On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 2:56:12 PM UTC-5, TyngTech wrote:
>
> If I remember correctly, Maryland had the champion fleet. Sound familiar?
>
I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't remember that. Daisy ... Daisy ...
give me
your answer do ...
--
--
You are currently subscribed to the "R/
The Forbin Project! Good movie and one of my favorite book series. In the
second book we find an Earth at piece being run by the AI created by the
old US and Soviet computers. For a non-violent entertainment, the AI
converts the old human Naval warships into remote controlled fleets for
remo
Yes, indeed. The good ole days when all we had to worry about was
cooperation between two U.S. and Soviet computers intent on destroying
the world with nuclear weapons. Nowadays, there are over 1 billion
(that's with a 'b') personal computers in use around the world (not to
mention smart phon
When referring to 1970 you must consider Mr Forbin's, Project Colossus.
LOL.
On Monday, November 17, 2014 9:30:18 PM UTC-5, Frank Pittelli wrote:
>
> Skynet? That's like a dial-up modem network from the late 70's compared
> to the Tri-Pact Battlefield Management Network scheduled to become
Actually, we see a random "glitch out" every battle, but it's not the
electronics, it's the humanoid operating the electronics ;-)
The Tri-Pact Battlefield Management System (TP-BMS) will eliminate all
such problems ... and we do mean "eliminate"!
On 11/18/2014 7:52 AM, isaac goldman wrote:
^^Great, itll be just like FIRST robotics; first we will loiter around for
15 minutes while an IT guru does something so we can connect. And every
fourth battle someone will randomly glitch out and the battle will be
ordered replayed. I can hardly wait. Can we also ban all 2.4Ghz gear? That
digital
Skynet? That's like a dial-up modem network from the late 70's compared
to the Tri-Pact Battlefield Management Network scheduled to become
"self-aware" sometime in 2015.
On 11/17/2014 7:39 PM, Mike Lyons wrote:
I'm invoking the Skynet clause of our friendship agreement.
--
--
You are curren
I'm invoking the Skynet clause of our friendship agreement.
On Monday, November 17, 2014 1:43:31 PM UTC-5, Frank Pittelli wrote:
>
> ...
Based on those studies, we should remove all humans from the equation
> and just let the tanks battle each other.
...
--
--
You are currently subscribed
True Story: Before the Internet existed, a company called Tandem
Computers was started by some database exports on the West Coast for the
purpose of developing and selling fault-tolerant computer systems to
support non-stop database applications. One of the pioneers of such
work was Dr. Jim G
Then we need to solve the correct problem.
I propose a remote-controlled device be attached to each operator
with the capability to remove said operator from the control process.
For testing purposes the phasers should be set to "Stun".
On Monday, November 17, 2014 12:36:57 PM UTC-5, Frank Pitte
For the record, I must note that the "out of control" examples cited by
both Mr. Tyng and Rocket Man were both operator malfunctions. In both
cases, the RC systems were working as designed :-)
To my knowledge, in 10+ years of battling, we've never had a situation
where the tank was running ac
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch
All excellent points. At our current "mobilization level", a hobby
standardized kill system is a moot point anyway. Besides, the Cromwell's
remote kill system has already been tested and validated. I just have to make
sure Marty's
All excellent points. At our current "mobilization level", a hobby
standardized kill system is a moot point anyway. Besides, the Cromwell's
remote kill system has already been tested and validated. I just have to
make sure Marty's van is parked at the correct spot when something goes
wrong!
Way back in the stone age, my doctoral thesis was on the design of
fault-tolerant electronics. A lot has changed in the 25+ years, but
reliability theory hasn't changed much since Roman times when the
historian Juvenal coined the phrase "Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?"
(i.e., But who will
Some remotes Like the Spectrum remotes have full channel failsafe. This means
that at low battery voltage or loss of radio signal they will go to the
failsafe position on all channels. This could be used to kill the tank in these
situations. They also make an add on failsafe to control 1 channel
Gee guys, I hope that the NHTSA (national hobby tank safety administration)
Czar is not a lurker on this site. Otherwise we might have speed limits
imposed if you keep up this type of chatter. LOL.
On Friday, November 7, 2014 2:15:59 PM UTC-5, lo...@fieldofarmortanks.com
wrote:
>
> Let alone ca
Let alone catch up with your monster at full speed? I run marathon, and 7 mph
is a healthy speed in cross country!
--
--
You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubsc
17 matches
Mail list logo
