Re: qmail, DNS, and relaying for a hidden host

1999-03-17 Thread Timothy L. Mayo
How are you starting qmail-smtpd? Are you using tcpserver or inetd? What is the command syntax you user for what you use? One possible solution, set up an outbound only relay machine in the DMZ that only accepts SMTP connections from your mail store machine and does not perform any DNS lookups

Bounces off of incorrect smtproutes

1999-03-17 Thread Greg Owen {gowen}
Short summary: I screwed something up and bounced a lot of mail. It seems to me that the mistake I made could be handled differently, and I'd just like to explore it as an idea, see if it makes sense to anyone else. I'm not blaming qmail or saying "qmail should definitely do this." I'

Re: qmail, DNS, and relaying for a hidden host

1999-03-17 Thread Greg Owen {gowen}
>How does Qmail act as an outbound relay for a host who is not listed in >DNS? Ah, I think I just found my answer, on the qmail home page. "Dan Bernstein noted that qmail will skip dns queries for incoming mail with tcpserver -Hl your.host.name; and you can skip them for outgoing mail wi

qmail, DNS, and relaying for a hidden host

1999-03-17 Thread Greg Owen {gowen}
I'm quoting Timothy Mayo from his March 2 message titled "Re: DNS & /etc/hosts" >No, qmail does NOT use the resolver. Yes it makes direct DNS requests. ... >qmail NEVER uses /etc/hosts, period. It only uses DNS, regardless of how >you have set up your resolver. The only way to override the

RE: splogger replacement?

1999-03-17 Thread Stefan Paletta
John Conover wrote/schrieb/scribsit: > Is there a replacement for splogger that will log qmail's activity into > its own log so that I won't have to use syslog? > I also use tcpserver instead of inetd, and would like to log activity > on those ports, too. Use cyclog from djb's daemontools: http

Mails that refused to be dequeued

1999-03-17 Thread Operations
Hi Apology if this question has been asked a thousand time over. We have been seeing that certain of our client using us as their secondary mail server having problem dequeueing SOME mails. It is just SOME and NOT all mails for those particular domains that refuse to go down to them. It stays w

splogger replacement?

1999-03-17 Thread John Conover
The syslog on my machine takes more resources than qmail in: exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" qmail-start ./Mailbox splogger qmail Is there a replacement for splogger that will log qmail's activity into its own log so that I won't have to use syslog? I also use tcpserver instead of in

Re: ezmlm and "delay notifies" (was: Re: mini-bounce)

1999-03-17 Thread Greg Owen {gowen}
>Lists should also identify themselves as lists so vacation programs >don't reply to them. > >On this list in particular, when you subscribe, the ezmlm confirmation >message doesn't include any of the magic cookies traditionally >associated with daemon messages (such as "Precedence: junk" or

Re: ezmlm and "delay notifies" (was: Re: mini-bounce)

1999-03-17 Thread Tim Pierce
On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 10:08:27AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 06:13:15PM -0500, > Scott Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | But yes, it would consider these warnings as bounces. > > > > It also considers vacation

Re: Unusual Delivery Problem

1999-03-17 Thread Aaron L. Meehan
Well, I successfully sent a message to an invalid address to eagle.co.nz. I'd guess it was a wierd patch, too. 921720265.618007 delivery 147849: failure: 202.36.45.1_does_not_like_recipient. /Remote_host_said:_550_<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>_user_unknown/Giving_up_on_202.36.45.1./ Aaron Quoting Harald

Re: Rcpthosts

1999-03-17 Thread Sam
Michael Bryan writes: > Sam wrote: > > > > Michael Bryan writes: > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > 208.15.106.2 does not like recipient. > > > Remote host said: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed > > > rcpthosts (#5.7.1) > > > Giving up on 208.15.106.2. > > > > > > All the tc

Re: Rcpthosts

1999-03-17 Thread Michael Bryan
Sam wrote: > > Michael Bryan writes: > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 208.15.106.2 does not like recipient. > > Remote host said: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed > > rcpthosts (#5.7.1) > > Giving up on 208.15.106.2. > > > > All the tcp stuff is correct. And, I can actually send

Re: Rcpthosts

1999-03-17 Thread Sam
Michael Bryan writes: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 208.15.106.2 does not like recipient. > Remote host said: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed > rcpthosts (#5.7.1) > Giving up on 208.15.106.2. > > All the tcp stuff is correct. And, I can actually send mail to virtual > addresses fr

Rcpthosts

1999-03-17 Thread Michael Bryan
Hey Guys, This is just driving me crazy and I've tried everything I know. I'm getting Qmail setup on a new network. I've always used Qmail on the same as my machine nameserver. This network, however, has a dedicated name server and a dedicated mail machine. I get the standard error: <[EMAIL

Re: Problems starting qmail

1999-03-17 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 12:18:32AM +, Ernesto Miranda wrote: > Hi, please, help me. When I start qmail, this not run and in the > /var/log/maillog apper this message: > Mar 17 15:56:07 pegasus qmail: 921700567.838979 alert: cannot start: > unable to switch to queue directory > > Because appe

Problems starting qmail

1999-03-17 Thread Ernesto Miranda
Hi, please, help me. When I start qmail, this not run and in the /var/log/maillog apper this message: Mar 17 15:56:07 pegasus qmail: 921700567.838979 alert: cannot start: unable to switch to queue directory Because appear this message?.

Re: ETRN, qmail-1.03 and etrn patch v0.1f

1999-03-17 Thread Andrew Spencer
Disregard... UNIX 101: Don't bypass make install lightly... :) -Andrew Andrew Spencer wrote: > This is the first time I've posted to the list, so if I've missed > something, kindly let me know... > I checked the FAQ but didn't find anything... > > This is concerning the etrn solution I found

e-mail hanging ... at 12:00 - 1:30

1999-03-17 Thread t
Hello all and thanks in advance. Heres my problem. Mail seems to hang on all the clients sometime between lunch and 1:30. It happens everyday. And it only seems to be e-mail. I can telnet to the port locally and it seems fine. But from a remote system, no go. Any suggestions? I have checked everyt

ETRN, qmail-1.03 and etrn patch v0.1f

1999-03-17 Thread Andrew Spencer
This is the first time I've posted to the list, so if I've missed something, kindly let me know... I checked the FAQ but didn't find anything... This is concerning the etrn solution I found at this URL: http://www.cqc.com/~pacman/projects/qmail-etrn/ I am currently using a P90/Redhat 5.2 test st

RE: delivery errors?

1999-03-17 Thread Mark Delany
At 12:14 PM 3/17/99 -0800, Wil Boucher wrote: >This error is generated by the popd daemon, I have seen it before and it >took me FOREVER to track it down, I have no idea how they came up with the >'disk error' eroor message but what the problem actually is, is a lock fle >in the users home directo

Re: Virtual Domains.

1999-03-17 Thread Anonymous
At 04:57 PM 3/17/99 +0100, Daniel V. Pedersen wrote: Hi, this is maybe not the place to ask, bnut here goes :)   I'm running a Sun Sparc server w. solaris and qmail 1.03 - this machine will host multiple domains, now..   how do i setup qmail to deliver mail for each domains in specefic folders et

Re: NIS and qmail

1999-03-17 Thread Mark Delany
At 02:15 PM 3/17/99 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi, >I can`t make qmail deliver mail on a box that is NIS base (users have only >pop3 accounts there and no homedirs) >qmail keeps loggin infamous #5.1.1 mistake ... Might be helpful if you actually give us the full log extracts rather than pa

RE: delivery errors?

1999-03-17 Thread Wil Boucher
This error is generated by the popd daemon, I have seen it before and it took me FOREVER to track it down, I have no idea how they came up with the 'disk error' eroor message but what the problem actually is, is a lock fle in the users home directory. go into there directory, remove the lock file

Re: keeping users from running shells

1999-03-17 Thread Mark Delany
At 08:43 AM 3/17/99 -0600, Jeff Hayward wrote: >On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Adam D. McKenna wrote: > > # groupadd shellusr > # vi /etc/group > # chown root.shellusr /bin/csh > [...] > > etc.. Of course you need to be careful when doing this and make sure every > user that could possibl

Re: delivery errors?

1999-03-17 Thread Mark Delany
At 09:52 AM 3/17/99 -0800, Samuel Dries-Daffner wrote: > >On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Sam wrote: > >> > Mar 17 07:31:09 1C:ella ipop3d[1417154]: Retrying after disk error >> > user=spertus host=UNKNOWN mbx=/acct/faculty/spertus/mbox: Invalid argument >> > Mar 16 23:57:57 1C:ella ipop3d[1417154]: Retrying

Re: delivery errors?

1999-03-17 Thread Samuel Dries-Daffner
On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Sam wrote: > > Mar 17 07:31:09 1C:ella ipop3d[1417154]: Retrying after disk error > > user=spertus host=UNKNOWN mbx=/acct/faculty/spertus/mbox: Invalid argument > > Mar 16 23:57:57 1C:ella ipop3d[1417154]: Retrying after disk error > > user=spertus host=206.111.145.243 mbx=/

Re: delivery errors?

1999-03-17 Thread Sam
Samuel Dries-Daffner writes: > > Any ideas what cause these types of errors? > > from maillog: > > Mar 17 07:31:09 1C:ella ipop3d[1417154]: Retrying after disk error > user=spertus host=UNKNOWN mbx=/acct/faculty/spertus/mbox: Invalid argument > > > from syslog.critical > > Mar 16 23:57:57 1

delivery errors?

1999-03-17 Thread Samuel Dries-Daffner
Any ideas what cause these types of errors? from maillog: Mar 17 07:31:09 1C:ella ipop3d[1417154]: Retrying after disk error user=spertus host=UNKNOWN mbx=/acct/faculty/spertus/mbox: Invalid argument from syslog.critical Mar 16 23:57:57 1C:ella ipop3d[1417154]: Retrying after disk error user

Virtual Domains.

1999-03-17 Thread Daniel V. Pedersen
Hi, this is maybe not the place to ask, bnut here goes :)   I'm running a Sun Sparc server w. solaris and qmail 1.03 - this machine will host multiple domains, now..   how do i setup qmail to deliver mail for each domains in specefic folders etc - meaning that mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] foes

Re: Relaying problem (kind of)

1999-03-17 Thread torben fjerdingstad
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 05:14:20PM +0300, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 02:06:27PM +0100, torben fjerdingstad wrote: > > > Things do not work quite as I expect. > > > > Say I am MX for domain inside.dk (this is not a real name). > > So, I put two lines into rcpthosts and HUP qm

Re: keeping users from running shells

1999-03-17 Thread Jeff Hayward
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Adam D. McKenna wrote: # groupadd shellusr # vi /etc/group # chown root.shellusr /bin/csh [...] etc.. Of course you need to be careful when doing this and make sure every user that could possibly need shell access is included (including any users

Re: Relaying problem (kind of)

1999-03-17 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 02:06:27PM +0100, torben fjerdingstad wrote: > Things do not work quite as I expect. > > Say I am MX for domain inside.dk (this is not a real name). > So, I put two lines into rcpthosts and HUP qmail-smtpd: There's no qmail-smtpd to HUP. It is started each time a connect

again NIS and qmail: refined question

1999-03-17 Thread pashah
Hi, I`ve find out the problem, that made deliveries of local messages impossible - since all the users has the ~ set as /tmp (they have only vsm pop3 accounts) qmail refuses to deliver messages ... the [Q] is where do I tweak qmail sources for it to be more tolerant about this matter? I`ve checked

Relaying problem (kind of)

1999-03-17 Thread torben fjerdingstad
Things do not work quite as I expect. Say I am MX for domain inside.dk (this is not a real name). So, I put two lines into rcpthosts and HUP qmail-smtpd: .inside.dk inside.dk Right? Now mail to @inside.dk bounces: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for

Re: probleet with qmail and defunc processes

1999-03-17 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Franky Van Liedekerke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | I'm seeing a lot of zombies in my process list (qmail 1.03 with anti | spam from Sam). Is this a known problem or do I need some patch? Or do | they time out? Zombies are processes whose parents have not waited for them. They never time out. The s

probleet with qmail and defunc processes

1999-03-17 Thread Franky Van Liedekerke
Hi, I'm seeing a lot of zombies in my process list (qmail 1.03 with anti spam from Sam). Is this a known problem or do I need some patch? Or do they time out? 8 Z qmailq 549 546 0 0 0:00 8 Z qmailq 2288 2284 0 0

NIS and qmail

1999-03-17 Thread pashah
Hi, I can`t make qmail deliver mail on a box that is NIS base (users have only pop3 accounts there and no homedirs) qmail keeps loggin infamous #5.1.1 mistake ... any ideas about what I could have messed up? Pashah -- http://www.spb.sitek.net/~pashah/public-key-0x97739141.pgp

qmail Digest 17 Mar 1999 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 582

1999-03-17 Thread qmail-digest-help
qmail Digest 17 Mar 1999 11:00:01 - Issue 582 Topics (messages 23017 through 23052): CNAME_ 23017 by: Harald Hanche-Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [LONG QUOTE] Re: dot-qmail security 23018 by: "Oliver Thuns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rblsmtp - I need to change the bounce report.

Re: Unusual Delivery Problem

1999-03-17 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
- "Karl Lellman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | Whenever the 'renaissance.co.nz' qmail server tries to deliver mail to | 'relay.eagle.co.nz' it logs the following error... | | Connected to 202.36.45.1 but my name was rejected./Remote host said: 220 | ESMTP tried here/ | | The SMTP server administrator a

MX Problems through Firewall

1999-03-17 Thread Karl Lellman
I have a customer who is running Qmail 1.03 server (running on Linux). The Qmail server is located in a DMZ behind a firewall. All incoming mail is proxied through from the internet to the Qmail server in the DMZ which then relays it in to an Exchange server on the internal network. All outgoin

Unusual Delivery Problem

1999-03-17 Thread Karl Lellman
I have a customer who is running Qmail 1.03. They are having a lot of bounce's when trying to deliver mail to a specific site. Originating mail domain is 'renaissance.co.nz'. MX entry for 'renaissance.co.nz' points to 'mail.renaissance.co.nz' (202.97.88.10). Outgoing mail through firewall revers

new user's mail loops - reason unclear

1999-03-17 Thread Andreas Schuldei
Linux 2.0.30, qmail 1.0.1 I created the new users account, run qmail-pw2u and qmail-newu and shecked the assign-file. the new users .qmail file seems to work: oliver@paul:/home/oliver > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-local -n $USER ~ $USER '' '' '' '' ./Mailbox maildir /home/oliver/.mailspool/ did 1+0+0

Re: keeping users from running shells

1999-03-17 Thread Andrzej Wadas
Perhaps it is somehow off the subject but related to file permissions on mail account. My customers need http virtual servers so I made extra directory Page on mail account wher Mailbox file resides. They can ftp to own mail account using the same name and passw as the do to read post. They transf