Re: fastforward: wildcards

1999-09-07 Thread Ira Abramov
what you want: cd ~alias echo "| forward $[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > .qmail-noc ln -s .qmail-noc .qmail-noc-default -- Ira Abramov | Internet Zahav | Linux Guru and T-Shirt collector Ixnay on the IcrosoftMay | please write to me only in English! [EMAIL PROTECTED] | it's hard to read Hebrew left to right

Re: a bug again?

1999-09-07 Thread Ira Abramov
s/.qmail-*) when downloading mails... : why would it use an alias as a user? how would it authenticate it anyway? RTFM... this is basic Email stuff, not even Qmail specific. -- Ira Abramov | Internet Zahav | Linux Guru and T-Shirt collector Ixnay on the IcrosoftMay | please write to me only in

RE: I've been doing some relay testing.

1999-08-21 Thread Ira Abramov
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Ben Kosse wrote: > Actually, ORBS hasn't listed us. That e-mail touched precicely 3 systems: > the client, the one I'm building, and our internal Exchange box. It ended up > in our *INTERNAL* e-mail server as an undeliverable message. qmail tried to > send it to someone insid

Re: daemontools binaries (was Re: binaries)

1999-08-21 Thread Ira Abramov
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote: > Other products are in the public domain (e.g. cdb or checkpassword). > And other products are simply copyrighted with NO permission to > redistribute granted at all (e.g. mess822, or libtai). umm, isn't libtai part of the cyclog package as it is? and

Re: daemontools binaries (was Re: binaries)

1999-08-21 Thread Ira Abramov
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Greg Hudson wrote: > > the daemontools binaries are included, they are, like all DJB > > software other than Qmail itself, under PD (not GPL). > > Public domain would mean you can do anything you want with it. You > can't; in particular, you are not allowed to distribute de

Viewing cyclog logs

1999-08-20 Thread Ira Abramov
I had this idea... > in my free time (in a month? :-) I want to start working on a log > reviewing tool for cyclog. right now it's very inconveniant to run less on > a random logfile, since the filename changes once in a while, plus the > time stamps are not human readable. an interface to read

fastforward and aliasing to \self

1999-08-19 Thread Ira Abramov
I started seeing a problem with handling the aliases by fastforward. some of our users had in the old sendmail host a few aliases set up in a way that the entire company mail is CC:ed to an aditional user, sometimes two. consider the following example: user1: \user1, \mon1, \mon2 user2: \user

Re: daemontools binaries (was Re: binaries)

1999-08-19 Thread Ira Abramov
On 19 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Mate, do your RPMs include daemontools binaries? > > I have looked for the license to daemontools, but it is not in the > daemontools tarball, and it is not on the daemontools web page. What > is the license for redistributing daemontools? the daemonto

Re: receive

1999-08-16 Thread Ira Abramov
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Kevin Chang wrote: > hello all. I met a question with maildir format. > When I send a mail to a user. I can found a > new letter in his $HOME/Maidir/new, but when i > receiver letter from netscape under x-window, > The netscape cann't find the new letter. if you use Maildir

Big mama ISP server

1999-08-16 Thread Ira Abramov
at 150K users, the loads on my server aren't impressive, I'm guessing Israeli users surf and chat more than write Emails, possibly because of the software limitations (very few Right-to-left clients available, fewer agree on the encoding of the characters) My bosses are quite happy with an outgo

Re: qmail-Linux-distribution

1999-08-15 Thread Ira Abramov
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Kevin Waterson wrote: > Every Redhat server I set up I need to go throuth the > process of ridding the system of sendmail and istalling qmail. > I use the memphis rpm and wrote up a simple install script > So I started piecing together my own redhat clone (yes, > yet another

Re: binaries

1999-08-14 Thread Ira Abramov
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote: > I still do not know what option to rpm you are talking about that would allow > patches to be applied on the fly. I doubt that is possible: some patches do > not use the %patch macro. > welp, I saw it once and I can't remember the syntax. the basic ma

Re: binaries

1999-08-13 Thread Ira Abramov
On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote: > A simple pointer: people who look for the "memphis" rpm, should not look into > the var-qmail dir. People who look for a binary distribution of qmail, > should look into var-qmail. I loved that qmail SRPM, it always worked great for me. > > The only a

Re: binaries

1999-08-10 Thread Ira Abramov
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote: > var-qmail packages and binary rpms are in > > ftp://moni.msci.memphis.edu/pub/qmail/var-qmail > Comments are welcome please don't take this the wrong way... but compared to the RPMs I like to use (one directory above it, same FTP site), what are the ad

Re: Squashing 20,000 rumors...

1999-08-10 Thread Ira Abramov
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Jeffrey Skelton wrote: > What about Critical Path? Do they use qmail - or at least > something derived from qmail. Egroups.com both in and out, AFAIK, and ezmlm for the list management (or derivative of)

Re: 20,000 mailboxes...

1999-08-10 Thread Ira Abramov
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Magnus Bodin wrote: > One of the biggest swedish ISP:s (algonet) are using qmail for their > 5+ users. Solaris, Sun and NetWork Appliances hardware. Internet Zahav here in Israel is THE biggest ISP in the country currently... 150k users. we use Qmail for all outgoing mai

non-existant host - defered?!

1999-08-04 Thread Ira Abramov
I just noticed messages to non-existant hosts (due to typos or whatever) don't get bounced, but instead stay stuck in the queue for the full lifetime (1 week here). any REALLY good reaon for that?

Re: M$ Exchange -> qmail

1999-08-01 Thread Ira Abramov
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Olivier M. wrote: > I have a friend which has an Microsoft Exchange Mail server ("main" server) > always connected to the internet, and there are a few (about 10) > other MS-Exchange servers which are connecting directely to the main > mailserver every hour using ISDN-dialin

Re: Industry name for various email services? (repost)

1999-07-26 Thread Ira Abramov
On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Dave Kitabjian wrote: > > What are the industry-standard names for the following email services: I doubt it's a standard in some ISO or IEEE book, it's not even an RFC. let your marketing guy sit with a copywriter and find a name for these packages so they SELL :-) >

Re: Recipientmap dead?

1999-07-26 Thread Ira Abramov
On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Russell Nelson wrote: > Ira Abramov writes: > > to illustrate: my current set of rules for sendmail looks like this: > > > > @bothers.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > @building.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Null

1999-07-26 Thread Ira Abramov
On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Russell Nelson wrote: > Tony Wade writes: > > Hi there, > > > > How does one dump mail to /dev/null , > > I know! I know! Pick me! Pick me! > > echo '#' >.qmail > I thought it would discard it as a null file hat way, so ever since I started using qmail (and it's

Re: Recipientmap dead?

1999-07-26 Thread Ira Abramov
On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Martijn Koster wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 12:09:21PM +0300, Ira Abramov wrote: > > > > > > In a new installation I'm doing for a client, I found the need for the > > /var/qmail/control/recipientmap I used to use back in the 1.01 days.

Re: relaying redundancy

1999-07-26 Thread Ira Abramov
On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, torben fjerdingstad wrote: > I wish smtproutes could take a prioritized list of destinations. > > Our workstations has jam.net.uni-c.dk defined as "smarthost", > using smtproutes, which contains > :jam.net.uni-c.dk > > If that host is down, my outgoing mail is deferred, and

Recipientmap dead?

1999-07-26 Thread Ira Abramov
In a new installation I'm doing for a client, I found the need for the /var/qmail/control/recipientmap I used to use back in the 1.01 days. now it seems not to respond, it's not even in the qmail-control manpage. was it really canceled? is there an equivalent, i.e. so I won't need to break up t