linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread linuxpeople
Hello I have documented each step up until they fail. I just started fresh after rebooting and re-downloading the source. I am now stuck where I was previously and begging for help. I do not see what to do if the compile fails. I am not blaming qmail which is the general impression I get from

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Russ Allbery
Please don't post hundreds of lines of directory listings of the qmail source. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > /compile qmail-local.c > qmail-local.c:1: sys/types.h: No such file or directory > qmail-local.c:2: sys/stat.h: No such file or directory There's something seriously wrong with your system

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Uwe Ohse
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 01:32:16AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > qmail-local.c:1: sys/types.h: No such file or directory > qmail-local.c:2: sys/stat.h: No such file or directory /usr/include/sys/stat.h (types.h) is missing. This is an developement environment installation problem. You are po

RE: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Steve Carter
... > qmail-local.c:1: sys/types.h: No such file or directory > qmail-local.c:2: sys/stat.h: No such file or directory > make: *** [qmail-local.o] Error 1 > [root@www qmail-1.03]# > > DARN!!! > > however, > > [root@www qmail-1.03]# locate types.h > /usr/include/security/_pam_types.h > /usr/i386

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread linuxpeople
- Original Message - From: "Russ Allbery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 2:11 AM Subject: Re: linuxpeople thread > Please don't post hundreds of lines of directory listings of

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Russ Allbery
linuxpeople <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can re-install the entire machine with red hat 6.0 then upgrade every > package again, but I don't see the need its a fresh 112 meg install with > the various applications upgraded as needed to meet security issues that > have arisen as of late. My Lin

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread linuxpeople
these is that correct? **Also, please scroll down for the comments to this post, they actually worked now I have a new error. - Original Message - From: "Steve Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Qmail mailing list (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesd

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread linuxpeople
- Original Message - From: "Russ Allbery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 3:14 AM Subject: Re: linuxpeople thread > linuxpeople <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I can

RE: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Steve Carter
Unfortunately you can't. "lusers" like you and me are spoiling it for everyone. We should get new MUAs. ("mail clients") > I am using outlook express and will continue to do so > throughout this ordeal so if its ruining the "web page" > posting please tell me now so I can do it correctly.

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Peter Green
linuxpeople <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > error: failed dependencies: > kernel-headers is needed by glibc-devel-2.1.3-15 > kernel-headers >= 2.2.1 is needed by glibc-devel-2.1.3-15 > > Apparently not. > > I will install glibc-devel-2.1.3-15 and its deps right now if you think i

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread linuxpeople
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Russ Allbery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 4:37 AM Subject: Re: linuxpeople thread > > - Original Message - > From: "Russ Allbery&qu

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread linuxpeople
- Original Message - From: "Peter Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 5:13 AM Subject: Re: linuxpeople thread > linuxpeople <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > error: failed dependencies: > >

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Chris Johnson
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 06:01:26AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Reading is a lot easier then dealing with antosocial-newbie-haters that wish > they were part of the l33t that run Internet but are stuck volunteering on a > free software maill support list, so they pick on every obvious newbie

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread linuxpeople
- Original Message - From: "Chris Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 6:25 AM Subject: Re: linuxpeople thread > On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 06:01:26AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread linuxpeople
I got all the way up to: Step 7. Read INSTALL.maildir Here's how to set up qmail to use maildir for your incoming mail: % maildirmake $HOME/Maildir % echo ./Maildir/ > ~/.qmail [root@www qmail-1.03]# maildirmake $HOME/Maildir bash: maildirmake: command not found [root@www qmail-1.03]# An

RE: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Tim Hunter
nk to it from the qmail.org site. -- Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 10:01 AM To: Steve Carter; Qmail mailing list (E-mail) Subject: Re: linuxpeople thread I got all the way up to: Step 7. Read INSTALL.maildir H

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Oliver Koch
On Mit, 13 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I got all the way up to: > Step 7. > Read INSTALL.maildir > > Here's how to set up qmail to use maildir for your incoming mail: > >% maildirmake $HOME/Maildir >% echo ./Maildir/ > ~/.qmail > > [root@www qmail-1.03]# maildirmake $HOME/Maild

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Oezguer Kesim
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > [root@www qmail-1.03]# maildirmake $HOME/Maildir > bash: maildirmake: command not found > [root@www qmail-1.03]# > > Any legitimate suggestions? /var/qmail/bin/maildirmake or PATH=$PATH:/var/qmail/bin maildirmake I pre

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Jason Brooke
>% maildirmake $HOME/Maildir >% echo ./Maildir/ > ~/.qmail > > [root@www qmail-1.03]# maildirmake $HOME/Maildir > bash: maildirmake: command not found > [root@www qmail-1.03]# > > Any legitimate suggestions? It's not in your path, so specify the path to it jason

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Robin S. Socha
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000913 09:54]: > "Chris Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > You're one of the more annoying people who's posted on this list in > > a while. Most newbies manage to post their questions and get > > answers here without pissing everyone off. [...] > > Good luc

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Justin Bell
On 13 00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # I got all the way up to: # Step 7. # Read INSTALL.maildir # # Here's how to set up qmail to use maildir for your incoming mail: # #% maildirmake $HOME/Maildir #% echo ./Maildir/ > ~/.qmail # # [root@www qmail-1.03]# maildirmake $HOME/Maildir # bash:

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Stephen Bosch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > so at great distress I post these lines : > > [root@www qmail-1.03]# make setup check > /compile qmail-local.c > In file included from qmail-local.c:1: > /usr/include/sys/types.h:26: features.h: No such file or directory > /usr/include/sys/types.h:30: bits/types.h:

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer
> Yeah, right: "Nameless idiot helps ML reader to death after being flamed > by a Bastard." Film at 11. Anyone feel like buying popcorn shares? I suggest that everyone who feels that linuxpeople is stupid should ignore him NOW. Everyone who thinks there is any hope he will get his system up sho

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread David Gadoury
last laugh - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Peter Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 8:01 AM Subject: Re: linuxpeople thread > - Original Message - > From: "Peter Green"

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread David Gadoury
> > Any legitimate suggestions? yeah several, but this is a qmail list not a general-unix-help list so figure it out yourself.

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Michael T. Babcock
- Original Message - From: "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Now? Where have you been? As far as pissing people off that seems to > > be the main goal of the peole that have replied to my posts. > > Doesn't that make you wonder why? > > Yeah, right: "Nameless idiot helps ML read

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Stephen Bosch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > so at great distress I post these lines : > > > > [root@www qmail-1.03]# make setup check > > /compile qmail-local.c > > In file included from qmail-local.c:1: > > /usr/include/sys/types.h:26: features.h: No such file or

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 13 September 2000 at 04:37:19 -0700 > > - Original Message - > From: "Russ Allbery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, Se

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Peter Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 13 September 2000 at 08:13:23 -0400 > linuxpeople <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > error: failed dependencies: > > kernel-headers is needed by glibc-devel-2.1.3-15 > > kernel-headers >= 2.2.1 is needed by glibc-devel-2.1.3-15 > > >

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 13 September 2000 at 08:55:01 -0600 > Are you really sure you want the misery of running a mail server on a > 486 with only 8 Mb of RAM? I ran one on a 386 with 8 Mb of RAM that also ran web. Worked fine, except that kernel builds were a bit slow (t

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Peter Green
also sprach linuxpeople: > > Wouldn't it just be possible to: > > > > 1) do everything in the INSTALL on a ``faster'' development machine, > > 2) tar up the source tree with the binaries already built, > > 3) transfer it to the less-disk-endowed machine, > > 4) untar it, and > > 5) run make setup

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Nathan J. Mehl
In the immortal words of [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I got all the way up to: > Step 7. > Read INSTALL.maildir > > Here's how to set up qmail to use maildir for your incoming mail: > >% maildirmake $HOME/Maildir >% echo ./Maildir/ > ~/.qmail > > [root@www qmail-1.03]# maild

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Nathan J. Mehl
In the immortal words of Michael T. Babcock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Note: your posts are more noise, less signal, than any of the people you've > flamed. Most of my flames are done in private Email. Start reading some of > those Internet newbie sites again, and learn how to deal with people yo

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Russ Allbery
Frank Tegtmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I suggest that everyone who feels that linuxpeople is stupid should > ignore him NOW. Everyone who thinks there is any hope he will get his > system up should support him by private mail NOW. While in general I agree with the sentiment of your messa

Re: linuxpeople thread

2000-09-13 Thread Vincent Schonau
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 03:22:17PM -0400, Peter Green wrote: [...] >>> Finally, if you *still* had questions on the RPM install (sorry I'm harping >>> on it, but I've used it extensively, >> what the rpm? > Yes, Bruce Guenter's qmail+patches RPM. Note that the qmail RPM's that are linked to

Linuxluser thread (Was: linuxpeople thread)

2000-09-13 Thread Robin S. Socha
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000913 04:32]: > Hello I have documented each step up until they fail. Damn, you are *STUPID*. When someone tells you to post a *SHORT* and *PREGNANT* error message, why do you send > 600 lines? > /compile qmail-local.c > qmail-local.c:1: sys/types.h: No

Re: Linuxluser thread (Was: linuxpeople thread)

2000-09-13 Thread Stephen Bosch
"Robin S. Socha" wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000913 04:32]: > > Hello I have documented each step up until they fail. > > Damn, you are *STUPID*. When someone tells you to post a *SHORT* and > *PREGNANT* error message, why do you send > 600 lines? And HOT damn, you are

Re: Linuxluser thread (Was: linuxpeople thread)

2000-09-13 Thread linuxpeople
- Original Message - From: "Michael T. Babcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 8:15 AM Subject: Re: Linuxluser thread (Was: linu

Re: Linuxluser thread (Was: linuxpeople thread)

2000-09-13 Thread Robin S. Socha
* Michael T. Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000913 11:13]: > "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000913 04:32]: [quoting readjusted] > > > I have documented each step up until they fail. > > Damn, you are *STUPID*. When someone tells you to post a *SHO

Re: Linuxluser thread (Was: linuxpeople thread)

2000-09-13 Thread Michael T. Babcock
Because every other time someone posts an error message, they get told to send ALL their logs. So now, someone does, and they're told they're an idiot for not reading your mind? - Original Message - From: "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0

Re: Linuxluser thread (Was: linuxpeople thread)

2000-09-13 Thread markd
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 11:15:43AM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote: > Because every other time someone posts an error message, they get told to > send ALL their logs. So now, someone does, and they're told they're an > idiot for not reading your mind? This is boring, but to be correct, mostly pe

Re: Linuxluser thread (Was: linuxpeople thread)

2000-09-13 Thread Michael T. Babcock
How do you manage to get back to MUAs in most messages you write? How exactly am I mis-using my MUA? Hmmm? I'm not misusing my MUA. I didn't complain about how messages looked, yours, mine or others'. You're the one who's been whining. That can be verified by the archives if you have some pr

Re: Linuxluser thread (Was: linuxpeople thread)

2000-09-13 Thread Eric Cox
"Robin S. Socha" wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000913 04:32]: > > Hello I have documented each step up until they fail. > > Damn, you are *STUPID*. When someone tells you to post a *SHORT* and > *PREGNANT* error message, why do you send > 600 lines? > > > /compile qmail-l