Hi,
Is there a
way to turn relay a message off a server that has qmail installed? I was trying
to send a mail via Net:SMTP through the mail server (QMAIL) but it doesn't seem
to do anything. If there is a solution, could anybody give me a detailed way of
configuring this set-up? Th
what's exactly your problem ?
try telnetting the server and do a smtp conversation by hand
if it works, the problem has to searched by perl, if this doesn't work
either, tell us some details about your configuration and especially your logs
At 13:46 13.07.2001 -0700, ed lim wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28 Sep 2000, at 19:20, Alan Chung wrote:
> I am trying to setup some relaying for tcp.smtp server.
>
> Can I put domain name instead of IP address in /etc/tcp.smtp-rules?
No, unless you do some serious patching.
> And do I need to add an entry
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Petr Novotny wrote:
> On 28 Sep 2000, at 19:20, Alan Chung wrote:
>
> > I am trying to setup some relaying for tcp.smtp server.
> >
> > Can I put domain name instead of IP address in /etc/tcp.smtp-rules?
>
> No, unless you do some serious patching.
mee@host:/local/src/uc
In answer to the question, I believe not having a control/rcpthosts
file will cause qmail to act as an open relay. Alternatively, setting
the environment variable RELAYCLIENT to an empty string for the
qmail-smtpd process will have the same effect.
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Timothy L. Mayo wrote:
> Pl
Please go back and reread what was said in the FAQ. This is EXACTLY what
you need to do. You do NOT want to relay for anybody in the world. You
want to relay for YOUR users (selective relaying restricts it to YOUR
users).
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, [iso-8859-1] Johan Mjönes wrote:
> Hello, My qmail
On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 09:34:01AM +0200, Tony Wade wrote:
> I put all the relevant domain details in /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
>
> what happens is in both instances a Exchange server forwards the mail to the
> Qmail server.
>
> The Qmail server then rejects the mail saying, "Domain not in
Install ucspi-tcp (tcpserver) and don't use inetd
http://www.qmail.org has a link to complete instructions.
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, dd wrote:
>
> hi again,
>
> i'd like the users in .mydomain.com to use my machine as a relay host. so
> i did what the FAQ says, changed the smtp like in inetd.con
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 09:47:55PM -0700, Michael Anderson wrote:
> Strange question, got Qmail all up and running, and can't seem to get the
> silly thing to send mail out to the rest of the Internet. I can send mail to
> the server, send mail from one user to another, but nothing outside.
http
hi,
max wrote:
> I cant stop it from relaying. I read something in the documentation, and
it
> mentioned some variable named $RELAYCLIENT, but i have no clue where that
> variable is. Is my assumption correct, anyway? Is that var the only thing
i
> have to change to stop relaying?
put domains yo
max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 1 November 2000 at 07:06:44 -0500
> im new to qmail and i have a slight problem with it. I cant stop it
> from relaying. I read something in the documentation, and it
> mentioned some variable named $RELAYCLIENT, but i have no clue
> where that variable is. I
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> and did tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb /etc/tcp.smtp.temp <
> /etc/tcp.smtp also kill -HUP qmail-send but relaying still fails
> What could be missing here?
Are you calling tcpserver with -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb ? (From
/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run
It should be an IP address.
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Kurth Bemis wrote:
> ok well with the qmail-smtp problems outta the way
>
> i am confused about relaying rules
>
> this is my /etc/tcp.smtp file
>
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> g4.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>
> however this does not
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 02:03:21PM -0800, Rohit Gupta wrote:
> Hello all Gurus
> I wish to relay to all hosts...
> i am already authenticating users from tcpserver but is there any way that i dont
>have to specify hosts , for which i can act as a relay , in the RCPTHOSTS file but
>simpy relay fo
Hi,
Rohit Gupta wrote:
...snip...
> I wish to relay to all hosts...
...snip...
if this is not an internal only mailserver you are likely to run into big
troubles
:) alexander
"Rohit Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wish to relay to all hosts...
Soon, you will feel differently. Either you'll think better of this
before you implementit, or else you will go ahead and implement it, be
found by spammers, get 10 million bounce messages, and get added to
ORBS, the RS
> I need to provide users with the ability to send mail to anywhere. But
since
> that can make my server an open relay, i was thinking of a solution where
a
> user must receive mail before sending, thus proving that he can use the
> server for relaying.
you need of vpopmail
http://inter7.com/vpop
Rodrigo Borges Pereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I need to provide users with the ability to send mail to anywhere. But since
> that can make my server an open relay, i was thinking of a solution where a
> user must receive mail before sending, thus proving that he can use the
> server for r
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:51:19PM +0200, Roberto Marzialetti wrote:
> > I need to provide users with the ability to send mail to anywhere. But
> since
> > that can make my server an open relay, i was thinking of a solution where
> a
> > user must receive mail before sending, thus proving that he
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: quarta-feira, 16 de Maio de 2001 22:36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Relaying advice
>
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:51:19PM +0200, Roberto Marzialetti wrote:
> > > I need to provide users with the ability to send mail to anywhere. But
>
qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I recently set up a second totally basic qmail installation intented for
> sending only for a particular project. The return address for bounces and
> replies is an address on the main server.
Fine.
> Problem. I am getting a lot of bounces that from other se
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 03:37:31PM +, qmail wrote:
> A typical bounce message looks like this...
>
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mms-research3.marketingms.com.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
> addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up
Gustavo Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>But in qmail, i'm a little bit confused, as i read in Dave Sill's Life
>with Qmail,
>"If you follow the installation instructions in this document, selective
>relaying will be enabled by default. To give a client relay access, add
>an entry to
>/etc/t
Jeffrey Finkelstein wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
> What concerns me is that it would seem that anyone can relay through the
> server when it is setup that way. When I try using /etc/hosts.allow of the
> form:
>
> tcp-env: 1.2.3.: setenv = RELAYCLIENT
>
> then the system will not allow any connection
Putting the ``tcp-env: ALL'' in the /etc/hosts.allow solves the incoming mail
problem, but clients cannot send mail through the mail host since the
destination mail address is not in the rcpthosts file.
I must be missing something obvious somewhere, but I'll be darned if I see it
just yet.
-jef
Jeffrey Finkelstein wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
> Putting the ``tcp-env: ALL'' in the /etc/hosts.allow solves the incoming mail
> problem, but clients cannot send mail through the mail host since the
> destination mail address is not in the rcpthosts file.
Your'e supposed to have both lines in hosts
You need BOTH lines in /etc/hosts.allow!
tcp-env: 1.2.3.: setenv = RELAYCLIENT
tcp-env: ALL
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Jeffrey Finkelstein wrote:
> Putting the ``tcp-env: ALL'' in the /etc/hosts.allow solves the incoming mail
> problem, but clients cannot send mail through the mail host since the
Tarkan Hocaoglu wrote:
> I set up rcpthosts and tcp.smtp files in order to allow incoming and
> outgoing mails only for my domain.
>
> I use an EXTERNAL PC with a different IP address to test this
> configuration.
>
> I use this set of tests doing a telnet connection to my mailhub :
>
> 1- mai
Looks like you have the SMTP port already running in /etc/inetd
Tony Wade
-Original Message-
From: Denis Voitenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 July 1999 09:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: relaying setup
I am in a process of setting up my linux box to relay mail for clients on
On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 03:46:10AM -0400, Denis Voitenko wrote:
> I am in a process of setting up my linux box to relay mail for clients on a
> 192.168.0.X LAN. I am trying to follow the directions from
> http://www.palomine.net/qmail/selectiverelay.html and here is something that
> gives me troub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I have a qmail server set up such that it's being used as a relay (all
> incoming mail just gets dumped to whatever is in smtproutes). anyway,
> sometimes the machine that my qmail box is relaying to goes down or
> crashes, whatever. Is there a hack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have a qmail server set up such that it's being used as a relay (all incoming
> mail just gets dumped to whatever is in smtproutes). anyway, sometimes the
> machine that my qmail box is relaying to goes down or crashes, whatever. Is
> there a hack to allow qmail to
Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>If you were somehow able to route the email thru qmtp to a qmtp
>server, you can specify multiple qmtp servers. If the first connection
>is dead it tries the next line in the file.
I think you're thinking of qmQp, not qmTp. The file is
qmqpservers. See the
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 08:48:52AM -0500, Ken Jones wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I have a qmail server set up such that it's being used as a relay (all incoming
> > mail just gets dumped to whatever is in smtproutes). anyway, sometimes the
> > machine that my qmail box is relaying to
ntiles)
Subject: Re: relaying redu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I have a qmail server set up such that it's being used as a relay (all incoming
> mail just gets dumped to whatever is in smtproutes). anyway, sometimes the
> machine that my qmail box is relaying to goes down or crashes, whatever. Is
> there a hack to allow qmail to r
I wish smtproutes could take a prioritized list of destinations.
Our workstations has jam.net.uni-c.dk defined as "smarthost",
using smtproutes, which contains
:jam.net.uni-c.dk
If that host is down, my outgoing mail is deferred, and I
am not notified.
It would be nice if having
:jam.net.uni-c
On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
> I wish smtproutes could take a prioritized list of destinations.
>
> Our workstations has jam.net.uni-c.dk defined as "smarthost",
> using smtproutes, which contains
> :jam.net.uni-c.dk
>
> If that host is down, my outgoing mail is deferred, and
torben fjerdingstad wrote:
> I wish smtproutes could take a prioritized list of destinations.
[snip]
> If that host is down, my outgoing mail is deferred, and I
> am not notified.
[snip]
> What are my options? I cannot send mail out directly because
> of a firewall.
Assuming your firewall also ru
torben fjerdingstad writes:
> I wish smtproutes could take a prioritized list of destinations.
Point smtproutes at a domain name which has multiple A record. Not
exactly what you asked for, but a reasonable facsimile.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr sells
Marek Narkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have set up tcpserver to allow from 212.:
>which is the group of IPs my ISP uses.
That's not good enough. You also need to set the RELAYCLIENT
environment variable. Let's see your tcp.smtp file.
>I first tried a message to a remote host which was r
> Hi again. I have managed to get tcpserver to work with my qmail
installation and am
> now testing relaying.
> I have set up tcpserver to allow from 212.:
How? Is the line in your tcp.smtp file like the following?
212.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> I first tried a message to a remote host which was r
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 06:48:52PM +0800, Edward Castillo-Jakosalem wrote:
> Hi to all!
> I recently configured our smtp to point to another machine running
> qmail-1.03. No problem with that. Now, what I see in our log file is
> that it says 'deny' to all the hosts except the 2 ip blocks I con
Remove your last line. It is what is causing your problem.
You want to allow but without setting the RELAYCLIENT environment variable
which is the default behavior.
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Edward Castillo-Jakosalem wrote:
>
> Hi to all!
> I recently configured our smtp to point to another machin
>
> > :deny
>
> This means don't let ANY OTHER host connect. What you want as your last
> rule is ":allow". That will allow connections from all other hosts, but
> will not let them relay.
>
Yes but I already tried setting that to 'allow' and tested sending mail using
another ISP and it allo
Did you remove your /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts file? This MUST be in
place!
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Edward Castillo-Jakosalem wrote:
> >
>
> > > :deny
> >
> > This means don't let ANY OTHER host connect. What you want as your last
> > rule is ":allow". That will allow connections from all o
Yup. It's still there.
"Timothy L. Mayo" wrote:
> Did you remove your /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts file? This MUST be in
> place!
>
> On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Edward Castillo-Jakosalem wrote:
>
> > >
> >
> > > > :deny
> > >
> > > This means don't let ANY OTHER host connect. What you want as you
So now I removed that deny line in my tcp.smtp file, issued the tcprule
command, and restarted my tcpserver. Does it mean that hosts can now connect
to my server without using it as a relay?
Oh and do we still need the rcpthosts file eventhough we are running
tcpserver?
Sorry but am quite a newbie
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 09:32:07PM +0800, Edward Castillo-Jakosalem wrote:
> So now I removed that deny line in my tcp.smtp file, issued the tcprule
> command, and restarted my tcpserver. Does it mean that hosts can now connect
> to my server without using it as a relay?
Yes. Incidentally, you d
Thanks a lot Anand. You've been a great help!
Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 09:32:07PM +0800, Edward Castillo-Jakosalem wrote:
>
> > So now I removed that deny line in my tcp.smtp file, issued the tcprule
> > command, and restarted my tcpserver. Does it mean that hosts can now
Make sure that the primay IP address of the web server is in your
/etc/tcp.smtp file and then do a "qmail cdb" and "qmail restart". Basically
when your web server sends data via email Qmail doesn't like who it is
coming from. You need to identify the IP address and domain that your web
server se
Chad Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off, yes, I've read life with qmail and everything I can about
> rcpthosts. :)
>
> The error message I'm receiving is:
>
> Error sending to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (553 sorry, that domain isn't in
> my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1))
> [Tue Apr 4 17:2
Now for the obvious question, what does your /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
file look like ? Is beachassociates.com in it ? Is it a virtual server (if
so, is it in /var/qmail/control/virtualservers and NOT in
/var/qmail/control/locals) or is it a local domain ?
Matt Soffen
Web Intranet D
> Now, my problem is related to relaying . I have read "The
> qmail newbie's quide to relaying" which comes with life with
> qmail as a URL. It states that "qmail's rcpthosts file, which
> gets its name from the RCPT TO command, determines whether the
> recipient will be accepted; it will be acc
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Andy Furnell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a specific way of configuring qmail so that it will only
> act as a relay/spooling server for backup MX. (ie. when the main
> server goes down, this one has the next highest DNS MX Pref and
> holds the mail until the destinat
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:22:30AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i would like to set relaying up based almost exclusively on ip address
> ranges, with the exception of allowing relaying from one particular domain.
Define "from one particular domain." What exactly does it mean for someone to
b
At 10:22 AM 2/7/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please read life with qmail by dave sill @ http://www.lifewithqmail.org
your looking for something called tcp.smtp
~kurth
>Hi
>
>If anyone could point me in the right direction I would appreciate it. I
>would like qmail to relay for a user if he/
On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 04:21:53PM +0200, Kwasniewski Piotr wrote:
> I have Qmail installed. It properly sends and acepts mail. It is
> also supposed to do relaying for a group of users.
> In the FAQ it said, how to enable relaying for a group of
> machines, but I'd like to accomplis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7 Jul 00, at 16:21, Kwasniewski Piotr wrote:
> My local domain is domain.com. If an user tries to send mail from a
> machine with relaying enabled, qmail should check if the sender adress
> is [EMAIL PROTECTED] If it is for example [EMAIL PROTECTED
2000-07-07, at 16:21:53, Kwasniewski Piotr wrote:
> Hello!
> I have Qmail installed. It properly sends and acepts mail. It is
> also supposed to do relaying for a group of users.
> In the FAQ it said, how to enable relaying for a group of
> machines, but I'd like to accomplish so
Sylwester S. Biernacki writes:
> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
> here you define which machines you allow to be your relay clients.
No, that file lists the destination hosts and domains that qmail
accepts mail for via SMTP and QMTP. To allow certain senders to relay
though you to any destination,
On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 05:25:54AM -0400, Denis Voitenko wrote:
tcpserver is normally installed in /usr/local/bin. However, this
directory is not usually found the system startup scripts' PATH. Try
using the full pathname in /etc/rc.d/rc.local, like this:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x .
>
Chris McCarthy writes:
>
> My company has 2 qmail servers, one is a dialup, the other is online
> permanently in another office.
> When a user in the dialup office sends an email with a large attachment
> to a large number of recipients, is it possible to configure the dialup
> qmail server to s
On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 04:26:19PM +, Sam wrote:
> Chris McCarthy writes:
>
> >
> > My company has 2 qmail servers, one is a dialup, the other is online
> > permanently in another office.
> > When a user in the dialup office sends an email with a large attachment
> > to a large number of rec
Why not have the user send via an alternate account that uses the smtp
server of the main office directly that way it is only sent once. This is
very easy to do in Outlook, Outlook Express, Eudora, Netscape, etc. and it
requires virtually no effort on your part.
Cris Daniluk
MicroStrategy
>
"Adam D . McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>What about using qmtp/qmqp? Wouldn't this accomplish what he needs?
No, SMTP already has a mechanism to handle this (multiple RCPT's), and
QMTP doesn't add anything there. The "problem" is that qmail doesn't
try to minimize bandwidth by using mult
I have thought of that, the disadvantage is that it takes longer to upload.
Sending to the server on the LAN takes hardly no time, the subsequent
uploading from server to server is of course transparent to the user.
I guess I'll just leave things as they are and suffer an occasional drop in
bandwi
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:43:25 -0400 (EDT), Dave Sill wrote:
>No, SMTP already has a mechanism to handle this (multiple RCPT's), and
>QMTP doesn't add anything there. The "problem" is that qmail doesn't
>try to minimize bandwidth by using multiple RCPT's [1]. Also, I
>believe he said he's unlikely
On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 12:43:25PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
> "Adam D . McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >What about using qmtp/qmqp? Wouldn't this accomplish what he needs?
>
> No, SMTP already has a mechanism to handle this (multiple RCPT's), and
> QMTP doesn't add anything there. The
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 06:28:02PM +0200, Paulo Jan wrote:
> I've just installed Bruce Guenter's system to allow mail relaying after
> checking mail (http://em.ca/~bruceg/relay-ctrl/), and it doesn't work.
> Basically, what happens is:
>
> 1) The "relay-ctrl" file, that the program us
On Tue, 9 May 2000, James wrote:
> What if I have a client that will be using Free-i
> (http://www.freei.com/) or any of the current free Internet connections
> for his Internet connection to get and send mail? How do I allow relaying
> from that server? Is this possible without an open relay?
I'm not quite sure what you mean, but if you are asking how do you make
xinetd relay, then it is really simple. You must use the only_from option
and the env option The important one is the env option. My smtp thing
looks like this:
# default: on
service smtp
{
disable
Have U tried the rcpthosts file, that shld do the trick.
E
ksemat writes:
> Hello everyone,
> Sorry for putting this on the list if it has already been answered however
> I checked the archives and failed to get an answer to it and although I
> have read 5.4 in the FAQ it does not help me much.
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 06:32:14PM +0300, ksemat wrote:
> instructed in the FAQ however the /etc/tcp.smtp file only accepts realying
> by ip address yet I would like to do it by domain name i.e
As you have noted, it's a terrible idea but if you insist
http://www.palomine.net/qmail/relaymailfrom
ksemat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using tcpserver and I have set up qmail and done relaying as instructed
> in the FAQ however the /etc/tcp.smtp file only accepts realying by ip address
> yet I would like to do it by domain name
[...]
> I know the dangers but I really have no choice in this
> Sorry for putting this on the list if it has already been answered however
> I checked the archives and failed to get an answer to it and although I
> have read 5.4 in the FAQ it does not help me much.
> I am using tcpserver and I have set up qmail and done relaying as
> instructed in the FAQ ho
David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any reason I should ever enable relaying of messages arriving
> via qmtp? All the smtp relay cases I have are for clients submitting
> mail; currently no clients that I know of can submit via qmtp. So no
> need?
This may be jumping the gun
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This may be jumping the gun, but I imagine Bruce Guenter might just right
> a qmtp module for nullmailer...
^
Sheesh, that should have been "write", obviously.
Charles
--
---
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:13:09PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> This may be jumping the gun, but I imagine Bruce Guenter might just right
> a qmtp module for nullmailer to go alongside the existing qmqp and smtp
> modules. He's mentioned on this list once that it would not be an
> enormous eff
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Have U tried the rcpthosts file, that shld do the trick.
> E
> Systems Engineer
> Infocom Uganda Limited
> Tel:077409672 or 075409672
>
>
Well if you had looked at my question you could see that I can't possibly
put every domain in the world in m
> As you have noted, it's a terrible idea but if you insist
> http://www.palomine.net/qmail/relaymailfrom.html
>
> [ found from http://www.qmail.org/top.html ]
Thanks for this. I am going to try Aaron's suggestion of forcing pop
before smtp and inserting the roaming ip for a period if it fails
> I don't think you've considered all the choices. A POP-before-SMTP
> solution would be as effective, but much more secure. Try Bruce Guenter's
> relay-ctrl package, which you can find from a link on www.qmail.org.
As was pointed out by another poster. I guess it is because I did not know
it w
Well Then U have No option other than using pop b4 smtp :)
E
ksemat writes:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Have U tried the rcpthosts file, that shld do the trick.
> > E
> > Systems Engineer
> > Infocom Uganda Limited
> > Tel:077409672 or 075409672
> >
> >
> Well if
Actually I have some options including a patch to qmail-smtpd so that it
can relay using envelope sender addresses with tarpitting I think this
could be reasonably safe. because I can't guarantee that all my users will
pop before smtp besides outlook express has an annoying habit of sending
queue
Have you considered authenticated SMTP? That way clients would have to
verify themselves each time they sent out a message, similar to the POP
login procedure. There is a very good patch for qmail that enables the
ESMTP AUTH command, written by Krzysztof Dabrowski, available at
www.qmail.org/top
> Have you considered authenticated SMTP? That way clients would have to
I hadn't. Thanks. I will look into it as well.
Have you rebuilt the tcp.smtp.cdb file? See the cdb) entry in the qmail rc
file in Life With Qmail (links to it in www.qmail.org) for more...
/BR
Manager
InterPlanetary Solutions
http://ipsware.com/
net admin wrote:
>
> Hi;
> I am trying to setup selective relaying for a client who wants to send
> email through our Qmail server from his office LAN.
> I allowed his office IP block in my /etc/tcp.smtp file as follows
>
> xxx.yyy.zzz.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> .
> .
> .
> :allow
> This I assume t
Hi Dan,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:16:39PM -0700, net admin wrote:
> I allowed his office IP block in my /etc/tcp.smtp file as follows
> xxx.yyy.zzz.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> This I assume this will let him relay as long as he comes from the IP address
> pool above regardles of what his email addre
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 02:06:27PM +0100, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
> Things do not work quite as I expect.
>
> Say I am MX for domain inside.dk (this is not a real name).
> So, I put two lines into rcpthosts and HUP qmail-smtpd:
There's no qmail-smtpd to HUP. It is started each time a connect
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 05:14:20PM +0300, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 02:06:27PM +0100, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
>
> > Things do not work quite as I expect.
> >
> > Say I am MX for domain inside.dk (this is not a real name).
> > So, I put two lines into rcpthosts and HUP qm
- torben fjerdingstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| The problem.
| I have, too many times, seen mail.isp.dk reject mail to
| my customers domains with the following error:
|
| "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host,"
| "it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 12:52:53PM +0100, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
> DNS says (made up names):
>
> customer.dk. <--- customer's zone
> IN MX 10 mail.customer.dk. <-- customer's server
> IN MX 20 mail.isp.d
torben fjerdingstad writes:
> I have, too many times, seen mail.isp.dk reject mail to
> my customers domains with the following error:
>
> "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host,"
> "it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
> - torben fjerdingstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> | The problem.
> | I have, too many times, seen mail.isp.dk reject mail to
> | my customers domains with the following error:
> |
> | "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-prefer
> From: torben fjerdingstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 15:47:50 +0100
>
> No. In the cases I remember DNS was delegated to the customer's
> name server. I run the ISP's nameserver so I am used to check DNS.
> I could not find any error in DNS for the customer's domains.
Is it
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 09:13:56AM -0600, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > From: torben fjerdingstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 15:47:50 +0100
> >
> > No. In the cases I remember DNS was delegated to the customer's
> > name server. I run the ISP's nameserver so I am used to check D
- "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| Is it possible that these were domains in which they had just added
| the MX and the old zone data was still cached in various places in
| the DNS, so your qmail didn't have access to the latest zone yet?
But then his server would not even be aware that
On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
> I put this list into control/rcpthosts on mail.isp.dk (name not real)
> and get mail.isp.dk added as a lower precedence MX in my customer's
> zone files. That should be enough, right? Nothing more necessary.
>
> The problem.
> I have, too many ti
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 04:35:49PM +0100, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
> - "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> | Is it possible that these were domains in which they had just added
> | the MX and the old zone data was still cached in various places in
> | the DNS, so your qmail didn't have a
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
