"pop corn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2) If they don't add reverse PTR records for my virtual domains, I've
> been debating telling the Internic to change my DNS servers for the
> virtual domains to the base address of my own dedicated server. It's
> not as if my virtual domains are subdomains
I'm dealing with a new ISP that has been pretty much ok until this problem.
I realized that they didn't set up the reverse PTR records for my eight IP
addresses on a dedicated server. (I will be creating 8 virtual domains - one
per IP address).
Their staff initially said 1) reverse PTR records
Grant writes:
> I still get timeouts even thought I have used the flags below.
> Intermittent timeouts though, sometimes it will connect to port 25 and
> send instantly, others it will timeout.
>
> root 561 0.0 0.0 1152 60 ?SJul01 0:00
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -H -R
Hi All,
Thank you to all for all the replies
I also found that Qmail is definitely better than sendmail.
After reading lot of documentation links given here and elsewhere
I also found that sending mails concurrently is better than sending
mails from one connection.
I have checked the mailing l
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:30:52PM -0600, Roger Walker wrote:
> Test with stock qmail on a Solaris workstation, 10,000 copies sent
> to the same email address (obviously the same domain) using qmail-inject:
> 30 minutes.
>
> Test from same workstation with a script to generate 10,000
* Mark Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > * no quote string
> > * no attribution line
>
> Corrected.
Nope.
> > * HTML to bloat your crap mail even more
>
> Fixed.
Nuh uh:
I 1 [multipa/alternativ, 7bit, 3.1K]
I 2 [text/plain, 7bit, iso-8859-1, 0.8K]
I 3 [tex
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I broke my qmail server. I tried to erase the mail queue.
[...]
> qmail-inject: fatal: qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0)
>
> message when I try to send mail. What did I erase, and how can I fix it.
You've got several options:
-do "make setu
I broke my qmail server. I tried to erase the mail queue. It was crapped
up with a bunch of messages that couldn't be sent, and they had been there
for several weeks. So I went in to the /var/qmail/queue/mess and the other
directories that had the files in them and did an `rm -rf *`. Anyway,
* Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010709]:
> "Dave Sill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >-Dave
>
> That's bizarre. What I actually sent was:
>
> http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#multi-rcpt
>
> -Dave
>
> -Dave
>
If I could make a guess, in the original message you had
"http: www.
Wait a minute now... Who said anything about straight?
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Adam McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: Netgear RP114 Router doesn't work well with Qmail POP daemon?
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:14:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:14:58PM +0200, Lukas Beeler wrote:
> as he already said in another posting, it's a 386, and he was mistaken..
Well, I'm sure glad we got that straightened out.
--Adam
nodnod, been forever since I've checked on the poor thing It was
basically a set it up and forget it thing in which case untill now it was
forgotten (laugh).
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Lukas Beeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ricardo SIGNES" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
as he already said in another posting, it's a 386, and he was mistaken..
On Monday 09 July 2001 18:45, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
> In a message dated Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:21:35PM +0300, Mike Jackson
wrote:
> > James Stevens wrote:
> > > I had a similar problem however my resolve to it was to
Yes you could do that unless your parnoid about things.. Just make sure you
tell your NAT/Firewall which IP to allow inbound outbound connections on
port 53 to. In that case it would be that machine. The whole slowdown in my
case was a stupid mistake of not mapping port 53 in the first place but e
In a message dated Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:21:35PM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
> James Stevens wrote:
> > I had a similar problem however my resolve to it was to take an *OLD* 286 I
> > had laying around install a fairly bare installation of Linux on it and
Am I getting senile, or is Linux 386+ on
I initially thought about it. But upon reviewing the user's report
(see the underlined part) I ruled that out. He clearly said that he
had his cable modem for a while, and before he got his Netgear RP114,
he didn't experience any symptom. That means the reverse lookup was
fine with his connecti
Well if the problem is name resolutions, why not just install bind on the
machine itself (in a caching-only configuration)? Then make it listen only
on 127.0.0.1 and make this the primary resolver for the machine.
w
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:32:53AM -0700, James Stevens wrote:
> I had a simila
James Stevens wrote:
>
> I had a similar problem however my resolve to it was to take an *OLD* 286 I
> had laying around install a fairly bare installation of Linux on it and
> installed the DNS service. Then I put that online behind my firewall and
> added it's IP for port 53 to my NAT/Firewall
>I beg to differ...
Only quoted the evidence...
>Wheras
>qmail just cranks out each message in it's own instance and does not have to
>deal with all those extra commands and can open as many as (in my case) 400
>connections to a single remote server at one shoot, limiting my bandwidth to
I beg to differ...
I have a list of 40k I'll use to race ya.. Hell I'll even let you use a list
of 10k to race my list of 40k.. Me using qmail and you using Sendmail.. I'll
even go beyond that I'll limit the bandwidth my server can consume to
1600kb/s and you can use whatever you want.. I'll stil
Roger Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip bogus test]
> I get the results that I expected - to send to the same domain (ignoring
> VERP requirements), it is faster to use a single connection for multiple
> messages than to use qmail.
Fine. Don't use qmail. This discussion is closed.
Charl
"Dave Sill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-Dave
That's bizarre. What I actually sent was:
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#multi-rcpt
-Dave
-Dave
I take that back, it's a 386... Drrr
Writting the message on it made me log into it just to check up on it been
awhile
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "James Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Balatero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Chin Fang"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
I had a similar problem however my resolve to it was to take an *OLD* 286 I
had laying around install a fairly bare installation of Linux on it and
installed the DNS service. Then I put that online behind my firewall and
added it's IP for port 53 to my NAT/Firewall and assigned it as the primary
D
>"Rodney Broom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>This has been hashed, rehashed, and re-re-hashed on this list. It
>inevitably ends in a flameware, somebody telling somebody else to
>profile rather then speculate, and a series of past analyses of these
>events supporting both sides of the argument
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is expected behaviour. If you want separate namespaces, those domains
> should be virtual, not local. See the qmail documentation and FAQ.
If it's only necessary to separate some aliases he could also put
these addresses into virtualdomains an
-Dave
Its quite slow with my Netgear RT314 router as well.
-- David Balatero
-Original Message-
From: Chin Fang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Netgear RP114 Router doesn't work well with Qmail POP daemon?
I recently have a user
Chin Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> I then asked him to use telnet to port 110 to our POP server, and he
> still got the delay. So, I am quite sure it's most likely caused by
> the Netgear RP114, although I don't see any reason why this is so.
A common cause of this can be your POP s
Chin Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently have a user reported me the following:
>
> I recently installed a Netgear RP114 Router, to provide multiple computers
> access to the internet via a single cable modem from ATT. Since then, my
> Eudora email program encounters some sort of
I recently have a user reported me the following:
I recently installed a Netgear RP114 Router, to provide multiple computers
access to the internet via a single cable modem from ATT. Since then, my
Eudora email program encounters some sort of 30 second delay when
attempting to retrieve e
"Rodney Broom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> D Rajesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> DR> > If in the total 20,000 mails, say 5000 are hotmail, 5000 are yahoo and
> the
> DR> > rest are to other domains. Then, is it possible to open a single
> DR> > qmai
I recently have a user reported me the following:
I recently installed a Netgear RP114 Router, to provide multiple computers
access to the internet via a single cable modem from ATT. Since then, my
Eudora email program encounters some sort of 30 second delay when
attempting to retrieve e
Kevin DeGraaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I run a qmail server that handles mail for 8 domains, all of which are in
> my "rcpthosts" and "locals" files. It works fine, but I'd like to have a
> bit more control over specific user@domain combinations.
>
> Currently, sending mail to "kevin" at any
Rodney Broom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> D Rajesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
re: batched recipients per-MX or per-domain
> DR> > I guess this speeds up the mail delivery amazingly
>
> CC> No, it slows it down tremendously. That's why qmail doesn
"Rodney Broom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ===> OK, to be fair I'll include the example of sending a bunch of mail to
> this same domain with a single connection but with differing message bodies.
Note that VERP, which is very useful for mailing lists, requires this
approach, because the one c
"~darkage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> This is what my tcp.smtp.cdb looks like -
>
> 10.1.0.28.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> :allow
Do you mean to say that's what your /etc/tcp.smtp file looks like?
If that's really what's in /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb, that's your problem; it
should be in /etc/tcp.
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/incominghost.html#multi-virtual
and the rest of http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/incominghost.html
-tcl.
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Kevin DeGraaf wrote:
> I run a qmail server that handles mail for 8 domains, all of which are in
> my "rcpthosts" and "locals" files. It works fine,
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, ~darkage wrote:
> 10.1.0.28.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
having a trailing dot here is a problem since you are specifying all bits.
/* Regards,
Jason Kawaja, UF-ECE Sys Admin */
arrrghh.. your right, the little dot was the prob.. It must be late I
didn't even notice the dot..
Thanxs for the help.. Its working perfect now.. (: silly me..
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "~darkage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, ~darkage wrote:
> from the document mentioned above it seems like all u need to do is to add
> this "-x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb" to tcpserver for qmail-smtpd & to make sure u
> have a properly formatted tcp.smtp.cdb file..
>
>
> This is what my tcp.smtp.cdb looks like -
Sounds l
I run a qmail server that handles mail for 8 domains, all of which are in
my "rcpthosts" and "locals" files. It works fine, but I'd like to have a
bit more control over specific user@domain combinations.
Currently, sending mail to "kevin" at any of the 8 domains works fine, and
the mail is deliv
> Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> D Rajesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DR> > If in the total 20,000 mails, say 5000 are hotmail, 5000 are yahoo and
the
DR> > rest are to other domains. Then, is it possible to open a single
DR> > qmail-remote process and dump all messages to be sent to hotma
I've read the relaying doc at
http://www.palomine.net/qmail/selectiverelay.html, but still I can't get
relaying based on ip going..
This is how I startup qmail, so it works with qmailmrtg -
env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 2850 -g 32
After patching qmail-remote.c with Frederik
Lindbergs qmail-verh-0.06, the only problem I encountered was with To:
header fields of the form archive@jab.org where each
mailing recipient, apart from the verh bounce and reply addresses, would get a
"personal" message with his address in the To
* Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010709 09:37]:
>
> I have apply to compile ezmlm-0.53 + idx-0.40 with
> and such error has been reported
1. You are on the wrong list. Consult http://ezmlm.org/
2. In the meantime, check this: http://untroubled.org/ezmlm-browse/
you're asking for the perfect spam
solution
your targets get mail messages without a To: header
or a bogus one, and if they're lucky enough to receive mail on one address but
reply with another, you'll never know who's it coming from
it's clearly not the right way to do
things
dan
-
Hello
I have apply to compile ezmlm-0.53 + idx-0.40 with
and such error has been reported
Please help fix it:
./load ezmlm-list subdb.a fs.a getconf.o slurpclose.o slurp.o \
strerr.a getln.a getopt.a substdio.a stralloc.a \
alloc.a error.a open.a str.a case.a `head -1 conf-sqlld`
./compile ezml
D Rajesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If in the total 20,000 mails, say 5000 are hotmail, 5000 are yahoo and the
> rest are to other domains. Then, is it possible to open a single
> qmail-remote process and dump all messages to be sent to hotmail on one
> connection and open another connection fo
Jens Hassler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "|/var/qmail/bin/autoresp bla".
>
> It works, but the problem is: The message which causes the autoresponder to
> reply is lost.
As soon as you create a .qmail file to hand delivery of a message over to your
script, the default delivery instructions (the
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 04:01:58PM +0200, Carlo Borelli wrote:
> Boss's company asked me to realize this scenario:
> an internal qmail server to serving co-workers on port 25 (smtp) and 110
> (pop3);
> trhough a FW1 the qmail server must talks on port 24 with a sendmail server
echo ':sendmail.ser
Hi all,
Boss's company asked me to realize this scenario:
an internal qmail server to serving co-workers on port 25 (smtp) and 110
(pop3);
trhough a FW1 the qmail server must talks on port 24 with a sendmail server
that can be sacrified because totally exposed;
the sendmail mta server does at this
> I am sending different mails to 20,000 recipients at a time.
> So, each qmail-remote sends a mail to each recipient.
> or am I wrong
No, that's more-or-less how it works.
> If in the total 20,000 mails, say 5000 are hotmail, 5000 are
> yahoo and the rest are to other domains. Then, is it
Hi All,
I am sending different mails to 20,000 recipients at a time.
So, each qmail-remote sends a mail to each recipient.
or am I wrong
If in the total 20,000 mails, say 5000 are hotmail, 5000 are
yahoo and the rest are to other domains. Then, is it possible
to open a single qmail-rem
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:59:17PM +0200, Jens Hassler wrote:
> So... How can save a copy of the incoming message into the users Maildir and
> send back a short autoresponder message?
'man dot-qmail'. It clearly says that ".qmail contains one OR MORE lines"
(emphasis my own).
- Adrian
Hi there,
I'm using an autoresponder which is invoked in a .qmail file through piping
"|/var/qmail/bin/autoresp bla".
It works, but the problem is: The message which causes the autoresponder to
reply is lost.
So... How can save a copy of the incoming message into the users Maildir and
send back
qmail Digest 9 Jul 2001 10:00:00 - Issue 1420
Topics (messages 65715 through 65730):
Re: Blank lines in .qmail files
65715 by: Tetsu Ushijima
Re: qmail-queue-patch and qmail-scanner
65716 by: Adrian Ho
65717 by: Andreas Grip
65719 by: Jason Haar
queue-repai
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> queue-repair version 0.8.4 incorporates this fix.
You write software faster than I can keep up with reading your mails
:)
Hi,
try to follow the instructions of Paul Gregg at
http://qmail.3va.net/single-uid-howto.html
I've configured a multiple domain qmail server and works fine.
Carlo Borelli
Project Management
Business Unit Tecnologie Data Center
Akros Informatica S.r.l. Via Cavina 7 Ravenna, Italy
Office +39 0544
"Essy Ren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How can I separate this two different man ?
Have a look at the man page for qmail-send. Look for the paragraph
about the controlfile virtualdomains.
Hint: If you add a domain to virtualdomains you *must* remove it from
locals.
There are also complete pa
"Qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what could be the problem and how do i resolve it.
What do the logs say?
What is the content of your smtpd run script?
Regards, Frank
http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail
-- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks
540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com
-Original Message-From: Essy Ren
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 9:27
PMTo: qmailSubject: two people with the same name but
differen
62 matches
Mail list logo
