Hello Again,
I think I'm finally getting qmail set up like I want. I'm using Maildir
access and got tcpserver to work instead of inetd. I'm curious, is there
any way to get tcp wrappers to work? I can do it with inetc, but not
tcpserver.
While I'm at it, is there any possible way to create a
Petru Paler wrote:
Hi,
In your opinion, which solution is the best for implementing a virtual
mail user environment with qmail on linux ? The requirements are:
1. There should be no real users added to the system (averthing on one
uid)
2. There shoul be easyly manageable by web
qmail Digest 2 Jun 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 659
Topics (messages 26168 through 26192):
qmail-pop3d adding extra lines to messagse - turning it off?
26168 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Lenneis)
26171 by: Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qmail - Maildir webadministration
I configured qmail as you told me. I left out the "mail.isp.at" because
I want to test it locally.
I tested it with
"echo To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject"
and got the following lines in /var/qmail/maillog:
Apr 27 17:56:07 smiley qmail: 925228567.901397 new msg 8517
Hello, I guess I'm still a newbie, since I've hardly touched the qmail-server since
I installed it over a year ago, just added some users. 100% uptime last year on
an old P90 in a network with 65 users is something I like :) Still running qmail-
1.01 on RedHat 5.0.
Now, I've had some problems
"Lanik, Laurenz (21)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I configured qmail as you told me. I left out the "mail.isp.at" because
I want to test it locally.
I tested it with
"echo To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject"
and got the following lines in /var/qmail/maillog:
Apr 27
"Fre de Vries" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
my control/me file contains mail.mydomain.com wich is the FQDN
When i created a new include list say test, the file test contains:
john
bob
harry
When i do newinclude test, it creates test.bin.
The problem is that it contain : [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While I'm at it, is there any possible way to create a web-based email
client that doesn't use pop for mail access? I'd like to set up a web mail
reader that could do direct Maildir access w/o being some major security
hole. Is it possible?
See
I had a similar problem with qmail 1.03 but was solved by creating
/var/qmail/control/helohost with simply the line mydomain.com
I'm not sure it will work for you but its sounds like a good shot.
Hi list
Here's a puzzling riddle: I implemented qmail 1.03 along with tcpserver
and daemontools, using the HOW-TO and the sample startup-script from
Adam D. McKennas page.
When I issue "qmail stop", all processes die. If I issue "qmail start"
everything is fine, for one exception: I get TWO
I run a small mailserver (20+ users) internally that routes all our mail
plus internet mail. I am thinking of setting up some type of mailing list
so users can send to the whole company on just one address so they each
don't have to keep a list on each machine. Can this be done with aliases?
Or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I run a small mailserver (20+ users) internally that routes all our mail
plus internet mail. I am thinking of setting up some type of mailing list
so users can send to the whole company on just one address so they each
don't have to keep a list on each machine. Can this
No tcpserver entry in the rc script! And here's the ps output:
ps auxww | grep qm
qmaild 701 0.0 1.2 832 280 p0 S15:49 0:00 tcpserver -v
-x/etc/t
cp.smtp.cdb -u4 -g333 0 25 qmail-smtpd
qmaild 796 0.0 1.2 832 296 p0 S15:52 0:00 tcpserver -v
-x/etc/t
That is expected behavior. tcpserver spawns another instance of itself to
handle the communication for a specific connection request. (up to the
maximum specified by the -c option - default is 40).
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, [iso-8859-1] "Günthner, Ralf" wrote:
No tcpserver entry in the rc script!
Gee, thanks a lot! So all the fuss was about nothing??? *sigh* From now
on I'll just leave things running as they are... g
Cheers
Ralf
--
Von: Timothy L. Mayo
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: Re: Why 2 tcpserver processes?
Datum: Mittwoch, 2. Juni 1999 16:35
That is expected
"Timothy L. Mayo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, [iso-8859-1] "Günthner, Ralf" wrote:
qmaild 701 0.0 1.2 832 280 p0 S15:49 0:00 tcpserver -v
-x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u4 -g333 0 25 qmail-smtpd
qmaild 796 0.0 1.2 832 296 p0 S15:52 0:00 tcpserver
Arrgh!! So my problem isn't solved?
Hello qmailars,
Sorry to bother, but would appreciate the help.
Do the Subject: From: and To: lines within message headers always read
Subject: From: and To: without being translated into another language?
I see that the headers are occasionally translated into other languages,
but I'm
On 2nd thought: Dave, it's all a misunderstanding.
The tcpserver processes I showed in my ps output really are smtpd processes, because
that's the last argument to tcpserver, if you look closely. Doh...
Regards
Ralf
Eric Dahnke writes:
Do the Subject: From: and To: lines within message headers always read
Subject: From: and To: without being translated into another language?
Yes. Always.
I see that the headers are occasionally translated into other languages,
but I'm fairly sure it is the e-mail
I stand by my original statement (or hang).
On a moderately busy (50 messages/minute for ~16 hours per day), there is
a tcpserver process spawned for every incoming connection attempt. I
usually have 35-40 of these present on the system in addition to the one
started by supervise. Each of these
Eric Dahnke writes:
Do the Subject: From: and To: lines within message headers always read
Subject: From: and To: without being translated into another language?
Yes. RFC 822 doesn't really make provisions for headers to be translated
into other languages at the MTA level.
I see that the
Where can I find a copy of the above? I looked through the tarball but
couldn't find anything.
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Dave Sill wrote:
"Timothy L. Mayo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stand by my original statement (or hang).
On a moderately busy (50 messages/minute for ~16 hours per day), there is
a tcpserver process spawned for every incoming connection attempt. I
usually have 35-40
Hi there,
I posted the questions some days ago and got no answer... we really need
to find a sollution for it...
Anybody has any ideas on how to modify qmail-getpw and make it check
users on a different way other than /etc/passwd ? (PostgreSQL)
--
Jose Ignacio de Cordoba Alvaro
Dax Kelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where can I find a copy of the above? I looked through the tarball but
couldn't find anything.
See:
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#License
-Dave
Ignacio de Cordoba [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anybody has any ideas on how to modify qmail-getpw and make it check
users on a different way other than /etc/passwd ? (PostgreSQL)
It is easy to write a checkpassword replacement that does
whatever authentification you can imagine. We also have
On a moderately busy (50 messages/minute for ~16 hours per day), there is
a tcpserver process spawned for every incoming connection attempt. I
usually have 35-40 of these present on the system in addition to the one
started by supervise. Each of these authenticates the IP address the
connection
On 2 Jun 1999, John R. Levine wrote:
I don't know what tcpserver you're running, but it's not the one
that's part of ucspi-0.84. It has a single master tcpserver process.
It forks each time it accepts a connection, then the child process
runs the rules and either exec's qmail-smtpd or
"Timothy L. Mayo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave and John, do you both run tcpserver with the -H option set?
I don't.
-Dave
I'm looking for something (patch?) against Mailbombs (for example:
more than 100 mails for the same recipient during a definied time).
Does such a thing already exist ? Thanks for any pointer... :)
Cheers,
Olivier
Tim Hunter wrote:
all you need is to use thisd for your startup
#!/bin/sh
# Using splogger to send the log through syslog.
# Using procmail to deliver messages to /var/spool/mail/$USER by default.
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
qmail-start '|preline procmail' splogger qmail
Hello all,
I am writing in the hope someone can give me a clue as to what
might have happened. I have a machine in our office which has a
real ip address ending in .214 (it used to end in .249)...Now, ever since
it was changed, outlook express (the MTA the guy uses) has been barfing
Maybe his new IP is not a valid relay client ?
If he is using Outlook or Exchange you should try instead using the MS
Internet Mail client (from IE) or Messenger from Netscape (not sure about
Eudora) from his PC both of these will tell you what error is returned from
the server. (ie. sorry,
This is an unpatch version of tcpserver from the latest ucspi-0.84 and you
are correct. The tcpserver instances do go change to (in my case) sh
instances when the reverse lookups have completed. My goof and sorry for
the confusion!
Aha. I bet if you adjust the shell script so the last thing
I'm getting just a teensy bit fed up with Microsoft and their approach to
Internet Standards...
Outlook Express version 5 has fixed most of my issues with IMAP bar this
one: Outlook creates a 'special' folder called Inbox. This folder doesn't
exist on the IMAP server, so every synch with the
On Thursday, June 03, 1999 5:24 AM, Jim Gilliver [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I'm getting just a teensy bit fed up with Microsoft and their approach to
Internet Standards...
[...]
Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions for me?
Yes use something other than Microsoft
37 matches
Mail list logo
