Jaime,
I tried to follow your advice and replace the insert key with Ctrl + i
A strange bug happens (is it REBOL or my machine?):
The Ctrl + i combination returns the tab key code ( #^- ) :
So the new version (http://alain.goye.free.fr/rebol/NoteReb.r) still uses
the same keys but it's easy to
Hi Alain,
have you thought about adding import / export for KeyNote
http://www.tranglos.com/free/index.html ?
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Arie van Wingerden
http://home.zonnet.nl/rebolution/
- Original Message -
From: Alain Goyé [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
[REBOL] [REBOL.org] Recent changes
This is an automatic email from REBOL.org, the REBOL Script Library to notify you of
recent changes to the Library.
===changes===
topic-tags.r
--change: new script
--title: Topic Tags
--owners: christian
--author: Christian Ensel
--purpose: Makes
On Fri, 14 May 2004 10:55:01 -0600, Gregg Irwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just recently Sunanda posted his message about tagging the ML index at
REBOL.org. In the short time since, the tag team (Peter Wood,
Christian Ensel, and Sunanda -- did I miss anyone?) have pushed the
number of tagged
Hi Robert,
Hi, I think this is a tremendous work and I'm thinking if your resources
shouldn't be used for other things. Some time ago I posted a request about
Bayes filters etc. IMO it should be possible to use those 1200 taged
messages as the base to train a bayes filter and than
Hi, I found:
f: func [aa /local x /a aa] []
help f
USAGE:
F
DESCRIPTION:
aa
F is a function value.
g: func [aa /a aa /local x] []
help g
USAGE:
G /a aa
DESCRIPTION:
aa
G is a function value.
REFINEMENTS:
/a
aa -- (Type: any)
Is there really
Hello Anton,
Friday, May 14, 2004, 3:02:42 PM, you wrote:
AR That's great Oldes!
AR Fast response and auto-expanding too. :)
AR Anton.
But will have to improve it as well to get better info about domains
(not just about domain providers)
And a core version as well of course...
--
Best
Hello Maxim,
Friday, May 7, 2004, 7:28:04 PM, you wrote:
MOA one word:
MOA AWESOME!
thanks, check it now - large earth maps used as well
--
Best regards,
rebOldes -[ http://oldes.multimedia.cz/ ]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Roland,
Tuesday, May 11, 2004, 11:06:00 AM, you wrote:
RH http://www.errru.net/rebol/fun/rdm.r
it's really nice:)
Best regards,
rebOldes -[ http://oldes.multimedia.cz/ ]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the
Hi Ladislav,
On Saturday, May 15, 2004, 3:08:40 PM, you wrote:
LM Hi, I found:
f: func [aa /local x /a aa] []
help f
LM USAGE:
LM F
LM DESCRIPTION:
LM aa
LM F is a function value.
g: func [aa /a aa /local x] []
help g
LM USAGE:
LM G /a aa
LM DESCRIPTION:
LM aa
You mean, you think refinements, even if specified after /local,
should still become the function's refinements ?
Anton.
Hi, I found:
f: func [aa /local x /a aa] []
help f
USAGE:
F
DESCRIPTION:
aa
F is a function value.
g: func [aa /a aa /local x] []
help g
Hi Alain,
AG I tried to follow your advice and replace the insert key with Ctrl + i
AG A strange bug happens (is it REBOL or my machine?):
AG The Ctrl + i combination returns the tab key code ( #^- ) :
It's REBOL. You need to use events, where you can see if the ctrl key
is pressed, to
Ladislav et al
You mean, you think refinements, even if specified after /local,
should still become the function's refinements ?
LM I think they do.
Wow. I didn't know that. My gut reaction is to agree with Gabriele
about what standard style we should use but, if this is legal, it
means HELP
Gregg Irwin napsal(a):
Ladislav et al
You mean, you think refinements, even if specified after /local,
should still become the function's refinements ?
LM I think they do.
Wow. I didn't know that. My gut reaction is to agree with Gabriele
about what standard style we should use
Hi, everyone
Many computers calculate their time as the number of milliseconds since January 1,
1970. How do I get that number out of rebol's date! or time!?
HY
Better hurry, loads of them pass by while I'm sitting here.
Prætera censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
--
To unsubscribe from this
Hi Gregg,
On Saturday, May 15, 2004, 6:52:46 PM, you wrote:
GI Wow. I didn't know that. My gut reaction is to agree with Gabriele
GI about what standard style we should use but, if this is legal, it
GI means HELP isn't interpreting things the same way the interpreter
GI does, which should be
Hi Hallvard,
HY Many computers calculate their time as the number of milliseconds
HY since January 1, 1970. How do I get that number out of rebol's
HY date! or time!?
1000 * to decimal! difference now/precise 01-jan-1970
== 1084647682996
-- Gregg
--
To unsubscribe
Hi Gabriele,
GS The interpreter has never been doing things in any particular way.
GS That is, /LOCAL is just a refinement, like /ALL would, or /WITH,
GS etc. Carl just decided, as a convention, to use the refinement
GS named /LOCAL to define local words; so HELP is just following this
GS
- Use the rebol plugin to provide interactive shell with a sandbox.
- File reading and writing could be to a virtual, temporary sandbox file in ram.
- Enhanced by web-based Easy-Vid implementation. Code examples use the same virtual
i/o when needed.
I've been out of the Rebol loop, so won't be
Brilliant. Thanks, Gregg!Dixit Gregg Irwin (21.03 15.05.2004):
Hi Hallvard,
HY Many computers calculate their time as the number of milliseconds
HY since January 1, 1970. How do I get that number out of rebol's
HY date! or time!?
1000 * to decimal! difference now/precise 01-jan-1970
==
Hi Gregg,
On Saturday, May 15, 2004, 9:31:51 PM, you wrote:
GI Of course that makes perfect sense, but shouldn't HELP still
GI understand that refinements coming after /local are part of the
GI interface and display them?
It surely could; I think it's just that HELP was written with the
Jason:
The rebol.org INDEX is Great.. thanks again
Thanks. The tag team are doing a great job,
...But maybe I just found a small bug for your attention
And thanks again for spotting and reporting the bug.
My apologies.I'd uploaded a wrong file while improving something. It
should
/local for local var is only a convention set by RT, but indeed there is no
difference at all between /local and any other refinements:
that's what I thought...
of course some functions add it ('function 'has) when creating the internal
func call.
f: has [a b] [print [local a b]]
f/local
Of course that makes perfect sense, but shouldn't HELP still
understand that refinements coming after /local are part of the
interface and display them?
I think it should. when duplicating an arg block which has a local in it, it
can be a pain to have to make sure that you INSERT new args
As for refinements put after /local, I can see an advantage to
the current behavior: Undocumented interfaces. It is sometimes
private refinements... I admit its a good idea...
sort of goes against what I just said, I guess...
what I'd like are private members and methods.
As a way to
Good thoughts, all, on this subject! It seemed like an easy thing to
address but, once again, REBOL's flexibility (and our potential
creativity) make it a topic deserving deeper consideration.
I like the idea of not changing things. :)
I like consistency.
I like the idea of hidden interfaces.
26 matches
Mail list logo
