On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 10:25:39AM +0800, wheatly wrote:
> why do i receive the same two letter sometimes?
> under freebsd4.x and qmail1.03
Elaborate on your problem, and include relevant logs.
PGP signature
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 10:11:24AM +1100, Colin Humphreys wrote:
> Is there a package for doing imap before smtp with courier-imap and
> qmail?
The same relay-ctrl package works for both POP3 with qmail-popup/pop3d
and for IMAP with Courier IMAP.
--
Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
why do i receive the same two letter sometimes?
under freebsd4.x and qmail1.03
ÉϺ£Ë÷Ê¢»¥ÁªÍøÐÅÏ¢·þÎñÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾Shanghai
Soim Internet Information Service Co.,
Ltd---ÉϺ£Êл´º£Öз381ºÅ
Someone posted a patch quite some time ago to the lists, try searching the
archives.
Colin Humphreys writes:
> Is there a package for doing imap before smtp with courier-imap and
> qmail?
>
> Jeremy McLeod wrote:
> >
> > Auf Oct 22, 2000, an 08:20, Mark Thomas (Tech14) besagt dieses:
> >
>
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> Reading the error message closely reveals that asm/sigcontext.h is
> included from signal.h. asm/sigcontext.h is probably part of the kernel
> include files. Do you have those installed?
On both systems I have the kernel source installed (in
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 05:14:20PM -0600, Roger Walker wrote:
> I have compiled verions 1.03 successfully under Mandrake 6.x, but
> under 7.1 it fails when it gets to sig_alarm.c. Here is the output:
>
> ./compile sig_alarm.c In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:300,
>
I have compiled verions 1.03 successfully under Mandrake 6.x, but
under 7.1 it fails when it gets to sig_alarm.c. Here is the output:
./compile sig_alarm.c In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:300,
from sig_alarm.c:1: /usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28:
asm/sigconte
Is there a package for doing imap before smtp with courier-imap and
qmail?
Jeremy McLeod wrote:
>
> Auf Oct 22, 2000, an 08:20, Mark Thomas (Tech14) besagt dieses:
>
> >Hello everyone,
> >
> >Is there a way to setup qmail to use SMTP authorization?
> >Right now I am limiting sending of mail to
Hi
Just joined the list.
I really like pine _and_ like the idea of Maildir, so I'm looking
into applying the patch to my pine 4.21. The problem is, the site
that hosts the patch seems to be down (Jozef Hitzinger's site, have
been down at least all though today and i think yesterday.), so I
ca
> Hello there,
Hi,
> I would like our mail to be firstly delivered
> to my organisation's DMZ (through a regular
> primary MX record), and then to make it
> route to our internal network (private
> IP addresses).
>
> I think a "smtproute" that overrides the
> DNS configuration might do it,
Alex Pennace wrote:
> It is no more abusive than pestering a mailing list about conclusions
> reached while ignoring big bold blinking letters. RTFM.
>
>
>Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
What happened? when t
You can use stunnel to encapsulate qmail-pop3d withing SSL.
Find out more about it at http://www.stunnel.org I use it
with my own certificates generated by OpenSSL. I also use
it with the vpopmail software on top of qmail, so not
straight qmail, but it works either way. My script is
based on th
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 07:47:56AM +1100, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> "John R. Levine" wrote:
>
> > I wish there were some way I could make this stuff more idiot
> > resistant, but some idiots can resist anything.
>
> This is helpful and informative in what manner?
> Degenerated to abuse, how approp
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 08:15:25AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MaD dUCK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > how does it get these??? i mean, once remote/13/145994 is removed, how can
> > qmail know of it's existence? does it keep track in memory then?
>
> Okay, I guess that you cannot really
Is there a SSL based POP3 server for qmail?
--
Vinko Vrsalovic B. +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ Perche' la tua lingua e mia!, MIA! ++
ICQ: 9299103 ++ (Mr B.)++
Geek code will never
"John R. Levine" wrote:
> I wish there were some way I could make this stuff more idiot
> resistant, but some idiots can resist anything.
This is helpful and informative in what manner?
Degenerated to abuse, how appropriate from abuse.net
regards
Kevin Waterson
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:30:19PM +0200, Sebastian Wolfgarten wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have got a working mail system here with some
> local users which is used to send mail between
> the users in an intranet. It works pretty fine,
> but now I have got a question: I don't want the
> local users to be
well, disable port 25 on the firewall for anything but intranet.mynetwork.com.
you want only local mail, or you want to force users to use the server as a
gateway?
martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(greetings from the heart of the sun)
Hi,
I have got a working mail system here with some
local users which is used to send mail between
the users in an intranet. It works pretty fine,
but now I have got a question: I don't want the
local users to be able to send to any other host
than this one here (intranet.mynetwork.com).
How can
Auf Oct 22, 2000, an 08:20, Mark Thomas (Tech14) besagt dieses:
>Hello everyone,
>
>Is there a way to setup qmail to use SMTP authorization?
>Right now I am limiting sending of mail to authorized users on the
>local segment(10.1.0.x). How would I go about forcing the user to
>sign in with a user
Hello everyone,
Is there a way to setup qmail to use SMTP authorization?
Right now I am limiting sending of mail to authorized users on the
local segment(10.1.0.x). How would I go about forcing the user to
sign in with a username/password in order to send smtp mail, rather
than disallowing total
Hi,
hmm, I just contacted the user and she said, she told me the wrong address,
with the right address it works :)
Thanx for all help.
/Richard
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 04:05:15PM +0200, Richard Sjögårdh wrote:
> Hi,
> yes, that was one reason, but now postmaster gets a return mail:
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. The fo
Hi,
yes, that was one reason, but now postmaster gets a return mail:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unrouteable mail domain "oth
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:18:04PM +0200, Richard Sjögårdh wrote:
> Hi,
> Oct 22 15:13:06 lix qmail: 972220386.456634 delivery 2793: deferral:
> Uh-oh:_.qmail_has_file_delivery_but_has_x_bit_set._(#4.7.0)/
> How do I fix this?
chmod -x .qmail is my wild guess?
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
Hi,
I still tries to set up a .qmail in order to deliver one and the same
incoming mail local _and_ to a external user. The .qmail looks like:
&[EMAIL PROTECTED]
./Maildir/
The log says:
Oct 22 15:13:06 lix qmail: 972220386.397546 info msg 201365: bytes 778 from
qp 1698 uid 502
Oct 22 15:13:06
qmail Digest 22 Oct 2000 10:00:02 - Issue 1161
Topics (messages 50902 through 50921):
Re: pop3 with virtualdomains
50902 by: Marco Leeflang
Re: announcement: daemontools 0.70 accustamp patch
50903 by: Matthias Andree
Re: Flushing Queue
50904 by: MaD dUCK
50
MaD dUCK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how does it get these??? i mean, once remote/13/145994 is removed, how can
> qmail know of it's existence? does it keep track in memory then?
Okay, I guess that you cannot really flush the queue. Here is what I did to
remove all messages and get a working qm
In the immortal words of Kevin Waterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > ORBS doesn't use the abuse.net tests to determine who is
> > an open relay.
> To quote from the ORBS site
> Try Abuse.Net's new relay tester (requires registration). This is the
> only web-based tester which carries out the sa
29 matches
Mail list logo