Wait a minute now... Who said anything about straight?
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Adam McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: Netgear RP114 Router doesn't work well with Qmail POP daemon?
On
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:14:58PM +0200, Lukas Beeler wrote:
> as he already said in another posting, it's a 386, and he was mistaken..
Well, I'm sure glad we got that straightened out.
--Adam
AIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Netgear RP114 Router doesn't work well with Qmail POP daemon?
as he already said in another posting, it's a 386, and he was mistaken..
On Monday 09 July 2001 18:45, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
as he already said in another posting, it's a 386, and he was mistaken..
On Monday 09 July 2001 18:45, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
> In a message dated Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:21:35PM +0300, Mike Jackson
wrote:
> > James Stevens wrote:
> > > I had a similar problem however my resolve to it was to
uot;Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: Netgear RP114 Router doesn't work well with Qmail POP daemon?
Well if the problem is name resolutions, why not just install bind on the
machine itself (in a caching-on
In a message dated Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:21:35PM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
> James Stevens wrote:
> > I had a similar problem however my resolve to it was to take an *OLD* 286 I
> > had laying around install a fairly bare installation of Linux on it and
Am I getting senile, or is Linux 386+ on
I initially thought about it. But upon reviewing the user's report
(see the underlined part) I ruled that out. He clearly said that he
had his cable modem for a while, and before he got his Netgear RP114,
he didn't experience any symptom. That means the reverse lookup was
fine with his connecti
27;t was I did not want the load of the
> DNS service on that machine.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --JT
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Balatero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Chin Fang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Mo
James Stevens wrote:
>
> I had a similar problem however my resolve to it was to take an *OLD* 286 I
> had laying around install a fairly bare installation of Linux on it and
> installed the DNS service. Then I put that online behind my firewall and
> added it's IP for port 53 to my NAT/Firewall
ng"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Netgear RP114 Router doesn't work well with Qmail POP daemon?
I had a similar problem however my resolve to it was to take an *OLD* 286 I
had laying around install a fairly bare insta
the load of the
DNS service on that machine.
Cheers,
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "David Balatero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chin Fang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:08 AM
Subject: RE: Netgear RP114 Router does
Its quite slow with my Netgear RT314 router as well.
-- David Balatero
-Original Message-
From: Chin Fang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Netgear RP114 Router doesn't work well with Qmail POP daemon?
I recently have a
Chin Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> I then asked him to use telnet to port 110 to our POP server, and he
> still got the delay. So, I am quite sure it's most likely caused by
> the Netgear RP114, although I don't see any reason why this is so.
A common cause of this can be your POP s
Chin Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently have a user reported me the following:
>
> I recently installed a Netgear RP114 Router, to provide multiple computers
> access to the internet via a single cable modem from ATT. Since then, my
> Eudora email program encounters some sort of
I recently have a user reported me the following:
I recently installed a Netgear RP114 Router, to provide multiple computers
access to the internet via a single cable modem from ATT. Since then, my
Eudora email program encounters some sort of 30 second delay when
attempting to retrieve e
I recently have a user reported me the following:
I recently installed a Netgear RP114 Router, to provide multiple computers
access to the internet via a single cable modem from ATT. Since then, my
Eudora email program encounters some sort of 30 second delay when
attempting to retrieve e
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:34:18PM +0200, Fabio Pedrazzoli wrote:
> I know sqwebmail need vpopmail
This isn't true. I'm running sqwebmail with qmail-ldap.
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
Unix is very simple,
Fabio Pedrazzoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A customer of mine asked me for webmail. He use a qmail-based mailserver
> whit about 100 mail virtual-domains. The problem is the virtual domain
> handling.
>
> I know sqwebmail need vpopmail, but on that server virtual domains are
> handled in
Hi guys, straight to the probl.:
A customer of mine asked me for webmail.
He use a qmail-based mailserver whit about 100 mail virtual-domains.
The problem is the virtual domain handling.
I know sqwebmail need vpopmail, but on that server virtual domains are
handled in the "classic" qmail way, w
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 05:23:19PM +, Subba Rao wrote:
> I have qmail-popup and qmail-pop3d running on my system. Is it
> possible to dedicate this service to selected interfaces only?
> If it can be done, could you please point me to that URL?
man tcpserver
This is a FAQ.
--
Henning Braue
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 05:23:19PM +, Subba Rao wrote:
> I have qmail-popup and qmail-pop3d running on my system. Is it
> possible to dedicate this service to selected interfaces only?
> If it can be done, could you please point me to that URL?
Read up on tcpserver. That's the program that ac
I have qmail-popup and qmail-pop3d running on my system. Is it
possible to dedicate this service to selected interfaces only?
If it can be done, could you please point me to that URL?
Thank you in advance.
--
Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pws.prserv.net/truemax/
Qmaillist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I installed the pop before smtp authentication package, so that the users
> > > need to autheticate first before they can send mail. But the problem ist
> > > that the readlog & qmail-send die unexpectedly. Then I restart qmail and
> > > everything is fi
]
Betreff: Re: qmail POP before SMTP dies unexpected
Estephano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I installed the pop before smtp authentication package, so that the users
> need to autheticate first before they can send mail.
>
> But the problem ist that the readlog & qmail-send
Estephano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I installed the pop before smtp authentication package, so that the users
> need to autheticate first before they can send mail.
>
> But the problem ist that the readlog & qmail-send die unexpectedly. Then I
> restart qmail and everything is fine again.
Hello.
I installed the pop before smtp authentication package, so that the users
need to autheticate first before they can send mail.
But the problem ist that the readlog & qmail-send die unexpectedly. Then I
restart qmail and everything is fine again.
Anyone got a clue?
Thanks in advance
S. W
Hi,
> ac.d4a.net is being announced in the DNS as 203.164.92.195. Is that
> correct?
> I can't get a connection to port 25 on that machine -- something is
With tcpdump running and telnetting to port 25 of that address I see:
12:37:54.262380 ubr1-pos1-0.mirnd1.nsw.optushome.com.au > dog.eschle.c
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 03:07:46AM -0800, Justin Cunningham wrote:
> the domain is ac.d4a.net. I am just really confused because it only
> happened over new years eve, and the computer running qmail was not
> even touched over that period. it worked flawlessly before then
ac.d4a.net is being anno
10:58:00 +
>From: James Raftery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: qmail pop no longer works
>
>On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:43:35AM -0800, Justin Cunningham wrote:
>> the person that sends it gets those "warning: message undelivered for
>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:43:35AM -0800, Justin Cunningham wrote:
> the person that sends it gets those "warning: message undelivered for
> 4 hours" type messages
Hi,
It seems that something is blocking incoming SMTP traffic to your
mail server. The warning messages you mention should give som
Ok this is wierd. after new years eve, i can no longer receive mail that is sent to me
remotely through my qmail server. i.e i can send myself and others on my network
email, but noone can receive mail that is sent from elsewhere on the net, the mail
just does not show up, and the person that s
> I habe a problem with qmail-pop. The users Maildir exist
> and new Mail will be delivered properly.
>
> This shows the local telnetsession on pop3:
>
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> +OK
Ruprecht Helms wrote:
> -ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir
This means the User has no Mail Directory!
Maildir => /home/$USER/Maildir
The deeper Maildir Structure:
Maildir/cur
Maildir/new
Maildir/tmp
That Directories must be present and must have the working Rights to
Access!!
CU
--
--^..^---
Hi,
I habe a problem with qmail-pop. The users Maildir exist
and new Mail will be delivered properly.
This shows the local telnetsession on pop3:
mail:~ # telnet localhost pop3
Trying ::1...
telnet: connect to address ::1: Connection refused
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape
"James Shelby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So far qmail has been easy to install with the exception of the pop service.
>I have the 110 port open and it does function however it states this user
>has no $HOME/Maildir when in fact the Maildir does exist in the /home/user
>directory.
Is it really
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 09:27:40PM -0600, James Shelby wrote:
> Thanks Dale, still no luck...same error message. Here is a little more
> information that might tell someone that I have it configured wrong...
First, did you try changing your inetd.conf file as in my previous post? Did
you HUP in
that goes to the /home/johnd/Mailbox
Does any of this sound like a misconfiguration?
Thanks
James
-Original Message-
From: Dale Miracle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 9:12 PM
To: 'Chris Johnson'
Cc: James Shelby; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
'Chris Johnson' wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 08:37:17PM -0600, James Shelby wrote:
> > In the inetd.conf file I have
> >
> > pop-3 stream tcp nowait root/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
> > mail.mydomain.com /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
>
> I hardly use inetd
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 08:37:17PM -0600, James Shelby wrote:
> In the inetd.conf file I have
>
> pop-3 stream tcp nowait root/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
> mail.mydomain.com /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
I hardly use inetd for anything, so I'm no expert, but I
applications
pointing to the addresses.
James
-Original Message-
From: Chris Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 8:31 PM
To: James Shelby
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qmail pop
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 06:11:32PM -0600, James Shelby wrote:
> So far qmail
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 06:11:32PM -0600, James Shelby wrote:
> So far qmail has been easy to install with the exception of the pop service.
> I have the 110 port open and it does function however it states this user
> has no $HOME/Maildir when in fact the Maildir does exist in the /home/user
> d
Hi All,
well being the newbie on this list and new to qmail I figure I would start
off with the typical how do I question and see what kind of experts we have
on here. :)
So far qmail has been easy to install with the exception of the pop service.
I have the 110 port open and it does function ho
> Jasper Jans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> and does anyone know if there is
> pop software available that does not reply on /etc/passwd
> or /etc/shadow for password authentication but uses an other file?
>
> The reason for this is - I want to create many (10k+) email
Hi..
I was wondering - what does qmail reply on to deliver email
for user authentication (valid username etc) so you dont end
up with mails bouncing - and does anyone know if there is
pop software available that does not reply on /etc/passwd
or /etc/shadow for password authentication but uses an
MAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 2:44 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: ERR Authorization failed w/qmail-pop
>
>
>I have setup qmail+qmailadmin with all associated packages. I have set up a
>few accounts via qmailadmin and am able to send messages with
m: James Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ERR Authorization failed w/qmail-pop
I have setup qmail+qmailadmin with all associated packages. I have set up a
few accounts via qmailadmin and am able to send messages with out a problem
I have setup qmail+qmailadmin with all associated packages. I have set up a few
accounts via qmailadmin and am able to send messages with out a problem.
Now I want to use pop3 to get messages from qmail.
I have qmail-pop running as I used the example in #12 of INSTALL in vpopmail package
effan
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 08:29:04PM +0300, buqtraq list wrote:
> > > hi again
> > >
> > > Well I have installed now qmail pop-3 and vpopmail, but now I tried
> > > to read my mails via pop3 mailreader.
> > > After I logged on entered login
eke wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Try 'man qmail-pop3d' :-)
> >
> > qmail-pop3d doesn't support mbox type mailboxes.
> > It only supports Maildir
> >
> > HTH,
> > Steffan
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 08:29:04PM +0300, buqtraq lis
type mailboxes.
> It only supports Maildir
>
> HTH,
> Steffan
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 08:29:04PM +0300, buqtraq list wrote:
> > hi again
> >
> > Well I have installed now qmail pop-3 and vpopmail, but now I tried
> > to read my mails via pop3 mailread
Hi,
Try 'man qmail-pop3d' :-)
qmail-pop3d doesn't support mbox type mailboxes.
It only supports Maildir
HTH,
Steffan
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 08:29:04PM +0300, buqtraq list wrote:
> hi again
>
> Well I have installed now qmail pop-3 and vpopmail, but now I trie
hi again
Well I have installed now qmail pop-3 and vpopmail, but now I tried
to read my mails via pop3 mailreader.
After I logged on entered login/passwd. The program gave me dialog:
'The mail server responded: this user has no $HOME/Maildir.
Please enter a new password'
seems
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 08:19:13PM +0400, Mikhail Kuzminsky wrote:
[snip]
> Is there some other pop-3/imap daemons which can work
> succesfully in cooperation w/qmail ?
Sure, lots of 'm.
http://freshmeat.net/appindex/daemons/pop3.html should be helpful.
Greetz, Peter.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Pe
Dear netters,
we are using qmail 1.03 (instead of sendmail) on SGI O2.
Qmail is configured to work w/mbox format
(binmail for local delivery to /var/mail/user).
We want to install pop-3 (or imap) daemon on this
workstation. Unfortunately qmail-pop3d opereates
only w/Maildir format.
Is there
I'm using the following command to start the pop daemon:
tcpserver -v 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.drmail.com.br \
/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1 | \
/var/qmail/bin/splogger pop &But, when I try to get message via Netscape Messanger i get this:" Netscape:
Jeroen ten Berge wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
Please, keep your lines around 70 characters max, thanks.
> auto-reply and auto-forward message's I'm fucked cause I have to
> enable it on the linux-box, is there a tool for windows that would
> make life easier ?
I did this yesterday to enable configu
Hello dear readers,
my co-workers are not very bright PC users, so I can't let them play in linux cause
that would be weird for them (you know, no mouse and windows, only those weird
characters ;) ), but they can work around in outlook a bit, but anytime some-one goes
on holiday and needs to a
Hi:
I followed the virtual-accounts howtro from Jedy to the letter,
but Ie a problem.
My hostname is: perseo.dce.net.mx
I start qmail-pop from inetd a sfollows:
pop-3 stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
perseo.dce.net.mx /usr/bin/checkpoppasswd
Pavel Kankovsky wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
>
> > > 2. qmail-send is run as root?
> >
> > Yup. Well, qmail-start is run as root. Along the line it gives up
> > its rootness, becoming qmail-send, and leaving only qmail-lspawn
> > running as root.
>
> Login is run as ro
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Petr Novotny wrote:
[...] Everyone will suggest you to ditch splogger
> and use cyclog instead.
Well, cyclog is already history for some of us. :-)
History: BigBang -> syslog -> splogger -> cyclog -> multilog
Mads
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> > 2. qmail-send is run as root?
>
> Yup. Well, qmail-start is run as root. Along the line it gives up
> its rootness, becoming qmail-send, and leaving only qmail-lspawn
> running as root.
Login is run as root. It switches to my privs and execs my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Jan 00, at 11:10, Russell Nelson wrote:
> > > Maybe. Maybe not. But splogger isn't a setuid program and needn't be
> > > run as root (unlike qmail-send).
> >
> > 1. qmail-popup is a setuid program?
>
> No, howeer syslog is often used by
Pavel Kankovsky writes:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
>
> > Maybe. Maybe not. But splogger isn't a setuid program and needn't be
> > run as root (unlike qmail-send).
>
> 1. qmail-popup is a setuid program?
No, howeer syslog is often used by daemons, and some daemons run
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Maybe. Maybe not. But splogger isn't a setuid program and needn't be
> run as root (unlike qmail-send).
1. qmail-popup is a setuid program?
2. qmail-send is run as root?
--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"
Derek Callaway writes:
> What about the calls to syslog in qmail's splogger.c? Are they secure?
Maybe. Maybe not. But splogger isn't a setuid program and needn't be
run as root (unlike qmail-send).
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free soft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Jan 00, at 10:49, Derek Callaway wrote:
> > I don't recommend applying that patch. Every line of it is wrong. It
> > makes qmail-popup less secure, by inserting a call to syslog(), which
> > is a security disaster. It also sucks in the string
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> > 5. Recommendation
> >
> > Impose the 40 character limitation specified by RFC1939 into qmail.
> > Apply qmail-popup patch http://www.ktwo.ca/c/qmail-popup-patch
>
> I don't recommend applying that patch. Every line of it is wrong. It
> makes
Giles Lean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> syslogd is not quality software. There are various efforts underway to
> write replacements, including of course Dan's tools. People committed
> to syslog() style interfaces might want to look at:
> http://www.ietf.org/ietf/99nov/syslog-agenda-99nov.txt
I only supply this sample patch because there is not one from the
author. It is not designed to be in the same style of qmail code, for
instance, I included a comment.
Also, it is a great idea to impose the limitation on vpopmail aswell.
Thanks.
K2
PS. I dont believe there is a "sprintf()" i
On 24 Jan 2000 05:38:20 -0800 Russ Allbery wrote:
> That's just for starters. To be fair, current syslog on *most* Unix
> systems is now pretty solid except for occasionally losing messages. But
> among the problems I've seen or heard of in different
> implementations:
Also, depending on the
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, iv0 wrote:
> Robert Varga wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, iv0 wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I recommend upgrading to the latest version of vpopmail which fixes
> > > the exploit. Pick up the current stable version:
> >
> > So it is fixed from version 3.4.11?
> >
> > Robert
Robert Varga wrote:
>
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, iv0 wrote:
>
> >
> > I recommend upgrading to the latest version of vpopmail which fixes
> > the exploit. Pick up the current stable version:
>
> So it is fixed from version 3.4.11?
>
> Robert Varga
Yes, version 3.4.11j as of Jan 20th has the fix.
From: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:53:31 -0500 (EST)
> 5. Recommendation
>
> Impose the 40 character limitation specified by RFC1939 into qmail.
> Apply qmail-popup patch http://www.ktwo.ca/c/qmail-popup-patch
I don't recommend applying t
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, iv0 wrote:
>
> I recommend upgrading to the latest version of vpopmail which fixes
> the exploit. Pick up the current stable version:
So it is fixed from version 3.4.11?
Robert Varga
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Securing vchkpop. There is no reason to limit the username or password
> information to 40 characters, even if the RFC does say to do it.
That's not what the RFC says. The RFC says that the *client* shall not
send arguments in excess of 40 character
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Derek Callaway writes:
>> Curious, what's so insecure about syslog()?
> A version was subject to a buffer overflow attack.
That's just for starters. To be fair, current syslog on *most* Unix
systems is now pretty solid except for occasionally losing
> Keywords are three or four characters long. Each argument
> may be up to 40 characters long.
qmail-popup's accepting arbitrarily long arguments doesn't constitute
"nonconformance to the pop3 specification." A client sending more than a
40-character argument is non-conformant; qmail-popup has on
Derek Callaway writes:
> Curious, what's so insecure about syslog()?
A version was subject to a buffer overflow attack.
> > is a security disaster. It also sucks in the string library, which
> > includes the well-known security hole sprintf().
>
> Does that sprintf() introduce an overflow
Adam McKenna writes:
> In that case, what would you recommend?
Securing vchkpop. There is no reason to limit the username or
password information to 40 characters, even if the RFC does say to do
it.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free softw
I recommend upgrading to the latest version of vpopmail which fixes
the exploit. Pick up the current stable version:
http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/
vchkpw - which authenticates a user with information from qmail-pop
up was storing the information in a staticly defined buffer. There
was no
In that case, what would you recommend?
--Adam
On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 10:53:31PM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote:
> > 5. Recommendation
> >
> > Impose the 40 character limitation specified by RFC1939 into qmail.
> > Apply qmail-popup patch http://www.ktwo.ca/c/qmail-popup-patch
>
> I don't re
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> > 5. Recommendation
> >
> > Impose the 40 character limitation specified by RFC1939 into qmail.
> > Apply qmail-popup patch http://www.ktwo.ca/c/qmail-popup-patch
>
> I don't recommend applying that patch. Every line of it is wrong. It
> makes
> 5. Recommendation
>
> Impose the 40 character limitation specified by RFC1939 into qmail.
> Apply qmail-popup patch http://www.ktwo.ca/c/qmail-popup-patch
I don't recommend applying that patch. Every line of it is wrong. It
makes qmail-popup less secure, by inserting a call to syslog(),
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: remote root qmail-pop with vpopmail advisory and exploit with
patch
w00w00 Security Advisory - http://www.w00w00.org/
Title: qmail-pop3d with vpopmail/vchkpw
Platforms: Any
Discovered: 7th January, 2000
Local: Yes.
Remote:
Saw this on buqtraq, may be interesting for those running vpopmail/vchkpw
Robert S. Wojciechowski Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: what's your style? [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2000 7:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: remote root qmai
Sam wrote:
--
"Security is not a state, but a process."
There is no such thing as security- only different levels of user
capabilities.
Bernie Courtney
Z100 New York Engineering
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 9 Oct 1999, Gustavo V G C Rios wrote:
> Ano question still keep on: Is there any place to get a tutorials on
> checkpassword internals ?
checkpassword.c would probably be a very good start. It's not like
there's a lot of code there. Look yourself, and figure out how it works.
Sam wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Gustavo V G C Rios wrote:
>
> > Why qmail pop3 service is so slow?
> >
> > I have been using cucipop, and it's ast, very very fast!
> > After i decide to switch to Maildir i had to go through qmail-pop3d, and
> > now, things are not as fast as it used to be (i
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Gustavo V G C Rios wrote:
> Why qmail pop3 service is so slow?
>
> I have been using cucipop, and it's ast, very very fast!
> After i decide to switch to Maildir i had to go through qmail-pop3d, and
> now, things are not as fast as it used to be (i talk only about pop3
> serv
Why qmail pop3 service is so slow?
I have been using cucipop, and it's ast, very very fast!
After i decide to switch to Maildir i had to go through qmail-pop3d, and
now, things are not as fast as it used to be (i talk only about pop3
service).
CAn anyone here explain me what is the difference be
On 9/27/99 at 4:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joshi, Vivek) wrote:
> Q1. I read somewhere the pop3 clients don't use encrypted passwords, is
> there a way to implement increased security in this case ?
Yes, but you need to make sure the clients can handle the kind of authentication
you want to use.
Hi,
I am new to linux and have recently setup qmail on a Redhat(6.0
kernel-2.2.12) system. I followed the instructions in lwq and the system is
working fine. I use the qmail-pop server, the mail folder used is Maildir
For increased security i have commented out most of the services in
inetd.conf
92 matches
Mail list logo
