On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Rob Genovesi wrote:
> Has anyone ever modified the vacation program to quote the body of the
> original message in the autoreply message? This is very trivial to do in
> concept, however things such as email attachments can cause obvious problems.
>
> I'm using Peter Samuel
Somewhere in internet land there is a Web Server called:
www.seaweedsoftware.com.au
The web server stuff is working fine.
I am trying to turn this server into mail server as well,
using qmail. I want to send and receive mail from a local
machine using Netscape Navigator's MUA. This has to be d
Has anyone ever modified the vacation program to quote the body of the
original message in the autoreply message? This is very trivial to do in
concept, however things such as email attachments can cause obvious problems.
I'm using Peter Samuel's modified vacation for Qmail (thanks Peter!), I
ju
On Apr 19 1999, Erwann CORVELLEC wrote:
(...)
> - I run qmail as a standalone daemon
What?! How's that? You mean you run qmail-smtpd stand-alone? How?
> - The system is a Linux Debian one so it is using inetd, and to
> avoid incompatibilities with this distribution I don't want to use
>
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Robert J. Adams wrote:
> If we are speaking about reliability.. what if the local machine croaks..
> then anything in the queue (of that local machine) is lost.. that isn't
> acceptable.
Not necessarily. If the queue disk wasn't blown out when the machine
croaked, then you
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
> + "Robert J. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> | Is it possible to have two machines accessing the same queue via NFS?
>
> No! Your single copy of qmail-send assumes it is the only entity
> making any changes in the queue (with the exception of q
At 04:04 PM Tuesday 4/20/99, Robert J. Adams wrote:
>Harald,
>
>If we are speaking about reliability.. what if the local machine croaks..
>then anything in the queue (of that local machine) is lost.. that isn't
>acceptable.
Correct. But that doesn't detract from Harold's point that you *will*
co
Harald,
If we are speaking about reliability.. what if the local machine croaks..
then anything in the queue (of that local machine) is lost.. that isn't
acceptable.
-j
---
Robert J. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.siscom.net
Looking to outsource news? http://www.newshosting.com
SISCOM Networ
Trying this again...
Any ideas why sending mail would take an unusual amount of time? POP reacts quick
when receiving mail, but smpt seems extremely slow.
Running Redhat 5.1, Pentium 166 w/ 64 megs of ram, and it's slow even on a lan.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
+ "Robert J. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| Is it possible to have two machines accessing the same queue via NFS?
No! Your single copy of qmail-send assumes it is the only entity
making any changes in the queue (with the exception of qmail-queue,
which does however follow a specific protocol for
Hello all,
Is it possible to have two machines accessing the same queue via NFS? After
looking at the Earthlink setup
(http://www.earthlink.net/about/papers/mailarch.html ) that was done with
Sendmail, it seems like this wouldn't be all that hard to do with Qmail.
Only thing is.. the queue would
setup a file .qmail-marcos:tang and your problem is history
marco leeflang
Marcos Tang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have setup a qmail server and it works fine.
>
> However, there is a big problem I can't figure it out. Please tell me your
>suggestions:
>
> I created a file .qmai
Barton Hodges wrote:
>
> Hmmm, this is interesting. Microsoft's Hotmail uses Qmail for
> outgoing mail, but what does it use for incoming mail? All
> of this is done on a Solaris box? Are there any Linux boxes
> hidden in the corners of the "Hotmail-Headquarters"? Any
> insight on this topic?
ok, thanks
i just forget this little dot
marco
RaTao von J wrote:
> you must be forgeting the dot "." in the end of the file ;) read the docs
>
> On 19-Apr-99 Marco Leeflang wrote:
> > I have to setup a lot of full-name mail users.
> > example:
> > marco.leeflang> user leem
> > so i have m
+ Marcos Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| I created a file .qmail-marcos.tang
See FAQ #4.6.
- Harald
Hi,
I have setup a qmail server and it works fine.
However, there is a big problem I can't figure it out. Please tell me your
suggestions:
I created a file .qmail-marcos.tang at /var/qmail/alias and hope that my
qmail will accept mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I s
Didn't someone say they had a patch to restrict .qmail users to a staff
file? If so, can you send it along please? Thank you.
-andy
Jim Baxter writes:
> ->/var/adm/messages:
> ->Apr 20 07:34:47 arrowroot popper[7038]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -ERR
> Unknown command: "uidl".
> ->Apr 20 07:34:47 arrowroot popper[7038]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -ERR
> POP EOF received
>
> The above is an error i keep getting on occasion.. does anyone know
Hmmm, this is interesting. Microsoft's Hotmail uses Qmail for
outgoing mail, but what does it use for incoming mail? All
of this is done on a Solaris box? Are there any Linux boxes
hidden in the corners of the "Hotmail-Headquarters"? Any
insight on this topic?
> -Original Message-
On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Rick McMillin wrote:
> We're experiencing a minor problem with setting a mail client
> to leave messages on the server. It's not even really a problem,
> just something annoying.
I've seen this too. I believe that it has to do with clients losing track
of which messages th
->/var/adm/messages:
->Apr 20 07:34:47 arrowroot popper[7038]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -ERR
Unknown command: "uidl".
->Apr 20 07:34:47 arrowroot popper[7038]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -ERR
POP EOF received
The above is an error i keep getting on occasion.. does anyone know what it
is and how to fix it? I c
qmail Digest 20 Apr 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 616
Topics (messages 24420 through 24487):
bounces
24420 by: Anand Buddhdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
qmail anti-SPAM relaying support ???
24421 by: Erwann CORVELLEC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
24422 by: Keith Burdis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 07:18:13AM -, John Conover wrote:
> Peter van Dijk writes:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 11:30:57AM -0300, Juan Carlos Castro y Castro wrote:
> > > I already knew (as everybody) that MS couldn't put NT to work properly
> > > and uses Solaris to run HotMail. But this is ne
23 matches
Mail list logo
