Re: QMAILQUEUE patch - how to apply?

2000-10-26 Thread Milen Petrinski
Hi, after sending my last message something happend and qmail stopped delivering local mail: Oct 25 02:02:33 be-01 qmail: 972439353.047394 starting delivery 258: msg 134477 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oct 25 02:02:33 be-01 qmail: 972439353.047854 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 Oct 25 02:02:33

RE: Question about OpenBSD and FD_SET()

2000-10-26 Thread Nicolas Deslions
Hi, On my FreeBSD system i modified the file /usr/include/sys/types.h i changed "#define FD_SETSIZE 1024" to 2048 I don't know if open bsd has the maxusers options in the kernel config file but if it's there u should put something like 256 there. -Message d'origine- De : Collin B.

Sending mail to WWW

2000-10-26 Thread Daniel Knights
Hi, I have installed qmail and everything seems OK except for sending mail out to the WWW. If I remove/rename the rcpthosts file I can then send mail out to any domain, but I presume this is not the correct way to solve this. I have our servers full domin and domain name listed in the

Is there a bug in the pop3 server?

2000-10-26 Thread Goran Blazic
Hi, me again... :) My qmail setup otherwise works just fine, but I think I may have stumpled over a bug in the code... Like I have stated before, a friend of mine was writing a pop3 retrieval component (thanks to all who sent messages to his mailbox...) and cam upon an interesting thing: When

Re: QMail RPM buggy...

2000-10-26 Thread Mario . Lorenz
Hi there, I'll fullquote my until now private conversation with Bruce so you know what this is about. Bruce Guenter wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 12:35:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, today I wanted to configure a box that actually uses the bind-iface patch, that is, has

Re: Sending mail to WWW

2000-10-26 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer
Hi Daniel, first: the Internet is not the WWW although many people see them as the same. They are not. I have installed qmail and everything seems OK except for sending mail out to the WWW. If I remove/rename the rcpthosts file I can then send mail out to any domain, but I presume this is

fastforward problem

2000-10-26 Thread Federico Barbazza
hi all, is there a way to write into "/etc/aliases" file this row: @domain1:@domain2 so that an email sent to pippo@domain1 go to pippo@domain2. thanks a lot Federico.

THX: Queue growing...

2000-10-26 Thread Nicolas Deslions
The problem was the HD speed... Thanks everyone for your help -Message d'origine- De : Jeroen ten Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : Thursday, October 26, 2000 12:17 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: Queue growing... How about the connection speed ? Maybe the queue is waiting

POP3 on tcpserver

2000-10-26 Thread Jeroen ten Berge
Hi all, can someone xplain me how to modify the current pop3 service from inetd to tcpserver ? Currently inetd.conf shows: pop-3 stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup ourhost.nl /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d ./Maildir/ But I'd like to run

Dubs about flushing the queue

2000-10-26 Thread J.J.Gallardo
Greetings. My qmail server stores mail to users they are not permanent connected and so i need to process the saved messages in the queue at given intervals (people who knows sendmail : sendmail -q5m). I would like to run a program (with cron at five minutes interval) like this:

Re: fastforward problem

2000-10-26 Thread janjan
try to make use of your virtusertable. On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Federico Barbazza wrote: hi all, is there a way to write into "/etc/aliases" file this row: @domain1:@domain2 so that an email sent to pippo@domain1 go to pippo@domain2. thanks a lot Federico.

Secure Outgoing Messages

2000-10-26 Thread Angel Krustev
Hi, I want my outgoing mail server to required authentication, is it possible using qmail to do this? Angel Krustev

Re: Secure Outgoing Messages

2000-10-26 Thread Timo Geusch
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:08:28PM +0300, Angel Krustev wrote: Hi, I want my outgoing mail server to required authentication, is it possible using qmail to do this ? Check www.qmail.org for the links to the qmail-auth patches. -- Timo Geusch Empower Interactive Group Ltd 5/7 St. Helen's

Documentation Specialist Seeking Contract Work

2000-10-26 Thread writer
Documentation Specialists Seeking Contract Work - Technical Writing, Editing,Graphics, Robohelp, HTML, SGML, etc. Senior technical writers, senior editors, project leaders and electronic documentation specialists seek contract work. Clients have included companies such as Microsoft and Koch

Re: Is there a bug in the pop3 server?

2000-10-26 Thread markd
Now I deleted a message in one session and quited the session (quit :) When trying to read the message in the other session, it failed! Ok, I said... It fails... Nothing to worry about, I mean, you get an error message, but nothing bad happens. But still... Lets see, what RFC 1939 says

Re: Queue growing...

2000-10-26 Thread markd
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 12:17:26PM +0200, Jeroen ten Berge wrote: How about the connection speed ? Maybe the queue is waiting for transport to another mailserver ? No. The two rates are disconnected. It's either queue disk performance or possibly a mis-setup queue (the classic trigger issue

RE: Is there a bug in the pop3 server?

2000-10-26 Thread Goran Blazic
= Once the POP3 server has determined through the use of any authentication command that the client should be given access to the Note the operative word "should" ... "as necessary". I personally think that should applies

installation Problems [WatchDog checked]

2000-10-26 Thread Christophe . Andreoli
Hi !! I am not very experienced with linux, but anyway I have to install Qmail on my SUSE Linux. I followed the documentation "life with Qmail" but can not start the qmail Batch ( qmail start). I get a syntax error although I copied the Qmail file exactly as it is. This syntax

FD_SET() for forking many processes such as Qmail

2000-10-26 Thread Collin B. McClendon
I found the answer, the FD_SET is located in /usr/src/sys/sys/types.h I upped this from 256 to 1024, I hope this works. -Collin

RE: SPAMCONTROL

2000-10-26 Thread Vu Vuong
hi, I have spamcontrol installed adn it's running fine, but only the unix servers can send email to it. The NT's and server2000 keeps getting dropped. Do you have any idea why? I've added them into my DNS file so that it can recognize the listed servers as local. How does NT SMTPSVC

Re: installation Problems [WatchDog checked]

2000-10-26 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I followed the documentation "life with Qmail" but can not start the qmail Batch ( qmail start). I get a syntax error although I copied the Qmail file exactly as it is. This syntax error is: "unexpected end of file". Here is the Qmail Batch: (See attached file:

Re: RSS and rblsmtpd revisited

2000-10-26 Thread Mate Wierdl
I have been running an rbldns server for a few moths now that pulls the rss zone file every hour. You are welcome to use it. Just put -r relays.msci.memphis.edu into your unpatched rblsmtpd's run file (or whatever you use). Mate

Bounce configuration QUESTION..

2000-10-26 Thread Alex Khanin
Ok. lets say my mail server is mailserver.domain.com, and i am an MX record for subdomain.anotherdomain.com. I am wondering how would I set up a bounce rule so that *@subdomain.anotherdomain.com will bounce to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't want ANY mail to go through to the actual users on the

qmail-smtp Delay issues with only some Ips.

2000-10-26 Thread Corey J. Briere
Is there away to shuttoff qmail-smtp from doing a reverse lookups? What's happening is, on some clients when they go to connect (via the internet) to send messages through my smtp,, connect ((tested with telnet)) but takes 20-50 seconds for a reply from the smtp server ((header,,ok message etc)).

Re: qmail-smtp Delay issues with only some Ips.

2000-10-26 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Corey J. Briere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 26 October 2000 at 12:01:08 -0700 Is there away to shuttoff qmail-smtp from doing a reverse lookups? What's happening is, on some clients when they go to connect (via the internet) to send messages through my smtp,, connect ((tested with

Re: Bounce configuration QUESTION..

2000-10-26 Thread Dave Sill
"Alex Khanin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: lets say my mail server is mailserver.domain.com, and i am an MX record for subdomain.anotherdomain.com. I am wondering how would I set up a bounce rule so that *@subdomain.anotherdomain.com will bounce to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't want ANY mail to go

Ezlml as newsletter

2000-10-26 Thread Fernando Costa de Almeida
First of all, let me explain the scenario: We are setting a newsletter here in my work, so we set a database with users information, html, etc (using Sql-Server 7.0 and Windows NT 4.0), and we make administrators via web too, using ASP. We will have a lot of types of newsletter, acording

Re: Ezlml as newsletter

2000-10-26 Thread Daniel Augusto Fernandes
Fernando Costa de Almeida wrote: First of all, let me explain the scenario: We are setting a newsletter here in my work, so we set a database with users information, html, etc (using Sql-Server 7.0 and Windows NT 4.0), and we make administrators via web too, using ASP. We will have

Alias question

2000-10-26 Thread Anthony Abby
Is it possible to redirect aliases to an account on another server vice directing it to a local user account? If I wanted to redirect postmaster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is it possible (echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster)? Thanks for any help. Anthony

SE Virginia

2000-10-26 Thread Anthony Abby
Is there anyone on this list that lives/works in South East Virginia? If so please contact me offline. Thank you. Anthony

Re: Alias question

2000-10-26 Thread Chris Johnson
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:00:28PM -0400, Anthony Abby wrote: Is it possible to redirect aliases to an account on another server vice directing it to a local user account? If I wanted to redirect postmaster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is it possible (echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Alias question

2000-10-26 Thread Anthony Abby
Yes. (Why didn't you just try it and see?) Chris Thankyou. I didn't try it (yet) because I'm learning Linux and Qmail at the same time. This is all pretty new to me, and since I'm in the middle of setting up QMail I wanted to know whether I could use existing accounts on an existing

I dont know whats wrong

2000-10-26 Thread Mark van der Putten
My logs are stuffed with "trouble opening local.." i can receive and send messages ! This is a peace of the logfile **972597697.332317 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 **972597697.339167 warning: trouble opening local/7/18683; will try again later **972597697.342566 warning: trouble opening

Re: I dont know whats wrong

2000-10-26 Thread Charles Cazabon
Mark van der Putten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My logs are stuffed with "trouble opening local.." i can receive and send messages ! This is a peace of the logfile **972597697.332317 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 **972597697.339167 warning: trouble opening local/7/18683; will try again

Re: I dont know whats wrong

2000-10-26 Thread Andreas Landmark
At 26.10.2000 15:27 -0600, you wrote: Mark van der Putten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My logs are stuffed with "trouble opening local.." i can receive and send messages ! This is a peace of the logfile **972597697.332317 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 **972597697.339167 warning:

SMTP auth patch on firewall?

2000-10-26 Thread Chris Garrigues
Can some one help me wrap my brain around something? I've got a mailserver behind a firewall using qmail with the LDAP patches. The firewall is running the same qmail executable (the LDAP part is fully enabled and as I type this it suddenly occurs to me that this may be a security issue,

What to do about these barelinefeeds?

2000-10-26 Thread Hubbard, David
Well first off, can someone explain to me the reasoning behind the bare linefeed restriction? I hope it is an actual standard that this restriction is trying to make other MTA's adhere to. So anyway, 2 questions: 1) Does anyone have a list of commonly used mail servers that violate this?

Re: What to do about these barelinefeeds?

2000-10-26 Thread Adam McKenna
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 08:29:42PM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote: Well first off, can someone explain to me the reasoning behind the bare linefeed restriction? I hope it is an actual standard that this restriction is trying to make other MTA's adhere to. So anyway, 2 questions: 1) Does

Re: What to do about these barelinefeeds?

2000-10-26 Thread Chris Johnson
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 08:33:43PM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote: On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 08:29:42PM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote: Well first off, can someone explain to me the reasoning behind the bare linefeed restriction? I hope it is an actual standard that this restriction is trying to

User password change using web. Suggestions?

2000-10-26 Thread Philip Tong
What is a good method to allow users to have their mail password changed using a Web Browser? What are the security issues that I need to look into? TIA

RE: What to do about these barelinefeeds?

2000-10-26 Thread Hubbard, David
Thanks, I hadn't seen that link before. I'm sorry, I meant that the 256 was the status code I see in my smtpd log. But, in searching the archives, I saw reference to people saying the bare LF generates a 451 and not a 553. I can't verify that since I don't have a mailer to try it with but it

Re: What to do about these barelinefeeds?

2000-10-26 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Hubbard, David" on Thu, 26 Oct 2000 23:31:01 EDT: verify that since I don't have a mailer to try it with but it seems that you'd never want the 451 in this case because obviously it will be the same mailer that will retry each time and it will continue to be broken for each

Re: What to do about these barelinefeeds?

2000-10-26 Thread Adam McKenna
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:31:01PM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote: Thanks, I hadn't seen that link before. I'm sorry, I meant that the 256 was the status code I see in my smtpd log. But, in searching the archives, I saw reference to people saying the bare LF generates a 451 and not a 553. I

Kernel Panic in regards to tcpserver

2000-10-26 Thread Andy Abshagen
OK. So everything has been going along fine until this morning. All of a sudden I noticed that our new qmail server stopped responding. I went to the qmail server and noticed that there was a kernel panic message on the screen and then something about tcpserver. Since the first time it seems

Re: Kernel Panic in regards to tcpserver

2000-10-26 Thread markd
You have a kernel or hardware problem. If qmail is mostly what you are running then it is likely that it will trigger the kernel bug or hardware problem. (If you were mainly running sendmail on that box, then it's likely that it would trigger that kernel bug or hardware problem.) You'll need to

Re: Kernel Panic in regards to tcpserver

2000-10-26 Thread Dave Sill
"Andy Abshagen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK. So everything has been going along fine until this morning. All of a sudden I noticed that our new qmail server stopped responding. I went to the qmail server and noticed that there was a kernel panic message on the screen and then something about