I've tried the Selle Anatomica Titanico saddle which is great but I felt
like it hammocked me too much... almost to the point where it was "too
broken in".
I went back to the B17 and I definitely plan on trying the Aspin on my next
build.
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 11:55:33 PM UTC-5
I've enjoyed many a B17 Champion Special, and a few not, and only a few B17
standards.
NOTE: I'm six foot tall, 165lbs, with a 13cm sit bone width. I run a few
times a week and do a couple of 25 mile rides each week, and shorter rides
for errands, etc. Long way of saying I'm not real wide and
For me, bounce is the operative word. Over bigger bumps the Flyer will
bounce enough to launch my butt off of the saddle. That's what happens
when you have springs with no damping. Kind of useless off-pavement IMO,
but it does add some comfort on reasonably paved roads. I put mine into
I did not think my springs compressed so had someone follow to watch
...turns out they do, noticeably.
Eric
220 lbs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
The springs* do* compress. I can feel them do so on small and large bumps
alike, at different levels of travel depending on the roughness of the
road. Saddle will bounce more on the bigger bumps. I pedal in the 80's
cadence range. The saddle bounces along like you are in a limo. But not too
I forgot an aside, worthy of another thread. Thus:
Am I alone in finding 50 mm, at least for 700C wheels, a sweet spot for
pavement and loose dirt? The F Freds measure 51 mm with my electronic
caliper, and while I do notice that 51 mm at 17/20 does not float as well,
nor roll as cush, as 15/18
Nice looking ride -- that's pretty much how I'd set up a bike for road use.
The Matthews' bar is about even with saddle. And yet you find the springs
do help. I'll have to try another Flyer, some day.
Yesterday's ride on the Matthews, a bit over 25 miles, covered at least 22
miles on dirt, say
I'm set up in kops on my Bleriot . You can see the the seatpost and the way the
saddle set up on it here: https://www.flickr.com/gp/70237737@N00/TnUUnm
KOPS on Sam: https://www.flickr.com/gp/70237737@N00/TnUUnm
Always perfect bounce from day one.
I wonder why they don't bounce for some people?
Anecdotally, my stoker noticed an improvement in comfort with a sprung flyer
over a non-sprung but well broken in B-17.
It's hard to say how measurable the suspension is but when you forget to
mention or don't see a bump in time and the stoker says "that wasn't bad", it's
worth having.
Ray
Patrick Moore wrote:
I couldn't get any suspension (that I noticed) from the Flyer I owned. Is there
a secret to setting it up? I do recall that, because of the short rails, I had
to buy a new seatpost with a lot of setback (Thompson, perhaps?). Could this
have been the reason that springs
I couldn't get any suspension (that I noticed) from the Flyer I owned. Is
there a secret to setting it up? I do recall that, because of the short
rails, I had to buy a new seatpost with a lot of setback (Thompson,
perhaps?). Could this have been the reason that springs weren't compressing?
On
They even have an imperial flyer now!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group,
My Atlantis is set up with Noodle Bars and a Flyer. Works for me.
On Friday, October 21, 2016 at 8:15:51 PM UTC-5, René wrote:
>
> This might seem like a dumb question, but I've only seen sprung saddles,
> such as the B-17 Flyer or the B-67 on upright bikes like the Cheviot, and
> in fact I
I weigh 175. Both of my B-17 Flyers have always bounced just perfectly for me
on my Bleriot and Sam and Rambouillet with drop bar 1.3cm below saddle height.
Perfect also sitting bolt upright for me with Albatross bars! Turns your bike
into a limousine! I ride centuries and the saddle is
The springs don't give much at all and I will say that I'm a fair amount
heavier than Patrick. It just smooths out the road/trail a tad to make all
day riding just a bit more comfortable.
One thing I will warn you about is that the flyer squeaks a lot. I'm
accustomed to it, but I imagine
Thanks! I may give it a try.
On Friday, October 21, 2016, Patrick Moore wrote:
> I tried a Flyer on an all-rounded mountain bike, with drop bar. I think
> that the bar -- 46 cm Noodle on 10 cm D Drop stem -- was even with saddle.
> The Flyer was no worse for me than the B
My Atlantis has a Flyer on it and I like the saddle quite a bit. I had a
drop bar on it, until I injured my hand. After that, I changed to a
moustache bar to take the weight off my injured hand, but plan to go back
now that I am mostly healed.
-Matt
--
You received this message because you
Michael, If you're willing to venture beyond Brooks, I highly recommend
Rivet Saddles. They have the cutout and are the best feeling saddle I've
ever ridden, though my range of experience is fairly small (B-17, B-68,
Rivet). Their widest saddle is sized like the B-17, but looks narrower in
the
As a recent b17 hoarder, I can tell you there are tons of folks that
have them in the closet. We must be filled with the attitude of
someday well have a bike for them. I think we should keep a sticky
post just to sell/swap b17 saddles in various colors and sizes.
On Jun 29, 3:56 pm, Bruce
New Green B17 special available
$120 shipped CUSA paypal prefered
On Jun 30, 12:38 pm, Minh mgiangs...@gmail.com wrote:
As a recent b17 hoarder, I can tell you there are tons of folks that
have them in the closet. We must be filled with the attitude of
someday well have a bike for them. I
OK... time out... WHO HAS A HONEY B17 for sale, and what is the
price... please?
Thanks,
BB
On Jun 29, 1:16 am, Adam oceanm...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry eflayer. I have a honey flying in from the midwest, didn't see
your offer until too late. I do like those local exchanges.
Best,
Adam
On
me. b17, honey, black rails, small rivets, used but no issues.
$75 shipped.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/DXkNwJcY8w8J.
To post
i am in berkeley and have a honey in perfect condition.
eddie.fla...@att.net
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/xpvPnOLau7IJ.
To post
: [RBW] Re: B17
i am in berkeley and have a honey in perfect condition.
eddie.fla...@att.netmailto:eddie.fla...@att.net
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw
: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 1:53 PM
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: [RBW] Re: B17
i am in berkeley and have a honey in perfect condition.
eddie.fla...@att.netmailto:eddie.fla...@att.net
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
RBW Owners Bunch
. Or at least envy.
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com [mailto:
rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of eflayer
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 1:53 PM
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: [RBW] Re: B17
i am in berkeley and have
i do have a brooks b17 for sale here in berkeley. honey colored one.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/eyeyvUeNprEJ.
To post to this
Sorry eflayer. I have a honey flying in from the midwest, didn't see
your offer until too late. I do like those local exchanges.
Best,
Adam
On Jun 28, 5:37 pm, eflayer eddie.fla...@att.net wrote:
i do have a brooks b17 for sale here in berkeley. honey colored one.
--
You received this
I tried an aged B-67 and had to take it back to my LBS. Too soft.
Might work for a light rider, but it felt like a saggy, broken down
saddle under my heavy weight.
Totally agree with Grant on the Colt. I had one from my LBS. Tried
to ride it for a few hundred miles. Never could get it
Actually I had a pre-softened Pro, and it was if anything pre-worn-out.
However, right now it's in the hands of a bud and Bob, who said it
disappeared under him.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote:
On Sep 17, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Steve Palincsar wrote:
On
I think I've seen some long-used Swallows, and they seem to need their
tension screws tightened way down after a while. I'm guessing this is a
result of tension being distributed over less leather, increasing stretch.
I had a VO model 6, which stretched out quite a bit from the get-go.
I don't
On Sep 18, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Ken Freeman wrote:
I keep thinking Brooks saddles are best on frames with a 72 or 73
degree seat tube, which would allow at least this rider to use
setback v straight seatposts to get my butt position right. For
me, 74 and 75 frames need either an extreme
It's nice to know that the most comfortable Brooks saddle may very
well be the least expensive. Then again, I've never ridden a Swift or
B17 Titanium... but I'm OK with that..
Peace,
BB
On Sep 17, 11:37 am, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote:
On Sep 17, 2010, at 8:06 AM, JoelMatthews
...@gmail.com
To: RBW Owners Bunch rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 3:42 PM
Subject: [RBW] Re: B17 vs Team Pro... any direct comparison wisdom?
It's nice to know that the most comfortable Brooks saddle may very
well be the least expensive. Then again, I've never ridden
I measured the B17 and the Swift, and they're the same clamping area (60mm)
and same amount from rear to front of the clamping area (~130mm). They
seem pretty similar in that respect:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cyclotourist/
I don't know if they are different in their front-center
The Colt is already available. Initial impressions I have heard are
that the saddle is very hard and not terribly comfortable. Apparently
it is meant to be a race type saddle for the heavier rider.
On Sep 16, 10:37 pm, Chris Halasz chal...@gmail.com wrote:
In another month or two, these
I'm looking forward to a select B17. If it's simply a thicker stiffer B17
Special that'd be beautiful (unless they cost $300 or something; that'd be
ridiculous).
Yours,
Thomas Lynn Skean
On Sep 17, 2010, at 8:06 AM, JoelMatthews joelmatth...@mac.com wrote:
The Colt is already available.
On Sep 17, 2010, at 8:06 AM, JoelMatthews wrote:
The Colt is already available. Initial impressions I have heard are
that the saddle is very hard and not terribly comfortable. Apparently
it is meant to be a race type saddle for the heavier rider.
I have one of the old Colts that I bout 10
Colt and cutaway saddles in general
The flaps that get cut off are part of the saddle's structure. Without
the flaps, the saddle sags sooner. The Swallow deals with it by
riveting the two sides together underneath, but I've never seen a well-
ridden Swallow (mostly they go on Show Bikes, not Go
For those who think Brooks has been going soft..
(I love the headline)
New Brooks saddles even harder - Vans saddle
Read more:
http://www.roadcyclinguk.com/gear-news/new-brooks-saddles-even-harder/5484-4.html#ixzz0zoNx5cjM
Swiss select Organic cowhide for your Brooks, perfect, almost as
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 11:14 -0700, Scott G. wrote:
For those who think Brooks has been going soft..
(I love the headline)
New Brooks saddles even harder - Vans saddle
Read more:
http://www.roadcyclinguk.com/gear-news/new-brooks-saddles-even-harder/5484-4.html#ixzz0zoNx5cjM
Swiss
On Sep 17, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Steve Palincsar wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 11:14 -0700, Scott G. wrote:
For those who think Brooks has been going soft..
(I love the headline)
New Brooks saddles even harder - Vans saddle
Read more: http://www.roadcyclinguk.com/gear-news/new-brooks-
Subject: [RBW] Re: B17 vs Team Pro... any direct comparison wisdom?
I'm surprised to see the comments to the effect that the Pro is
flatter than the B17. I have a couple of each and find them all to
have that distinct hammock shape. The key differences, as far as I
can tell, are that the Pro
In another month or two, these beauties will be available from Brooks:
http://bikereviews.com/2010/06/new-products-from-brooks-saddles/
- Chris
Tucson, AZ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to
.
-- Rene
-Original Message-
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Noel
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 8:20 PM
To: RBW Owners Bunch
Subject: [RBW] Re: B17 vs Team Pro... any direct comparison wisdom?
I'm surprised
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 16:37 -0700, Earl Grey wrote:
I had a b17, b17 special, and a team pro. Replaced the team pro with
another b17s. Comfort difference was slight, and I believe mostly due
to lack of break-in due to thicker leather, but the pro didn't have
saddle bag loops. Looks like some
I bought a new Brooks Team Pro nine months ago for the RB-1 and it
didn't have loops. The Viva loops work just fine on it:
http://flic.kr/p/7GTbYE/.
-nathan
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Steve Palincsar palin...@his.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 16:37 -0700, Earl Grey wrote:
I had a b17,
Thomas,
I have the Team Pro on a Gios, a B-17Ti on a Serrotta and another
B-17Ti on my touring rig. I used to ride the B-17 standard(steel
rails) and still have a B-17N on my Holdswoth which will be going to
the bench soon as it doesn't feel quite as nice.
Here's my take.
Team pro is very nice
] On Behalf Of Noel
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 8:20 PM
To: RBW Owners Bunch
Subject: [RBW] Re: B17 vs Team Pro... any direct comparison wisdom?
I'm surprised to see the comments to the effect that the Pro is
flatter than the B17. I have a couple of each and find them all to
have
My original post must have been rejected by the moderator, so I'll
respectfully try again.
A key difference in my opinion is the 3 holes in the top of the B17,
which don't exist on the Swift, Team, etc. I am convinced this makes
a difference in the overall comfort. In fact, I LOVE the assorted
On Sep 11, 5:39 pm, Thomas Lynn Skean thomaslynnsk...@comcast.net
wrote:
Hi!
snip I decided to simply
use a B17 to begin with. I like it fine. But I wonder if a Team Pro
would be even better.
Thomas,
I like the B17s better than the old Team Pro's for longer rides.
YMMV. See if you can
I actually prefer the B17-N or any of the narrower Brooks saddles.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, LF fie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 11, 5:39 pm, Thomas Lynn Skean thomaslynnsk...@comcast.net
wrote:
Hi!
snip I decided to simply
use a B17 to begin with. I like it fine. But I wonder if
with handlebar which make you more upright riding, I like the
aged special model B68.
-- Rene
-Original Message-
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Noel
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 8:20 PM
To: RBW Owners Bunch
Subject: [RBW] Re
From Wallbike, on Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wallblog/sets/72157624333065377/with/4777148941/
- Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To
FWIW, I took a couple quick pix of my B17 and Swift:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cyclotourist/ Other than narrower, you can
(kinda') see the similar shape.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Chris Halasz chal...@gmail.com wrote:
From Wallbike, on Flickr:
Thanks, all. I think what I'm hearing leads me to believe the shape of
the Team Pro is the biggest risk for me; in fact, big enough not to
experiment right now. On today's 20+ mile ride, my B17 felt great.
Maybe better than on my last rude. But I'm losing interest in trying
the Team Pro.
Thanks
When I first started drinking the koolaid a couple of years ago, I
started with a B17. Although it was much better than the Terry Fly it
replaced, (on my then fast bike with handlebars below seat,) I started
to have chafing on my inner thighs. I thought a narrower saddle would
fix that, and I am
bowed in that its front and/or back is/are higher than the middle?
I'd so, does either point up more than the other?
I may actually *like* it, for example, if the nose is turned up some,
whether or not the tail is. However, if the tail is up and the nose
not so much, I wouldn't Luke that.
I
David's right regarding the shape.
For me, a Pro is good only if the h'bars are below the saddle. Even,
get a B17. Wy up there Albatrossess, get the sprung B66/67.
Esteban
San Diego, California
On Sep 11, 3:48 pm, Thomas Lynn Skean thomaslynnsk...@comcast.net
wrote:
bowed in that its
Bowed across the back, from side to side. You can kinda' see it
herehttp://www.wallbike.com/TeamPro.html.
Front to back is pretty flat, with the tail up a touch. B17 are like that,
too.
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Thomas Lynn Skean
thomaslynnsk...@comcast.net wrote:
bowed in that its
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 16:47, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote:
Bowed across the back, from side to side. You can kinda' see it here.
Front to back is pretty flat, with the tail up a touch. B17 are like that,
too.
I've been pretty happy on Pro-shaped saddles, although I have a
I'm surprised to see the comments to the effect that the Pro is
flatter than the B17. I have a couple of each and find them all to
have that distinct hammock shape. The key differences, as far as I
can tell, are that the Pro is a narrower at the back and is made of
thicker leather. (I have one Pro
62 matches
Mail list logo