-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7 Jun 00, at 8:53, clemensF wrote:
> add
>
> pop3 110/udp#Post Office Protocol - Version 3
> pop-3 110/udp#Post Office Protocol - Version 3 for qmail :)
Ouch! Since when can pop3 run over udp? 110/tcp lines are just
eno
> Peter van Dijk:
> Research shows that FreeBSD 4.0's inetd actually doesn't have these
> misfeatures anymore - it has a concurrency limit (yes, really!) and a
> max-connections-per-minute-per-remote-IP.
starting with at most 2.8.8, it has. freebsd 2.8.8 is my religion.
clemens
> Photocon:
> avail. Can someone tell me what to do about a "tcpserver: fatal: unable to
> figure out port number for pop-3" error on a redhat 6.2 system?
add
pop3110/tcp#Post Office Protocol - Version 3
pop3110/udp#Post Office Protocol - Version 3
pop-3
I use qmail with serialmail and fetchmail. I conect
to my ISP with dial up.All messages for out are stored in
"/var/qmail/alias/pppdir/" and that is OK.All mesages witch I receive (with
fetchmail) are in "/var/qmail/qlias/pppdir/" too.
And that is
problem. Why this mesages not in maildir o
> Xionghui Chen:
> every time when I send mail via port 25, if the domain of the mail address is not
>belong in the file control/rcpthosts, it says:
> 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
you would select the recipients-hosts.domain:25 port. in comes the mail
d
> Derek Watson:
> qmail-start "|/var/qmail/myscripts/filter.pl ./Maildir/" splogger qmail
>
> Where filter.pl would read STDIN, filter out words, and print to STDOUT,
> in the hopes that qmail-local would pick up the rest and deliver to Maildir.
> But this doesn't seem to work out. .. I just
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 08:36:43AM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
>
> > I agree with you in general, Russ. The only benefit I can see to
> > comp.mail.qmail is that there is also a comp.mail.sendmail.
>
> The impression I gain is that reception amidst vocal
> qmail advocates is at best lukew
Ben Beuchler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 11:13:51PM -0400, John R Levine wrote:
>> * Majordomo 2: looks swell but is in perpetual alpha, dunno about VERP
> I've never liked majordomo... But that's just personal opinion.
Majordomo 2 is a completely different program tha
[ added ezmlm list to cc: ]
also sprach johnl:
> I'm moving my lists to a new server, and I figure this is as good a time
> as any to look for something better than Majordomo 1.94. Here's what I
> want:
[snip]
> -- web interface, at least enough so that the subscription confirmation
>can h
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 11:13:51PM -0400, John R Levine wrote:
> * Majordomo 2: looks swell but is in perpetual alpha, dunno about VERP
I've never liked majordomo... But that's just personal opinion.
> * ezmlm: no digests, no web, no MIME
What you want is ezmlm-idx, a fully supported patch fo
Hi John,
ezmlm can have digest with idx patch.
(i dunno about web/mime still)
Best regards,
Murat Guven Mural
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "John R Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "qmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 6:13 AM
Subject: Suggesti
I'm moving my lists to a new server, and I figure this is as good a time
as any to look for something better than Majordomo 1.94. Here's what I
want:
-- automatic VERP bounce processing
-- plain and digest lists
-- multiple lists in multiple virtual domains
-- plays nicely with qmail
-- does s
I'm not following???
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, clemensF wrote:
>> John Gonzalez/netMDC admin:
>
>> On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Peter Samuel wrote:
>> >I've never seen this. How? What operating system? What version of
>> >inetd? You've got me curious now.
>>
>> man inetd
>
>this is one of those things. we ar
> Greg Hinton:
> > i would like to refuse accepting emails from i.e. baddomain.com
> > or [EMAIL PROTECTED] how could this be achieved ?
>
> Probably the easiest way is to use QMAIL-HOME/control/badmailfrom, see
> the qmail-smtpd(8) man page. You could also use tcpd(8), tcpserver(8),
> or rblsm
> John Gonzalez/netMDC admin:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Peter Samuel wrote:
> >I've never seen this. How? What operating system? What version of
> >inetd? You've got me curious now.
>
> man inetd
this is one of those things. we are used to spend five minutes on
inetd.conf using vendor-supplied-tem
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 04:24:54PM -0700, Photocon wrote:
> avail. Can someone tell me what to do about a "tcpserver: fatal: unable to
> figure out port number for pop-3" error on a redhat 6.2 system?
Yep. It tries to figure out what port number 'pop-3' is by looking it up
in /etc/services. I
Jens Georg wrote:
>
> i would like to refuse accepting emails from i.e. baddomain.com
> or [EMAIL PROTECTED] how could this be achieved ?
Probably the easiest way is to use QMAIL-HOME/control/badmailfrom, see
the qmail-smtpd(8) man page. You could also use tcpd(8), tcpserver(8),
or rblsmtpd(8).
hello all
forgive the newbie question, but Ive come to a point where Im stuck, and
need some help. Ive read the FAQ, the help pages, but I cant seem to find a
definitive answer. Im having the same problem that Eric Fletcher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about on the 12th of may (according to
Hello all,
I am running qmail1.03 on SunOS5.7 single processor, single disk
machine. This is an incoming qmail box that processes around 75,000
messages a day. It does no local delivery, it simply relays all mail to a
certain host with a line like the following in smtproutes:
:host.domain
What
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 11:22:51AM -0700, Aaron L. Meehan wrote:
> Quoting Peter van Dijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 10:48:24AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> > >
> > > > More evidence that the person running ORBS is incompetent.
> >
> > He's not. I've spoken to him on several
Hey, Folks--
This is the first time I've had to unsubscribe an ezmlm list (and
particularly [EMAIL PROTECTED]), and I wanted to deliver my opinion on
the unsubscribe process, as a sort of counterpoint to all the "How do I get
off this list?" mails.
It was almost trivially simple. I checked a
I am running qmail on a Linux box with a default domain of "default.com" and
a virtual domain of "virtual.com". I have set up the users in
"control/virtualhosts" and they receive mail correctly for the virtual
domain. My question is, when a user that exists on the virtual domain
"virtual.com" an
I downloaded the checkpoppasswd script at
http://www.tibus.net/pgregg/projects/ and would like to implement it into
qmail. I put it into /var/qmail/bin and compiled it - what do I do next?
Just a follow up to my last message, which might not have been very
clear. I think I want to do something from within the rc script so that
qmail runs like this:
qmail-start "|/var/qmail/myscripts/filter.pl ./Maildir/" splogger qmail
Where filter.pl would read STDIN, filter out words, a
You mean something like this?
cut -f6 -d: < /etc/passwd | xargs -i echo grep "''" "{}""/.qmail-*" | sh
Ari Arantes Filho wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there some script to list all users including the content of each
> qmail-?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ari
--
David N
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 08:12:35PM +, Jules Desforges wrote:
> I need to be able to redirect e-mail from particular
> addresses to different servers. (NOT forwarding).
>
> e.g. if I host the domain :-
>
> blah.com
>
> I would like to send :-
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to server [x.y.z]
> [EMAIL
Hi,
I've recently installed Qmail 1.03 on a BSD box, and
I'm impressed with both the speed and the security
features in Qmail.
But I have a design problem which somebody might be
able to throw light on.
I need to be able to redirect e-mail from particular
addresses to different servers. (NOT fo
> Luca Zancan:
> "tcpserver: fatal error: unable to bind: port already in use", or
usually it's one & too many. at least two servers in the field.
clemens
hi,
i haven't found a hint about configuring qmail to refuse accepting
emails from either ip's or domains or simply an email-address.
i would like to refuse accepting emails from i.e. baddomain.com
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] how could this be achieved ?
regards,
jens
Quoting Peter van Dijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 10:48:24AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> >
> > > More evidence that the person running ORBS is incompetent.
>
> He's not. I've spoken to him on several occasions and he is quite clueful.
I don't believe Alan Brown incompetent,
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Peter Samuel wrote:
>I've never seen this. How? What operating system? What version of
>inetd? You've got me curious now.
>
>Regards
>Peter
>--
man inetd
pop3 stream tcp nowait.120 root /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env tcp-env..
--
___ _ __ _
On Tue, 30 May 2000, yavuz wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have installed qmail1.03 under the FreeBSD3.4
>
> I can log in pop3 and smtp ports in telnet
>
> But I can not putting any user in mailbox
Try su -c /var/qmail/bin/maildirmake ~/Maildir
is the local user you want to add
and create a .qma
I have some more question about this...
So, the email gets to the internal servers but can the internal servers
be sendmail servers or they must also be qmail servers and will the
users be able to read their messages from the internet???
Thanks again
Guillermo Villasana Cardoza wrote:
>
> Thank
Greetings...
I have a problem creating vrituals dominains of mail... In
the DNS setup:
miprueba.comMX miservidor.empresa.com
servidor.miempresa.com A 209.167.23.26
and in /var/qmail/controls/ add miprueba.com to rpchosts and
virtualdomains [EMAIL PROTECTED]:usuariop
In
> > I now understand why I get these messages from ORBS dropped into my
> > postmaster box.
> You will get mail from ORBS in two situations:
> - ORBS wants to warn you that they successfully relayed through your
> server.
> - an OR
Hello all.
I was just looking for a little insight, maybe from someone who has
tried this before. I plan to write a wrapper (for qmail-local?), which will
intercept every local mail delivery (from local to local, or remote to
local). I need to filter the content, strip attachments and
Hi,
Is there some script to list all users including the content of each
.qmail-?
Thanks,
Ari
:-)
No, you didn't. I was wrong.
-Mensagem Original-
De: Próspero, Esteban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: 'Bruno Negrão' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Enviada em: Terça-feira, 6 de Junho de 2000 10:27
Assunto: RE: programming with vpopmail -
"Próspero, Esteban" wrote:
>
> I've already installed qmailadmin, but it doesn't allow "inexistent" users
> to subscribe themselves; you must login as postmaster or other vpopmail
> user, with password and domain. Did I miss something?
>
No. That's all what you can do with qmailadmin. Users can
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 02:36:24PM -0700,
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruno Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think I will be able to use them again as I only want to block inputs
> > and outputs, since the ORBS seems to catch sites faster than the RSS.
>
> That's because
I've already installed qmailadmin, but it doesn't allow "inexistent" users
to subscribe themselves; you must login as postmaster or other vpopmail
user, with password and domain. Did I miss something?
Esteban Javier Próspero
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruno Negrão [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTE
>> This seems like a weak excuse, all your interfaces should have
>> matching RDNS to their main A records and it's sufficient to set this up once!
>
> Who shall fill in control/locals, should the reverse (outside my control) change?
You, because you choose the mailservers hostname/domain.
Just
* Gologan, Andrei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [ 6 Jun 2000 08:58]:
> we need a litle help with qmail
> We need to block all attachments, except one or two predefined ones.
> The sender of the mail, has to receive an e-mail saying what type of
> attachment is allowed.
Here are two ideas:
1. Use the QMA
Hi,
we need a litle help with qmail
We need to block all attachments, except one or two predefined ones.
The sender of the mail, has to receive an e-mail saying what type of
attachment is allowed.
Any idea where to look or how to do it ?
Sincerily,
Andrei Gologan
Hello
I have installed qmail1.03 under the
FreeBSD3.4
I can log in pop3 and smtp ports in telnet
But I can not putting any user in mailbox
And I couldn't make maildir
directory.
As manually How can I add any user in a
qmailserver ?
Thanks
I use qmail with serialmail and fetchmail. I
conect to my ISP with dial up.
All messages for out are stored in
"/var/qmail/alias/pppdir/"
All mesages witch I receive are in
"/var/qmail/qlias/pppdir/" to. And that is problem. Why this mesages not in
maildir of my users??? How qmail can disloc
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 11:50:33AM +, Nguyen Hong Son wrote:
> Dear all
> Thank you for helping me with the SMTP Auth patch, But if you know where to
> get a tool (or package) for making a web-mail site for qmail, please tell me
You may try omail-webmail :
http://webmail.omnis.ch/omail.pl?a
Take a look of SqWebMail
http://www.inter7.com/sqwebmail
Nguyen Hong Son escritas:
> Dear all
> Thank you for helping me with the SMTP Auth patch, But if you know where to
> get a tool (or package) for making a web-mail site for qmail, please tell me
> .
> Thanks a lot
Dear all
Thank you for helping me with the SMTP Auth patch, But if you know where to
get a tool (or package) for making a web-mail site for qmail, please tell me
.
Thanks a lot
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmai
"Xionghui Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is real urgent:
>
> every time when I send mail via port 25, if the domain of the mail
> address is not belong in the file control/rcpthosts, it says: 553 sorry,
> that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
> do this mean that I h
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 07:22:25PM +1000, Peter Samuel wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
> >
> > While i agree with Peter that tcpserver is superior, i dont want people
> > getting the wrong idea of inetd.
> >
> > inetd by default has the above behaviour, but can be
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Xionghui Chen wrote:
> This is real urgent:
>
> every time when I send mail via port 25, if the domain of the mail address is not
>belong in the file control/rcpthosts, it says:
> 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
>
> do this mean that I
This is real urgent:
every time when I send mail via port 25, if the domain of the mail address is not
belong in the file control/rcpthosts, it says:
553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
do this mean that I have to put all my possible rcpt domains in the rcpthot
qmails 45724 0.0 0.3 840 408 p2- I11:16PM 0:00.06 qmail-
send
qmaill 45725 0.0 0.3 784 420 p2- I11:16PM 0:00.00
splogger qmail
root 45726 0.0 0.2 784 312 p2- I11:16PM 0:00.00 qmail-
lspawn ./Mailbox
qmailr 45727 0.0 0.2 780 308 p2- I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 Jun 00, at 11:56, OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg wrote:
> This seems like a weak excuse, all your interfaces should have
> matching RDNS to their main A records and it's sufficient to set this
> up once!
Who shall fill in control/locals, should the
qmail Digest 6 Jun 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 1024
Topics (messages 42668 through 42760):
Re: patch for authenticate SMTP services
42668 by: Krzysztof Dabrowski
Re: smtp relay setup (faq 5.4)
42669 by: Frank Tegtmeyer
Why not inetd?
42670 by: Magnus Naeslund
426
>> AFAIK all mailserver are required to have an A record,
>> they are also required to have an RDNS matching "this" A record.
>> This A record then becomes one of the possible domains to reach the mailserver,
>> which RFC 822 requires to have a postmaster@domain (domain being RDNS).
>
> Where do y
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
>
> While i agree with Peter that tcpserver is superior, i dont want people
> getting the wrong idea of inetd.
>
> inetd by default has the above behaviour, but can be overridden in the
> configuration file to accept any number of connections
When qmail-inject sees a header line that does not look like a header line
at all (e.g. a continuation line without proper indenting), it makes a
conclusion the header ends here and processes the line as if it was a part
of a message body.
I am sure there is some reason why it behaves this way bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 Jun 00, at 10:00, OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg wrote:
> > Ah. Since when is a mailserver requires to accept e-mails at its
> > reverse DNS name or IP? That's the problem; I have spoken to people
> > who never saw to e-mail; why? They don't accept
>> What a mail admin chooses to do with is ORBS information is up to him,
>> and he may ignore some or all listings ORBS give out for "admin refused".
>
> How can I set up my filters to just use "really open relay" info from
> ORBS and throw away "admin refused" unknows?
You have seen the other z
Hi all,
Could someone point me to any docs on ETRN and Mail Queueing with Qmail.
Thank You
--
Tony Wade (Postmaster)
The Internet Solution
Tel:(+27 11) 283 5000
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#include
63 matches
Mail list logo
