as far as qmail-lspawn can throw it (that is, not
very far),
Has anyone had experience with qmail and the sending of large attachments
like Real Audio to mailing lists 500 or so recipients? Other than the
huge bandwidth suck am I likely to run into anything other than the
usual MUA confusion?
Some mailing list software gets really confused. How about
I can't think of any reason why either ezmlm or qmail would get confused by
large outbound mails. Additionally, I've never seen any of them get confused
by large mails either.
Regards.
At 06:25 PM 1/21/99 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone had experience with qmail and the sending
Hi All..
I have a question about the SINGLE-UID-HOWTO.TXT file.. if anyone has read' it..
I can get QMAIL-POP3D to authenticate the 'Virtual POP3 account' with no problems...
but my only problem is when u try to email this 'virtual account'.. qmail-smtpd
rejects it with the error 'no mailbox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone had experience with qmail and the sending of large attachments
like Real Audio to mailing lists 500 or so recipients? Other than the
huge bandwidth suck am I likely to run into anything other than the
usual MUA confusion?
Some mailing list
Hi there. I recently cut over from sendmail to qmail and have been
very pleased with the results so far. We seem to only have on problem:
We're getting complaints from customers (so far using only eudora) that
they'll start to download their messages (as little as 5, as many as 200)
and the
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Niels Jensen wrote:
So, some of my control files are:
me:f64.work.com
locals:f64.work.com (to define local addresses)
defaultdomain: work.com
defaulthost: sonic.net (my ISP)
plusdomain:work.com
smtproutes::mail.sonic.net
If I send
Niels Jensen writes:
If I do this, then when I mail stuff remotely through my ISP's
mailserver, the return address for me is my work address, which I
do not want. Somehow I have to make qmail change my address to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] whenever mail is sent rmotely, and keep it to
nielsj, or
At 22:45 22/01/99 +1100, Gonzalo S. wrote:
I have a question about the SINGLE-UID-HOWTO.TXT file.. if anyone has
read' it..
I can get QMAIL-POP3D to authenticate the 'Virtual POP3 account' with no
problems... but my only problem is when u try to email this 'virtual
account'.. qmail-smtpd
Hello all,
We're putting together a new box to handle mail.. thought I would pick your
brains a little for advice. Hopefully someone has done this already.
We are planning on using 4x9gig Cheetahs in a RAID 0+1 configuration..
Currently we are looking at two RAID-RAID controllers.
1) Mylex 2
Niels Jensen writes:
If I do this, then when I mail stuff remotely through my ISP's
mailserver, the return address for me is my work address, which I
do not want. Somehow I have to make qmail change my address to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] whenever mail is sent rmotely, and keep it to
nielsj,
On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 11:34:40PM -0600, Aijaz A. Ansari wrote:
...
However, I cannot send mail from within MSOE to domain names that I do
not host (specifically anyone at interaccess.com). I get the common
`sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)'
...
My
52 matches
Mail list logo
