Re: vpopmail, virtual users on virtual domains always gives'Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name.'

2000-04-02 Thread anindya
Hi Markus, quick check: is testdomain.com in /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts? and what is the contents of your /var/qmail/control/{default|locals|me}? The output of /var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl might be helpful also. Also what happens if you telnet to localhost 110 and enter POP commands ma

vpopmail, virtual users on virtual domains always gives 'Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name.'

2000-04-02 Thread Markus Fischer
Hello, I'm running debian frozen (potato) with deb's mail and vpopmail set up from source. I'm locally runing bind so for testing I set up a domain 'testdomain.com' in bind and with vadddomain testdomain.com. Bt no mail for testdomain.com gets received, I always get back 'Sorry,_no_mailbox_here

Re: Relay based on IP

2000-04-02 Thread Chris Johnson
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 08:40:26PM -0300, Ricardo D. Albano wrote: > > This is a kind of access list at IP level, my qmail server is an inbound > relay for my domain, but also I need to work as an open relay for some nets > (my customers), if I make a filter like you say any connections from the

Re: offtopic about installation

2000-04-02 Thread Peter Samuel
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Mate Wierdl wrote: > Just accidentally, on another list I got a hint for using stow > > http://www.gnu.org/software/stow/ > > I think it could help installing/managing djb packages. > > In general, it seems to me one should just install a djb package with > > echo /usr/lo

Off Topic - Lotus Notes x Qmail

2000-04-02 Thread Gustavo Zambon Rozatti
        Does anyone has already integrated Notes and Qmail on the same domain?         On my work we have 2 mail servers MS-Mail and Lotus Notes and we'll migrate them both to one bigger running Qmail (after a happy experience on a branch office), but I'll do this one at a time the first wil

Re: Relay based on IP

2000-04-02 Thread Ricardo D. Albano
This is a kind of access list at IP level, my qmail server is an inbound relay for my domain, but also I need to work as an open relay for some nets (my customers), if I make a filter like you say any connections from the world may be denied. RDA.- >At 17:50 31/03/2000 -0300, Ricardo D. Albano

Re: Poor documentation of anti-spam options?

2000-04-02 Thread Chris Hardie
On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote: > I guess it's time to close the debate on that issue. > Actually, since I asked the original question, I'd like to clarify what I think the main point is: "The lack of clear and concise documentation about anti-spam/security options for the novice

Re: blocking with rbl.maps.vix.com doesn't work ?

2000-04-02 Thread Paul Schinder
At 6:36 AM -0700 4/2/00, Irwan Hadi wrote: >I use this syntax at >/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file > >[irwan@server qmail-smtpd]$ cat run >#!/bin/sh >QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild` >NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild` >exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 300 \ > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -c 100

blocking with rbl.maps.vix.com doesn't work ?

2000-04-02 Thread Irwan Hadi
I use this syntax at /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file [irwan@server qmail-smtpd]$ cat run #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild` NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild` exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 300 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -c 100 -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \ -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOF

run qmail-pop3d under supervise and multilog

2000-04-02 Thread Irwan hadi
If I want to run the qmail-pop3 daemon under supervise and multilog, based on LWQ howto, can I just create .. (because there is already /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/ and /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd directory) /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run #!/bin/sh env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/l

Re: Poor documentation of anti-spam options?

2000-04-02 Thread Patrick Bihan-Faou
I guess it's time to close the debate on that issue. I appreciate the main point here which is: that solution could work, except that today it is not practical to use "remote" relays that correspond to your main email domain. - Original Message - From: "Peter van Dijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: "special" chacters in .qmail filenames

2000-04-02 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 10:26:21PM -0500, Mark E. Drummond wrote: > I am setting up a large number of virtual domains. I have been > diligently replacing the "." in my .qmail files with ":" but I was > wondering, are there any other characters that require special > treatment? What about "-" ? Wha

Re: Poor documentation of anti-spam options?

2000-04-02 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 10:55:09AM +0200, Michael Raff wrote: [snip] > > I own the pobox.co.za domain and am having the same problem. Someone is > spamming faking a rubbish source address from the @pobox.co.za domain. The > first line in the headers that gives any smtp info is > > Received: fr

Re: Poor documentation of anti-spam options?

2000-04-02 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 12:24:43PM -0500, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote: > Hi, > > From: "Peter van Dijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > advertise the e-mail address associated with that user account in the > MAIL > > > FROM, nothing prevents you to advertise your "official" email address in > the > > > re

qmail Digest 2 Apr 2000 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 959

2000-04-02 Thread qmail-digest-help
qmail Digest 2 Apr 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 959 Topics (messages 39412 through 39432): Re: Poor documentation of anti-spam options? 39412 by: Paul Schinder 39413 by: Len Budney 39418 by: Patrick Bihan-Faou 39419 by: Len Budney 39420 by: Patrick Bihan-Fao

Re: Poor documentation of anti-spam options?

2000-04-02 Thread Michael Raff
Hi At 06:40 PM 3/31/00 -0500, you wrote: >At 3:06 PM -0500 3/31/00, Dave Sill wrote: >>Do the spammers: >> >> 1) throw up their hands and admit defeat, or >> 2) start using valid (but wrong) domains in their envelope return >> paths, thereby defeating your rejection and escalating the ar

Re: tcpserver accept netmasks?

2000-04-02 Thread Chris Johnson
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 07:53:21AM -, John Conover wrote: > Will tcpserver's -x something.cdb accept a netmask, like: > > :deny > 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > 172.16.0.0/12:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" No, but it will accept the following: 172.16-31.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" By the way, do