We'd like to move our post office to qmail, the problem is in the users
password.
Post office using MD5 encryption with a seed (64 char).
Any idea how to change this MD5 encryption to qmail?
Thanks in advance.
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 01:18:33PM +1100, Mark Delany wrote:
Is the inode just a handy unique number? Or are there file access
speed tricks, e.g. opening files directly using inode.
Handy unique filename. Vastly superior to tmpnam() and all the lame
variants that go with it.
It's not
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 12:25:03PM -0500, Donna Phillips wrote:
I'm using following command line for pop3 right now,
tcpserver -c300 -uXX -gYY 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.myisp.com \
/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
what are the values of XX and YY? For
Hi!
Why doesn't Qmail mailing list set the
Reply To: field to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
It is very anoying that I must type the
mailing list address for every message
I respond to.
What if a poster is not a subscriber? he would set the reply-to field
to his personal
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 11:52:26AM +0300, Roman V. Isaev wrote:
On 02/17, Rok Papez wrote:
Why doesn't Qmail mailing list set the
Reply To: field to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
It is very anoying that I must type the
mailing list address for every message
I respond to.
Touchy
Why doesn't Qmail mailing list set the
Reply To: field to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
It is very anoying that I must type the
mailing list address for every message
I respond to.
Check out http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html for a great
reason *not* to set the Reply-To: header. Any
I couldn't find a manual entry for it,
but provided it works that doesn't bother
me.
FAQ/4.6
Mate
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Mark Delany wrote:
At 02:26 AM 2/17/99 -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
I seem to recall the inode numbers biting people who were copying
filesystems (backups, changing disks). If your assertions are
correct, wouln't it make some sense to come up with some other
cheap
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Mark Delany wrote:
At 02:26 AM 2/17/99 -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
I seem to recall the inode numbers biting people who were copying
filesystems (backups, changing disks). If your assertions are
correct, wouln't it make some sense to come up with some
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 08:16:35AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Brian Reichert wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 01:18:33PM +1100, Mark Delany wrote:
Is the inode just a handy unique number? Or are there file access
speed tricks, e.g. opening files directly using
Yeah well.. what will you do with several messages per second? Even with usec
precision, there is a (very) small chance that you'll generate the same name
twice, which is unacceptable.
Hmm.. timestamp.qmail-queue pid.qmail-queue internal counter perhaps?
Greetz, Peter.
Mark Delany [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possibly. What do you propose? The current method guarantees a
unique file name first time, every time. Since it's needed for every
new mail, you want it to be efficient, right?
Not a very good argument. If some other technique gets a unique
filename the
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Then I remembered that qmail-queue is a long-running daemon and so
| will have the same pid for long periods of time.
You are confused. qmail-queue runs once per injected message. Its
pid is reported, for example by qmail-smtpd as qp:
ok 915060448 qp 17770
I'm in the process of doing this right now.
The answer is: You Can't.
I've spent weeks with the post.office technical support staff, just to
have them finally give me that answer. They told me something stupid like
"This is a proprietary algorithm and for ours and our customers security,
we
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Chris Naden wrote:
[snip]
rant
I've heard many people complain about the lack of documentation that comes
with qmail; I'd like to put in a contrary opinion. I've never seen so
completely documented a system. Everything is there. The only gotcha is
that, apart from
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 07:48:10PM +0100, Carles Latorre wrote:
Hello, I hope someone could help me.
I'm configuring a connection between an Exchange Server and
a qmail server. I've installed serialmail and ucspi-tcp and I'm
running qmail-smtpd from tcpserver -v.
I also have created a
This was for the message with
Subject: New Dual Mount Copy Holder by Rubbermaid
Mate
--- Forwarded Message
Dear Internet User,
Thank you for contacting the Prodigy Postmaster regarding unsolicited
commercial email (UCE) you have received.
The Prodigy account listed in the UCE, [EMAIL
Sorry folks, I am brand new to qmail and I am just getting it up and
running on a test box. I setup Maildir for my home directory and I am just
wondering if root in fact is the owner for the users Maildir/ directory..
-snipit---
ls -alg Maildir/
ls: Maildir/: Permission denied
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 11:10:10AM -0800, Mark Zugsmith wrote:
Sorry folks, I am brand new to qmail and I am just getting it up and
running on a test box. I setup Maildir for my home directory and I am just
wondering if root in fact is the owner for the users Maildir/ directory..
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a user ezmlm handling two virtual domains. The problem is that
we have a few users have email addresses in both domain, but some of
them want to have their mail in different domain treated differently.
~qmail/control/virtualdomains
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 08:09:27AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a user ezmlm handling two virtual domains. The problem is that
we have a few users have email addresses in both domain, but some of
them want to have their mail in different domain treated differently.
At 08:32 AM 2/17/99 -0500, Peter Green wrote:
Check out http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html for a great
reason *not* to set the Reply-To: header. Any reasonable mailer should
have some sort of "reply to (l)ist, (s)ender, (b)oth" option.
And also see the discussion forum that's linked
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Chris Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 08:09:27AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a user ezmlm handling two virtual domains. The problem is that
we have a few users have email addresses in both domain, but some of
them want to have their mail in
As Harold said in another part of this thread, it may well be moot by 2.0.
At 09:49 AM 2/17/99 EST, Greg Hudson wrote:
Mark Delany [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possibly. What do you propose? The current method guarantees a
unique file name first time, every time. Since it's needed for every
new
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 08:21:00AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Chris Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 08:09:27AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a user ezmlm handling two virtual domains. The problem is that
we have a few users have email
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 08:32:16AM -0500, Peter Green wrote:
Why doesn't Qmail mailing list set the
Reply To: field to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
It is very anoying that I must type the
mailing list address for every message
I respond to.
Check out
Fact: SMTP does not guarantee that you won't see two copies of any
given message. We all know this, right? It's come up again and again,
and the fair comment is always that anyone who cares about that problem
will have their MTA set up to deal with it.
Irony: what's the point of complaining if
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| You're not saying that qmail-smtpd should just read in locals and virtualdomains and
| accept mail for all domains in there, right?
Of course it should! (cdb optional.) That avoids the whole multiple
redundancy plus illogical defaults problem that the
I am configuring a new machine for qmail. The machine is a Dual 400 with
512 Meg of RAM. Currently we will be using an 18gig drive (RAID 5 setup)
for e-mail only. What would be the best way to partition this drive for
qmail to allow for queue and everything for optimal performance? Also, if
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
- "Matt D. Landry" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| I'm trying to set up an auto-reply feature for employees that are
| out of the office..can I set up a mailing list type script that
| allows employees to set an option that they are out of the office
|
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, MountaiNet Tech Support wrote:
I am configuring a new machine for qmail. The machine is a Dual 400 with
512 Meg of RAM. Currently we will be using an 18gig drive (RAID 5 setup)
for e-mail only. What would be the best way to partition this drive for
qmail to allow for
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 15:25:19 -0500,
Chris Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 11:10:10AM -0800, Mark Zugsmith wrote:
Sorry folks, I am brand new to qmail and I am just getting it up and
running on a test box. I setup Maildir for my home directory and I am just
qmail Digest 17 Feb 1999 11:00:01 - Issue 554
Topics (messages 22033 through 22091):
Fastforward refuses to delivery root email
22033 by: Chris Bond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22041 by: Anand Buddhdev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22043 by: "Petr Novotny" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22045
33 matches
Mail list logo
