Hello all,
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 08:42:07PM +0200, S.P. Hoeke wrote:
> I'm wondering if there's a FAQ or HOW-TO with regards to qmailanalog...
> The man pages are, for me, not sufficient to get it running :-(
I had it running once, but it didn't produce the desired res
Ah, I forgot that it's not called "tai64nfrac.c" instead just
"tai64nfrac" (although it's a C program). Sorry for the confusion.
IIRC, it is described on the same line as qmailanalog on qmail.org (or
mirrors).
Ronny
On 30-Mar-2000, Jon Rust wrote:
>
At 4:54 PM -0600 3/30/00, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
>On 30-Mar-2000, Jon Rust wrote:
>> tai64nlocal will convert it into something like 2000-03-30
>> 07:56:09.195584500, but qmailanalog doesn't want that either. :-/
>> Looks like a job for perl.
>
>I use
On 30-Mar-2000, Jon Rust wrote:
> tai64nlocal will convert it into something like 2000-03-30
> 07:56:09.195584500, but qmailanalog doesn't want that either. :-/
> Looks like a job for perl.
I use tai64nfrac.c found on qmail.org.
Ronny
95 to
>>local
>
>Those would be Dan's newer TAI64 timestamps IIRC. One of his packages can
>convert the timestamps back and forth, but I can't find it at the moment.
>Newer daemontools maybe?
>
>Charles
tai64nlocal will convert it into something like 2000-
Jon Rust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is qmailanalog compatible with multilog? The first part of the
> MATCHUP doc file says:
>
>Before using qmailanalog, make sure that your qmail log contains
>microsecond timestamps: e.g.,
>
> 901
Is qmailanalog compatible with multilog? The first part of the
MATCHUP doc file says:
Before using qmailanalog, make sure that your qmail log contains
microsecond timestamps: e.g.,
901967408.113926 new msg 19287
901967408.116537 info msg 19287: bytes ...
Um, nope. I have
"S.P. Hoeke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Specifically I don't know how to "feed your log through" the awk line.
> Same goes for "feed the matchup output through any of the" scripts
You ``feed a file through'' a program when you arrange for the file to
be the input of the program. Three obviou
"S.P. Hoeke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Keep in mind i'm a newbie to qmail and OpenBSD... a lot of this stuff
>maybe self-explanatory to the more 'advanced' users.
No problem.
>Specifically I don't know how to "feed your log through" the awk line.
If your log is in a file called "foo", do:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 02:01:11PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> "S.P. Hoeke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >This is wat i DO have, but it's not sufficient :(
> >/usr/local/share/doc/qmailanalog
> >/usr/local/share/doc/qmailanalog/ACCOUNTING
> >/u
"S.P. Hoeke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is wat i DO have, but it's not sufficient :(
>/usr/local/share/doc/qmailanalog
>/usr/local/share/doc/qmailanalog/ACCOUNTING
>/usr/local/share/doc/qmailanalog/MATCHUP
In what way, specifically, is MATCHUP inadequate?
-Dave
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:51:50PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> "S.P. Hoeke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I'm wondering if there's a FAQ or HOW-TO with regards to qmailanalog...
> >The man pages are, for me, not sufficient to get it running :-(
>
"S.P. Hoeke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm wondering if there's a FAQ or HOW-TO with regards to qmailanalog...
>The man pages are, for me, not sufficient to get it running :-(
Have you looked at /usr/local/qmailanalog/doc/*?
-Dave
Hello,
I'm wondering if there's a FAQ or HOW-TO with regards to qmailanalog...
The man pages are, for me, not sufficient to get it running :-(
THNX,
Steffan
When i run matchup, it proccess the log but print:
matchup: fatal: unable to write fd 5: file descriptor not open
What it? how i can make matchup work fine again?
Tks,
Jorge Rocha
Hi all,
I'm a newbie to Qmail and OpenBSD and i was wondering if there's a FAQ or something
about QmailAnaLog cause the documentation provided is, unfortunately, not enough for a
newbie like me :-(
Thanks,
Steffan
a lot again :-)
I'm going to forward this message to the mailing list too so maybe it can
help more people, or the author perform his "documentation".
- Original Message -
From: Dewald Strauss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'Andrés' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: We
Actually, I would recommend you to start using the latest daemontools
as soon as you can. The multilog is better than cyclog. If you have
sometime, I recommend you to review the web pages at
http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html
The documentation is pretty good.
I have also found the tai64 format i
0/20
> > (I wish that D. J. Bernstein, the programmer of qmailanalog, reads this
> > mailing list so he improves the documentation)
>
> Well, compared to his other documentation, qmail-analog's is a little
> murky. But most of what I wrote came from qmailanalog-0.70/doc
Andrés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (I wish that D. J. Bernstein, the programmer of qmailanalog, reads this
> mailing list so he improves the documentation)
I'm betting from the state of qmailanalog that it's going to become
obsolete with the next release of qmail. I w
Andrés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I wish that D. J. Bernstein, the programmer of qmailanalog, reads this
> mailing list so he improves the documentation)
Well, compared to his other documentation, qmail-analog's is a little
murky. But most of what I wrote came from qma
> Ok, the following example assumes that the various binaries from
> qmailanalog (0.70) are in your path; this isn't the default, but
> it makes the command lines shorter.
>
> If your qmail logs go through splogger and then to syslog (Dan's default
> at the point q
Andrés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so for a newbie like me, who has the logs inside /var/log/qmail and
> qmailanalog inside /usr/local/qmailanalog, what should I execute to see the
> different addresses that I have received mails for? Or another example with
> an explanati
Andrés,
Once upon a time I wrote a web interface script for qmailanalog 0.60.
With a little modification you may get it to work with .70.
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1999/09/msg01297.html
-jim
OK, so for a newbie like me, who has the logs inside /var/log/qmail and
qmailanalog inside /usr/local/qmailanalog, what should I execute to see the
different addresses that I have received mails for? Or another example with
an explanation of what it does.
Just to start understanding please, an
Andrés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have installed qmailanalog 0.70 but I don't know how can I use it.
>
> Isn't there a howto or a mini guide to explain me how do I have to use the
> binaries?
Yes, in the .../doc/ directory under the install directory
Hello.
I have installed qmailanalog 0.70 but I don't know how can I use it.
Isn't there a howto or a mini guide to explain me how do I have to use the
binaries?
Thanks.
when i try to run zoverall
awk: cmd. line:61: (FILENAME=- FNR=11385) fatal:
division by zero attempted
any idea why ?
Ismal Hisham DarusAsst. Manager, System
SupportJohn Hancock Life Insurance (Malaysia)
Berhad.
Hi all,
I am trying to debug problems we have had delivering to specific domains.
I would like to use qmailanalog to tell me the following things, if
possible:
1) When multiple MX records exist for a domain, what percentage of
deliveries are successful (and what percentage of
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 10:02:41AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm running a relativelly large qmail system: 2 servers, each one outputs 1Mb
> of cyclog logs each 5 minutes...
>
> I would like to use qmailanalog to have some statistics (mainly total
> d
Hi!
I'm running a relativelly large qmail system: 2 servers, each one outputs 1Mb
of cyclog logs each 5 minutes...
I would like to use qmailanalog to have some statistics (mainly total
deliveries and histogram of deliveries per time interval), but saving the
logs for a full day would take
Hi,
How do you use qmailanalog to determine the amount of message sent to a
particular domain??
Thanks
Tonino
Jeremy Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I now have time stamps, so really all I need to do is call tai64nfrac
> through matchup, right?
Works For Me (tm). :)
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Actually I just figured it out. I was called multilog wrong. I'm using
Bruce G's rpm's and he does some stuff around his $logger varible in his
init scripts that altered the command sequence a little, basically cause
his scripts were built for his logger qfilelog.
I now have time stamps, so re
Jeremy Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, this part I don't understand. I'm using the t option, yet in my
> long I see no timestamp at all. Tmp is just a sample output from
> multilog.
What does your multilog command line look like? Order of actions is
significant.
--
Russ Allbery ([E
Ok, this part I don't understand. I'm using the t option, yet in my long
I see no timestamp at all. Tmp is just a sample output from multilog.
Are you saying that tai64n should be used at logging? Perhaps you could
give me an example that would better clarify this for me.
Thanks
-jeremy
> S
Jeremy Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>cat tmp | tai64n | ./tai64n2time | /usr/local/qmailanalog/bin/matchup |
As Russ Allbery pointed out, you should be timestamping the log
entries at the time they occur. But I couldn't let the egregious use
of "cat" go by...
Jeremy Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I'm using multilog and qmailanalog. I did some searching on the mail
> list and found some scripts that do the hex conversion, etc, but I'm
> seeing somewhat strange results anyway. All my time signatures change
> each
Frederik Lindberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What do you do with fd5 (man matchup)?
if [ -s qlog.deferred ] ; then
cat qlog.deferred "$1" | tai64nfrac | matchup > qlog 5> qlog.deferred
else
tai64nfrac < "$1" | matchup > qlog 5> qlog.deferred
fi
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
What do you do with fd5 (man matchup)?
-- Fred
So I'm using multilog and qmailanalog. I did some searching on the mail
list and found some scripts that do the hex conversion, etc, but I'm
seeing somewhat strange results anyway. All my time signatures change
each time I run the logs through the setup of scripts and qmailanalog e
qmailanalog wants seconds and fractional seconds (since start of epoch, I
suppose, although I don't think it actually matters since I believe all of
its calculations are relative). Dan, were you planning on releasing a new
version of qmailanalog sometime at or after qmail 2.0? Is the lo
"Jay" == Jay Soffian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jay> I've attached a patch for daemontools-0.61 which creates tai64nepoch,
Jay> something I hacked from tai64nlocal. I happen to rotate my logs
Oops, forgot to attach the patch. Attached.
j.
--
Jay Soffian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 13:14:27 -0600, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
>Like Jay said, one would probably want to use the output of file
>descriptor 5 as well if one desires to see the analysis of pending
>messages and deliveries.
The info (pending messages) is required by matchup to match the final
delivery
On 04-Jan-2000, Jay Soffian wrote:
> Ronny> cat /var/log/qmail/* | matchup > $QMAILLOG 5>/dev/null
>
> You really shouldn't be throwing away the output from fd5. It's there
> for a reason.
[...excellent script snipped...]
Sorry. I forgot to mention that I only want to see what's already
don
"Ronny" == Ronny Haryanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ronny> I use this script to send me a log analysis nightly (via crontab).
Ronny> Add the z* commands as you like before ")| qmail-inject".
Ronny> #!/bin/sh
Ronny> PATH=/usr/local/qmailan
"Ari Arantes Filho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to use qmailanalog without successfull.
>
>I've read MATCHUP and all documentation in /usr/local/qmailanalog/doc
>but I'm still lost.
>
>Could you send me some layout ou
On 03-Jan-2000, Ari Arantes Filho wrote:
> I'm trying to use qmailanalog without successfull.
> I've read MATCHUP and all documentation in /usr/local/qmailanalog/doc
> but I'm still lost.
> Could you send me some layout output and input for the zoverall and
Hi,
I'm trying to use qmailanalog without successfull.
I've read MATCHUP and all documentation in /usr/local/qmailanalog/doc
but I'm still lost.
Could you send me some layout output and input for the zoverall and
others tools?
I've tried using splogger a
Here's a quick hack:
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
while (<>) {
if (my($s,$t,$rest)=/^\@.(\w{15})(\w{8})(.*)/) {
$s = hex($s);
$t = hex($t); $t =~ s/500$//;
$_ = "$s.$t$rest\n";
}
} continue {
print;
}
Hi,
>
> just a quickie: does qmailanalog handle the timestamps from the new
> daemontools package?
--
See complete headers for more info
Hi,
just a quickie: does qmailanalog handle the timestamps from the new
daemontools package?
Franky
Just to add..
> >qmail-1.03, qmailanalog-0.70
> >
> >I'm truing to make two quieries for a user:
> >
> >1. Who the user sends mail to (and how many)?
> >2. Who the user receives mail from (and how many)?
> >
> >So, I do the folloing with m
I am just curious how a few of the listee's are using qmailanalog to
generate reports. If you care to share your methods, I can make a summary
for the list.
Thanks.
Warning: egregious use of "cat" ahead.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>qmail-1.03, qmailanalog-0.70
>
>I'm truing to make two quieries for a user:
>
>1. Who the user sends mail to (and how many)?
>2. Who the user receives mail from (and how many)?
>
Hello,
qmail-1.03, qmailanalog-0.70
I'm truing to make two quieries for a user:
1. Who the user sends mail to (and how many)?
2. Who the user receives mail from (and how many)?
So, I do the folloing with my processed "mail.log":
cat mail.log | xsender [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
qmail-1.03, qmailanalog-0.70
I'm truing to make two quieries for a user:
1. Who the user sends mail to (and how many)?
2. Who the user receives mail from (and how many)?
So, I do the folloing with my processed "mail.log":
cat mail.log | xsender [EMAIL PROTECTED] | zrecipien
This was, in fact, answered. Perhaps not authoritatively, but answered
nonetheless:
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1999/09/msg01403.html
...Troy
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Dwayne Jacques Fontenot wrote:
> what's the deal with qmailanalog? I see several questions
what's the deal with qmailanalog? I see several questions over the last
few months with not a single response. so I don't have my hopes up.
new daemontools produces hex timestamp
current qmailanalog does not seem to grok it
does nobody use it? why has this not been
Is there a source of good documentation for qmailanalog? As near as I can
tell, it's just trial and error to figure out what type of output each
script will produce.
And, barring that, any suggestions on a useful cron setup to produce daily
reports?
Ben
--
The phrasing, style
dmail.
What I am curious about is whether there is a qmailanalog equivalent for
sendmail? I have setup cron jobs on this users machine to generate
extrememly useful stats and reports daily for the customer and will
definitely miss not having this with sendmail.
I know that this isn't the idea
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
> B. Engineer writes:
> > Hello:
> >I am running qmailanalog0.70.
> > Any ideas
> Yup. Read the documentation for matchup.
Sorry!
I did read the doc/MATCHUP carefully but it looks like I should have read
the man page. It talks about opening des
B. Engineer writes:
> Hello:
> I am running qmailanalog0.70.
> Any ideas
Yup. Read the documentation for matchup.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Government schools are so
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268
Hello:
I am running qmailanalog0.70.
It dies with the error
bin/matchup qoo
matchup: fatal: unable to write fd 5: file descriptor not open
It dies at the same size everytime
rw-r--r-- 1 root other36934041 Oct 6 16:13 qoo
I know I have enough space on the system and everythin
Hi !
Is it possible that qmailanalog calculates how much traffic was
done by a specified user oer specified domain ?
I need to count the MBs for *@mydomain.net.
After using grep and so on i have a list if *@*.domain.net and the
traffic,
but it would take sooo long to calculate evrythign by
Running: qmail 1.03, qmailanalog 0.70
I'd like to find all senders for a recipient:
First I did:
cat /var/adm/maillog | awk '{$1="";$2="";$3="";$4="";$5="";print}' |
matchup >maillog1 5>maillog1.blah
T
Since daemontools now produces hexadecimal TAI64N labels and the
qmailanalog programs want decimal TAI64N labels, they need to be
converted somewhere. Are there any patches to matchup that does that
already?
/Sebastian
Running qmail 1.03 with daemontools and ucspi-tcp. So far so good everything
is working like clock work. The only place I am lacking is the statistics of
how my mail is being processed. I have qmailanalog installed and have looked
at the output of some of the combinations I tried. The only thing
==>> TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>14:02FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==>> TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>I downloaded someone's perl script which advertised this functionality,
>but it just gave me raw maillog data as output. And qmailanalog won't
>give an output
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==>> TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I downloaded someone's perl script which advertised this functionality,
but it just gave me raw maillog data as output. And qmailanalog won't
give an output like I'm needing (at least I can't figureout how to get
somet
Hello,
qmailanalog will give you lots of usefull information, but it seems
geared toward providing bulk sender / recipient related stats. Is there
a way to get it to provide per msg sender and recipient information:
perhaps something like this:
10:01[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==>>
Brandon Dudley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Is it normal, when using the "zuids" script in qmailanalog, to see an
>abnormal ammount of messages comming from user qmaild?
No, an abnormal amount of anything is, by definition, not normal.
>mess bytes sbytes rbyt
Is it normal, when using the "zuids" script in qmailanalog, to see an abnormal
ammount of messages comming from user qmaild?
mess bytes sbytes rbytes recips tries xdelay uid
105 287318 307020 307020 107107 2.140147 16
7327832783278
Hello Qmailers,
I currently use qmailanalog in conjunction with some zscripts. Works
fine, but was wondering if it is possible to get sender and recipient on
a per msg basis. Perhaps something like this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]==>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]==>>>
Hi list
Does anyone disagree that -judging by the stats shown below- there's currently no
reason to worry about an overloaded qmail system? I think ddelay looks good and
average concurrency too, but then I have no comparison
Total delivery attempts: 5998
success: 5649
failure: 56
def
Hi list
Would anyone agree that -judging by the stats shown below- there's currently no reason
to worry about an overloaded qmail system? I think ddelay looks good and average
concurrency too, but then I have no comparison
Total delivery attempts: 5998
success: 5649
failure: 56
defer
Hmm, I just thought it interesting to see these two together:
+ "Henrik Holmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| My qmailanalog programs don't work :(
|
| They just hang and do nothing at all, what can be wrong??
+ Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| Dave S
"Henrik Holmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My qmailanalog programs don't work :(
>
>They just hang and do nothing at all, what can be wrong??
Lots of things, but I'm not going to guess.
-Dave
On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 11:07:28AM -0700, Henrik Holmberg wrote:
> My qmailanalog programs don't work :(
>
> They just hang and do nothing at all, what can be wrong??
Did you read the documentation, or did you just try running the programs to see
what happens?
If the latter, then
My qmailanalog programs don't work :(
They just hang and do nothing at all, what can be wrong??
/Henrik
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Hi,
First pardon me if my questions are wrong or stupid. We have been using
Qmail
for a few months now. Overall we are very happy with Qmail. Just
recently I installed
the qmailanalog to analyze qmail logs. Our average concurrency is around
10 from zoverall and it has been in the range of (3
H,
I am endeavouring to use qmailanalog to provide an answer to the following
question.
How much mail traffic is the domain xyz.com.au generating through a mail
server- both inbound and outbound.
If anyone has a readily available qmailanalog syntax to achieve this I would
greatly appreciate
Before answering the thread - I've got an qmailanalog question myself.
What is considered good, bad and normal for the zoverall statistics?
At 18:25 1999-01-12 -0500, "Adam D. McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There isn't much documentation available on qm
There isn't much documentation available on qmailanalog. Does anyone have
any stock scripts available that they could send me which would allow me to
analyze my logs quickly and easily? I really don't feel like spending three
hours on this..
--Adam
101 - 184 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
