I got all
the same error message while booting my Linux box:
"tcpserver:
fatal: unable to figure out port number for pop-3"
I just
installed the qmail packages from the var-qmail & qmail-run
rpms.
Can
somebody tell me how to fix this problem??
Thanks a
lot!!
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 04:33:02PM +0800, Michael Chao wrote:
> I got all the same error message while booting my Linux box:
> "tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for pop-3"
>
> I just installed the qmail packages from the var-qmail & qmail-run rpms.
> Can somebody tell me how to
Hi!
Replace
pop-3 by 110. This is the port number. Then try to run your startup script for
tcpserver.
CU,
Holger
-Original Message-From: Michael Chao
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Freitag, 17. März 2000
09:33To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: qmail-pop3d
question
I got a
Did this not get through to the list when I sent it yesterday? I
didn't see any responses and one usually gets something even if it is
just RTFM! ;-)
- Forwarded message from Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
I get the occasional deferral like the following:-
Mar 16 11:24:36 server qma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Mar 00, at 8:50, Chris Green wrote:
> I get the occasional deferral like the following:-
>
> Mar 16 11:24:36 server qmail: 953205876.814716 delivery 4: deferral:
> Sorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_by_that_name._(#4.1.2)/
That means that the do
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Today I got the following message in my SMTP logs:
>
> tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to fork: temporary failure
> tcpserver: status: 146/256
In an act of desperation, I started another tcpserver to listen on another interface.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 10:00:32AM +0100, Petr Novotny wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 17 Mar 00, at 8:50, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > I get the occasional deferral like the following:-
> >
> > Mar 16 11:24:36 server qmail: 953205876.814716 delivery 4: deferral:
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Mar 00, at 9:46, Chris Green wrote:
> Well this doesn't seem to agree with what I'm seeing, the incorrectly
> addressed mail was sent to @enterprises.net, whereas it
> should have been sent to @enterprise.net and I was definitely
> getting the d
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 09:46:15AM +, Chris Green wrote:
> Well this doesn't seem to agree with what I'm seeing, the incorrectly
> addressed mail was sent to @enterprises.net, whereas it
> should have been sent to @enterprise.net and I was
> definitely getting the deferral message. If you do
Hi,
Platform : HPUX 11.0
1). Installed qmail 1.03
2). configured qmail to use Maildir
3). configured Maildir in each user.
4). Tested local delivery : OK
5). Tested delivery from a remote sendmail : OK.
6). Installed and tested checkpassword : OK
7). configured pop3d as described in FAQ.
Coul
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 06:21:52PM +0800, TEK-KEE WANG wrote:
> 7). configured pop3d as described in FAQ.
>
> Could not make connection from pop3 client.
>
> Debug using telnet : trace follows :
>
> -> telnet0110
> <- +OK
^^
How are you running q
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 11:00:05AM +0100, Petr Novotny wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 17 Mar 00, at 9:46, Chris Green wrote:
> > Well this doesn't seem to agree with what I'm seeing, the incorrectly
> > addressed mail was sent to @enterprises.net, whereas it
> > s
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 05:18:57AM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 09:46:15AM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > Well this doesn't seem to agree with what I'm seeing, the incorrectly
> > addressed mail was sent to @enterprises.net, whereas it
> > should have been sent to @enterpri
Hello.
We are planning to use two PC for our mail system sharing a directory using
coda.
The DNS will be used to alternatively give one of the computer as smtp
server.
I would like to know if it is safe to only create one qmail queue under the
shared directory as
as far as I know the file name i
> Basically I suppose it's a risk of having a domain which is likely to
> have other domains with similar names, it's also a risk which is
> likely to increase as the net becomes bigger.
Whole life is a risk.
> Is there a way to ask qmail to send warning messages (to the user or
> to the postmas
Thanks, Chris.
The inetd.conf line reads :
pop3 stream tcp nowait root /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
/bin/checkpassword \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
In my last mail, in the telnet trace the x is a number.number
Tek Kee.
Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/17/2000 06:27:5
Pter,
checkpassword came from the same source.
It was tested OK based on instructions contained in the distribution.
Thanks,
Tek Kee.
"Petr Novotny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/17/2000 06:25:45 PM
qmail Digest 17 Mar 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 943
Topics (messages 38603 through 38672):
Deferral when host doesn't exist
38603 by: Chris Green
38659 by: Chris Green
38660 by: Petr Novotny
38662 by: Chris Green
38663 by: Petr Novotny
38664 by: Chr
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 11:48:11AM +0100, Frank Tegtmeyer wrote:
> > Is there a way to ask qmail to send warning messages (to the user or
> > to the postmaster) when such deferrals occur?
> Yes, there is a program call qmail_bounce. Look at www.qmail.org for
> Brian T. Wightman and his delayed ma
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 06:51:08PM +0800, TEK-KEE WANG wrote:
> The inetd.conf line reads :
>
> pop3 stream tcp nowait root /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
> /bin/checkpassword \
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
I don't use inetd for this kind of thing, but I think it wants the first
argument of
Is there a qmail equivalent to sendmail's "Smart Relay Host"? I am
trying to set up qmail on a server to use more than one relay for
outgoing mail. With sendmail, I just set the smart relay host to
relay.host. When sendmail sends the message out, it chooses a host
from among the MX records fo
"Production Team 2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We are planning to use two PC for our mail system sharing a directory
>using coda. The DNS will be used to alternatively give one of the
>computer as smtp server.
>
>I would like to know if it is safe to only create one qmail queue
>under the share
> That's not the real problem, which is that the queue was designed to
> be "owned" by a single qmail installation.
>
> -Dave
Thanx.
To solve this problem we are going to run two queues and only share the
users directories.
This sound good for you ??
Thomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 10:20:19PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >
>> > I tried to add in virtualdomains:
>> > anydomain.com:alias-anydomain
>> >
>> > then adding in /alias/.qmail-anydomain-default with the
>> > | forward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > with this setup e
"Systems" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>To solve this problem we are going to run two queues and only share the
>users directories.
>This sound good for you ??
Yes.
-Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In an act of desperation, I started another tcpserver to listen on
>another interface. I noticed that I can only run a max of around 150
>smtpd's simultaneously, whether under one tcpserver or two.
You're likely hitting some OS resource limit like max processes per
use
Is there anyway of changing concurrencyremote while qmail is running and
have it take affect?
Thanks,
Len
"Vaz, Len" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there anyway of changing concurrencyremote while qmail is running and
>have it take affect?
No.
-Dave
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 05:09:36AM -0800, Don Owens wrote:
> relay.host instead of to one of relay.host's mail exchangers. Does
> anyone know how to make qmail use multiple relays for outgoing mail?
changing this line in qmail-remote.c:
switch (relayhost ? dns_ip(&ip,&host) : dns_mxip(&ip,&hos
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 05:08:23PM -0500, Keith Warno wrote:
> eh?
>
> That would work; try "man forward" :)
>
Erm... it would, you're right... (*blush*)
Ricardo
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ricardo Cerqueira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To
Peter Schultz writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just curious about other people's opinions on which
> solution is best. Maildrop seems cool, but it's interesting
> to note that it doesn't recieve a mention on qmail's home
> page. Procmail doesn't even support qmail natively (although
> it looks like
Hello,
About having an open relay, im using tcpserver /w qmail, how do i setup
qmail so it can authentication first thru pop3,
then let the user relay when he wants to send mail, thank you..
Jonathan Fortin, Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Revelex
Vaz, Len writes:
> I know this is an open ended question with a lot of variables involved, but
> is there a place or does anyone know what the throughput might be for mail
> being sent out via qmail. How many emails/sec has qmail been known to send
> to the outside world with optimal configura
Jay Moore writes:
> I would like to add the following to my tcp.smtp file for tcprules:
>
> .domain.com:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>
> My question is can you use domain names with tcprules, or does it
> have to be IP addresses. In the man page all expamples use Ips and
> not domains.
There's
Hi. I'm currently implementing the "spam blocking on a per user basis"
solution using rblcheck and procmail. I've got everything in place and
all the command line tests pass just fine, but for some reason, by the
time procmail has gotten a hold of the message, the TCPREMOTEIP
environment variab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Mar 00, at 10:24, Chris Hardie wrote:
> Hi. I'm currently implementing the "spam blocking on a per user
> basis" solution using rblcheck and procmail. I've got everything in
> place and all the command line tests pass just fine, but for some
Chris,
Thanks. You are right. I missed out an additional qmail-popup argument. Putting
it into the inetd.conf entry
makes pop3 works.
Tek Kee.
Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/17/2000 08:32:41 PM
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Petr Novotny wrote:
> Sure. Please think about how qmail works:
> qmail-smtpd gets message, passes to qmail-queue, message gets
> queued, stop.
> qmail-send wakes up, passes message to qmail-local, it passes
> message to procmail.
>
> The TCPREMOTEIP is present only in the
Strike that, there's one included with the rblcheck package, it just
didn't install by default with FreeBSD's /usr/ports make.
Sorry for the laziness and sloth exhibited here on my part. :)
Chris
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Chris Hardie wrote:
> These things being said, does anyone have a good or
> > This starts tcpserver/pop3d, but how do I go about shutting it down cleanly?
>Anything nicer than a 'kill'?
>
> kill uses the ``SIGTERM'' by default, which politely asks the process
> to die after it has cleaned up.
>
> kill -KILL shoots the process without warning.
OK, kill (regular, not
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OK, kill (regular, not -9) is fine with me :)
>Is there an easy (i.e. 'automatic') way of getting the PID of the tcpserver?
daemontools
-Dave
Jonathan Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> About having an open relay, im using tcpserver /w qmail, how do i setup
> qmail so it can authentication first thru pop3,
> then let the user relay when he wants to send mail, thank you..
Bruce Guenter has written a package which does exactly this.
Don Owens writes:
> If I put the relay host name in smtproutes, qmail delivers it to
> relay.host instead of to one of relay.host's mail exchangers. Does
> anyone know how to make qmail use multiple relays for outgoing mail?
Sure. Make a new hostname with multiple A records that point to e
Hi!
If you want to use Coda for Maildirs, you have to make small patch to qmail-local:
Coda doesn't support file links between directories, so you need substitute
link(),unlink() for rename().
Her is the patch, but I can't vouch for it - haven't used it on production machine.
*** qmail-local.
I´m begin to install qmail in my computer and i
have a direct conection with the internet, Should i had to have a DNS entrie for
qmail make a relay on messages to a external smtp and pop3??
Can i use a qmail just for do relay between smtp
servers?? There are another more easy way to do this??
Hello,
Im having some problems on certain issues, how do i setup qmail so it will
only accept emails thru the smtp server
if the to: is to our domain and not to any other domain, so we can stop
relayers..
Thanks
Jonathan Fortin, Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Ok thank you for this *very* useful information.
I will let anyone knows how this installation is going
(Give us a week at least we are quite busy ... Who isn't)
Thomas
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Pavlykevych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Production Team 2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL
Hello,
How , in qmail, do i only allow mail to host to our domain.com so if users
try accessing our server, they can only send
to our domain.com and not other domains, how do i do this in qmail?
thank you.
Jonathan Fortin, Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Hi Petr,
I did what you said - I put pop3d under supervise as well (I already had smtpd under
supervise).
It looks like pop3d is running fine, but authentication fails for some reason now and
I'm wondering if it is because I'm trying to run pop3d under user 'qmaild' ?
>> more /var/qmail/super
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Mar 00, at 9:45, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
> QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
> NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0
> pop-3 /var/qmail/
Anand Buddhdev writes:
> With the new tcpserver v 0.86, you can use hostnames. See the
> documentation.
Hrm. But Chuck Foster/John Levine's patch is still useful, because it
allows you more control over the results of the PTR lookup. Anybody
interested in bringing it up to date (it's on qmai
As a Network Administrator do you get frustrated with people who ask
you questions and make no effort to find the answer themselves? Do these
people seem too lazy to take the time to learn or they think that their time
is more valuable than yours?
Do you respond better to people who have made som
wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I´m begin to install qmail in my computer and i have a direct conection with the
>internet, Should i had to have a DNS entrie for qmail make a relay on messages to a
>external smtp and pop3??
> Can i use a qmail just for do relay between smtp servers?? There ar
I have been watching this list for a few weeks now. And the people on
here are the most un-helpful people I have seen. Your typical answer to a
question is man this or man that. And yes I understand that there are people
that don't read the docs, but this list is typical of linux
users/adminis
> here are the most un-helpful people I have seen. Your typical answer to a
I'm teaching him to fish. You want to keep feeding him fish. I think my
way is actually more helpful.
Regards.
He is fishing... for an answer. Why don't you just answer the
poor guy? Or do you think that you're going to singlehandedly
change the way he acts by being rude?
Regards
Dan Barber
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > here are the most un-helpful people I have seen. Your typical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Mar 00, at 13:37, Lee Trotter wrote:
> "I don't
> have the time for you because you are not as smart as me"
That's not it. "This is Unix - stop acting so clueless" is more apt.
> Frankly I don't have the time to search though hundreds
> of em
Lee Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been watching this list for a few weeks now. And the people on
> here are the most un-helpful people I have seen.
I would beg to disagree with you. There is very little flaming on the list.
> Part of the problem with linux is it's very cryptic
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 01:37:45PM -0500, Lee Trotter wrote:
> I have been watching this list for a few weeks now. And the people on
> here are the most un-helpful people I have seen. Your typical answer to a
> question is man this or man that. And yes I understand that there are people
I bel
> > Frankly I don't have the time
> > to search though hundreds of emails in the archive, so I'll ask my
question.
> > Hopefully someone will take time out of his or her busy day to answer it
>
> So, your time is too valuable to waste looking for answers on your own,
> but you expect other people
> > as cryptic as the liunx/qmail documentation. Frankly I don't have the
time
> > to search though hundreds of emails in the archive, so I'll ask my
question.
>
> If you don't have the time to read installation and maintenance
documentation
> you probably don't have the time to properly secure yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Mar 00, at 13:58, Lee Trotter wrote:
> If all the questions have been answered then whats the point of a mailing
> list?
To answer the complicated questions, obviously. Not all questions
have been answered. Those that have been are archived
s
> I have been watching this list for a few weeks now. And the people on
> here are the most un-helpful people I have seen. Your typical answer to a
> question is man this or man that.
When I first signed up to this list, I wondered why people didn't just
give answers, then I realized: It g
Using multilog. I have one file with an extension with of .u
Under what circumstances would that happen?
Len
"Lee Trotter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have been watching this list for a few weeks now. And the people on
>here are the most un-helpful people I have seen.
I don't think you're being fair. Even people who "rudely" tell someone
to read the FAQ or a man page are being helpful. Truly unh
This happens when logging is not shutdown properly, like a system crash or
a -KILL.
-Original Message-
From: Vaz, Len [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 2:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qmail logs
Using multilog. I have one file with an extension with of .u
U
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 02:00:41PM -0500, Lee Trotter wrote:
> > > Frankly I don't have the time to search though hundreds of emails in
> > > the archive, so I'll ask my question.
> >
> > If you don't have the time to read installation and maintenance
> > documentation you probably don't have the
"Vaz, Len" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Using multilog. I have one file with an extension with of .u
>Under what circumstances would that happen?
>From ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/daemontools/multilog.html:
.u: This file was being created at the moment of an outage. It may
have been t
Can a CNAME in an MX record cause a problem for qmail?
I mean, our sysadm set up
cs.memphis.edu preference = 10, mail exchanger = mx.cs.memphis.edu
where mx.cs.memphis.edu is an alias.
If it can, how exactly?
Thx
Mate
- Original Message -
From: "Lee Trotter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "qmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri 17 Mar 2000 10:58
Subject: Re: Qmail Relay Question
> My time is not more valuable then yours I never said it was however if
I can
You pretty clearly implied it was, if you didn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Sigh.
Here we go again.
Scott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBONKLGFpGPE+AF6qBAQHJWAQAtRxevMTwJMYbGw1xerYKgd7UMDgZagGF
KTILWlFSQNElBDc7lOdwTR0xORfrOxn7jyNvOWSEGEsQxrRUB2LUFxpk0XjNi3bN
fzicmZR/GE6PzWbuW8PNrJpD2xeD854nw7iVDOEPAKAiKCSlFUoQ
Ted Deppner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 17 March 2000 at 11:01:10 -0800
> Be clear on this point: The informed person asking the tough question gets
> _excellent_ support from this list.
I have to agree with this. I've even gotten excellent support on
*easy* questions; maybe I was just luc
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 02:19:42PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> "Lee Trotter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I have been watching this list for a few weeks now. And the people on
> >here are the most un-helpful people I have seen.
>
> I don't think you're being fair. Even people who "rudely" t
Quoting Lee Trotter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I am also on an IIS list and not once has someone been put down for not
^^^
Well, that explains it.
> searching the archives or reading one of the manuals, which are not nearly
> as cryptic as the liunx/qmail documentation. Frankly I do
Mate Wierdl wrote:
>
> Can a CNAME in an MX record cause a problem for qmail?
> I mean, our sysadm set up
>
> cs.memphis.edu preference = 10, mail exchanger = mx.cs.memphis.edu
>
> where mx.cs.memphis.edu is an alias.
>
> If it can, how exactly?
>
> Thx
>
> Mate
Grab O'Reilly & Associate DN
pretty much all of the mailing lists that I am on agree on one point. Asking
newbie questions is ok, we were all newbies at one point. BUT, their is a way to
ask them that will give you the most response without having to put on a pair of
Nomex Underwear.
"I did A, I expected B, I received C.
Totally agree. I've asked a couple questions I regretted asking once I got
a response saying "man xxx", but even that helped me by pointing me to the
correct man page.. was looking in the wrong place a lot of the time, or just
didn't understand how qmail functioned.. but I think I did a good job
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 01:34:32PM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> Can a CNAME in an MX record cause a problem for qmail?
> I mean, our sysadm set up
>
> cs.memphis.edu preference = 10, mail exchanger = mx.cs.memphis.edu
>
> where mx.cs.memphis.edu is an alias.
>
> If it can, how exactly?
Yes.
> Quoting Lee Trotter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I am also on an IIS list and not once has someone been put down for not
> ^^^
> Well, that explains it.
>
Ah one of the Linux is better then NT people, each technolgy has it's place.
Don't assume one is better then the other.
> > s
To clear somethings up. I aplogize to
everyone who I offended here, I can relate with people who post here frustated
because their system doesn't work and they are trying to find answers and as
such it annoyes me greatly when people are more willing to put them down then to
help them.
Dav
One of the key factors when selecting open source, free and GPL source
software is that you cannot expect to get anything more than what's
provided. If you give, you'll get.
This mailinglist is a loose community of both givers and takers.
Some people need only to find the http://www.qmail.org/
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 03:48:22PM -0500, Lee Trotter wrote:
>
> > Quoting Lee Trotter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > I am also on an IIS list and not once has someone been put down for not
> > ^^^
> > Well, that explains it.
> >
> Ah one of the Linux is better then NT people, each
Hello,
Ive read webwave qmail faq and another qmail faq, and i was wondering how to
i setup relay so only
users can send email thru our smtp if its going to a user from our domain...
So what i did was
edit /etc/tcp.smtp and add 207.61.176.194:allow:RELAYCLIENT=""
and then ran tcpmakectl to
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 12:44:24PM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Sigh.
>
> Here we go again.
>
> Scott
Thx, so how will qmail get confused ?
Mate
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 05:04:36PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
> I see BIND complaining about MX records pointing to CNAMES all the time, but
> I've never had a problem with qmail failing to deliver to any of those hosts
> AFAIK.
Now, having a CNAME in *our* MX could somehow cause trouble to remot
Quoting Jonathan Fortin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Ive read webwave qmail faq and another qmail faq, and i was wondering how to
> i setup relay so only
> users can send email thru our smtp if its going to a user from our domain...
Hey, looks like you have been reading that thread :)
> edit /etc/tcp.
Pretty much the same question, but asked in a much better way.
In RC, you want something more like
tcpserver -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u $UID -g $GID 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
&
at least that is the way that we did it this weekend. We also setup our
/etc/tcp.smtp file to have
10.1.1.252
Hello,
I'm trying to set up qmail (pop3d) with a single user and I'm getting the following
error in syslog:
delivery 17: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/
I followed the directions at http://www.tibus.net/pgregg/projects/
I created 'popuser', here is the /etc/passwd entr
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 08:34:09PM -, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
> I'm searching for an easy solution to operate two servers using qmail that
> have both the exact same mails on them (so some kind of mirroring) to ensure
> the mails don't get killed when one server fails. I understand, that this i
"Steve Wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have been watching this list for a few weeks now. And the people
> > on here are the most un-helpful people I have seen. Your typical
> > answer to a question is man this or man that.
>
> When I first signed up to this list, I wondered why people d
Hello there.
Recently, most mail is kept in the queue with the following error in the
log:
953345547.577072 delivery 1: deferral:
/bin/sh:_-c:_line_2:_syntax_error:_unexpected_end_of_file/
Ok, the reason is obvious... if I look at the file in the queue
(/var/qmail/queue/local/22/46206 for exampl
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 03:20:40AM +0100, J.M. Roth iip" wrote:
> Hello there.
>
> Recently, most mail is kept in the queue with the following error in the
> log:
> 953345547.577072 delivery 1: deferral:
> /bin/sh:_-c:_line_2:_syntax_error:_unexpected_end_of_file/
You've missed a crucial line he
92 matches
Mail list logo
