On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 01:18:33PM +1100, Mark Delany wrote: > >Is the inode just a handy unique number? Or are there file access > >speed tricks, e.g. opening files directly using inode. > > Handy unique filename. Vastly superior to tmpnam() and all the lame > variants that go with it. > > It's not for speed - excepting speed of creating a unique filename. I seem to recall the inode numbers biting people who were copying filesystems (backups, changing disks). If your assertions are correct, wouln't it make some sense to come up with some other cheap unique filename? -- Brian 'you Bastard' Reichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 37 Crystal Ave. #303 Current daytime number: (603)-434-6842 Derry NH 03038-1713 USA Intel architecture: the left-hand path
- Re: Script Question Peter Samuel
- Re: Qmail for NT Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Can anyone see this ? Tony D'Andrade
- Re: Can anyone see this ? Vince Vielhaber
- Sorry About -> Re:... Tony D'Andrade
- Re: Sorry About ->... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Sorry About ->... Mirko Zeibig
- Re: Qmail for NT Stefan Paletta
- file names = inodes : why? Ari Rubenstein
- Re: file names = inodes :... Mark Delany
- Re: file names = inod... Brian Reichert
- Re: file names = inod... Mark Delany
- Re: file names = inod... Peter Green
- Re: file names = inod... Mate Wierdl
- Re: file names = inod... Greg Hudson
- Re: file names = inod... Mark Delany
- Re: file names = inod... thomas . erskine-dated-b9c4f841028cc089
- Re: file names = inod... Peter van Dijk
- Re: file names = inod... Mate Wierdl
- Re: file names = inod... David Villeger
- Re: file names = inod... Harald Hanche-Olsen