On Nov 4, 2006, at 12:48, Tom Smith wrote:
Now don't get me wrong, qmail is also a great product. But qpsmtpd
being tied to it in such a way limits its use.
There isn't anything in core qpsmtpd that's tied to qmail.
I think qpsmtpd would be much more versatile if it was a completely
On Oct 24, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Peter Eisch wrote:
When the plugin was changed to use the qpsmtp transaction temp
file, this
broke the tmp_dir option. The patch below fixes this bug []
[ ... http://beta.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/5681 ...]
Hi Peter,
I don't understand how the
Hi everyone,
Looking over some of Peters patches reminded me just how much better
the current 0.3x svn must be than 0.32.
Are there any bug-fix patches we must apply before releasing 0.33?
I'd like to get it out soon-ish. It's been +6 months since the last
release and I like us to have
On Oct 31, 2006, at 6:38 PM, John Peacock wrote:
The issue is that this plugin requires a patch to the core
to actually implement the skip part, which might be fine, but there
might also
be a more elegant way to handle this that I can't see right now.
I'm not sure what it would look like;
On Oct 30, 2006, at 14:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Creating TCP socket 0.0.0.0:25 Permission denied when Qpsmtpd-
forkserver
started in port 25.
No service was using port 25. It started in port 2525 successfully.
You have to run tcpserver as root to bind to port 2525.
One neat way (on
On Oct 25, 2006, at 13:00, Peter Eisch wrote:
[malformed patch]
I can't see what the failure was.
I couldn't figure it out either; but I had trouble applying your
syslog and spamassassin patch too... :-/
--
http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/
On Oct 24, 2006, at 13:33, Peter Eisch wrote:
This adds the extensibility to customize the prepended signature in
the
Subject via the config. It also includes the ability to include
the score
in the signature as well as include a space in the signature. The
issue of
the space comes
On Oct 16, 2006, at 3:05 AM, Nick Leverton wrote:
if it's coded close enough to qpsmtpd stylee for me to update the
wiki -
A few quick comments,
- use use POSIX qw();
- I'd prefix the configuration variables with config_ or some
such to make it clear what they are (or see below)
-
On Oct 12, 2006, at 12:30, John Peacock wrote:
which would perform more or less the same action, i.e. it will see
if that $cmd is in the allowed listing of commands for that $self,
plus confirm that it is actually implemented. I would be
overloading the UNIVERSAL::can behavior, in order
On Oct 6, 2006, at 16:09, James Turnbull wrote:
The order is essentially meaningless though isn't it? The associated
judgement is unenforceable because Spamhaus isn't under the
jurisdiction
of US law - it's a UK entity. If Linhardt wants to stop them he is
going to have to file the same
On Oct 6, 2006, at 15:39, Ed McLain wrote:
What client are you trying to use?
Straight telnet
How do you speak SSL then? :-) That's a little like programming
with cat /dev/sda1.
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 30, 2006, at 6:31 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
Just wondering what the plans were for the pollserver - will the
unstable branch be merged into the 0.3x branch (or vice versa)?
Last we talked about it we were leaning towards moving the
On Sep 22, 2006, at 11:15, John Peacock wrote:
Any ideas how I can trigger this bug?
No, but it's great that you are trying. :-)
I noticed (curiously) that my small spamtrap doesn't have *any*
debris. It is not running SA, virus checking and is using the
Maildir queue plugin.
Hmn,
On Sep 18, 2006, at 11:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am wondering if someone else has similar hardware, what kind of
a userbase they are supporting with it. Similarly, if someone is
supporting about 10,000 users, what hardware they are using.
What kind of users?Some users
On Sep 12, 2006, at 22:54, David Muir Sharnoff wrote:
I think the isa_plugin() stuff is for when you want your plugin to
inherit from another class in addition to the default Qpsmtpd::Plugin.
No, it's to inherit from another plugin.
What I'm looking for is a way to take the spam filtering
On Sep 13, 2006, at 14:14, Brad Zobrist wrote:
I don't understand what is causing this to error out and reset the
connection.
Is it possible the client drops the connection before qpsmtpd sends
the banner?
- ask
--
http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/
On Sep 12, 2006, at 13:44, David Muir Sharnoff wrote:
I'm writing a plugin that needs fairly high-level control and idealy
would use the results from other plugins. Are there hooks for
qpsmtpd plugins to have plugins?
Yup, look at the very bottom of README.plugins. It's not exactly
On Sep 6, 2006, at 2:55, Mike Williams wrote:
config_dir attempts to get the config from $name/config, $name
being based on
$0, but $0 (the process name) is changed in qpsmtpd-prefork for
prettyness.
It should just store the name somewhere else before messing with $0.
The pretty names
On Sep 6, 2006, at 5:16, Mike Williams wrote:
I wouldn't really call v6 support a driver, it is more core
functionality,
The use of IO::Socket::INET(6) is prefork and forkserver specific
(hence the check in Qpsmtpd::Constants is too).
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ -
On Sep 6, 2006, at 9:10, Matt Sergeant wrote:
It should just store the name somewhere else before messing with $0.
The pretty names are useful for debugging with ps axw when you see
a hundred qpsmtpd processes running.
No arguement there, pretty is pretty :)
Attached patch does save $0
On Sep 4, 2006, at 10:04, Mike Williams wrote:
Could we call the other relayclients file something else than
relayclients2?
(Or just not use two files...)
- ask
--
http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/
On Aug 30, 2006, at 4:59, Mike Williams wrote:
Hmm, test cases are quite hard...
The test suite should support for example testing running the
check_relay will work.
On Aug 22, 2006, at 13:56, Mike Williams wrote:
The patch is against branches/0.3x.
I put it in SVN, thanks!
Next time (or for a follow-up patch) a few new test cases to test it
would be good. :-)
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/
On Aug 18, 2006, at 19:35, Eric Gerlach wrote:
Thanks for the tip. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work with
the milter plugin. Oh well, got it working anyways :)
I don't think the milter plugin is widely used, so it could
definitely benefit from more testing and polishing. Patches
On Jul 20, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Write your own logging plugin that ignores logging for that IP.
A very simple one will use the inheritance / wrapper stuff to just
check the IP and then return or call the real plugin as appropriate.
- ask
--
On Jul 8, 2006, at 10:55, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
I didn't quite dare to test it on my production system, though... :-)
FWIW, I did now, and I think it did do the trick! :-) I hope you the
right guy will consider it for inclusion in the SA plugin.
I committed your change to the 0.3x branch,
Hi everyone,
Some time ago there was discussion about contributors distributing
plugins on CPAN.I made a change so that should be possible. I
didn't do more than the most basic testing, so I didn't commit it.
Feedback welcome.
The patch below should apply to the latest code from
On Jun 22, 2006, at 12:17, Robert Millan wrote:
New patch. This time using $self-qp-respond to avoid modifying
the core.
Taking advantage of this, I also implemented code 251, just for
completeness
(when ~/.forward exists, it'll return 251. Otherwise 551).
Hi Robert,
Nice job on
On Jun 20, 2006, at 14:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and the recipient is not on the local server, the mail should be
relayed. Now the
question is how to relay the mail? Is there a plugin/method in
qpsmtpd can
do this?
You want to look at the queue/ plugins. You can either queue to a
On Jun 18, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
Can you rewrite this to be a plugin?
Yes. But are you sure it's necessary to split it? Given that
nothing happens
unless users create ~/.preforward files, I'd say it's quite harmless.
Just to explain the policy:
The trouble is that
On Jun 7, 2006, at 12:19, Charlie Brady wrote:
I'd guess that I'm not the only one here who doesn't know what a
launchd plist is.
launchd is the init / process 1 on Mac OS X 10.4. A plist is a OS
X / Cocoa configuration format.
The continue the brief digression: launchd is actually
On May 18, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Max Clark wrote:
Hi all,
What is the default timeout for new smtpd connections to qpsmtpd (i.e.
if the remote server doesn't do anything within x second)? How can I
lower this value?
The default is 1200 seconds.
Put a lower number of seconds in
On May 2, 2006, at 17:04, David Sparks wrote:
The transaction object you get in hook_connect, ie:
sub hook_connect {
my ($self, $transaction) = @_;
what is it used/good for?
Probably not anything. :-) (Or as you point out, it's not good for
long).
Any values put in the notes
On May 1, 2006, at 1:32 PM, John Peacock wrote:
I've been toying with the Mail::DomainKeys and Mail::DKIM modules
and they both want to have all of the data lines, which is going to
get wasteful (performance-wise) really fast. Would it be
reasonable to create a new data_lines hook which
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:11 AM, John Wang wrote:
It's about 3 times faster than the qpsmtpd-forkserver that
ships with qpsmtpd.
Has anything significant changed with Apache::Qpsmtpd or forkserver
since
then? Was that test valid? According to Matt's 15 Sep 2005 O'Reilly
article,
qpsmtpd is
On Apr 1, 2006, at 2:38 PM, John Wang wrote:
Is there still a Danga based high performance version, has this been
merged into the trunk, or has something else happened?
Hi John,
The Danga version is indeed in the trunk now.
The 0.3x releases are from the 0.3x branch[1].
The danga version
On Mar 23, 2006, at 5:14 AM, john habermann wrote:
I can't seem to get the require_resolvable_fromhost to work. I have
enabled it in the plugins and it appears in the logs see below, but if
I send an email with a sender address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] the
message is accepted and delivered.
On Mar 23, 2006, at 18:08, Devin Carraway wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:33:36PM +1100, john habermann wrote:
plugin in now works fine. I will submit a bug report to the debian
package as it would be good to mention this in the comments for that
plugin.
Please do.
The configuration
On Mar 22, 2006, at 10:56 AM, John Peacock wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Is it really worth this much trouble just to accommodate a
replacement mailer that causes this problem in the first place?
Yes, because this has been longstanding need for completely
different reasons.
I work for a
On Mar 16, 2006, at 10:38 PM, Hanno Hecker (via RT) wrote:
I'd like to see a patch that makes a better API for reading the
command and the command parameters. The default can still be having
it space separated and provided in @_, but the hacks in mail() and
rcpt() to read the rest aren't
On Mar 15, 2006, at 5:21 PM, Robin Bowes wrote:
Ok, attached is a patch that adds an additional parameter (clamd_conf)
to the clamav plugin.
It is used as follows:
virus/clamav clamscan_path=/usr/bin/clamdscan
clamd_conf=/etc/clamd.d/qpsmtpd.conf action=reject max_size=1048576
I may even
On Mar 13, 2006, at 10:40, Joe Schaefer wrote:
The only other novel thing we do in the ASF is run the earlytalker
plugin in the data hook instead of connection. This allows us
to run it with a much higher delay, because dnsbl and friends knock
out most of our spammers quickly (thus reducing
On Mar 8, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Robert Spier wrote:
Maybe it should be configurable? We could have a plugin_path
file in config/ ?
+1.
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/
On Mar 9, 2006, at 12:46 AM, Fred Moyer wrote:
Do'h! I dug around the code but couldn't find that feature,
An update to the wiki would be in order if you have a minute.
Anyway, it was easy enough to put together, not to mention a bit of
fun.
That's the whole point, isn't it? :-)
-
On Jan 26, 2006, at 21:55, Peter Eisch wrote:
On 1/26/06 10:42 PM, Robert Spier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure there is a module that
someone has written that abstracts this all away.
Sorry for the text inline, I'm somewhat encumbered at the moment:
#!/usr/bin/perl
=head1 NAME
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Johannes russek wrote:
it happens from time to time time today that i get an error while
accessing
your viewcvs at svn.perl.org:
Robert moved the svn server to another box some days ago and the new
box is having some trouble with mod_python. Until it's
On Feb 25, 2006, at 8:37 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
I couldn't find docs for $connection-relay_client, so I added them
and a few more methods in Qpsmtpd::Connection.
Thanks, committed.
- ask
--
http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/
On Feb 27, 2006, at 6:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[.]
That's what I expected. So, is there a way to implement qpsmtpd on
port 465, accepting a straight SSL/TLS connection?
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/4545
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd;max=4566
Thanks everyone! I love how we get more and more contributors for
each release.
http://smtpd.develooper.com/get.html
http://smtpd.develooper.com/files/qpsmtpd-0.32.tar.gz
- ask
0.32 - 2006/02/26
Add logging/file plugin for simple logging to a file (Devin
Carraway
On Feb 23, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Robin Bowes wrote:
[using plugin inheritance]
The only thing I haven't worked out is how to handle any optional
commandline arguments to the original queue plugin (which may just
be a
matter of calling the original plugins init() sub with the
appropriate @_).
On Feb 24, 2006, at 1:45 AM, John Peacock wrote:
However, it would be cleaner if we had _pre and _post hooks for
each distinct
stage in the SMTP conversation. It would go along with the
standard rhetorical
motif:
1) I'm going to do 'X';
2) I'm doing 'X';
3) I just did 'X'.
I like that!
On Feb 24, 2006, at 2:42 AM, Robin Bowes wrote:
As an aside, isn't great to be able to easily modify the code like
this?
Can you imagine trying to patch qmail-smtpd to do this? Kudos.
I made the first qmail-smtpd in perl port because it seemed like
more fun than patching qmail-smtpd to
On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:00 PM, Johan Almqvist wrote:
Hi all
I've been putting some work into the wiki recently,
Woah, it's starting to look really good. Thanks to you and everyone
else who has contributed so far!
http://wiki.qpsmtpd.org/
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ -
On Feb 21, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 16:47, Charlie Brady wrote:
[...] If we wanted to use sendmail, we'd use
sendmail. We don't want to talk about it on this list.
Sorry, most lists aren't so hostile to the mention of things
invented elsewhere.
I'm sorry
On Feb 19, 2006, at 4:57 PM, Robin Bowes wrote:
1. Is this normal? i.e. is it correct that this is getting called
three
times?
Johan explained this well.
2. If it is normal, how to I detect the final time it is called as I
only want to log the accepted mail details once? i.e. what
On Feb 18, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Robin Bowes wrote:
[...]
1. Use some separator character other than comma that can be
guaranteed
not to occur in any of the list items
2. Quote each item, if necessary.
[...]
Is it OK to add a dependency on Text::CSV_XS ?
I dislike tab delimited output as
On Feb 17, 2006, at 9:43 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Wouldn't it at some point be simpler to run sendmail as the
front end since it already knows how to do this stuff?
It depends.
I run qmail-smtpd (with TLS and AUTH patches) on the client relays,
but if I had a user database integrated with
On Feb 8, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Charlie Brady wrote:
OK, so looks like DENYSOFT_DISCONNECT would be more appropriate -
and just as effective.
+1.
Almost by definition then the client isn't being conferment if it is
using a HELO host that's in badhelo, so I'm not sure we should care
too
On Feb 5, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Michael Holzt wrote:
Comments?
Great. :-)
I've added a link from http://smtpd.develooper.com/ (aka http://
qpsmtpd.org/ thanks to you).
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/
On Feb 5, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Charlie Brady wrote:
I wish to have different configurations for different connecting
clients. And I'd like to have finer grained control than just
whether they are permitted to relay or not. I've roughed out a
plugin for doing that, and I'd appreciate some
On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:13 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
You'd see the same if the process died - e.g. segfault, or killed
by OOM condition. You are sure that the remote MTA timed out?
I still think that anonymous files are the right spool to use,
precisely for these conditions.
The original
On Jan 26, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Robert Spier wrote:
I'm pretty sure 0.28 is fine.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ host -t mx perl.org
perl.org mail is handled by 5 mx.develooper.com.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ telnet mx.develooper.com 25
[...]
220 la.mx.develooper.com ESMTP qpsmtpd 0.28 ready; send us your
On Jan 25, 2006, at 6:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@400043d8342f1d7e6c34 Can't load '/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.5/x86_64-
linux-thread-multi/auto/Socket/Socket.so' for module Socket: /usr/
lib64/perl5/5.8.5/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Socket/Socket.so:
failed to map segment from shared
On Jan 24, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Gordon Rowell wrote:
- License statement - either as per qpsmtpd or as per Perl or
similar open license
No, it really should be MIT licensed (as per qpsmtpd) to go in the
distribution.
There are a few exceptions (only your plugins at a cursory glance),
but
On Jan 24, 2006, at 8:09 PM, Peter Eisch wrote:
Hi Peter,
Does stuff like this actually work? My submissions would just sit
there
without even getting a thumbs up/down vote, review or even [...]
Warnock's dilemma! :-)
Maybe things are different now?
I hope so!
If you send the patch
On Jan 24, 2006, at 9:02 PM, Gordon Rowell wrote:
I don't have an issue with my qpsmtpd plugins being changed to state:
[...]
This software is free software and may be distributed under the same
terms as qpsmtpd itself.
Done (r603); thank you.
Though as a distro maintainer, we do have a
On Jan 23, 2006, at 10:27 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
I'd love to hear what other people are doing for related problems,
and patches or suggestions are of course welcome.
For years one of my TODOs have been to implement the user
information plugin API I have in my head.
The essence of it is
On Jan 18, 2006, at 12:30 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
Hi Ulrich,
Thanks for contributing your plugin; it or something like it would
make a good addition I think. (Like many other modules posted to the
list for that matter :-) ...).
I didn't know how likely those where to collide so I
On Jan 13, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
Once I get it working ok, I'd be happy to submit it. Would it be best
to email it to the list, to a maintainer? Or check it in someplace?
Best email it to our bug tracker at bugs-qpsmtpd at perl dot org.
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ -
On Jan 18, 2006, at 1:26 PM, Johan Almqvist wrote:
All the big mail servers (sendmail, qmail, exim, postfix, exchange)
will add message IDs to all outgoing messages.
This is getting really off-topic, but qmail doesn't.
qmail-inject and thus the qmail /usr/bin/sendmail replacement does,
On Jan 15, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
One thing that would make this nicer would be if the server knew
what IP
addresses it is listening on. Unfortunately, this information is not
passed from the daemon-running script into the main
We really could use a small How-To / Tutorial on the different
qpsmtpd environments and how to start them.
:-)
--
http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/
On Jan 11, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Mark Powell wrote:
Sorry not been keeping up with this list. Wasn't there some
version of qpsmtpd that did all the pre-forking stuff itself?
Yes, try qpsmtpd-forkserver from 0.31.1.
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/
On Jan 9, 2006, at 6:50 PM, Robin Bowes wrote:
my $validrcptto_file = '/var/qpsmtpd/0.31.1/config/
validrcptto.cdb';
Something like
my $validrcptto = $self-config('validrcptto', 'map');
should set validrcptto to a tied hash accessing your cdb file.
(yeah, the map parameter
On Dec 16, 2005, at 7:58 AM, Juerd wrote:
For aforementioned reasons, I'd like this to be configurable. I agree
that DENYSOFT may be a better default.
Make a patch! :-)
--
http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/
On Nov 28, 2005, at 15:45 , Robin Bowes wrote:
[...]
How would I change this to use PPerl?
Is it worth me trying the high_perf branch?
Try qpsmtpd-forkserver instead of running under tcpserver.
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/
John Peacock wrote:
[...]
3) Keeping all files related to a single plugin in a dedicated
directory would make it easier to have a layout like this:
unsupported/
[...]
1) It does seem a little heavy to me too.
2) If it's a good idea, why isn't it a good idea for the regular
plugins?
On Nov 22, 2005, at 4:29 , Robin Bowes wrote:
I'm seeing the following errors from the spamassassin plugin:
@400043830dae2c91c464 Use of uninitialized value in substitution
(s///) at ./plugins/spamassassin line 188, SPAMD line 4.
When you figure out what it was then a patch to make a
Get it's while it's fresh! Changelog below.
http://smtpd.develooper.com/get.html
http://svn.develooper.com/qpsmtpd/tags/0.31
There are no changes from Mondays rc3 (I just renamed the .tar.gz and
the SVN tag).
- ask
0.31 - 2005/11/16
STARTTLS support (see plugins/tls)
On Nov 15, 2005, at 18:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded the latest SVN by doing:
svn co http://svn.perl.org/qpsmtpd/trunk qpsmtpd-dev
The latest production release is 0.31 (just released!)
You can move your subversion checkout to it with
svn switch
On Nov 3, 2005, at 16:34 , Gordon Rowell wrote:
As done in check_goodrcptto
I'm not sure I understand the use case?
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/
On Nov 2, 2005, at 10:52 , John Peacock wrote:
I assigned the copyright to Peter, since he started it, but I
wonder if we want/need to get better about being consistent.
Should we assign our own copyrights as we add stuff or should we
sign over the copyright to Ask for everything? Does
On Oct 25, 2005, at 14:55 , Matt Sergeant wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_smtpd/trunk/
It's actually turned out fairly interesting looking.
We transcribe a C smtpd to perl, add some apache httpd tasting bits
and hack on it for a few years.
Now they transcribe the perl
On Oct 25, 2005, at 15:04 , Bob Dodds wrote:
[...]
If you need to take some recipients out of
$transaction-recipients before qmail-queue, how
do you do that?
You can modify the list and set it again with $transactions-
recipients([EMAIL PROTECTED]);
There was talk about adding a
On Oct 25, 2005, at 21:19 , Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
You should look at the plugin inheritance system Robert made. See
the bottom of README.plugins; look for plugin_isa.
eh, make that isa_plugin.
Also:
http://xrl.us/h69s (Link to groups.google.com)
--
http://askask.com/ - http
On Sep 21, 2005, at 10:50 PM, Gordon Rowell wrote:
So, I guess the TODO needs to be done. And if we're not doing this
for 0.31, we should mention (a form of) the workaround in the
release notes.
Seems important enough to get in 0.31. (And it justifies me not
having put it out yet ;-) )
On Aug 25, 2005, at 8:44, Les Mikesell wrote:
I realize that qpsmtpd has its own way of doing the same things, but
would it be possible and has anyone considered adding a milter
interface
to qpsmtpd that could work with existing milters that were
designed to
work with sendmail?
Did you
On Aug 18, 2005, at 4:14 PM, Gavin Carr wrote:
when I wrote a plugin that did something like this. It's in the
old CVS
archive in the Attic if you're interested in looking (can't remember
what I called it, but it's the only plugin we ever attic'd).
The old viewcvs doesn't work anymore,
On Jul 19, 2005, at 14:19, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Any objections?
Go for it.
- ask
On Jul 12, 2005, at 15:53, Jim Winstead wrote:
is there a reason that the rhsbl plugin checks the host given in HELO?
Not a good reason, which is why we took it out in 0.30. It had
sneaked in there with another patch earlier I think. :-)
- ask
On Jul 8, 2005, at 7:52 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
The date line was missing but my mail server added one, so I
didn't notice.
Maybe that's something qpsmtpd should do too :-)
Why? qpsmtpd is an MTA (a partial one). Providing a Date header is
not mail transport. If the MUA doesn't provide
How about we wait another couple of days to see if Roberts patches
need some tweaks before branching for 0.31 (and starting the
high_perf merge). Or Matt, do you have a few days free right now in
particular to hack on it?
- ask
--
http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/
On Jul 6, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
We already did... But more importantly it's almost identical to the
code I checked in so that when we removed SIGCHLD stuff we would
still call REAPER every now and then. So the code fits in perfectly.
Frankly I'm much happier with not
On Jul 6, 2005, at 2:55 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Is the non-sig-handlers change not going into 0.30 then?
For 0.30 I just used the rc2 tag from last week.
Basically as soon as 0.30 is tagged and shipped I'm going to start
merging high_perf in.
Woah. Fun. Did you get all the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 3, 2005, at 1:23 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
RFC 2821 says we should return 421, if we disconnect, not 450 or 451.
I'm pretty sure I made it 45[01] because some SMTP servers (at the
time) wouldn't treat anything else as a temporary
On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Gordon Rowell wrote:
Whee. Very cool. :-)
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/
On Jun 8, 2005, at 11:03, Robert Spier wrote:
But - David's message got me thinking - it is probably time to factor
out the config reading code from being a huge
if/elsif/elsif/elsif/elsif tree into being classful. Then people
could easily have add-on config plugins.
What do you want to
On May 25, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Bob wrote:
How many want \n conversion to crlf in queueing to lmtp?
If so, why?
If the LMTP standard uses CRLF you don't have much of a choice...
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/
On May 18, 2005, at 9:20 PM, Keith Ivey wrote:
John Peacock wrote:
Though a couple of self-inflicted Denial of Service attacks on my
mail servers, I've discovered that qpsmtpd doesn't implement any
mailing loop detection internally. Now that I have fixed my
misconfiguration (alias domains
On May 10, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
Some of these reasons may not make sense from a technical standpoint.
But I know qpsmtpd, I'm comfortable with it, and I have enough
going on
that built in TLS support is something that sounds very appealing
to me.
FWIW I'd like to see it built-in
201 - 300 of 395 matches
Mail list logo
